Where Are Those WMD
wtf

Shelbiana, KY

#44 Jun 17, 2013
wtf is a jail boy wrote:
<quoted text>wtf is a NUTCASE from the girlie side of bastardism. It doesn't know anything but jail and what's there to mount him.
You sound like a Q boy.
Mel

Frankfort, KY

#45 Jun 17, 2013
What about the 500 sarin nerve agent bombs they found in 2004? It was determined that these weapons were not stored correctly and thus were not usable. Therefore, these weapons did not count. What about the wmds that were used by Iraq during the Gulf War in 1991? Did Saddam Hussein, out of the goodness of his heart, destroy all of them after they lost the war? What about the WMD that Iraq had during their war with Iran In the 1980s? Did Iraq use them all up during that war?

The excuse they gave for the weapons they found in 2004 was that they were leftovers form the Iraq's war with Iran--it was not the weapons they were looking for. That would be like the police raiding a house looking for illegal pain pills, but finding cocaine. Well, we won't make an arrest because we were looking for pain pills not cocaine.

Iraq had WMDs. They had them in the 1980s. They had them in the 1990s. And they had them during Operation Freedom. Saddam had plenty of time to get rid of most of the weapons. Operation Freedom was not exactly a sneak attack. Saddam knew we were coming. Remember a few years after the first Gulf war ended in 1998, Saddam refused to let UN inspectors inspect a certain factory. Per an agreement, Iraq was suposed to allow UN inspectors to view factories. Sources had indicated that Saddam was working on a nuclear weapon and the UN wanted to inpect the factory. Saddam refused and then President Clinton bombed the factory. Now, if Saddam was NOT working on a nuclear device, why did he refuse the UN inspectors? To say that Irag had no WMDs is completely wrong.

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

#46 Jun 17, 2013
GOP wrote:
They're being used by the Assad regime against his own country.....I thought most people knew that.
When hundreds of large trucks fled Iraq and into the Syrian countryside with Saddam's known arsenal of WMDs it was just a matter of time till they surfaced again and caused death.
Saddam stopped weapons inspectors sent by the United Nations to find and destroy his known arsenal of WMDs....so he was attacked when he convinced our congress and most of the world the weapons absolutely existed....then as we attacked on one side several caravans of those 'secret' weapons flowed freely out the other, for weeks, across the border to where we couldn't confiscate them.
Now they surface again, exactly as President George W. Bush predicted.
Where did you make this story up?

Since: Sep 08

Neon City Oh.

#47 Jun 17, 2013
Bush Whacked wrote:
Where oh where are those WMD.s, it has been 12 Years.
Please tell us.
Well you see, Saddam has a fleet of ghost sailing ships, then he used his magic carpet to transport the WMDs to the ships. They are now awaiting orders to attack.
I am sure Dick Cheney knows it.
wtf

Shelbiana, KY

#48 Jun 17, 2013
Mel wrote:
What about the 500 sarin nerve agent bombs they found in 2004? It was determined that these weapons were not stored correctly and thus were not usable. Therefore, these weapons did not count. What about the wmds that were used by Iraq during the Gulf War in 1991? Did Saddam Hussein, out of the goodness of his heart, destroy all of them after they lost the war? What about the WMD that Iraq had during their war with Iran In the 1980s? Did Iraq use them all up during that war?
The excuse they gave for the weapons they found in 2004 was that they were leftovers form the Iraq's war with Iran--it was not the weapons they were looking for. That would be like the police raiding a house looking for illegal pain pills, but finding cocaine. Well, we won't make an arrest because we were looking for pain pills not cocaine.
Iraq had WMDs. They had them in the 1980s. They had them in the 1990s. And they had them during Operation Freedom. Saddam had plenty of time to get rid of most of the weapons. Operation Freedom was not exactly a sneak attack. Saddam knew we were coming. Remember a few years after the first Gulf war ended in 1998, Saddam refused to let UN inspectors inspect a certain factory. Per an agreement, Iraq was suposed to allow UN inspectors to view factories. Sources had indicated that Saddam was working on a nuclear weapon and the UN wanted to inpect the factory. Saddam refused and then President Clinton bombed the factory. Now, if Saddam was NOT working on a nuclear device, why did he refuse the UN inspectors? To say that Irag had no WMDs is completely wrong.
Where are the Nuclear Weapons we were warned about???
Mel

Frankfort, KY

#49 Jun 17, 2013
They were in the process of making nuclear wepons. They did not have the weapons yet much like the Iran situation last year. but it takes time to start a nuclear program. Perhaps there was no such program in Iraq, but it isn't that far-fetched. Why was Saddam so adamant that he would not let UN officials inspect the facilities? It's like when the police want to search your car for something illegal. How many innocent people refuse a search? If Saddam had nothing to hide, why did he refuse to let his facilites be searched?

“PROUDLY PUNKING MODS & TROLLS ”

Since: May 13

FOR 1/2 A DECADE!!!

#51 Jun 17, 2013
Mel wrote:
What about the 500 sarin nerve agent bombs they found in 2004? It was determined that these weapons were not stored correctly and thus were not usable. Therefore, these weapons did not count. What about the wmds that were used by Iraq during the Gulf War in 1991? Did Saddam Hussein, out of the goodness of his heart, destroy all of them after they lost the war? What about the WMD that Iraq had during their war with Iran In the 1980s? Did Iraq use them all up during that war?
The excuse they gave for the weapons they found in 2004 was that they were leftovers form the Iraq's war with Iran--it was not the weapons they were looking for. That would be like the police raiding a house looking for illegal pain pills, but finding cocaine. Well, we won't make an arrest because we were looking for pain pills not cocaine.
Iraq had WMDs. They had them in the 1980s. They had them in the 1990s. And they had them during Operation Freedom. Saddam had plenty of time to get rid of most of the weapons. Operation Freedom was not exactly a sneak attack. Saddam knew we were coming. Remember a few years after the first Gulf war ended in 1998, Saddam refused to let UN inspectors inspect a certain factory. Per an agreement, Iraq was suposed to allow UN inspectors to view factories. Sources had indicated that Saddam was working on a nuclear weapon and the UN wanted to inpect the factory. Saddam refused and then President Clinton bombed the factory. Now, if Saddam was NOT working on a nuclear device, why did he refuse the UN inspectors? To say that Irag had no WMDs is completely wrong.
Good point, GOP. The Liberals/Demo(nic)Rats refuse to just admit that when
Hussein gassed the Kurds he was using "Weapons Of Mass Destruction" in the
form of chemical agent-based weaponry. There's no leap in logic required to expect that such a madman would be in pursuit of or possession of WMDs with his blatant hostility and aggression in clear view. It's more than obvious that Hussein successfully delayed U.N. Inspectors long enough to smuggle the
WMDs in his regime's possession out of Iraq altogther.
wtf

Shelbiana, KY

#52 Jun 17, 2013
PAT RlOT wrote:
<quoted text>
Good point, GOP. The Liberals/Demo(nic)Rats refuse to just admit that when
Hussein gassed the Kurds he was using "Weapons Of Mass Destruction" in the
form of chemical agent-based weaponry. There's no leap in logic required to expect that such a madman would be in pursuit of or possession of WMDs with his blatant hostility and aggression in clear view. It's more than obvious that Hussein successfully delayed U.N. Inspectors long enough to smuggle the
WMDs in his regime's possession out of Iraq altogther.
Good point fatty patty you have farted a WMD.
Mel

Frankfort, KY

#53 Jun 18, 2013
Hey, WTF, why were you up so late? It's a school night!
wtf

Shelbiana, KY

#54 Jun 18, 2013
Mel wrote:
Hey, WTF, why were you up so late? It's a school night!
I am not in reform School.
JOE NOBODY

Bloomington, IN

#55 Jun 18, 2013
Libs are hopeless and ignorant, nothing you say will change them. That little light, in their head, has to brighten, on its own. Unfortunately, many are all ready burnt out. No flicker, no flame!!!!!!
wtf

Chicago, IL

#56 Jun 18, 2013
JOE NOBODY wrote:
Libs are hopeless and ignorant, nothing you say will change them. That little light, in their head, has to brighten, on its own. Unfortunately, many are all ready burnt out. No flicker, no flame!!!!!!
Conservaturds are just stupid.
Anonymous

Yanai, Japan

#57 Jun 18, 2013
Mel wrote:
What about the 500 sarin nerve agent bombs they found in 2004? It was determined that these weapons were not stored correctly and thus were not usable. Therefore, these weapons did not count. What about the wmds that were used by Iraq during the Gulf War in 1991? Did Saddam Hussein, out of the goodness of his heart, destroy all of them after they lost the war? What about the WMD that Iraq had during their war with Iran In the 1980s? Did Iraq use them all up during that war?
The excuse they gave for the weapons they found in 2004 was that they were leftovers form the Iraq's war with Iran--it was not the weapons they were looking for. That would be like the police raiding a house looking for illegal pain pills, but finding cocaine. Well, we won't make an arrest because we were looking for pain pills not cocaine.
Iraq had WMDs. They had them in the 1980s. They had them in the 1990s. And they had them during Operation Freedom. Saddam had plenty of time to get rid of most of the weapons. Operation Freedom was not exactly a sneak attack. Saddam knew we were coming. Remember a few years after the first Gulf war ended in 1998, Saddam refused to let UN inspectors inspect a certain factory. Per an agreement, Iraq was suposed to allow UN inspectors to view factories. Sources had indicated that Saddam was working on a nuclear weapon and the UN wanted to inpect the factory. Saddam refused and then President Clinton bombed the factory. Now, if Saddam was NOT working on a nuclear device, why did he refuse the UN inspectors? To say that Irag had no WMDs is completely wrong.
The funny part is the military did actually recover weapons components and engineering assembly parts in both Afghanistan and Iraq but people are just too lazy to do a simple google search. The stuff is all documented on paper, but people act like no intelligence was ever found at different sites, which couldn't be farther from the truth.
wtf

Shelbiana, KY

#58 Jun 18, 2013
Anonymous wrote:
<quoted text>
The funny part is the military did actually recover weapons components and engineering assembly parts in both Afghanistan and Iraq but people are just too lazy to do a simple google search. The stuff is all documented on paper, but people act like no intelligence was ever found at different sites, which couldn't be farther from the truth.
W says you are full of it, no Weapons were found. Zero. Nothing.
Anonymous

Yanai, Japan

#59 Jun 18, 2013
wtf wrote:
<quoted text>Where are the Nuclear Weapons we were warned about???
The military found and recovered parts that make up a long-range missile. This happened in a few sites in Iraq, what more did you want? It's so unrealistic and unlikely that any country goes into hot spots and actually sees a rocket or missile in the launch tube ready to cook-off with a timer, it just doesn't make sense. The weapons that weren't taken by vehicle to Iran or Syria, some of them were found. Ask The governments of the U.K and Australia if there were no weapons of war in Iraq, why did they send in troops too? People always want to see to make them believe, but in these particular scenarios you have to think about how many components and parts a rocket system is made. This is stuff the public was never going to see regardless due to confidentiality and national security.
Anonymous

Yanai, Japan

#60 Jun 18, 2013
wtf wrote:
<quoted text>W says you are full of it, no Weapons were found. Zero. Nothing.
You sound like a parrot right now? What you are talking about has many parts involved. Did you expect the missiles and rockets to be charged and connected to a timer-like device like in Rambo movies? Doesn't change the fact the allied U.S. and British forces did gather and found many weapons there, some of which Sadaam was sure to use on fellow Muslims. Sometimes the truth hurts bro.
wtf

Shelbiana, KY

#61 Jun 18, 2013
Anonymous wrote:
<quoted text>
The military found and recovered parts that make up a long-range missile. This happened in a few sites in Iraq, what more did you want? It's so unrealistic and unlikely that any country goes into hot spots and actually sees a rocket or missile in the launch tube ready to cook-off with a timer, it just doesn't make sense. The weapons that weren't taken by vehicle to Iran or Syria, some of them were found. Ask The governments of the U.K and Australia if there were no weapons of war in Iraq, why did they send in troops too? People always want to see to make them believe, but in these particular scenarios you have to think about how many components and parts a rocket system is made. This is stuff the public was never going to see regardless due to confidentiality and national security.
Not true at all, W admitted in his 2010 Book that NO Weapons were ever found.

Sorry about your luck.
wtf

Shelbiana, KY

#62 Jun 18, 2013
Anonymous wrote:
<quoted text>
You sound like a parrot right now? What you are talking about has many parts involved. Did you expect the missiles and rockets to be charged and connected to a timer-like device like in Rambo movies? Doesn't change the fact the allied U.S. and British forces did gather and found many weapons there, some of which Sadaam was sure to use on fellow Muslims. Sometimes the truth hurts bro.
W disagrees with you Stupid.

Guess you know more than the failed POTUS?

“PROUDLY PUNKING MODS & TROLLS ”

Since: May 13

FOR 1/2 A DECADE!!!

#63 Jun 18, 2013
wtf wrote:
<quoted text>Good point fatty patty you have farted a WMD.
How did you like it's scent then? You've got your nose so far up my ass that it had to hit you full blast in that ugly q_eer mug of yours, LMAO!

“PROUDLY PUNKING MODS & TROLLS ”

Since: May 13

FOR 1/2 A DECADE!!!

#64 Jun 18, 2013
wtf wrote:
<quoted text>Not true at all, W admitted in his 2010 Book that NO Weapons were ever found.
Sorry about your luck.
P.S.- Hey sh!thead, just not finding something does not mean it was NEVER there to begin with. What part of smuggled out of Iraq or specific, required components (parts of) in making WMDs were found. Apparently you are too stuck on stupid to grasp that we are not saying that WMDs were actually found, we are saying that they WERE there and that thanks to Hussein's stalling tactics he managed to get them out on the country. You are as intelligent as a box of rocks, you brainless bastard.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pikeville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Brian Morris Exposed 4 min amy 4
News Bible study rules for public schools proposed (Feb '10) 13 min USA 176,770
Brian Morris Public Forum 29 min Jones and UMG 12
Hillary Clinton OUR next President (Jun '15) 44 min Ahillarydeportable 6,428
District Court Judges race 1 hr I Creeker 31
Word Association (Aug '11) 3 hr Visitor Bob 8,775
|keep a word, drop a word game| (Jul '11) 3 hr Visitor Bob 339
County Attorney Race Sat big daddy here 134

Pikeville Jobs

Personal Finance

Pikeville Mortgages