WZZM13 - Holland company contributes ...

WZZM13 - Holland company contributes to controversial Creation ...

There are 19 comments on the WZZM Grand Rapids story from May 29, 2007, titled WZZM13 - Holland company contributes to controversial Creation .... In it, WZZM Grand Rapids reports that:

Petersburg, KY - Crowds of supporters and protesters lined up Monday outside the new Creation Museum, a facility that says modern science supports the thinking that God created the world, Adam, & Eve less than ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at WZZM Grand Rapids.

danasue

Bangor, MI

#1 May 29, 2007
I am very excited to have a museum that supports my beliefs! It's difficult to take my kids to museums that have billions of years as their perspective, when I teach my children that the Creation Story of the Bible is literal. I have to tell them that there are scientist who don't believe that God meant it when He said in Genesis, "and the evening and the morning were the first day." Seems pretty self-explanatory, I'm not sure how you can argue with that.
danasue

Bangor, MI

#2 May 29, 2007
WHY DID THIS FORUM CENSOR THE WORD B I B L E?!?!?!?
K-J-G

United States

#3 May 29, 2007
This muesum is a not only a state-of-the-art facilty but also provides conviencing evidence again evolution.
J Rhinehart

Vero Beach, FL

#4 May 29, 2007
Would people protest an Islamic Museum....probably not. Christians are fun targets for people because they know that we'll "take it".
Keelynn

Big Rapids, MI

#5 May 29, 2007
Although I think it is interesting that they created a museum that has historical content - I don't truly believe that teaching people that humans and dinosaurs coexisted without scientific evidence supporting this theory is correctly informing people. If this is an accurate representation of our creation, then why do prehistoric creatures remains date back farther than any known human remains.
sarah

Grand Rapids, MI

#6 May 29, 2007
the thought that the world is only 10,000 years old doens't seem to hold water when put to the scrutiny of modern scientific tests. how do they explain all of the fossils and geological data that dates back past 10,000 years? i have no problem with faith, but feel that some take what is meant to be an allegorical text too literally.
Jim Morgan

United States

#7 May 29, 2007
Dinoaurs did coexist with humans. Evidence was found long ago in Texas. Human footprints and dinosaur footprints were found imbedded in the same fossilized rock. There is no such thing as "prehistoric".
Keelynn wrote:
Although I think it is interesting that they created a museum that has historical content - I don't truly believe that teaching people that humans and dinosaurs coexisted without scientific evidence supporting this theory is correctly informing people. If this is an accurate representation of our creation, then why do prehistoric creatures remains date back farther than any known human remains.

Since: May 07

Bolton

#8 May 29, 2007
Humans and dinosaurs could have never co exsisted any way. The predatory dinosaurs where the top predators, and would have probably made early humans extinct, if not then they would have definately slowed down the evolution of man.

Since: May 07

Bolton

#9 May 29, 2007
Jim Morgan wrote:
Dinoaurs did coexist with humans. Evidence was found long ago in Texas. Human footprints and dinosaur footprints were found imbedded in the same fossilized rock. There is no such thing as "prehistoric".
<quoted text>
Do you know where i can find a picture of this.
Jim Morgan

United States

#10 May 29, 2007
Science cannot prove that fossils date back millions of years. The scientific method of proof is to test something over and over again. For instance, you can scientifically prove that Ivory soap floats. Try it. Fill a sink with water and drop the soap into the sink 10 times. Does it float? If it does you have proven scientifically that Ivory soap floats. Anyone who tells you that something is millions of years old is not truthful. The evolution lie has been told so often, by so many people that we have been dupped into believing it.
If the entire Bible can't be believed literally, throw the whole thing out. Don't just choose to believe what you want to believe of it. If the Bible isn't true, there is no hope for mankind. We're just random products of chance that have not purpose and no meaning in life. Put your faith in Darwin, eat, drink and be merry, because when you die, you cease to exist. It takes more faith to believe that than to believe the Bible.
sarah wrote:
the thought that the world is only 10,000 years old doens't seem to hold water when put to the scrutiny of modern scientific tests. how do they explain all of the fossils and geological data that dates back past 10,000 years? i have no problem with faith, but feel that some take what is meant to be an allegorical text too literally.
Jim Morgan

United States

#11 May 29, 2007
The fossils don't lie, evolutionists do.
Reigo wrote:
Humans and dinosaurs could have never co exsisted any way. The predatory dinosaurs where the top predators, and would have probably made early humans extinct, if not then they would have definately slowed down the evolution of man.
Jim Morgan

United States

#12 May 29, 2007
I've seen a picture of it in a book. Let me look online and see what I can find.
Reigo wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you know where i can find a picture of this.
Jim Morgan

United States

#13 May 29, 2007
Easier to find than I thought. Now let's see if the link will take here.

http://www.bible.ca/tracks/tracks.htm
Reigo wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you know where i can find a picture of this.
Jim Morgan

United States

#14 May 29, 2007
More have been found in Russia:

http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v18/...
Jim Morgan

United States

#15 May 29, 2007
The word that has been deleted here is b i b l e . I guess whoever monitors this puts B I B L E in the same catagory as profanity. What a shame and a crock. Next thing you know they won't let us use the words America or freedom of speech.
Jim Morgan wrote:
Easier to find than I thought. Now let's see if the link will take here.
http://www.bible.ca/tracks/tracks.htm
<quoted text>

Since: May 07

Bolton

#16 May 29, 2007
those are the least convincing pictures i have ever seen. some of them look as if some one has just hammered small and large holes in the ground and then said "well i'll be damned, dinosaur and man, living together" and 'IF' these pictures were real.(which i highly doubt) how come we can find thousands of dinosaur fossils from over 65 milion years ago all over the world, but we can only find human fossils from around only 3 million years ago. and also if these were real, it would have been world wide news...
Concerned Person

Petoskey, MI

#17 May 29, 2007
You all are rediculous. Do you see what you all are doing? Turning friend and family into enemies. I've read the comments posted by everyone and just think how childish this is. I noticed over the years that it seems that everyone has some idea regarding this, but no one is willing to be open minded. It is this or nothing else. If even just a handful of you would become open minded you may realize that problems could be solved and solutions analyzed. Stop your bickering and just get along!
sarah

Grand Rapids, MI

#18 May 29, 2007
Jim Morgan wrote:
Science cannot prove that fossils date back millions of years. The scientific method of proof is to test something over and over again. For instance, you can scientifically prove that Ivory soap floats. Try it. Fill a sink with water and drop the soap into the sink 10 times. Does it float? If it does you have proven scientifically that Ivory soap floats. Anyone who tells you that something is millions of years old is not truthful. The evolution lie has been told so often, by so many people that we have been dupped into believing it.
If the entire Bible can't be believed literally, throw the whole thing out. Don't just choose to believe what you want to believe of it. If the Bible isn't true, there is no hope for mankind. We're just random products of chance that have not purpose and no meaning in life. Put your faith in Darwin, eat, drink and be merry, because when you die, you cease to exist. It takes more faith to believe that than to believe the Bible.
<quoted text>
If the bible is to be taken literally, why then do modern christians not adhere ot ALL parts of it?

"Leviticus 11:12 - Whatsoever hath no fins nor scales in the waters, that shall be an abomination unto you." I see many Christians who eat shellfish.

I also see many Christians who treat women as equals, when the bible has numerous passages regarding the role of women http://www.rapidnet.com/~jbeard/bdm/Psycholog...

I feel that the rules and values in society are less based on religious text and more based on the society itself. Being of a different religion or of no religion at all does not automatically make you immoral, just as proclaiming you are of the Christian faith does not automatically make you moral.
Keelynn

Big Rapids, MI

#19 May 29, 2007
Unconvincing since both pictures are from religious sites (not scientific or an unbiased site)- I don't even have to look at the pictures to know that this does not have scientific evidence to support these photos. If humans coexisted with prehistoric creatures then why have we not been taught that throughout school - I learned that the oldest human remains were from Ice Man and that only dates back to the Ice Age which followed Mesozoic period. I wasn't even aware that mammals existed during that period and if they didn't exist during that period then how do you explain their existence? Evolution is a believable theory - besides man hasn't always been the same; we have continuously evolved as scientific evidence has proven (ex. Neanderthals). And whoever said that fossil dating cannot be accurate needs to go back to school, because carbon dating has been scientifically proven to be accurate. Education is a beautiful thing, learn to accept the truth and dispel the myths. Besides the B I B L E has great historical contexts and is a wonderful book of morals, but allowing yourself to be open to other possibilities may make you seem less ignorant.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Petersburg Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Glad we talked some Feb 9 Tiab toy 5
In the past Feb 7 Stop it 5
Text me kwp Feb 6 Anytime 1
Poll Who Can Arrest Tyler Brockman? (Sep '14) Jan 31 Tawanda 26
Poll What Samantha Ramsey's homocide... justified? (May '14) Jan 30 bill 882
How mad are you (Jul '16) Jan '17 Har 3
Needing some help Jan '17 Needahandup 2

Petersburg Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Petersburg Mortgages