Runyon is reviewing Court transcripts :)

Posted in the Peterborough Forum

Comments

Showing posts 1 - 16 of16

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Justice will prevail!!

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Ohhhh much more than smiling. Add whistling and dancing after yesterdays hearing!!!!!!! Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!
Jenny

Warner, NH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

You are an idiot! We all laugh!

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#13
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

patty has to use 2 names: one to obsess with and one to respond to her own obsession. lol she's truly a schizophrenic with ocd.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#15
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Secret x SquirreI wrote:
LOL!! You're so right! She vascilates between the names to give herself a sense of having someone support her.
she's got one name set up on her cell and one name set up on her iPad. that's what people obsessed with topix do. lol

Since: Mar 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23
Feb 15, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

DesireBelmores life wrote:
Word of advice: if you need to fool people at least just sit and stare, read and cry in emails...posting gives your bullshit pitiful lies away.LMFAO!
It sure does dumbass.....forfuckssake Patty, you literally posted all day & night..who the hell are you to say anything about anyone posting on Valentines Day. LMAO, you're such a hypocrite fucktard!!
jacanus donovani

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#26
Feb 15, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

DesireBelmores life wrote:
<quoted text>
Aww did the fake aol lawyer miss the posts?
Because hes a delusional and dumb as the rest..
"not a part of the case" lol!!!
LMAO @ You thinking everyone reads ever single post you make. There are too many to do that.

But since you can't understand what your Chief said, I'll explain it to you.

"Not part of the case" = NOT PERTINENT TO THE OUTCOME

It isn't perjury that fulfilled the elements, because the actual "perjury" would have left the elements "unfulfilled" by the words "no relationship" alone. <--see that?

Elements were fulfilled by the defendant, in that she admitted to the attack and prior relationship. You keep saying Desire was the only witness. There are instantly two witnesses to an attack. One is the victim, and the other is the assailant. Are you saying the Chief never took your statement? The IMPACT statement came from the defendant admitting her wrongs, while also establishing the type of relatiionship necessary to fulfill the elements for Domestic violence. <---let that soak into your pea brain

Desire's "perjury" was not pertinent to the outome. Patty's own ADMISSION WAS. The perjury hearing alone strengthened the prosecutions case, because DUMBASS Patty pointed out to a judge that the truthful statement should have been "A relationship or prior relationshp".<---See that?

Yes, a judge may review the case, but he needs only to go as far as YOUR ADMISSION to find that the original charge and ruling was proper. It isn't what Desire said. It's what YOU SAID.

For some stupid reason, you expect the court to just ignore your admission and throw everything out based on a statement that had absolutely NO BEARING on the outcome. That DOESN'T HAPPEN.

The fact that you keep repeating your theory shows exactly how STUPID you are.

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#33
Feb 15, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Apparently Patty is under the delusion that couples are supposed to hump all day and night on Valentines Day....therefore should not be posting on Topix. She never stopped to think that maybe they humped before and after the posts... and those few minutes on Topix was to take a break from all the wild, hot, loving sex. Well, now she knows better, right? LOL
jacanus donovani

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36
Feb 15, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

1. The hearing itself is a "review", you DUMBSHIT, so to say "Runyon is reviewing transcripts" from a review is redundant. What else is he supposed to be doing?

2. The hearing was granted based on an issue YOU raised. That issue was 'perjury by a witness, with no other witnesses", which would have to prove detrimental to the outcome. That isn't the judge's theory. It isn't your lawyers theory, since he only represents you. It is YOUR THEORY presented to the court, DUMBASS!

3. Desire Belmore was not on trial. Patty Donovan was. The admission of a relationship by the defendant is more pertinent to the outcome than the words "no relationship" from the victim. This much is obvious by the fact the charge stood, regardless of a statement from the victim that would have disallowed a domestic violence charge.

4. You ask what your admission of guilt has to do with anything, then you go on to say you didn't admit to guilt. If you never admitted anything, you wouldn't ask that first question.

5. In reviewing a specific issue, a judge will ask himself,--"If not for the perjurious statement, would Ms. Donovan be charged with domestic violence"?-- The answer is "YES", she would have, because that single statement had no bearing on the court's decision. If it had any bearing on the decision, the court would have ruled "No domestic violence, because the perjurious statement claimed "no relationship".

I can't believe this is the advice a lawyer gave. But then again, you also agreed to "mutual combat" that got Jenny off the hook. Did you shop for the lawyer in the phone book? If you did, that would explain it.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37
Feb 15, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Try as you might from.California
You are neither a lawyer or judge
Your delusional stories change with each twist

Hey wait! Your story was I admitted to the attack, second verse same as the first

I will stick with what the Judge said

Bipolar=trying to rationalize the irrational

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#38
Feb 15, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Shopping for a lawyer in a phone book is a far cry from shopping for a fake one in a chatroom. You are incredibly stupid

You are NOT a lawyer. No matter how many ignorant morons you can fool

PS for once, figure out what mutual means, doofus.. Two, get it? Off the hook?.lol!!
You have got to be on drugs.
jacanus donovani

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#39
Feb 15, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Pattys winning photo wrote:
PS for once, figure out what mutual means, doofus.. Two, get it? Off the hook?.lol!!
You have got to be on drugs.
Yes, TWO, which means you consented to your ass beating!

If you consented to your ass beating, NO HARM, NO FOUL. Jennifer off the hook for assault and battery charges.

Good job, DUMBFUCK! LMFAO

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#42
Feb 15, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Your not a lawyer or a judge just a lonely, angry, bitter bipolar from.California

Bipolar=trying.to rationalize irrational

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#43
Feb 16, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Yet a new story

Since when was Cullinan charged with.assault and battery, bozo?

Learn what the mutual means in.mutual combat

When at first you dont succeed lie, lie again
Old bipolar proverb lol
jacanus donovani

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#44
Feb 16, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Pattys winning photo wrote:
Yet a new story
Since when was Cullinan charged with.assault and battery, bozo?
Learn what the mutual means in.mutual combat
When at first you dont succeed lie, lie again
Old bipolar proverb lol
She couldn't be charged with assault and battery, as long as you consented to your beating. Get it yet, dumbass?

You let her off the hook

NO HARM
NO FOUL

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#45
Feb 16, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

DesireBelmores life wrote:
If I admitted to the attack why would Runyon grant a hearing? Is that like appealing after you plead guilty? You can fool uneducated drug addicts but nobody else
Oh wait, bipolar belmore told you I admitted lol!!
Bipolar Belmore perjured himself about a relationship, leaving the defendant at a disadvantage at cross examination for motives to lie. Thats not my theroy, thats the Judges..hes reviewing the transcripts to affirm no other witnesses., get a license
No, that's like participating in an entire hearing then telling the judge he has no personal jurisdictiion over you. well, the CA saw that differently now didn't they. Since your lame objection came AFTER the closing arguments. Guess what, I'm still not cmelo. We all know what ana$$ you made of yourself in Wisconsin court. It's all over the internet. We got pages and pages of the transcripts and rulings. One doesn't have to be cmelo to know what a fool you made of yourself. LMAOO BTW you made a huge fool of yourself posting on here all day Valentines Day, what up? Obviously not Moe. Bean soup for dinner, very romantic, NOT!

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 1 - 16 of16
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••

Peterborough News Video

•••
Peterborough Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Peterborough Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Peterborough People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Peterborough News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Peterborough
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••