Bible study rules for public schools proposed

There are 20 comments on the The Courier-Journal story from Feb 10, 2010, titled Bible study rules for public schools proposed. In it, The Courier-Journal reports that:

FRANKFORT, Ky. - The state would create rules for teaching about the Bible in public high schools under a bill filed Monday by three Democratic senators.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Courier-Journal.

“Speaker of Mountain Wisdom....”

Since: Jan 10

Heidrick, KY

#98674 Apr 5, 2013
curious wrote:
<quoted text>
Given that i believe that you are posting under both names,I can see where you would come to your own defense,albeit,using another nickname.
Nevertheless,your postings merely serve to confirm the following;
Afool is known by his lack of wisdom
"Given that i believe that you are posting under both names"

Then your just Stupid... Never mind.....
curious

Ocoee, FL

#98675 Apr 5, 2013
Skeptical Spectacles wrote:
<quoted text>
I suspect it wouldn't matter to you if there was an answer.
The fact that you are willing to throw out the existing (and extensive) body of evidence that supports evolution and accept a story that has no evidence because every detail isn't exhaustively spelled out speaks volumes about your rationality.
Why is it that you don't apply the same inquisitive rigor to your own beliefs? Where did your god come from? Explain that to me.
Let us take this one step at a time;
1)For every body of evidence supporting evolution,I can provide you with a supporting body of evidence refuting evolution.
Jhonathan Sarpati Ph.D. 15 loopholes in the evolutionary theory of the origins of life
Early stage ofChemical evolution Theories byDuane Gish PhD
& Theories of Origin of Life By Charles Q. Choi PhD
17 evidences against evolution by Kenneth martin PhD
The scientific case against evolution by Henry D. Morris PhD
These and many other scientists,refute the theory of evolution.
2)I am interested in knowing how life was created ,the theory of evolution is unable to provide that answer.
They present theories based on suppositions,not facts, as to how life may have created. When putting their theories to the test,they have been unable to create even the simplest form of life,let alone being able to create the complex human bodies that we inhabit.
By their own admission,Evolutionists admit,that they have no factual evidence as to how life was created.
Since evolution does not provide an answer to my question,I need look elsewhwere for an answer.
That is where God comes in,and in Genesis I find an answer.
This answer suggests that a Supernatural"SPIRITUAL BEING"is the creator.
this supreme being says he is God,,But how can I prove God exists,
I can not,because as a human,I am unable to prove or comprehend that which is Spiritual or supernatural. The only one who can prove God's existence is God himself. And,in the Bible,he tells you
what you need to do,in order for him to reveal himself to you.
Here are some;
Deuteronomy 4:29
But from there you will seek the Lord your God and you will find him, if you search after him with all your heart and with all your soul.


Jeremiah 29:12-14
Then you will call upon me and come and pray to me, and I will hear you. You will seek me and find me, when you seek me with all your heart. I will be found by you, declares the Lord,.

Proverbs 8:17
I love those who love me, and those who seek me diligently find me.

When I put those statements to the test,their validity was confirmed,,,,(I have posted this before)
I sought God,through prayer,seeking answers to problems that I have faced in my life and for which I could not find a solution.
As a result of my prayers,requestind his help,those problems were resolved inways that I would have never imagined.
that is how God revealed himself to me,,,answered prayers
He did not talk to me,he did not appear to me and no,I did not hear voices in my head.
As the Apostle Paul stated;To the unbeliever,the existence of God is nonsense,because natural man cannot come to a knowledge of God.
The knowledge of God is spiritually discerned...
That is the basis for my faith...You don't have to believe it,that is your choice...contrary to the opinion of satans Priest,who accused me of being a con man, I have nothing to gain by trying to con anyone.....Iam merely sharing the reasons for my faith.
If,at some point in your life,you conclude that you need God's assistance,do not be afraid to put him to the test.
If you diligently seek him,you will find him
curious

Ocoee, FL

#98676 Apr 5, 2013
Evolution wrote:
Hello I am Evolution- I started from nothing,for nothing was in existence (no form of matter existed absolutely nothing.)
But over billions of years some unknown material evolved ,and I with no body,no brain,no eyes ,no legs,no feet ,no heart,no life created everything.
But as hard as this is to believe, I am responsible for all forms of life now living on planet earth,and through out the universe.
Only the very wise can comprehend this. Behold all stars,moon,sun,mankind,animals ,insects,birds,fish, plants ,trees ,all done by one with no life ,no brain .MIRACLE? Yes that's me ,Behold EVOLUTION
GRRRREAT Post and greatly appreciated'

You have finally answered the question that I have been posing and which no one on this website had been able to answer....LOL
GWB

Roseville, CA

#98677 Apr 5, 2013
curious wrote:
<quoted text>
Let us take this one step at a time;
1)For every body of evidence supporting evolution,I can provide you with a supporting body of evidence refuting evolution.
Jhonathan Sarpati Ph.D. 15 loopholes in the evolutionary theory of the origins of life
Early stage ofChemical evolution Theories byDuane Gish PhD
& Theories of Origin of Life By Charles Q. Choi PhD
17 evidences against evolution by Kenneth martin PhD
The scientific case against evolution by Henry D. Morris PhD
These and many other scientists,refute the theory of evolution.
2)I am interested in knowing how life was created ,the theory of evolution is unable to provide that answer.
The Challenge of the Fossil Record, by Duane T. Gish, 1985, pp. 180-204. These books must, of course, be taken with a large grain of salt because they, too, leave out whatever evidence does not support their ideas.

From : David Rice
Subj : Jehovah Witness' Little Blue Lie

The following is extracted from a general commentary on the
Watchtower Society book _Life - How Did It Get Here? By Evolution
Or By Creation?

http://www.skeptictank.org/files/moretext/jwi...

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#98678 Apr 5, 2013
TruthIs wrote:
<quoted text>Posted while bobble-heading no doubt too lol
Just keep on keepin on. Life's a garden, dig it.
Evolution

Morehead, KY

#98679 Apr 5, 2013
This is Evolution again. Thanks to all who believe in me.
True I am hard to believe in,seeing as I came from absolutely nothing, I did not exist,but if you know me, you know that a small bit of a supernatural matter formed me.
Even though I had no bodily form and no brain, I created all things your eyes behold.
And I am the greatest of all,therefore I, Evolution will be taught in your schools and passed on for generations. Man will write books and try to find out my secrets, but mankind will never create a single star in the universe(though I created millions. Me with no body,no eyes,no ears,no brain. Man says he does not worship me but I know better,for he keeps me in his thoughts always wanting to dig deeper and find the truth . Behold I, Evolution is Truth . Ha ha once you believe in me , Evolution ,you will always believe.

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#98680 Apr 5, 2013
Quantummist wrote:
<quoted text>I snipped repetitive drivel... No One does Not need chromosomes from the female and from the Male to create a new organism... Humans Do because we Evolved to reproduce that way over Billions of years, that variation of reproduction evolved before Humans were walking on 4 legs... Long before Humans moved onto land from the sea... But the Statement "So,one needs the chromosones from both,men and women,in order to create a new organism.That is a fact." That is Not Fact in All Organisms... Many Organisms retained the ability to reproduce without Male or Females.... Humans (actually all Vertebrates) Evolved billions of years ago to reproduce using genetic material from another of it's species... Some laid eggs, some gave live births .. Then along the way Mammals evolved to give live birth and maintain gender specific genetics... Some of our ancestor vertebrates retained the ability to be male or female dependent on populations and environment...

So to Make it Simple because I have No Doubt you didn't understand what I wrote ... The Statement "So,one needs the chromosomes from both,men and women,in order to create a new organism.That is a fact." Is Not True for all Organisms...
How does this not require the same amount of faith to believe since no one can explain the "along the way" part?

How could a specie go from laying eggs to giving birth? What does that transition look like? There's not much of a middle ground there for it to be a combination of the two.
Evolution

Morehead, KY

#98681 Apr 5, 2013
Evolution wrote:
This is Evolution again. Thanks to all who believe in me.
True I am hard to believe in,seeing as I came from absolutely nothing, I did not exist,but if you know me, you know that a small bit of a supernatural matter formed me.
Even though I had no bodily form and no brain, I created all things your eyes behold.
And I am the greatest of all,therefore I, Evolution will be taught in your schools and passed on for generations. Man will write books and try to find out my secrets, but mankind will never create a single star in the universe(though I created millions. Me with no body,no eyes,no ears,no brain. Man says he does not worship me but I know better,for he keeps me in his thoughts always wanting to dig deeper and find the truth . Behold I, Evolution is Truth . Ha ha once you believe in me , Evolution ,you will always believe.
It seems this topic gives two choices , either evolution or God.
Evolution is so far fetched that God is the only logical choice.
In my opinion neither should be taught in school.I believe in the Bible,but as this post through out proves that would only lead to arguing.
And evolution is totally fictional.(the reason I posted the above,it really is that stupid )
Teach science and biology as a subject ,without mentioning the creation ,and no will argue. The fairy tale of evolution should be listed under fiction,if at all.
But all these post has helped me and others to increase our faith in God,reading all the nonsense on evolution only made it clear that it is unbelievable.
Shall We Dance

Elkhorn City, KY

#98682 Apr 5, 2013
How many of you actually read the article? Judging by most of the comments, very few. This thread is about introducing legislature of an Elective Bible course, There are Bible classes already in SOME SCHOOLS. What a curve ball, going from a proposed bill being introduced to Non-Believer to Believer which side are you on thread!

“Speaker of Mountain Wisdom....”

Since: Jan 10

Heidrick, KY

#98683 Apr 5, 2013
do whut wrote:
<quoted text>
How does this not require the same amount of faith to believe since no one can explain the "along the way" part?
How could a specie go from laying eggs to giving birth? What does that transition look like? There's not much of a middle ground there for it to be a combination of the two.
Because all along the way we have Evidence , 10's of 1000's if not Millions of pieces of Evidence.... Do we have all the possible gaps filled in, no, but when we get a new piece of evidence we actually get to Test the Theory and see if the Predictions made by the theory is validated by the new evidence (Which it has been 1000's of time) or modify the theory accordingly.... Now Tomorrow if Evidence was found that was Repeatable, Verifiable that could stand up to open and candid debate that disproved the existing theories altogether then we would have to come up with a Better Explanation of the existing evidence and the new evidence... For an Example if Tomorrow a UFO landed and a short fellow with a big head stepped out and gave us a batch of Evidence that his folks had dropped in long ago and implanted Life, that could do it... But At No Time is Faith required...

A good example of this finding evidence to validate the theory is Birds being the evolutionary result of some dinosaurs surviving the impact 65 million years ago... That was a Theory years ago, was even considered when I was a kid... after years we found some dino's had wish bones... after a while longer we found some dinos had hollow bones... after a while longer we found dinos with feathers.... after a while we found dinos with wings and tails and teeth and feathers... And any stage we could have found a Robin from 100 million years ago that would have ended that theory altogether but all we find is Evidence that more and more validates the theory that one line at least of dinos evolved into birds.. No Faith required...

“Speaker of Mountain Wisdom....”

Since: Jan 10

Heidrick, KY

#98684 Apr 5, 2013
Oh and as for the laying eggs and giving live birth you are looking to far ahead.. That Specialization evolved far back in time... it's would go from laying soft shelled eggs in the sea as we swim about and having a lot of them eaten to where a few minor changes from some environmental or genetic mutation cause a critter to hatch the soft egg inside and that species passed along that trait .. over time more critters of that species lives that hatched the egg inside than those that laid the egg.. By the time assorted critters climbed out of the sea some species laid eggs and some didn't... We come from the line that didn't .. Dinos (Birds) and Reptiles continued to lay eggs but the amphibians had evolved into several genetic lines... Some laid eggs with soft shells some laid eggs in water and some hatched the eggs inside and gave birth to little critters... Later on the evolutionary jumps allowed some critters to very quickly fill gaps left after catastrophes ... It's called punctuated evolution.. when a major catastrophe happens and most life is wipe out species quickly change to fit the assorted niches in the environment until they become stable and change very little until the next catastrophe and then whats left is forced by to change to fit the niches..... Now everything that I just told you we have found Evidence for... we have found fossils of animals and plants going back Billions of years not just Millions... We have them from when they were Only microbial live forms before plants and animals diverged, we have plants and animals from the pre Cambrian epoch, we have plants and animals from the Cambrian explosion and every epoch after and in each one we see a great dying of as much as 90% of all life with a quick species divergence then a slow evolutionary change over millions of years... If you really wanted too you can do the work of studying what we do and do not know and even spend years in the field learning what we actually do know for fact and what we theorize based on the evidence we have found... All it take is a quest for Evidence and set aside all concepts of Belief or Faith...
Me

Winchester, KY

#98685 Apr 6, 2013
Quantummist wrote:
<quoted text>Because all along the way we have Evidence , 10's of 1000's if not Millions of pieces of Evidence.... Do we have all the possible gaps filled in, no, but when we get a new piece of evidence we actually get to Test the Theory and see if the Predictions made by the theory is validated by the new evidence (Which it has been 1000's of time) or modify the theory accordingly.... Now Tomorrow if Evidence was found that was Repeatable, Verifiable that could stand up to open and candid debate that disproved the existing theories altogether then we would have to come up with a Better Explanation of the existing evidence and the new evidence... For an Example if Tomorrow a UFO landed and a short fellow with a big head stepped out and gave us a batch of Evidence that his folks had dropped in long ago and implanted Life, that could do it... But At No Time is Faith required...

A good example of this finding evidence to validate the theory is Birds being the evolutionary result of some dinosaurs surviving the impact 65 million years ago... That was a Theory years ago, was even considered when I was a kid... after years we found some dino's had wish bones... after a while longer we found some dinos had hollow bones... after a while longer we found dinos with feathers.... after a while we found dinos with wings and tails and teeth and feathers... And any stage we could have found a Robin from 100 million years ago that would have ended that theory altogether but all we find is Evidence that more and more validates the theory that one line at least of dinos evolved into birds.. No Faith required...
Theory, But, If, and Millions of years ago is all I hear, Never concrete evidence of anything.

Dinosaurs turning into Robins but you question someone's faith, I guess you think Global Warming and Aliens are real to. Lol Seems to me you drunk the Kool Aid and want others to have a drink.

Miracles and unexplained really happen everyday. Faith Required..
Me

Winchester, KY

#98686 Apr 6, 2013
Quantummist wrote:
Oh and as for the laying eggs and giving live birth you are looking to far ahead.. That Specialization evolved far back in time... it's would go from laying soft shelled eggs in the sea as we swim about and having a lot of them eaten to where a few minor changes from some environmental or genetic mutation cause a critter to hatch the soft egg inside and that species passed along that trait .. over time more critters of that species lives that hatched the egg inside than those that laid the egg.. By the time assorted critters climbed out of the sea some species laid eggs and some didn't... We come from the line that didn't .. Dinos (Birds) and Reptiles continued to lay eggs but the amphibians had evolved into several genetic lines... Some laid eggs with soft shells some laid eggs in water and some hatched the eggs inside and gave birth to little critters... Later on the evolutionary jumps allowed some critters to very quickly fill gaps left after catastrophes ... It's called punctuated evolution.. when a major catastrophe happens and most life is wipe out species quickly change to fit the assorted niches in the environment until they become stable and change very little until the next catastrophe and then whats left is forced by to change to fit the niches..... Now everything that I just told you we have found Evidence for... we have found fossils of animals and plants going back Billions of years not just Millions... We have them from when they were Only microbial live forms before plants and animals diverged, we have plants and animals from the pre Cambrian epoch, we have plants and animals from the Cambrian explosion and every epoch after and in each one we see a great dying of as much as 90% of all life with a quick species divergence then a slow evolutionary change over millions of years... If you really wanted too you can do the work of studying what we do and do not know and even spend years in the field learning what we actually do know for fact and what we theorize based on the evidence we have found... All it take is a quest for Evidence and set aside all concepts of Belief or Faith...
Mutation does this mean that the Ninja Turtles could be real. Lol are using google for this crap. Every post you write a book.
I haven't looked on here since December and nothing has changed someone post and you have to comment like you hold the evolution knowledge of the world lol.
Let me set aside my beliefs and faith for a moment and say that your full of it.
If you would spend as much time reading the bible as you do writing this crap you might would learn something new. Instead of how old something is on earth when you don't know where it came from to begin with.

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#98687 Apr 6, 2013
Shall We Dance wrote:
How many of you actually read the article? Judging by most of the comments, very few. This thread is about introducing legislature of an Elective Bible course, There are Bible classes already in SOME SCHOOLS. What a curve ball, going from a proposed bill being introduced to Non-Believer to Believer which side are you on thread!
The topic "evolved"

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#98688 Apr 6, 2013
Quantummist wrote:
<quoted text>Because all along the way we have Evidence , 10's of 1000's if not Millions of pieces of Evidence.... Do we have all the possible gaps filled in, no, but when we get a new piece of evidence we actually get to Test the Theory and see if the Predictions made by the theory is validated by the new evidence (Which it has been 1000's of time) or modify the theory accordingly.... Now Tomorrow if Evidence was found that was Repeatable, Verifiable that could stand up to open and candid debate that disproved the existing theories altogether then we would have to come up with a Better Explanation of the existing evidence and the new evidence... For an Example if Tomorrow a UFO landed and a short fellow with a big head stepped out and gave us a batch of Evidence that his folks had dropped in long ago and implanted Life, that could do it... But At No Time is Faith required...

A good example of this finding evidence to validate the theory is Birds being the evolutionary result of some dinosaurs surviving the impact 65 million years ago... That was a Theory years ago, was even considered when I was a kid... after years we found some dino's had wish bones... after a while longer we found some dinos had hollow bones... after a while longer we found dinos with feathers.... after a while we found dinos with wings and tails and teeth and feathers... And any stage we could have found a Robin from 100 million years ago that would have ended that theory altogether but all we find is Evidence that more and more validates the theory that one line at least of dinos evolved into birds.. No Faith required...
What about eggs to birth like I asked? What does the middle of that evolution look like?

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#98689 Apr 6, 2013
Quantummist wrote:
Oh and as for the laying eggs and giving live birth you are looking to far ahead.. That Specialization evolved far back in time... it's would go from laying soft shelled eggs in the sea as we swim about and having a lot of them eaten to where a few minor changes from some environmental or genetic mutation cause a critter to hatch the soft egg inside and that species passed along that trait .. over time more critters of that species lives that hatched the egg inside than those that laid the egg.. By the time assorted critters climbed out of the sea some species laid eggs and some didn't... We come from the line that didn't .. Dinos (Birds) and Reptiles continued to lay eggs but the amphibians had evolved into several genetic lines... Some laid eggs with soft shells some laid eggs in water and some hatched the eggs inside and gave birth to little critters... Later on the evolutionary jumps allowed some critters to very quickly fill gaps left after catastrophes ... It's called punctuated evolution.. when a major catastrophe happens and most life is wipe out species quickly change to fit the assorted niches in the environment until they become stable and change very little until the next catastrophe and then whats left is forced by to change to fit the niches..... Now everything that I just told you we have found Evidence for... we have found fossils of animals and plants going back Billions of years not just Millions... We have them from when they were Only microbial live forms before plants and animals diverged, we have plants and animals from the pre Cambrian epoch, we have plants and animals from the Cambrian explosion and every epoch after and in each one we see a great dying of as much as 90% of all life with a quick species divergence then a slow evolutionary change over millions of years... If you really wanted too you can do the work of studying what we do and do not know and even spend years in the field learning what we actually do know for fact and what we theorize based on the evidence we have found... All it take is a quest for Evidence and set aside all concepts of Belief or Faith...
Still don't see how egg slowly evolves to live birth. That seems like a one or the other scenario to me
Yes and Amen

Winchester, KY

#98691 Apr 6, 2013
curious wrote:
Evolution is nothing more that Extreme Science Fiction
Those who do not believe in God and believe in the scientific theory of evolution would believe that,
Unliving and unintelligent matter can ,over a period of billions of years,evolve into a living intelligent being,able to reproduce after it's own kind.
Let us analyze that procedure and apply it to the human species;
According to evolution,certain elements came together,devoid of intelligence or life and were somehow,able to assemble themselves ,over a period of billions of years,into a living being,previously non existent.
Without any guidance or blueprint to follow,this process called evolution,was able to create an amazingly sophisticated and complex machine,hereto fore unknown.
Question,How did that happen?How did this process know what was needed in order to create a living human,that this human would need a heart,a brain,a liver etc. and create within itself HALF of the necessary elements needed in order to continue the survival of the human species.We call this,MAN.
Now,apart and Independent of this MAN,we would have to have,these same identical elements,over a period of billions of years,create an almost identical being called woman,which would have most of the same characteristics of man,a heart,a brain,liver etc,and create within itself the other HALF of necessary elements needed to create additional human beings of both sexes,But,how did this unintelligent process know to create separate beings of different sexes and provide them with the necessary parts so there would be a continuation of the species.
Science CAN NOT explain that process,has no idea how it occurred,but yet,insists that their theory is accurate. That is not Science,that is Science Fiction of the highest degree.
Thereby my belief that a far superior intelligence than we possess, created us,that superior intelligence is what I refer to as GOD.
Meanwhile,those who do not believe in this superior intelligence,attempt to disprove God's Existence,
the foundation of their argument,that unintelligent and unliving matter,was somehow,able to transform itself into living intelligent matter,in the form of a human being,a process they can neither explain,provide any evidence that this event happened,nor have any idea as to how it occurred,
Therefore,they are willimg to believe that we were not created by a Supernatural being with a far superior intellect than humans possess,but were instead created by an unintelligent,unliving source that evolved over billions of years..
Great post!
Of course you know what they will say.... LOL
God Bless :-)
Yes and Amen

Winchester, KY

#98692 Apr 6, 2013
excuse me wrote:
<quoted text>
Some skeptics may think that a 15- to 40-year gap between the life of Christ and the writings about him is too wide for the testimony to be reliable. But they are mistaken.
Think about events that occurred 15 to 40 years ago. When historians write about those events, we don’t say,“Oh, that’s impossible! No one can remember events from that long ago! Such skepticism is clearly unwarranted. Historians today write accurately about events in the 1970s, 80s, and 90s by consulting their own memories, those of other eyewitnesses, and any written sources from the time.
This process is the same one the New Testament writers used to record their documents. Like a good reporter, Luke interviewed eyewitnesses.{9} And as we’ll see in the next chapter, some New Testament writers were eyewitnesses themselves. They could remember 15- to 40-year-old events quite easily, just as you can. Why can you remember certain events vividly from 15 to 40 years ago and (if you’re old enough) even further back? You may be able to remember certain events because they made a great emotional impact on you.(In fact, those of us who are “over the hill” can remember some events from 30 years ago better than those from 30 minutes ago!)
Where were you and what were you doing when President Kennedy was assassinated? When the Challenger exploded? When the second plane hit the tower? Why can you remember those events so well? Because they made a deep emotional impact on you. Since an event like the Resurrection certainly would have made a deep emotional impact on the New Testament writers and the other eyewitnesses they may have consulted, it’s easy to see why the history of Jesus could be easily recalled many years later, especially in a culture with an established reliance on oral testimony
Furthermore, if the major works of the New Testament are eyewitness accounts written within two generations of the events, then they are not likely to be legend. Why? Because historical research indicates that a myth cannot begin to crowd out historical facts while the eyewitnesses are still alive. For this reason, Roman historian A. N. Sherwin-White calls the mythological view of the New Testament “unbelievable”.{10} William Lane Craig writes,“The tests show that even two generations is too short to allow legendary tendencies to wipe out the hard core of historical fact.”{11} Inside of those two generation, eyewitnesses are still around to correct the errors of historical revisionists.
We are seeing this tendency right now with regard to the Holocaust. In early twenty-first century, we’ve begun to see some people claim that the Holocaust never happened. Why are the revisionists trying this now? Because most of the eyewitnesses have now died. Fortunately, since we have written eyewitness testimony from the Holocaust, the revisionists are not successful in passing off their lies as the truth. The same holds true for the New Testament. If the New Testament was written within 60 years of the events it records, it is highly unlikely those events could be legendary. And as we have seen, all of the New Testament documents were written within 60 years of the events, and many much earlier.
Another Great post!
Wrong again Sparky

Winchester, KY

#98693 Apr 6, 2013
Satanic Priest wrote:
Being bombarded with news stories full of hate from the christian cult over any one and every one who does not blindly follow their beliefs, hearing christians sqay "not with my money" when it comes to helping some one, seeing christians condemn people for being poor and suck up to the wealthy I forget that there ARE good people who would do anything they can to help some one in need, people who are kind and not self righteous.
My post are directed towards the people who are hate filled and use religion to justify that hate, towards the people who use "god" to elevate themselves above others.
BUT I state that the kind person would be the same person with or with out any "god"
You are more hate filled than any Christian I know... Hypocrite much?
Wrong again Sparky

Winchester, KY

#98694 Apr 6, 2013
that guy wrote:
<quoted text>
...so you really believe that there's an invisible man -- living in the sky -- who watches everything you do, every minute of every day. And the invisible man has a special list of ten things he does not want you to do.. And if you do any of these ten things, he has a special place, full of fire and smoke and burning and torture and anguish, where he will send you to live and suffer and burn and choke and scream and cry forever and ever 'til the end of time!..But He loves you.
No!
I do not believe in an "Invisible man" living in the sky...
I believe in a Creator spirit living in the spirit world, an
alternate universe if you will!
He knows your heart, what is in it...
If your posting against Him just to be nasty... He knows that,
and you deserve what you asked for...
If your posting out of ignorance... you might get a pass!
See People that want to do evil... get what they sow!
That is why we post...
Been there, done that, seen the error in it...
seen the truth!
God is real, and we want you safe!
Yet... you (atheists/satanists) post with hate, calling
Evil good, and good evil...
having darkness in your hearts!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pikeville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Add a word, Drop a word (May '10) 6 min _FLATLINE-------- 24,133
Enterprized? 7 min Amy 1
What's mitch McConnell done for coal, when ther... (Jul '14) 12 min Senate Majority Liar 26,188
Obama causes riots 13 min Ecossais 5
looking for girls feet to worship 1 hr footman1234 1
Pike Central teacher 2 hr amazed 4
Musikal MishMash 2 hr MUSICK-NESS 77
Which attorney mowed a woman down with his vehi... 3 hr yup 8
white women and black men 5 hr funny 47
More from around the web

Pikeville People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]