“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#29348 Dec 1, 2012
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
Snore, couldn't agree more. That's why I told Mike to wake up and smell the roses. It's not like political offices just started being bought and sold the last 20 years. Goodness gracious, Joe Kennedy paid everybody and their brother to have Jack elected. You speak about it wasn't the money honey, but the power, I beg to disagree, you have to have money to get the power. Had John and Robert Kennedy not been assasinated and Ted learned to drive a little better while drunk, our country would have had 24 years of Kennedys in the WH and it would have been by payoffs.
The group you speak of is part Carnegie, Rockefeller etc all a part of the Bliderberg Group. People make lite of this group controlling not only our country's elections but other' as well, but they have the MONEY and the POWER and they do it. They practically own the world's wealth. I agree with you that our country is corrupt today as back a 100+ years ago. However, trying to ban speech by outside corportions is the least of our problems with elections, If that's the case, let's cease trade with other countries and see how well we can do by not being able to send commodities(?) made here in the U.S. just between the states. You can't tell countries our country owes money to hand over fist we'll ban your speech in our country. I think that would be like cutting your nose off to spite your face. Going back to the Bliderberg Group, old daddy Bush was in bed with the group too, so it's not just a one party group they own.
Good post Snore.
My complaints about corporations having more freedom now to fund political campaigns, has nothing to do with it always being done in the past to some extent. So why assume I am ignorant of it? You jump to conclusions with zero evidence.
I am only wanting it to be harder for corporations to do so, and it sounds as if you are want to make it easier.

Thank you for admitting allowing corporations to fund political campaigns is to allow foreign people fund our political campaigns.
I see you feel America must allow none Americans do so, but do you agree they should? BTW I do not agree America 'must' do so due to debt.

I see no connection of campaign finance and trade. Can you articulate how that is related?

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#29349 Dec 1, 2012
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
Mike, sorry honey, I was speaking of Old Hank aka Guam tipper and the sour grapes. The article I posted didn't have your name or picture, it was Hank. Stop personalizing everything so much and that should cut down on your whining. BTW, your party is bought and paid for too. You really need to read more. Read the post by Snore and my response, maybe between the two, you might want to read about what he posted and what I posted. Both very interesting reading.
I am not "personalizing" it, I am only asking if you are for or against it.
I did read both posts. I am aware of who you responded to. Does that mean I cannot ask a question or throw out my opinion? Do you know why topix allows anyone to respond to anyone's post? Do you understand the concept of this forum? If you wish to have private conversations, this is not the place for you.

Why do you run from so many questions?
WACO 1909

Humble, TX

#29350 Dec 1, 2012
Any fool knows.....whoever has the most money....has the most influence....hello there bacon....looks like they may allow a vote on casinos in Texas.....if so......I'm taking four quarters...to the first slot machine I can reach....!!!

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#29351 Dec 1, 2012
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>My complaints about corporations having more freedom now to fund political campaigns, has nothing to do with it always being done in the past to some extent. So why assume I am ignorant of it? You jump to conclusions with zero evidence.
I am only wanting it to be harder for corporations to do so, and it sounds as if you are want to make it easier.
Thank you for admitting allowing corporations to fund political campaigns is to allow foreign people fund our political campaigns.
I see you feel America must allow none Americans do so, but do you agree they should? BTW I do not agree America 'must' do so due to debt.
I see no connection of campaign finance and trade. Can you articulate how that is related?
Free expression is only free if they check with Miley the gay bar manager first. Perhaps the inconsistancy of America is why other governments are not modeling theirs after ours. Perhaps that same inconsistancy is why foreign investors are not investing into GM so they can clear what they owe from the first two rounds of "stimulus" to the American people before your president authorizes additional rounds of quantitative easing, oops sorry, stimulus.
WACO 1909

Humble, TX

#29352 Dec 1, 2012
I don't think anyone cares about your opinions on the proper usage of"forum". All you do is whine and complain.

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#29353 Dec 1, 2012
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>I am not "personalizing" it, I am only asking if you are for or against it.
I did read both posts. I am aware of who you responded to. Does that mean I cannot ask a question or throw out my opinion? Do you know why topix allows anyone to respond to anyone's post? Do you understand the concept of this forum? If you wish to have private conversations, this is not the place for you.
Why do you run from so many questions?
They do have personal message feature? You the forum cop now too? Man of many parts Miley.
WACO 1909

Humble, TX

#29354 Dec 1, 2012
Your opinion should definitely be thrown out.
WACO 1909

Humble, TX

#29355 Dec 1, 2012
Bacon it looks like the guy doesn't approve of your politics, or you.You must be devastated...

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#29357 Dec 1, 2012
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>My complaints about corporations having more freedom now to fund political campaigns, has nothing to do with it always being done in the past to some extent. So why assume I am ignorant of it? You jump to conclusions with zero evidence.
I am only wanting it to be harder for corporations to do so, and it sounds as if you are want to make it easier.
Thank you for admitting allowing corporations to fund political campaigns is to allow foreign people fund our political campaigns.
I see you feel America must allow none Americans do so, but do you agree they should? BTW I do not agree America 'must' do so due to debt.
I see no connection of campaign finance and trade. Can you articulate how that is related?
GE, do your homework and tell me how "campaign finance and trade" connect. Bet you can't or WON'T. BTW it took one second for me to think of this one.

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#29358 Dec 1, 2012
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
Snore, couldn't agree more. That's why I told Mike to wake up and smell the roses. It's not like political offices just started being bought and sold the last 20 years. Goodness gracious, Joe Kennedy paid everybody and their brother to have Jack elected. You speak about it wasn't the money honey, but the power, I beg to disagree, you have to have money to get the power. Had John and Robert Kennedy not been assasinated and Ted learned to drive a little better while drunk, our country would have had 24 years of Kennedys in the WH and it would have been by payoffs.
The group you speak of is part Carnegie, Rockefeller etc all a part of the Bliderberg Group. People make lite of this group controlling not only our country's elections but other' as well, but they have the MONEY and the POWER and they do it. They practically own the world's wealth. I agree with you that our country is corrupt today as back a 100+ years ago. However, trying to ban speech by outside corportions is the least of our problems with elections, If that's the case, let's cease trade with other countries and see how well we can do by not being able to send commodities(?) made here in the U.S. just between the states. You can't tell countries our country owes money to hand over fist we'll ban your speech in our country. I think that would be like cutting your nose off to spite your face. Going back to the Bliderberg Group, old daddy Bush was in bed with the group too, so it's not just a one party group they own.
Good post Snore.
The Kennedys. There is a group of people the democrats idolize and I will never understand why. Joe Kennedy made a lot of money bootlegging liquor during the Prohibition. He purposely broke the law and paid for his family's fortune with blood money.

And republicans are the assholes? Please.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#29359 Dec 1, 2012
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>My complaints about corporations having more freedom now to fund political campaigns, has nothing to do with it always being done in the past to some extent. So why assume I am ignorant of it? You jump to conclusions with zero evidence.
I am only wanting it to be harder for corporations to do so, and it sounds as if you are want to make it easier.
Thank you for admitting allowing corporations to fund political campaigns is to allow foreign people fund our political campaigns.
I see you feel America must allow none Americans do so, but do you agree they should? BTW I do not agree America 'must' do so due to debt.
I see no connection of campaign finance and trade. Can you articulate how that is related?
If you would take the time to read instead of watching cable news shows you might know the answers to your questions. TSF throws them out daily, did you miss the one this morning? Corporations and other countries can and do have free speech in our country Mike, they pay for it. Wake up guy and get off the tv cable news channels. Reading is like milk, it does a body good.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#29360 Dec 1, 2012
WACO 1909 wrote:
Bacon it looks like the guy doesn't approve of your politics, or you.You must be devastated...
If you're speaking of Mike, if he doesn't agree with me or my politics, I must be doing something right!
WACO 1909

Humble, TX

#29361 Dec 1, 2012
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
<quoted text>
The Kennedys. There is a group of people the democrats idolize and I will never understand why. Joe Kennedy made a lot of money bootlegging liquor during the Prohibition. He purposely broke the law and paid for his family's fortune with blood money.
And republicans are the assholes? Please.
I KNOW you don't want me to bring up some republican crooks.My grandfather was a moonshiner..prohibition apparently wasn't popular back then.As a Texan I believe if a law is wrong...break it en masse....which is exactly what they did.Sometimes, people have to stand up to their GOVERNMENT.
WACO 1909

Humble, TX

#29363 Dec 1, 2012
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
If you're speaking of Mike, if he doesn't agree with me or my politics, I must be doing something right!
Here here!
WACO 1909

Humble, TX

#29364 Dec 1, 2012
Silvercoast...the"throw your opinion out"was not directed at you.
Jauque Bavier

Paris, France

#29365 Dec 1, 2012
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>My complaints about corporations having more freedom now to fund political campaigns, has nothing to do with it always being done in the past to some extent. So why assume I am ignorant of it? You jump to conclusions with zero evidence.
I am only wanting it to be harder for corporations to do so, and it sounds as if you are want to make it easier.
Thank you for admitting allowing corporations to fund political campaigns is to allow foreign people fund our political campaigns.
I see you feel America must allow none Americans do so, but do you agree they should? BTW I do not agree America 'must' do so due to debt.
I see no connection of campaign finance and trade. Can you articulate how that is related?
Since no one likes you, come live with me at my cottage on the Riviera. I love American gay boys.
Snore

Gastonia, NC

#29366 Dec 1, 2012
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
Snore, couldn't agree more. That's why I told Mike to wake up and smell the roses. It's not like political offices just started being bought and sold the last 20 years. Goodness gracious, Joe Kennedy paid everybody and their brother to have Jack elected. You speak about it wasn't the money honey, but the power, I beg to disagree, you have to have money to get the power. Had John and Robert Kennedy not been assasinated and Ted learned to drive a little better while drunk, our country would have had 24 years of Kennedys in the WH and it would have been by payoffs.
The group you speak of is part Carnegie, Rockefeller etc all a part of the Bliderberg Group. People make lite of this group controlling not only our country's elections but other' as well, but they have the MONEY and the POWER and they do it. They practically own the world's wealth. I agree with you that our country is corrupt today as back a 100+ years ago. However, trying to ban speech by outside corportions is the least of our problems with elections, If that's the case, let's cease trade with other countries and see how well we can do by not being able to send commodities(?) made here in the U.S. just between the states. You can't tell countries our country owes money to hand over fist we'll ban your speech in our country. I think that would be like cutting your nose off to spite your face. Going back to the Bliderberg Group, old daddy Bush was in bed with the group too, so it's not just a one party group they own.
Good post Snore.
Couldn't agree with you more Bacon. It's "The two party DC Country Club"! The greens is where the real negotiations begin and end. I forgot about the other crook Joe Kennedy. He was as big a crook as any of the "fab four"(and I don't mean The Beatles.) Correct you are-Bliderberg Group now and mostly Jewish and I don't mean any disrespect. The Jews basically own the world. I did fail to mention although I thought it was implied that it takes EXTREME WEALTH, hence POWER that the "fab four" had that even Gates has not surpassed. Google kid Mark? on his way. Stock almost $590/share. Mind boggling.
Snore

Gastonia, NC

#29367 Dec 1, 2012
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
<quoted text>
The Kennedys. There is a group of people the democrats idolize and I will never understand why. Joe Kennedy made a lot of money bootlegging liquor during the Prohibition. He purposely broke the law and paid for his family's fortune with blood money.
And republicans are the assholes? Please.
They all got blood on their hands and to think the world and most Americans view The Kennedys' as US ROYALTY. Makes me want to vomit.
WACO 1909

Houston, TX

#29368 Dec 1, 2012
Snore wrote:
<quoted text>They all got blood on their hands and to think the world and most Americans view The Kennedys' as US ROYALTY. Makes me want to vomit.
Learn.....to love it! I cringe every time I hear what a great president Reagan was....
Taxpayer

Gastonia, NC

#29369 Dec 1, 2012
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>Maybe you should learn to read carefully. I never said I was going to find a new thread, I said I 'needed' to do so. Can you see the difference? I feel conservatives often fail to understand what they read as in this case. It seems to be a trend.
Actually, I am looking, but that does not mean I will stop responding to your republican rants.
How do you exist in life? You are like The Monk on TV. lol. Debilitating OCD X 1000. It's kinda sad.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pikeville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
A Hate Crime On Goldsboro Community Campus ?? ... Apr 14 American_Sons 2
Our Society is Headed to Lockdown in The War on... Apr 14 Culture Auditor 1
Goldsboro Mar '15 ECU15 1
Likes/ dislikes of goldsboro Mar '15 Stubbs89 1
Should I move to Goldsboro? Is it a safe place ... (Dec '09) Mar '15 Angyl 111
Review: Old School Auto Feb '15 Anonymous 1
Do anybody remember a guy they Called E Feb '15 Little E 1
More from around the web

Pikeville People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]