looking bad for all guns
haha

Tucker, GA

#24 Jan 17, 2013
Dumb wrote:
<quoted text>These are the same people who say limiting 30 round clips down to 10 wont change a school masacre. How dumb can they be.
It won't. 10(3)= 30. They'll just carry 3 clips. Clip change takes about 1.5 secs. So basically you've cause the massacre to take 4.5 more secs than before. Your username is indicative of your intelligence apparently.
haha

Tucker, GA

#26 Jan 17, 2013
wtf wrote:
<quoted text>Just outlaw all Guns.

Problem solved.
Yea cause criminals are gonna hand theirs over.
conceal carry

Taylors, SC

#27 Jan 17, 2013
Hey retards. They are not "clips". They are "magazines". Do some research.
haha

Pikeville, KY

#28 Jan 17, 2013
conceal carry wrote:
Hey retards. They are not "clips". They are "magazines". Do some research.
Hey retard. I've been a gun enthusiast for years. Nobody cares about the technicalities between clip and magazine. In most cases its a preference thing. The only difference is the feed mechanism. The words are used interchangeably by everyone except you word nazis. Get over it. The meaning is what matters.
conceal carry

Taylors, SC

#29 Jan 18, 2013
haha wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey retard. I've been a gun enthusiast for years. Nobody cares about the technicalities between clip and magazine. In most cases its a preference thing. The only difference is the feed mechanism. The words are used interchangeably by everyone except you word nazis. Get over it. The meaning is what matters.
Like I.said Retard. It's a magazine, not a clip. Listen and learn noob enthusiest.
If you can't tell the difference, you have no business talking about them.
ProMTR

Winchester, KY

#30 Jan 18, 2013
haha wrote:
<quoted text>
It won't. 10(3)= 30. They'll just carry 3 clips. Clip change takes about 1.5 secs. So basically you've cause the massacre to take 4.5 more secs than before. Your username is indicative of your intelligence apparently.
A couple seconds can mean the difference between life and death. That could be just enough time for a child to hide. IMO we should be happy that is all they are going after. If this nonsense doesn't stop it is gonna get even worse. Idiot doomsday preppers imagining they are preparing for the downfall of society don't realize how they are warping the minds of their children. A lot of the shooting deaths occur in larger cities with gangs involved. I agree with the tough New York laws and think all big Cities need the same laws. Some of you like to claim criminals will still have guns, but forget what they get when caught with them. They are removed from Society for the remainder of their lives.
Now to the imaginary three intruders and only seven bullets. It doesn't sound like you should even own a gun. Very possible you could kill one of your own family members. You don't throw up a gun and spray at the first sound. Like the Gentleman mentioned, drop one and the others waste no time going back out the door. In actuality you don't even need to hit the first one. They hear a shot and quickly decide it isn't worth losing their life.
haha

Macon, GA

#31 Jan 18, 2013
ProMTR wrote:
<quoted text>A couple seconds can mean the difference between life and death. That could be just enough time for a child to hide. IMO we should be happy that is all they are going after. If this nonsense doesn't stop it is gonna get even worse. Idiot doomsday preppers imagining they are preparing for the downfall of society don't realize how they are warping the minds of their children. A lot of the shooting deaths occur in larger cities with gangs involved. I agree with the tough New York laws and think all big Cities need the same laws. Some of you like to claim criminals will still have guns, but forget what they get when caught with them. They are removed from Society for the remainder of their lives.
Now to the imaginary three intruders and only seven bullets. It doesn't sound like you should even own a gun. Very possible you could kill one of your own family members. You don't throw up a gun and spray at the first sound. Like the Gentleman mentioned, drop one and the others waste no time going back out the door. In actuality you don't even need to hit the first one. They hear a shot and quickly decide it isn't worth losing their life.
First of all, 4.5 seconds is going to make zero difference in a massacre trust me.
Secondly, if a criminal gets caught with a gun and it is taken away, they can very easily get another. You people have no idea how easy you can get weapons on the black market. I know you believe we live in a perfect world where you think the millions of guns in this country can disappear overnight but that is simply not the case.
Finally, about the 7 rounds and 3 intruders, get your facts straight before you down somebody. That wasn't even me that said/mentioned that. Learn to read.
haha

Macon, GA

#32 Jan 18, 2013
conceal carry wrote:
<quoted text>Like I.said Retard. It's a magazine, not a clip. Listen and learn noob enthusiest.
If you can't tell the difference, you have no business talking about them.
Like I told you retard, I am far from a noob enthusiast. I have owned guns probably longer than you have been alive. I KNOW the difference. What I'm saying is, NOBODY cares. There is huge debate that the words can be used interchangeably. I'll use whatever word I please just to tick you off.
Alley Oops

Elkhorn City, KY

#33 Jan 18, 2013
They can't have mine because I be needing it for sqirrel and such .
hroola

Ellwood City, PA

#34 Jan 18, 2013
youtube.com/watch... ……Blind Justice
SUT UP STUPID

Ransom, KY

#36 Jan 18, 2013
obama hater wrote:
The 7 round limit isnt nice either...how could a man defend his home if 3 intruders were coming in and you only had 7 bullets....dont leave room for error now does it....
This is what I was referring to ha ha. Now If you cant defend yourself with a small clip against 3 then how will you massacre more than 3 at a time. Here is the point if a clip holding only 10 rounds don't matter why would it matter to an average target shooter or hunter. So if it makes the people feel safer why not do it. I don't think it matters and am not for banning any clip or gun, but I am smart enough to know that something has to be done. Mostly on the level of mental health. I know people who are disabled because of mental problems and own many guns this is the change we need.
haha

Pikeville, KY

#38 Jan 18, 2013
crazy indian wrote:
BAN ALL GUN'S, And The right to VOTE: to any one under 40 years old.AND" require a Mental Test; for all over 40 that want to vote or buy a Gun.
If you haven't noticed, everybody thinks you are psycho. This proposal as well as your others are something a kindergartener would come up with. A 40 year old can't go nuts and kill people? I was unaware that people over 40 are all completely same and free from all mental disorders.
think

Langley, KY

#39 Jan 18, 2013
27 dead in a school. How many did Timothy McVeigh kill in the building he blew up with a day care center in it? Why not outlaw or make it harder to rent a truck, get diesel fuel, ect? If someone wants to do harm to many people, they will find a way. If McVeigh went in with a assault rifle, he wouldn't have killed no where near as many as he did. The FBI has been saying for many years, stop telling the name of the serial killers and mass murders. That is why most behavioral psychologist claim they do it. Instant fame. Before the idiot poster asks again if I am saying it is better to blow them up than shoot them again. I was just saying if you want to do damage to others you can with or without a gun. BTW, after 9-11, jets are still legal. The Presidents bodyguards and the bodyguards of his family all carry more rounds in their weapons than the average person can now. Does his agents have to follow his executive orders? I bet not. Will their firearms be able to be checked for rounds in them and the secret service men get arrested for violation of the law? They should, they are citizens of this country just the same as all of us are.
think

Langley, KY

#41 Jan 18, 2013
It is ok for our soldiers to carry weapons under the age of 40 to protect our country, but it isn't ok for them to carry them when their tour of duty is up? I can see that now, "Take this weapon, go to a war zone where people are trying to kill you, but when you get home, you cant have one for at least 10 more years to protect yourself and your family." Yea, that statement makes a lot of sense don't it?
haha

Pikeville, KY

#42 Jan 18, 2013
crazy indian wrote:
<quoted text>DUMB ASS" i doubt: but maybe if" read that over AGAIN: SLOWLY. I" said ban all gun's and the right to Vote: for every one, UNDER 40. BECAUSE WE KNOW: for a Damn Fact that they are NUT'S. And do not have enough SENSE: TO POUR PISS OUT OF A BARREL.

THEN; I" Said, for those OVER 40; make them take a TEST: to see if they were INSANE or Maybe on the Edge of Being SO. BE FOR; they are allowed to Vote Or Buy a Gun. NOW" if, your DUMB ASS: is still confused, run out in the street and get you a 10 year old to Decipher, such for you.
A great doctor once said: every three out of five People: was definitely Insane, and the other TWO SUSPECT.
Your argument is as valid as saying a red crayon is blue. You can't categorize people under 40 as "nuts" when, in fact, there are many 2nd and 3 graders with more knowledge and common sense than you. You dumb POS.
haha

Macon, GA

#45 Jan 18, 2013
crazy indian wrote:
<quoted text>Both: you and I" know better than That: you just happen to be one of those under 40, ignorant bastards: that can not pour piss out of a Barrel.
I'm the under 40 ignorant one? You can't even put together a grammatically correct sentence.
wtf

Clay City, KY

#46 Jan 18, 2013
think wrote:
It is ok for our soldiers to carry weapons under the age of 40 to protect our country, but it isn't ok for them to carry them when their tour of duty is up? I can see that now, "Take this weapon, go to a war zone where people are trying to kill you, but when you get home, you cant have one for at least 10 more years to protect yourself and your family." Yea, that statement makes a lot of sense don't it?
Who is out to harm their Families???
think

Langley, KY

#47 Jan 19, 2013
crazy indian wrote:
<quoted text> the reason: it makes no sense to you, is because you have none your self. IF" you had: Had" any Damn Sense: you would not have let some evil Bastards send you to A Supposebly war Zone. you would have got your self a damn job, instead of being such a damn fool: and putting your life on the line 5,000 miles away, by people that were absolutely no threat to you what so ever.
Just because you was scared to join the military doesn't mean everyone else is. Some left better jobs than you have ever held in your life to become soldiers. It is something they believed in. So once again, would you tell a returning vet that they should not be allowed to carry a weapon? What about the police, FBI agents, ect that are under 40, should they not be allowed to carry firearms either? What you are saying is about the most stupied thing I have read on here. That is pretty bad considering some of the stuff that has been said. You also never said why you kept talking about the Rev dumbass Manning and how people should follow his word while you kept your distance behind a computer screen.
Unforgiven

Clay City, KY

#48 Jan 19, 2013
The 2nd amendment is my gun permit

Issued 12/15/1791 Experation Date Never
person

Chesterfield, MO

#49 Jan 19, 2013
that is right

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pikeville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Word Association (Aug '11) 5 min _FLATLINE-------- 7,780
Add a word, Drop a word (May '10) 25 min _FLATLINE-------- 26,784
Where is the best place to get botox in Pikeville? (Apr '16) 29 min BMW 12
Hillary Clinton OUR next President (Jun '15) 39 min out of the woods 4,093
Airport Board Once Again FAILS to Meet v2.0 1 hr About to Burst 45
News Bible study rules for public schools proposed (Feb '10) 2 hr ChromiuMan 161,229
Natural Gas still cheaper than Coal 2 hr JR 47
Ashley Brown's campaign lies 2 hr Panther Pause 80
What's mitch McConnell done for coal, when ther... (Jul '14) 10 hr Putins Puppet 36,183
Trump In Trouble 23 hr More Trump Lies 45

Pikeville Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Pikeville Mortgages