Benghazi, Boston, & Bureaucracy Blow ...
Grid Iron

Pikeville, KY

#846 Sep 13, 2013
Kyboy wrote:
CBS Omits Attkisson's Scoop on Kerry's Refusal to Let Benghazi Survivors Testify
http://m.newsbusters.org/blogs/matthew-balan/...
What would they say in their testimony? We were attacked by terrorist.
Kyboy

Louisville, KY

#850 Sep 13, 2013
Grid Iron wrote:
<quoted text>What would they say in their testimony? We were attacked by terrorist.
How about more details of what happened.

Obama been trying to keep the American people from finding out the truth. Why is he hiding from the truth.
soooo

Ashland, KY

#851 Sep 14, 2013
Grid Iron wrote:
<quoted text>What would they say in their testimony? We were attacked by terrorist.
IF that is all they have to say then let them say it. Sounds like there is something to hide.

“PROUDLY PUNKING MODS & TROLLS ”

Since: May 13

FOR 1/2 A DECADE!!!

#852 Sep 14, 2013
Kyboy wrote:
<quoted text>
How about more details of what happened.
Obama been trying to keep the American people from finding out the truth. Why is he hiding from the truth.
That is the question at the very heart of this matter: Why? I'll even give the Obama Supporters the benefit of the doubt on this one because I'm sure not a single one of them can logically explain to us why no one that was involved with Benghazi, that was there and knows
what went on, has come forward and told their story? This is 2013 where every thing that happens has someone involved running straight to the Media and telling their story..but NOT Benghazi. Stories of forced silence, intimidation, threats, etc. have all surfaced but NO
firsthand accounts. The Obama Administration went straight to a cover up within hours of this attack and tried to deflect attention by scapegoating an unrelated video. Why? What was going on there, what happened there to create such a contrived mystery that no one seem willing to break the silence about?
Grid Iron

Pikeville, KY

#853 Sep 14, 2013
PAT RlOT wrote:
<quoted text>
That is the question at the very heart of this matter: Why? I'll even give the Obama Supporters the benefit of the doubt on this one because I'm sure not a single one of them can logically explain to us why no one that was involved with Benghazi, that was there and knows
what went on, has come forward and told their story? This is 2013 where every thing that happens has someone involved running straight to the Media and telling their story..but NOT Benghazi. Stories of forced silence, intimidation, threats, etc. have all surfaced but NO
firsthand accounts. The Obama Administration went straight to a cover up within hours of this attack and tried to deflect attention by scapegoating an unrelated video. Why? What was going on there, what happened there to create such a contrived mystery that no one seem willing to break the silence about?
Only you Obama haters think its some cover up/ mystery. Are you willing to go on record saying that republicans pushed for the 300 million in cuts to embassy security? Unrelated video? The video sparked many protest in the middle east that day didn't they patty cakes. Protesters tried unsuccessfully to storm our embassy in Egypt that day. Those are things that you don't want even put in the equation. If I am not mistaken congress has subpoena power. No one has been stopped from talking to congress, First hand accounts of what. We were attacked by terrorist that's all there is to it.
Fox News Is A Joke

Shelbiana, KY

#854 Sep 14, 2013
Kyboy wrote:
<quoted text>
How about more details of what happened.
Obama been trying to keep the American people from finding out the truth. Why is he hiding from the truth.
Why are you so stupid?
Fox News Is A Joke

Shelbiana, KY

#855 Sep 14, 2013
PAT RlOT wrote:
<quoted text>
That is the question at the very heart of this matter: Why? I'll even give the Obama Supporters the benefit of the doubt on this one because I'm sure not a single one of them can logically explain to us why no one that was involved with Benghazi, that was there and knows
what went on, has come forward and told their story? This is 2013 where every thing that happens has someone involved running straight to the Media and telling their story..but NOT Benghazi. Stories of forced silence, intimidation, threats, etc. have all surfaced but NO
firsthand accounts. The Obama Administration went straight to a cover up within hours of this attack and tried to deflect attention by scapegoating an unrelated video. Why? What was going on there, what happened there to create such a contrived mystery that no one seem willing to break the silence about?
Because there is nothing there you ignorant SOB.
soooo

Ashland, KY

#856 Sep 14, 2013
Fox News Is A Joke wrote:
<quoted text>Because there is nothing there you ignorant SOB.
If there is nothing there then why are they refusing to let congress interview the people that were there?
Shmegal

Pikeville, KY

#857 Sep 14, 2013
soooo wrote:
<quoted text>
If there is nothing there then why are they refusing to let congress interview the people that were there?
No one can stop congress from talking to the people involved. You must have fox news talking points.
Kyboy

Louisville, KY

#858 Sep 14, 2013
Grid Iron wrote:
<quoted text>Only you Obama haters think its some cover up/ mystery. Are you willing to go on record saying that republicans pushed for the 300 million in cuts to embassy security? Unrelated video? The video sparked many protest in the middle east that day didn't they patty cakes. Protesters tried unsuccessfully to storm our embassy in Egypt that day. Those are things that you don't want even put in the equation. If I am not mistaken congress has subpoena power. No one has been stopped from talking to congress, First hand accounts of what. We were attacked by terrorist that's all there is to it.
I'll say it. Obama's budget plan was cut by 330 million that he asked for by the repubs.. The dems in the senate put 60 million back into the plan. The actual cut was 270 million.

So lets look at simpler way. Obama's plan asked to increase the spending by a dollar. He was told no, you can only have .67 cents. The dems said no we are giving him .73 cents. So was there a real cut when actual spending was increased?

Now for the rest of the story.

In testimony Wednesday before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Charlene Lamb, a deputy assistant secretary of state for diplomatic security, was asked,“Was there any budget consideration and lack of budget which led you not to increase the number of people in the security force there?”

Lamb responded,“No, sir.”

Recall that Lamb is the person who denied requests from the top diplomatic security officer in Libya to retain a 16-man team of military personnel who had been protecting diplomats.

So much for the budget cuts you lefties say was the problem.
Proof

Pikeville, KY

#859 Sep 14, 2013
Kyboy wrote:
<quoted text>
I'll say it. Obama's budget plan was cut by 330 million that he asked for by the repubs.. The dems in the senate put 60 million back into the plan. The actual cut was 270 million.
So lets look at simpler way. Obama's plan asked to increase the spending by a dollar. He was told no, you can only have .67 cents. The dems said no we are giving him .73 cents. So was there a real cut when actual spending was increased?
Now for the rest of the story.
In testimony Wednesday before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Charlene Lamb, a deputy assistant secretary of state for diplomatic security, was asked,“Was there any budget consideration and lack of budget which led you not to increase the number of people in the security force there?”
Lamb responded,“No, sir.”
Recall that Lamb is the person who denied requests from the top diplomatic security officer in Libya to retain a 16-man team of military personnel who had been protecting diplomats.
So much for the budget cuts you lefties say was the problem.
You think less money means more security.
Proof

Pikeville, KY

#860 Sep 14, 2013
Lamb testified that the correct number of security officials were in place at the time. Issa is the who said not to the American people. It was correct to the standard of practice for security of a CONSULATE. NEXT!!!!!!!! Don't spin fox news.
Proof

Pikeville, KY

#861 Sep 14, 2013
I can also say that its probable that more would have died. The 16 member National Guard team still would have been overwhelmed by the attack that took place. Anything else!
Proof

Pikeville, KY

#862 Sep 14, 2013
Like it or not the president ask for more money for Embassy security but the republicans slashed that request by 300 million.
Stan and Kyle

Madison, AL

#863 Sep 15, 2013
PAT RlOT wrote:
<quoted text>
That is the question at the very heart of this matter: Why? I'll even give the Obama Supporters the benefit of the doubt on this one because I'm sure not a single one of them can logically explain to us why no one that was involved with Benghazi, that was there and knows
what went on, has come forward and told their story? This is 2013 where every thing that happens has someone involved running straight to the Media and telling their story..but NOT Benghazi. Stories of forced silence, intimidation, threats, etc. have all surfaced but NO
firsthand accounts. The Obama Administration went straight to a cover up within hours of this attack and tried to deflect attention by scapegoating an unrelated video. Why? What was going on there, what happened there to create such a contrived mystery that no one seem willing to break the silence about?
I am starting to think this was a Black Opps. What I am hearing is that the CIA was torturing a high value captive. They started the attack to flush out CIA safe houses. makes sense.
Stan and Kyle

Madison, AL

#864 Sep 15, 2013
My Dad did Black opps in Iran throughout the 70's. at the time the Soviets were the reason we ran their country. who knows what plans they have for Libya
Critter

Pikeville, KY

#865 Sep 15, 2013
Proof wrote:
Lamb testified that the correct number of security officials were in place at the time. Issa is the who said not to the American people. It was correct to the standard of practice for security of a CONSULATE. NEXT!!!!!!!! Don't spin fox news.
13 times under George W Bush our consulate/embassies were attacked 9 americans were killed in one of them. You all said nothing about that then. I guess being attacked only one time in 5 years is a major improvement.

“PROUDLY PUNKING MODS & TROLLS ”

Since: May 13

FOR 1/2 A DECADE!!!

#866 Sep 15, 2013
Stan and Kyle wrote:
<quoted text>
I am starting to think this was a Black Opps. What I am hearing is that the CIA was torturing a high value captive. They started the attack to flush out CIA safe houses. makes sense.
I agree, S & K and am convinced there was something else of immense value going on there covertly, something so "big" that The Obama Administration has gone to great lengths in trying to prevent any details going public. There has already been stories surface that Arms destined to the Syrian Rebels were being
distributed from that particular point (Benghazi).
Fox News Is A Joke

Shelbiana, KY

#867 Sep 16, 2013
PAT RlOT wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree, S & K and am convinced there was something else of immense value going on there covertly, something so "big" that The Obama Administration has gone to great lengths in trying to prevent any details going public. There has already been stories surface that Arms destined to the Syrian Rebels were being
distributed from that particular point (Benghazi).
Lmfao

Arm yourself you holler hick head.
Kyboy

Great Barrington, MA

#868 Sep 16, 2013
Proof wrote:
Lamb testified that the correct number of security officials were in place at the time. Issa is the who said not to the American people. It was correct to the standard of practice for security of a CONSULATE. NEXT!!!!!!!! Don't spin fox news.
She is such a great Obama worshiper. Ambassador Stevens asked for six-month's for extra security

The truth is Hillary cut the securty forces in June.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pikeville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
More Ray Jones Rants 3 min Blacktop Puppet 18
News Bible study rules for public schools proposed (Feb '10) 15 min ChromiuMan 151,893
Paul Patton Statue 1 hr Who Paid For It 120
Vanderbeck Wants More Alcohol Sales 1 hr Did It Work 4
Awesome EXPO Performance by TED NUGENT 1 hr Ticket Give Away 19
Irish Pub coming 1 hr No Pub 15
Looking for 1 hr Doctor love 2

Pikeville Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Pikeville Mortgages