rabbee: is this all you have, is your hearsay about eye witnesses?<quoted text>
So eye witness testimony and physical evidence means nothing to you, so much for your investigative skills.
and i have heard some of, the false witnesses and false testimony. false because, it does not match what i observed, that day on live tv. the tops of the towers fell first, not the bottom. there could not of been, any explosives in the sections that were on fire that collapsed first.
fire and explosives, do not mix well. you would of either had a premature explosion bringing the building down much quicker than it did. or the main charges would have burned themselves out without exploding. or with insufficient charges burnt off left to do the job. and there were no signs, of explosions at that time in the collapsing sections.
i am not about to listen, to just anyone trying to stir up trouble for their own satisfaction.
and i do not care what you say, tens of millions of pounds is hard to stop once it gets moving.
but even if they were planning on bringing, any of the buildings down to prevent a worse catastrophe, it would be a moot point. even though i would seriously doubt, you could find enough demolition experts. that would be insane enough, to enter the building under those conditions. planting explosives is not a hurry job, unless you have a personal death wish.
when ever i planted explosives, there was a lot of planning and safety checks involved. and the blasting caps, were the last to go in. you don't carry high explosives, with the blasting caps attached. and nobody would have survived that fire, to do it at that initial point of fracture.
all the scientific, expert, visual, and audio evidence is against what you indicate. but it is your right to believe, in some other loony for some self glory or attention seeker any way. there are always con men, in similar situations like this. like with serial killers, where dozens of people confessed to of done it. or unhappy wives, claiming their husband did it.