No diversionary tactic employeed..sorryftor your lack of observation skills. The fool disturbs any and and I will continue to call him out. As I will you if you repeat incendiary and biased statement without supporting facts.<quoted text>
This would be important, if one's sexuality actually mattered in a political discussion. But seeing as it doesn't, you're using it as a diversion tactic, much like Republicans use it to distract people from the real issues. Now why don't you go find something pertaining to the topic at hand.
It's a huge joke on me that I left the "n" off "men"..I guess I can laugh at myself on that one.
I am anti-homosexual and don't want one around me that is being obvious as wtf and many I see out in public also making fools of themselves.
It's childish to call someone "homophobe"too because "phobia" denotes 'fear' and I don't know one person that fears a homosexual.
"Diversion" is a democrat tactic and you know that well. All too well. Liberals know nothing else. Just consider your left's tactics used to divert attention from the miserable performance from a total faliure in the oval office four nearly 4 years.
It's out now. Polled blacks ammount to 0% of Romney's intended vote. That's 100% less than blacks on 'the draw'. Liberal dems have championed unemployeed negroes before every election since JFK won the presidency with that plank.
As far as being 'on subject', I am more on subject, more often, and damn sure more accurate than you are. However...99 out of a hundred Caucasians are more pertinent and accurate, subject wise, than you.