bobby6464

Portland, OR

#50638 Jul 2, 2013
Hey tea bags, your option for president lost, racial hating ignorant dumb asses.

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#50639 Jul 3, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Does it hurt when you talk out of your ass? You do it all the time, so I was just wondering.
And how do you talk out of your ass with your head completely buried in there? That just seems impossible, yet here you are doing it.
Amazing.
Boy, you just hate it when truth is staring you in your face.

Go back to planning your wedding. Gays can do this now, according to bobbie the nut juice collector. LOL

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#50640 Jul 3, 2013
bobby6464 wrote:
Hey tea bags, your option for president lost, racial hating ignorant dumb asses.
BLAH BLAH BLAH. Same old tea bag this and tea bag that.

So bobbie, how many canning jars of nut juice did you add to your collection this week? I bet you have great suction power to be able to fill those quart canning jars up.

Did you every think of getting a job as a vacuum cleaner? LMAO

When you and your lover Danny get married who will be playing the role of husband?

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#50642 Jul 3, 2013
The BHO Legacy wrote:
26% of Obama Supporters View Tea Party as Nation’s Top Terror Threat
Half of all voters consider radical Muslims the bigger terrorist threat facing the nation, but supporters of President Obama consider the Tea Party to be as big a danger.
...Among those who Strongly Approve of the president, more fear the Tea Party than radical Muslims.
As for those who disapprove of Obama’s performance, 75% consider radical Muslims to be the bigger terrorist threat. Just one percent (1%) name the Tea Party.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_conten...
What an utterly meaningless and irrelevant poll.

Do you actually think this means something?

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#50643 Jul 3, 2013
ACA wrote:
1. Millions are losing the insurance Obama promised they could keep. Because ObamaCare forces employers to offer expensive Cadillac plans but also offers the option of paying a fine for not providing health insurance that can be cheaper than providing it, between seven and twenty million Americans are likely to lose their health insurance coverage according to the Congressional Budget Office. The original estimate was closer to four million.2. The cost of healthcare premiums is about to further skyrocket. Premium costs have already exploded, but that is a slow-motion explosion. In the near future, we could see costs double or worse. Naturally, these costs will hit an already burdened middle class hardest.3. Lost jobs. Lost jobs.The Federal Reserve’s March beige book on economic activity noted that businesses “cited the unknown effects of the Affordable Care Act as reasons for planned layoffs and reluctance to hire more staff.”Human resources consulting firm Adecco found that half of the small businesses it surveyed in January either plan to cut their workforce, not hire new workers, or shift to part-time or temporary help because of ObamaCare.4. Potential doctor shortages that will mean rationing: The healthcare industry is already a bureaucratic quagmire. ObamaCare is about to add steroids. As the profession becomes tyrannized by government, the talented people currently practicing medicine plan to get out sooner than expected. Who knows how many will choose not to get in. Doctor shortages are what lead to the nightmare known as rationed care.5. Somewhere around $800 billion in tax increases will hit America’s middle class. This added burden will not only further oppress a middle class already reeling from a drop in wages over the last few years, but could damage the overall economy.6. Inflation, the cruelest tax on the poor. When businesses get socked with added costs brought about by higher taxes and burdensome government mandates, they pass those cost along to the consumer in the form of higher prices.7. Added bureaucracy. Even those Obama lapdogs over at the Washington Post’s Wonk Blog are admitting that applying for health care is about to get more burdensome than the byzantine paperwork involved in buying a home.8. To cut costs or to avoid having to provide insurance, workers on the economic margins are already losing hours, which means a lower paycheck. There are a million sad stories in ObamaVille; here are just a few of them.9. ObamaCare is projected to add $6.2 TRILLION to a deficit the GAO has already declared “unsustainable.” That’s “trillion” with a “t”.10. More taxes than currently estimated are likely to hit because of situations like this one.11.Muslims, Amish, Native Americans, Congress are exempt from mandate and penalties under Obamacare that the rest of us have to pay.The govt becoming more involved in health care is the reason the costs have increased. So Govt creates a crisis, then provides a solution that comes at the expense of liberty and freedom, costs trillions, and by most accounts won’t solve the problem but in fact make it far worse.Corruption, incompetence, disregard of the Constitution, and lying are integral to the way that this country is being run.Three years ago, Obama, Democrats, and his media lied to us about cutting the cost of health care, being able to keep our insurance, and not taxing the middle class.Today, those lies and what ObamaCare is and will do to the working and middle class are the biggest untold story in America.Just refuse
This is actually readable at it's original source - the thoroughly discredited joke-of-a-site, Breitbart.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2013/...

Since: Jun 08

Not Waynesboro or Hagerstown

#50644 Jul 3, 2013
Major part of ACA delayed to 2015. Google it, I'm not force-feeding you.
LaughingAtYou

Chicago, IL

#50645 Jul 3, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
When you can't refute the facts, your only resort is to malign the source. Just sayin...
How true.
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
This is actually readable at it's original source - the thoroughly discredited joke-of-a-site, Breitbart.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2013/...
Ooops.

LMAO!
Rational Evolutionist

Saint Paul, MN

#50646 Jul 3, 2013
Please share this important message with your friends and family. Thank you!

The Myth of Homophobia

Thesis: Humans have evolved with certain inborn inhibitions that biologically serve to promote the preservation of the Homo Sapien species, and improve the chance of successful reproduction and the genetic diversity, health, and survivability of their offspring.

For centuries, anthropologists studying different human tribes, ethnic groups, cultures, and civilizations have observed that humans overwhelmingly avoid certain behaviors regardless of environment, available resources, or social context. The instinctual behaviors include but are not limited to: interspecies mating, intergenerational mating, and close family inbreeding.

The fact that these three behaviors are universally avoided regardless of geography, religion or culture suggests humans are restrained by instincts that serve a useful and evolutionary purpose. Consider the scientific rational for the following generally avoided behaviors:

Inter-species mating (interbreeding): Humans are biologically hardwired to avoid mating with other mammalian species because of anatomic incompatibility and failure to procreate. This instinct protects the continuation of a species by restricting sexual drive to anatomically compatible mating partners of the same mammalian group. Without this biological instinct, humans would erroneously seek out incompatible species for reproduction, fail to reproduce, and threaten the existence of our species.

Intergenerational mating: Fertile humans, instinctually avoid mating with infertile members of the opposite sex. Physical aging provides a useful biological purpose, which is to signal fertility and help humans direct their sexual drive to partners that offer the best chance of reproductive success. This explains why a typical, sexually mature male would prefer to copulate with a young woman rather than a post-menopausal woman or a prepubescent girl. Without this hard-wired preference, humans would erroneously direct their sexual drive towards infertile mates, fail to reproduce, and threaten the existence of our species.

Close-Family Inbreeding: Humans, and their primate ancestors, instinctually avoid mating with close kin (such as the mother, father, and sibling) and instead seek out partners outside of the nuclear family to secure the genetic diversity and health of their offspring. Without this innate instinct, people would misdirect their sexual drive to close relatives, produce genetically “defective” offspring, and threaten the adaptability and survival of future generations.

It has been universally observed that humans have developed strong cultural taboos against bestiality (inter-species mating), wide-gap intergenerational mating, and incest. Many religions ascribe meaning to these inborn instincts and interpret them as “God’s laws.” While many evolutionists don’t ascribe any cultural meaning to these inhibitions, they do recognize their profound biological function and evolutionary purpose.

Considering the reasons provided herein, if you feel an inexplicable repulsion or discomfort toward homosexual partnerships- understand that your sentiment is not prejudicial (i.e. homophobic) but biological. Your sentiment is based on a natural procreative instinct that for millions of years has served to ensure humanity’s propagation. Social conditioning and acculturation alone may not be enough to reverse this normal physiological hardwiring.
Rational Evolutionist

Saint Paul, MN

#50647 Jul 3, 2013
The Myth of Homophobia (continued)

Lastly, it is important to note that while primal instincts play a strong role in guiding or regulating behavior, humans are not completely govern by them. Since complex psychological factors play an equally influential role in driving behavior, people can and often do go against their innate impulses or inhibitions. Those that do behave contrary to their evolutionary instincts and deviate from nature’s imperative are an extreme minority. If deviant sexual preferences were to be normalized through socialization, the genetic progression and continuity of the human race would be threatened. Thus to preserve the propagation, diversity, and health of future generations, society should be very cautious to promote anti-evolutionary sexual behavior (e.g. homosexuality) as a normal alternative lifestyle to heterosexuality.
Rational Evolutionist

Saint Paul, MN

#50648 Jul 3, 2013
Why same-sex marriage is harmful from a secular perspective

It Imposes Its Acceptance on All Society

By legalizing same-sex “marriage,” the State becomes the official and active promoter of anti-evolutionary sexual behavior. The State calls on public officials to officiate at the new civil ceremony, orders public schools to teach its acceptability to children, and punishes any state employee who expresses disapproval.

In the private sphere, objecting parents will see their children exposed more than ever to this new, alternative lifestyle and children will be socialized and encouraged to act against their primal procreative instincts.

In every situation where marriage affects society, the State will expect heterosexuals and all people of good will to betray their biological inhibitions by condoning, through silence or act, an attack on the natural order and evolution.

Since homosexual behavior threatens the genetic progression and continuity of humanity, society should be very cautious to normalize and institutionalize it as a healthy alternative lifestyle.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#50649 Jul 3, 2013
America deserves to fail wrote:
Speaking of shit, do you think the 2015 date is a planned start or a reaction to the "trainwreck" occurring just before the 2014 elections? Obama has just entered the room. <sniff, sniff ... whewwwwww>
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
2015 date???
GenPatton wrote:
Major part of ACA delayed to 2015. Google it, I'm not force-feeding you.
Interesting.
bobby6464

Portland, OR

#50650 Jul 3, 2013
Hey tea bag rogers, America is not buying your racial hating victim blues, boy. There is nothing you Limbaugh nut juice guzzlers can do to stop Obama care, gay marriage or anything else this great country wants, but your ignorant ass tea bag club can sure try, you betcha. You tea bags are proven political failures and in 2014 america confirms it

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#50651 Jul 3, 2013
LaughingAtYou wrote:
<quoted text>
How true.
<quoted text>
Ooops.
LMAO!
You'd have a point except for one thing - I refute wingnut bullshit ALL THE TIME here.

But there isn't a reason in the world to waste any of my time addressing a self-refuting 600 or 700 word cut-n-paste.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#50652 Jul 3, 2013
Rational Evolutionist wrote:
Please share this important message with your friends and family. Thank you!
The Myth of Homophobia
Thesis: Humans have evolved with certain inborn inhibitions that biologically serve to promote the preservation of the Homo Sapien species, and improve the chance of successful reproduction and the genetic diversity, health, and survivability of their offspring.
For centuries, anthropologists studying different human tribes, ethnic groups, cultures, and civilizations have observed that humans overwhelmingly avoid certain behaviors regardless of environment, available resources, or social context. The instinctual behaviors include but are not limited to: interspecies mating, intergenerational mating, and close family inbreeding.
The fact that these three behaviors are universally avoided regardless of geography, religion or culture suggests humans are restrained by instincts that serve a useful and evolutionary purpose. Consider the scientific rational for the following generally avoided behaviors:
Inter-species mating (interbreeding): Humans are biologically hardwired to avoid mating with other mammalian species because of anatomic incompatibility and failure to procreate. This instinct protects the continuation of a species by restricting sexual drive to anatomically compatible mating partners of the same mammalian group. Without this biological instinct, humans would erroneously seek out incompatible species for reproduction, fail to reproduce, and threaten the existence of our species.
Intergenerational mating: Fertile humans, instinctually avoid mating with infertile members of the opposite sex. Physical aging provides a useful biological purpose, which is to signal fertility and help humans direct their sexual drive to partners that offer the best chance of reproductive success. This explains why a typical, sexually mature male would prefer to copulate with a young woman rather than a post-menopausal woman or a prepubescent girl. Without this hard-wired preference, humans would erroneously direct their sexual drive towards infertile mates, fail to reproduce, and threaten the existence of our species.
Close-Family Inbreeding: Humans, and their primate ancestors, instinctually avoid mating with close kin (such as the mother, father, and sibling) and instead seek out partners outside of the nuclear family to secure the genetic diversity and health of their offspring. Without this innate instinct, people would misdirect their sexual drive to close relatives, produce genetically “defective” offspring, and threaten the adaptability and survival of future generations.
It has been universally observed that humans have developed strong cultural taboos against bestiality (inter-species mating), wide-gap intergenerational mating, and incest. Many religions ascribe meaning to these inborn instincts and interpret them as “God’s laws.” While many evolutionists don’t ascribe any cultural meaning to these inhibitions, they do recognize their profound biological function and evolutionary purpose.
Considering the reasons provided herein, if you feel an inexplicable repulsion or discomfort toward homosexual partnerships- understand that your sentiment is not prejudicial (i.e. homophobic) but biological. Your sentiment is based on a natural procreative instinct that for millions of years has served to ensure humanity’s propagation. Social conditioning and acculturation alone may not be enough to reverse this normal physiological hardwiring.
What a creative and long-winded defense of bigotry.

Good luck with that.

BTW - have you read this?
http://books.google.com/books...

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#50653 Jul 3, 2013
Rational Evolutionist wrote:
Why same-sex marriage is harmful from a secular perspective
It Imposes Its Acceptance on All Society
By legalizing same-sex “marriage,” the State becomes the official and active promoter of anti-evolutionary sexual behavior. The State calls on public officials to officiate at the new civil ceremony, orders public schools to teach its acceptability to children, and punishes any state employee who expresses disapproval.
In the private sphere, objecting parents will see their children exposed more than ever to this new, alternative lifestyle and children will be socialized and encouraged to act against their primal procreative instincts.
In every situation where marriage affects society, the State will expect heterosexuals and all people of good will to betray their biological inhibitions by condoning, through silence or act, an attack on the natural order and evolution.
Since homosexual behavior threatens the genetic progression and continuity of humanity, society should be very cautious to normalize and institutionalize it as a healthy alternative lifestyle.
Your argument has a familiar ring to it.

Hmmmm...

Oh yeah - it sounds a lot like this:

----------

Inter-Racial Dating, Inter-Racial Marriage, Judgement Day

By Dr. Ed Fields

Some might ask: Why should the government ever have regulated the behavior of two consenting individuals? Do they not have the right to mate with whomever they choose?

Our forefathers recognized the vast gulf which exists between the White and Black races in terms of equality. They recognized the Negro African race to be an inferior race, child-like, capricious, impulsive and cruel, yet useful for manual labor under the constant direction of the White man.

They also recognized the inherent danger in the presence of a large Negro population in contact with Whites because it invariably leads to interracial sexual relations. They saw the hideous results of low-class White men mating with plantation negro females. They knew that every civilization in history that had used Negro slaves eventually succumbed to the corruption of interracial breeding, leading to the collapse of that society.

Therefore, the founders of America passed laws forbidding White-Black marriage. This was the real motivation behind the segregation laws which existed in the pre civil rights era South. They did not want their civilization to decay and fall due to interbreeding with inferior racial stock!
Rational Evolutionist

Saint Paul, MN

#50654 Jul 3, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Your argument has a familiar ring to it.
Hmmmm...
Oh yeah - it sounds a lot like this:
----------
Inter-Racial Dating, Inter-Racial Marriage, Judgement Day
By Dr. Ed Fields
Some might ask: Why should the government ever have regulated the behavior of two consenting individuals? Do they not have the right to mate with whomever they choose?
Our forefathers recognized the vast gulf which exists between the White and Black races in terms of equality. They recognized the Negro African race to be an inferior race, child-like, capricious, impulsive and cruel, yet useful for manual labor under the constant direction of the White man.
They also recognized the inherent danger in the presence of a large Negro population in contact with Whites because it invariably leads to interracial sexual relations. They saw the hideous results of low-class White men mating with plantation negro females. They knew that every civilization in history that had used Negro slaves eventually succumbed to the corruption of interracial breeding, leading to the collapse of that society.
Therefore, the founders of America passed laws forbidding White-Black marriage. This was the real motivation behind the segregation laws which existed in the pre civil rights era South. They did not want their civilization to decay and fall due to interbreeding with inferior racial stock!
While it's convenient to compare the same-sex marriage movement with the racial rights movement, it's simply not a valid comparison because there are far too many significant differences. For instance, homosexuals' descendants were never forced into slavery, categorized by anthropologists and governments as a sub-human species; homosexuals have never been systematically or institutionally segregated, deprived of housing, employment or educational opportunities, persecuted by the police, forced to drink from different water fountains etc.

Many people of color, in particular African Americans, are offended by the outrageous claim that the same-sex marriage movement is in par with the racial rights movement because the differences are far too significant and innumerable. Secondarily, they’re incomparable because, to quote General Colin Powell,“skin color is a benign, non-behavioral characteristic. Sexual orientation is perhaps the most profound of all behavioral characteristics. Comparison of the two is a convenient but invalid argument.”(Source: Colin Powell, My American Journey, 1995, p. 533)

To date, nonpartisan scientists have yet to prove that homosexuality is an innate biological condition. And even if it is, it's not an outwardly visible characteristic such as color, gender, age etc.

If homosexuals are really suffering systemic discrimination and oppression, comparable to the African-Americans plight of the past, then explain why American gay couples are far more likely to be highly educated and higher-income?(Kurtzleben, US News, March 2013) Does that sound like a demographic that’s being systemically oppressed? Moreover, how can this systemically “oppressed” group exert enormous political power disproportionate to their numbers?

Personally, I think it’s quite intellectually dishonest and shameful to compare the same-sex marriage movement with the racial rights movement.

Source: http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/03/0 ...
Fearless Contrarian

Saint Paul, MN

#50655 Jul 3, 2013
Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:
<quoted text>
Your argument has a familiar ring to it.
Hmmmm...
Oh yeah - it sounds a lot like this:
----------
You've been brainwashed by the LGBT movement, my friend.

Interracial marriage is not comparable to same-sex marriage. A fertile man and woman are anatomically compatible and can procreate, regardless of their skin pigmentation. A fertile man and man or woman and woman are neither anatomically/sexually compatible nor capable of producing a baby together in a natural way. I know it’s hard to accept, but that’s the truth.
Fearless Contrarian

Saint Paul, MN

#50656 Jul 3, 2013
If homosexuals are really suffering systemic discrimination and oppression, comparable to the African-Americans plight of the past, then explain why American gay couples are far more likely to be highly educated and higher-income?(Kurtzleben, US News, March 2013) Does that sound like a demographic that’s being systemically oppressed?

Don't believe the LGBT movement's lies.

Source: < http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/03/0... ;
xfactor

Mckeesport, PA

#50657 Jul 3, 2013
So what does the NSA have on these SCOTUS judges that decided the ACA is constitutional?

They have everything on everyone, and you don't think they use it?

Moving money from the private sector to the government is NEVER a good idea. Unless you are are a big fan of inadequacy, cronyism, bureaucracy, inefficiency, and socialism.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#50658 Jul 3, 2013
Rational Evolutionist wrote:
<quoted text>
While it's convenient to compare the same-sex marriage movement with the racial rights movement, it's simply not a valid comparison because there are far too many significant differences. For instance, homosexuals' descendants were never forced into slavery, categorized by anthropologists and governments as a sub-human species; homosexuals have never been systematically or institutionally segregated, deprived of housing, employment or educational opportunities, persecuted by the police, forced to drink from different water fountains etc.
Many people of color, in particular African Americans, are offended by the outrageous claim that the same-sex marriage movement is in par with the racial rights movement because the differences are far too significant and innumerable. Secondarily, they’re incomparable because, to quote General Colin Powell,“skin color is a benign, non-behavioral characteristic. Sexual orientation is perhaps the most profound of all behavioral characteristics. Comparison of the two is a convenient but invalid argument.”(Source: Colin Powell, My American Journey, 1995, p. 533)
To date, nonpartisan scientists have yet to prove that homosexuality is an innate biological condition. And even if it is, it's not an outwardly visible characteristic such as color, gender, age etc.
If homosexuals are really suffering systemic discrimination and oppression, comparable to the African-Americans plight of the past, then explain why American gay couples are far more likely to be highly educated and higher-income?(Kurtzleben, US News, March 2013) Does that sound like a demographic that’s being systemically oppressed? Moreover, how can this systemically “oppressed” group exert enormous political power disproportionate to their numbers?
Personally, I think it’s quite intellectually dishonest and shameful to compare the same-sex marriage movement with the racial rights movement.
Source: http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/03/0 ...
Here's why your argument isn't valid:

You can hide your sexual orientation. You cannot hide your skin color.

Individual homosexuals have received the same kinds of discrimination and harassment as African Americans, just not on the same scale because of the ability to hide sexual orientation.

I understand why you don't like the comparison. But your stated reasons don't hold up under scrutiny.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Phoenixville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
PA Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Pennsylva... (Oct '10) 4 hr Just Saying 3,999
PA Who do you support for Lieutenant Governor in P... (Oct '10) Sep 15 Jeremy 183
Smaller suburbs like Honey Brook work to revita... Sep 3 Brooker Wood 1
Basement water damage from overhead pipe leak (Dec '08) Aug 28 Seth Ashford 9
Collegeville Music Thread (May '12) Aug '14 Musikologist 17
Providence Town Center-Phase 2 (Mar '10) Aug '14 beanzalo1 291
Hobby Hut Aug '14 Catherine 1
•••

Phoenixville News Video

•••
Phoenixville Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Phoenixville Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Phoenixville People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Phoenixville News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Phoenixville
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••