One can self proclaim himself the winner in order to justify his immoral beliefs.<quoted text>
You really are dumb, aren't you?
Right from the outset I've used the word "consensual". Do you understand what that word actually means?
Given your constant stream of lies and strawmen arguments, I very much doubt you do.
Child abuse by nature is anything but consensual. Yet you claim that I support child abuse even though I have regularly said any incestuous relationship must be consensual.
You've lost, curious. Only someone who is desperate would continually invent so many strawmen arguments.
You take issue with me because I don't use the same hyperbole-laden rants that characterise your posts while all the time you continually fail to give one reason why the small window of incest I find acceptable is morally wrong.
Neither have you explained why your god blessed the incestuous marriage of Abe and Sarah. Something which I would never do even though you are clearly supportive of their marriage.
I know full well that you have mentionrd that incest has to be consensual and protection must be used.
The majority of incest cases involve children between the ages of 7 - 17
The unique relationship between fathers and daughters can sometimes led to inordinate relationships if there is dysfunction in the family. The incest relationship usually starts very "innocently." Daughters look up to their fathers. They have a deep trust and respect for the man who provides their food and clothing and give them a sense of security
The unique relationship between fathers and daughters can sometimes lead to inordinate relationships if there is dysfunction in the family. The incest relationship usually starts very "innocently." Daughters look up to their fathers. They have a deep trust and respect for the man who provides their food and clothing and give them a sense of security
When a husband and wife is having marital difficulty the husband sometimes turn to the daughter to meet the needs that the wife usually provide. This may begin with cleaning his shoes, ironing his shirts, waking her up late at night to cook for him. She would do it because she "loves her father." This may lead to extended warm embraces and cuddling. Why would a little girl not enjoy such attention, for it is her father? This type of behavior soon intensifies until the love is betrayed when the father crosses the boundary and engages in a sexual activity with his daughter that may include caressing, petting, kissing, making her suck his penis, intercourse etc
Even if this is all done with the daughter's consent,it is obvious that the child is placed in the position that her father ,whom she trusts,would not do anything to harm her,therefore, she consents to such behaviour.
That you are not willing to admit that the father has an incredulously unfair advantage attests to your immorality,which you are attempting to legitimize....
Incest is wrong under any and all conditions.
It does not matter that you are able to fabricate immoral and illconceived excuses to justify your beliefs...
It is obvious that in such cases the father holds power and authority over the child and in the process uses that power,authority and trust in order to seduce her.
The rest of what you posted is merely an effort to channel the topic in another direction.
Again , I would not trust an atheist with my pets, children or those who are deceased.
We know what their leaders stand on those issues Incest, beastiality and necrophelia
Of course this is all permisible under the guise of consent
I am still waiting for an explanation as to how you can morally condone in others something
that you claim makes your skin crawl using the lame excuse that " you are not hardwired for that.......
You are a hypocrite and are attempting to defend the indefensible....