Perry County Mo Sheriff Assault Weapo...

“Byte Me — Doofus”

Since: Oct 12

Here.

#41 Feb 3, 2013
bruce wrote:
<quoted text> What do you mean when he is a socialist? He is cramming socialism down the throats of the American people. I agree with you, but just.making a point. See you later capitalism and all these "Takers" win.
Socialism is quite simply—the precursor to Communism. Socialism is the step of governance required before communists take over the complete control of the government and then society. The best example available is Cuba.

Capitalism and patriotism paid for every freedom you have in this former great Republic. You will not remain free without capitalism paying your bills—but then again, that's your point. You want the government to pay your bills. Otherwise, you'd starve.

The moment you give up one freedom for any form of security is when you 'lose that freedom'. One day, people will be forced to fight and pay with their lives to regain the freedoms you so willingly give away to these twits.

Yet, you're a ne'er-do-well. My guess is, you need more lessons on Socialism than you received in Kinder-Care. Grow the hell up. And take that damned government sanctioned Popsicle out of your mouth before you choke to death, you imbecile.

“Byte Me — Doofus”

Since: Oct 12

Here.

#42 Feb 3, 2013
BrickInTheWall82 wrote:
I'm not sure what people need with assault rifles, target shooting maybe, but I also don't think taking them away is the right way to solve the problem. Maybe we could start by not giving these mass shooters the fame and media attention they wanted in the first place.
When you are faced with M1A1 Abrams tanks on the outskirts of your haven, you will finally understand why. Any weapon you give to the government that you do not have the right to buy or own, is the very weapon that will remove your freedoms from you, one-by-one.

These shooters, during the 50's and 60's, would have been institutionalized long before they were old enough or deranged enough to shoot children—with few exceptions. This is a mental health anomaly, not a constitutional one.

You have always lived in a free nation. That is ending. Then, you will understand why the Constitution has/had such guarantees. Those are ending, too.

This does not require a course in Nostradamus 101. Just pay close attention. They go after the young people's hearts and minds first—the oldest Marxist ploy of all. You're of the first generation to have been indoctrinated.

We have no great disagreement beyond freedom. There is nothing more important. You will not have it much longer.

“Byte Me — Doofus”

Since: Oct 12

Here.

#43 Feb 3, 2013
BrickInTheWall82 wrote:
This is why I never choose a political party to get behind, at least not in the big two.
Both parties are corrupt, and neither one give two-sh*ts about 'your constitutional rights'. They say whatever it takes to get elected, and then they rob us blind.

This is an issue of Constructional Freedoms.
Punisher

Jonesboro, AR

#44 Feb 15, 2013
nebka wrote:
The time i went deer hunting all i needed was a bolt action rifle.
There ia some weapons a civilian has no need for like a BAR,Intratec TEC-DC9,or any actual full-automatic assault rifles.
I am for the Second Amendment but as i said there are some weapons civilians do not need to own
Civilians can't own full auto. Problem solved.
Luke

Fort Wayne, IN

#45 Feb 15, 2013
The speedometer on my car goes up to 140, but the highway speed limit is 65. Why do people own cars that can go that fast and break laws? I own SPORTING RIFLES because I can.

“Byte Me — Doofus”

Since: Oct 12

Here.

#46 Feb 15, 2013
Punisher wrote:
<quoted text>
Civilians can't own full auto. Problem solved.
Any problem solved by removing a freedom and restricting a constitutional right is a far more complex and and an infinitely more deviant problem. Besides, making a weapon 'full auto' is child's play. It's akin to trying to enforce a law against the ocean tides—or marijuana use.

“Byte Me — Doofus”

Since: Oct 12

Here.

#47 Feb 15, 2013
—and
Punisher

Jonesboro, AR

#48 Feb 15, 2013
TripleNegative wrote:
<quoted text>
Any problem solved by removing a freedom and restricting a constitutional right is a far more complex and and an infinitely more deviant problem. Besides, making a weapon 'full auto' is child's play. It's akin to trying to enforce a law against the ocean tides—or marijuana use.
Is it child's play? You must be an engineer. If you were a gunsmith, like I am, you'd know that a full auto trigger group won't fit in civilian semi auto firearms. They're engineered that way. That being said, no problems are solved by removing freedoms, only expounded. I would go so far as to say violence is part of the human condition and will never be solved. If that were the case, laws against assault and murder would be enough. My question would be what changed in a generation that made mass murder so commonplace, and what do we need to change to go back to the way things used to be.

“Byte Me — Doofus”

Since: Oct 12

Here.

#49 Feb 15, 2013
Punisher wrote:
<quoted text>
Is it child's play? You must be an engineer. If you were a gunsmith, like I am, you'd know that a full auto trigger group won't fit in civilian semi auto firearms. They're engineered that way. That being said, no problems are solved by removing freedoms, only expounded. I would go so far as to say violence is part of the human condition and will never be solved. If that were the case, laws against assault and murder would be enough. My question would be what changed in a generation that made mass murder so commonplace, and what do we need to change to go back to the way things used to be.
Mass murder is a mental health issue America stopped addressing when they emptied the mental health institutions in the 70's placing mentally ill and dangerous people out on the streets, with little more than a monthly check and few dozen prescriptions as a barrier between them and reality, and empathy or humanity.

The process continues because the government is as fiscally bankrupt as they are morally so. This has absolutely nothing to do with guns beyond the superficial.

As much as I hate this trite remark, it is essentially true:'Guns don't kill people. Mentally ill twits kill people.'

“Byte Me — Doofus”

Since: Oct 12

Here.

#50 Feb 15, 2013
Sorry, I did not truly answer: Public hangings of politicians who refuse to step down and repay their ill-gotten gains. We must rid the barn of smallpox before rebuilding it.

The Republic is deceased. Sing an applicable dirge.

“zero nuclear weapons”

Since: Sep 08

Perryville

#51 Feb 15, 2013
TripleNegative wrote:
<quoted text>
Mass murder is a mental health issue America stopped addressing when they emptied the mental health institutions in the 70's placing mentally ill and dangerous people out on the streets, with little more than a monthly check and few dozen prescriptions as a barrier between them and reality, and empathy or humanity.
The process continues because the government is as fiscally bankrupt as they are morally so. This has absolutely nothing to do with guns beyond the superficial.
As much as I hate this trite remark, it is essentially true:'Guns don't kill people. Mentally ill twits kill people.'
Mass murder a mental health issue??? Where did this come from??
Look what we did to the Native Americans infecting blankets with small pox was that a mental health issue?

What about what we did to the tuskegee airmen? was that a mental health issue??

“Byte Me — Doofus”

Since: Oct 12

Here.

#52 Feb 15, 2013
nebka wrote:
<quoted text>
Mass murder a mental health issue??? Where did this come from??
Look what we did to the Native Americans infecting blankets with small pox was that a mental health issue?
What about what we did to the tuskegee airmen? was that a mental health issue??
Follow the discussion, sober up, and return when you can add something—this makes no sense with regard to how they intended 'mass murder'. It was a reference to Connecticut.

The smallpox infested blankets were done by the British and had absolutely nothing to do with automatic weapons. Tuskegee was not murder, it was governmental corruption and abuse of power and a travesty—and you made my point for public execution of politicians. Yet it had nothing to do with automatic weapons.

From where do you nincompoops come precisely? One word: COMPREHENSION. Is that so hard to follow?

“zero nuclear weapons”

Since: Sep 08

Perryville

#53 Feb 16, 2013
TripleNegative wrote:
<quoted text>
Follow the discussion, sober up, and return when you can add something—this makes no sense with regard to how they intended 'mass murder'. It was a reference to Connecticut.
The smallpox infested blankets were done by the British and had absolutely nothing to do with automatic weapons. Tuskegee was not murder, it was governmental corruption and abuse of power and a travesty—and you made my point for public execution of politicians. Yet it had nothing to do with automatic weapons.
From where do you nincompoops come precisely? One word: COMPREHENSION. Is that so hard to follow?
WRONG it was the U.S government that did it also to the Native Americans.if they were give smallpox infected blankets to make them sick and kill them. In many eyes that could be considered mass murder.

With your talk of public execution of public politicians sounds like those whacked out nuts who people who mass hundreds of weapons who see the government as the enmeny.
Punisher

Jonesboro, AR

#54 Feb 16, 2013
nebka wrote:
<quoted text>
WRONG it was the U.S government that did it also to the Native Americans.if they were give smallpox infected blankets to make them sick and kill them. In many eyes that could be considered mass murder.
With your talk of public execution of public politicians sounds like those whacked out nuts who people who mass hundreds of weapons who see the government as the enmeny.
I guess they are the enemy. Don't take any blankets from them.

“Byte Me — Doofus”

Since: Oct 12

Here.

#55 Feb 16, 2013
nebka wrote:
<quoted text>
WRONG it was the U.S government that did it also to the Native Americans.if they were give smallpox infected blankets to make them sick and kill them. In many eyes that could be considered mass murder.
With your talk of public execution of public politicians sounds like those whacked out nuts who people who mass hundreds of weapons who see the government as the enmeny.
The smallpox infested blankets incidents happened before the United States was even a nation. By the time of the incidents you seem to be relating, most of the natives had already been exposed to the disease, rendering it quite ineffective.

Yet you have such a bipolar argument, and such a alcohol-induced logic. In one breath you decry the US government for being mass murderers, and in the next, anyone who dislikes the government is nuts?

The truth is, you're a bigot. You dislike the government when it's personally expedient—when it fooks with black people, or natives—yet when it fooks with the rights of the rest of the citizenry, you become a fan. You're a socialist malcontent who loves Obama for purely racial and fanatical reasons, and none other.

He's as dull as your reasoning skills. Keep the fook up, dullard.

The government is the enemy. Did you hurt yourself with that rationalizing 180? Need a neck-brace?

“Byte Me — Doofus”

Since: Oct 12

Here.

#56 Feb 16, 2013
Punisher wrote:
<quoted text>
I guess they are the enemy. Don't take any blankets from them.
Now they give out free cellphones and monthly cards for food. It's of very little difference. It's modernization and patience. They hate Capitalism and Christianity, and even more so, the US Constitution. All three stand in the way of their ultimate goal.
Just a thought

Perryville, MO

#57 Feb 17, 2013
nebka wrote:
What is wrong with our Sheriff not wanting to ban assault weapons?
saying that he would not obey laws if passed to ban these weapons.
As a Sheriff you would think he would support this!!!
This ban will not take away a persons right to own hand guns or or a civilian rifles like for hunting. Just assault weapons which no civilian needs.
Wow Nebka! I am speechless on this one! Not sure if your just stupid or not from around here!
So we will give you the benefit and say your not from around here... So let me fill you in! You go ahead and try to take some of these fine people's guns away and see what happens! You will awake a bear never seen before! The citizens from here are NOT going to give them up! THEY KNOW THEY HAVE THE RIGHT TO PROTECT THEMSELVES AND THEIR PROPERTY AT ALL TIMES! With that being said, you might find a bullet in your a$$ if your not careful! The Sheriff knows this and also has the obligation to uphold the Constitution and the State Laws! Just a bit of information in case you did know anything about politics or the Missouri Laws!
CLOSED MINDS SHOULD FOLLOW BY CLOSED MOUTHS!
Educate your self so you don't seem so dumb on a public forum!
Yeah there is a bit of corruption down there, but I have to also state this, the Sheriff is not as dumb as some people think!
For once, I applaud him for actually standing up for something thats right!

So go ahead and try!

MOLON LABE!

“zero nuclear weapons”

Since: Sep 08

Perryville

#58 Feb 17, 2013
TripleNegative wrote:
<quoted text>
The smallpox infested blankets incidents happened before the United States was even a nation. By the time of the incidents you seem to be relating, most of the natives had already been exposed to the disease, rendering it quite ineffective.
Yet you have such a bipolar argument, and such a alcohol-induced logic. In one breath you decry the US government for being mass murderers, and in the next, anyone who dislikes the government is nuts?
The truth is, you're a bigot. You dislike the government when it's personally expedient—when it fooks with black people, or natives—yet when it fooks with the rights of the rest of the citizenry, you become a fan. You're a socialist malcontent who loves Obama for purely racial and fanatical reasons, and none other.
He's as dull as your reasoning skills. Keep the fook up, dullard.
The government is the enemy. Did you hurt yourself with that rationalizing 180? Need a neck-brace?
Read these
Covert United States foreign regime change actions
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covert_United_St...
Project MKUltra
COINTELPRO
Operation Northwoods
Iran- Contra
Watergate
Tuskegee syphilis experiment

“zero nuclear weapons”

Since: Sep 08

Perryville

#59 Feb 17, 2013
Just a thought wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow Nebka! I am speechless on this one! Not sure if your just stupid or not from around here!
So we will give you the benefit and say your not from around here... So let me fill you in! You go ahead and try to take some of these fine people's guns away and see what happens! You will awake a bear never seen before! The citizens from here are NOT going to give them up! THEY KNOW THEY HAVE THE RIGHT TO PROTECT THEMSELVES AND THEIR PROPERTY AT ALL TIMES! With that being said, you might find a bullet in your a$$ if your not careful! The Sheriff knows this and also has the obligation to uphold the Constitution and the State Laws! Just a bit of information in case you did know anything about politics or the Missouri Laws!
CLOSED MINDS SHOULD FOLLOW BY CLOSED MOUTHS!
Educate your self so you don't seem so dumb on a public forum!
Yeah there is a bit of corruption down there, but I have to also state this, the Sheriff is not as dumb as some people think!
For once, I applaud him for actually standing up for something thats right!
So go ahead and try!
MOLON LABE!
I am saying some weapons should be baned. I am not talking about bolt action rifle or hand guns. I am talking about weaponds that could be used on the battle field lets say a BAR or some of the guns that have been used in the recent mass shootings.

The next gun i would get for the home would be a side by side with number 9 shot that would scare anyone off
Andy

Jonesboro, AR

#60 Feb 17, 2013
nebka wrote:
<quoted text>
I am saying some weapons should be baned. I am not talking about bolt action rifle or hand guns. I am talking about weaponds that could be used on the battle field lets say a BAR or some of the guns that have been used in the recent mass shootings.
The next gun i would get for the home would be a side by side with number 9 shot that would scare anyone off
Well since the BAR is banned, you got your wish. Secondly, can you name a gun that hasn't been used in battle? Military sniper rifles are usually Remington 700 bolt action rifles. There's been some changes coming down the pipe, but since Vietnam until just recently, snipers used good ole bolt action deer rifles. Secondly, you might be okay with peppering the walls of your home with birdshot, but it's kind of dumb. I'll take my 30 rounds of .223 with my blinding white light and laser, and I'll bet that'll scare them off as well. If it doesn't, and if I somehow miss, I cab take comfort in the fact that the .223 doesn't overpenetrate and kill my wife or neighbor, and only makes one hole to fix later. Lastly, nothing you said even came close to a coherent argument for gun control, and everyone is now dumber for having read your post. May God have mercy on your soul.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Perryville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
I owe the moderator an apology. 2 hr Sam Fondren 13
I promise to get control of this thread... 2 hr Sam Fondren 31
sing a long 2 hr Sam Fondren 34
andrea kohlfeld 3 hr sam boe 1
I've dragged good people's names through the mu... 7 hr Julia Stokes Turner 29
Triple Negative Thread: 9 hr ArseCynic 36
You are crazy. 9 hr ArseCynic 21
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Perryville Mortgages