Dr. Janeen Demarte's home burglarized...

Dr. Janeen Demarte's home burglarized Feb.

Posted in the Peoria Forum

First Prev
of 11
Next Last
New Snow White

Spring, TX

#2 Apr 16, 2013
JANEEN DEMARTE CLASS OF 1998

Austin High School Class of 1998
El Paso, TX
St. Joseph School 1986-1994
El Paso, TX
University of Massachusetts - Arts & Sciences 1998-2002
Amherst, MA
Michigan State University 2003-2007
East Lansing, MI

Someone questioned her education. This goes all the way back.
Lois

United States

#3 Apr 17, 2013
Janeen talks with tremendous clarity. She makes sense! So refreshing from LaViolete and Sanders.
YaadieGyal

Oshawa, Canada

#4 Apr 17, 2013
I have much more respect for this expert than for the defense experts! She looks so young though. I wonder if the jury will be bothered by that. Let's hope not!
YaadieGyal

Oshawa, Canada

#5 Apr 17, 2013
Class of '98? So she's about 30?
YaadieGyal

Oshawa, Canada

#6 Apr 17, 2013
Lois wrote:
Janeen talks with tremendous clarity. She makes sense! So refreshing from LaViolete and Sanders.
Definitely!
Debbie

United States

#7 Apr 17, 2013
Keep up the great work Dr. Janeen DeMarte. You are an expert in your field and you are honest and these people with common sense can see through this murderer.. Don't let that ignorant Wilmont get to you...
really

United States

#8 Apr 17, 2013
Debbie wrote:
Keep up the great work Dr. Janeen DeMarte. You are an expert in your field and you are honest and these people with common sense can see through this murderer.. Don't let that ignorant Wilmont get to you...
Dr. D. Has mor professionalism In her 8yrs then Dick or Lav could ever dream about having!!!
Dave

Vancouver, Canada

#9 Apr 17, 2013
She's a presumptuous, green, potentially dangerous upstart who displays anger issues of her own. If her field was one of the physical or mathematical sciences, she might be able to hold herself out as something of a whiz. But this is one of the human psychosocial "sciences" where judgment and maturity born of vast experience are crucial. In this field virtually any fool, with the device known as cheat sheets, can memorize and regurgitate prescribed academic content. Applying it with skill and shrewd judgment, however, simply requires extensive practical experience. She needs to know her place, go to the back of the class and wait until she's a bit more dry behind the ears. There is, after all, a minimum age qualification for U.S. President, isn't there? There's a reason for that, right?

Judged:

12

11

8

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Jillian

Glen Mills, PA

#10 Apr 17, 2013
dave - there is always one out there and you are it! BTW- shes not running for president. She is making those "experienced, dry behind the ears, older" witnesses look like the idiots they are.
Dave

Vancouver, Canada

#11 Apr 17, 2013
Jillian wrote:
dave - there is always one out there and you are it! BTW- shes not running for president. She is making those "experienced, dry behind the ears, older" witnesses look like the idiots they are.
Hey Jillian
Thanks for your response. In a way you're right, but prob'ly not in the way you'd like. I AM one out there and proudly so. I'm rational, sober, fair-minded and (not wanting to pull rank here) a well-qualified, experienced professional clinician, so I know what I'm talking about in this field. I can spot an upstart, pushy greenhorn a mile off. For chrissakes, this woman just got outta high school and now she wants to pontificate about profound human affairs. Also, you failed to grasp my point about the U.S. presidency, but oh well.
Trish

Goodyear, AZ

#12 Apr 17, 2013
Obviously Dave, you fall in the same category as the two defense experts. I would rather have somebody young, up to date with new material and schooling evaluating me rather than somebody that is so seasoned they oose their prospective and get emotionally involved and attached. I think this expert i is very credible, knowledgeable, and doesn't try to evade the questions asked by being able to answer with yes or no respnses, not tap dancing and avoiding answers. Keep up the good work Janeen Demarte!
Pete

United States

#13 Apr 18, 2013
Well put Trish!
really

United States

#14 Apr 18, 2013
Dave wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey Jillian
Thanks for your response. In a way you're right, but prob'ly not in the way you'd like. I AM one out there and proudly so. I'm rational, sober, fair-minded and (not wanting to pull rank here) a well-qualified, experienced professional clinician, so I know what I'm talking about in this field. I can spot an upstart, pushy greenhorn a mile off. For chrissakes, this woman just got outta high school and now she wants to pontificate about profound human affairs. Also, you failed to grasp my point about the U.S. presidency, but oh well.
Say what you want but Dr. D is too busy to be playing around on topix apparently your NOT! Don't you have some. Well-qualified experienced professional stuff to be doing?
really

United States

#15 Apr 18, 2013
Dave wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey Jillian
Thanks for your response. In a way you're right, but prob'ly not in the way you'd like. I AM one out there and proudly so. I'm rational, sober, fair-minded and (not wanting to pull rank here) a well-qualified, experienced professional clinician, so I know what I'm talking about in this field. I can spot an upstart, pushy greenhorn a mile off. For chrissakes, this woman just got outta high school and now she wants to pontificate about profound human affairs. Also, you failed to grasp my point about the U.S. presidency, but oh well.
you don't sound very professional calling her a greenhorn. That is a personal attack & I'm sure it would be viewwed as unprofessional in you field.
Angela

Tahlequah, OK

#16 Apr 18, 2013
It took a dozen professionals rejecting to testify for the defense indicates to me even a high school graduate remotely interested in psychology could assess and form a relatively accurate opinion about Jodi
Dave wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey Jillian
Thanks for your response. In a way you're right, but prob'ly not in the way you'd like. I AM one out there and proudly so. I'm rational, sober, fair-minded and (not wanting to pull rank here) a well-qualified, experienced professional clinician, so I know what I'm talking about in this field. I can spot an upstart, pushy greenhorn a mile off. For chrissakes, this woman just got outta high school and now she wants to pontificate about profound human affairs. Also, you failed to grasp my point about the U.S. presidency, but oh well.
Bdub

Okatie, SC

#17 Apr 18, 2013
Dave wrote:
She's a presumptuous, green, potentially dangerous upstart who displays anger issues of her own. If her field was one of the physical or mathematical sciences, she might be able to hold herself out as something of a whiz. But this is one of the human psychosocial "sciences" where judgment and maturity born of vast experience are crucial. In this field virtually any fool, with the device known as cheat sheets, can memorize and regurgitate prescribed academic content. Applying it with skill and shrewd judgment, however, simply requires extensive practical experience. She needs to know her place, go to the back of the class and wait until she's a bit more dry behind the ears. There is, after all, a minimum age qualification for U.S. President, isn't there? There's a reason for that, right?
.
You sound like such an idiot. Bad analogy as well. You are trying way too hard to sound intelligent. Dr demarte is extremely knowledgable and is beyond qualified to testify in this case. Age has nothing to do with the fact that this witness has core knowledge and education in the field of psychology. If anything her age is an advantage. She is fresh and eager and filled with recent up to date knowledge, not like laviolette who is so in the seventies with her views and applications.
New Snow White

Spring, TX

#18 Apr 18, 2013
Dr. Demarte unnerved "Trigger" yesterday. Check out Nancy Grace.
Doubter

Garland, TX

#19 Apr 18, 2013
Dave wrote:
She's a presumptuous, green, potentially dangerous upstart who displays anger issues of her own. If her field was one of the physical or mathematical sciences, she might be able to hold herself out as something of a whiz. But this is one of the human psychosocial "sciences" where judgment and maturity born of vast experience are crucial. In this field virtually any fool, with the device known as cheat sheets, can memorize and regurgitate prescribed academic content. Applying it with skill and shrewd judgment, however, simply requires extensive practical experience. She needs to know her place, go to the back of the class and wait until she's a bit more dry behind the ears. There is, after all, a minimum age qualification for U.S. President, isn't there? There's a reason for that, right?
That's a totally ridiculous sttatement...this is not a presidential race. It's obvious that Dave has insecurity issues towards a sharp, younger woman who sticks to the facts and has no dog in this fight. There's no regurgitation of anything other than what she discovered during her interview of this blatantly calculated murderer. She should be admired for not allowing Willmott to railroad her into saying things she wants her to say... Far more credible than that windbag LaViolete
Jennifer

Tallahassee, FL

#20 Apr 18, 2013
As a new clinician myself, I would never behave the way DeMarte has on the stand - especially during cross. She shows clear hostility issues. In grad school we joke about those who will follow the money and go into forensics rather than those who focus on patients. Among her peers, she's a bit of a leper. But, smart move career wise - she will be rich and pay off her student loans in no time!
unclb

Raleigh, NC

#21 Apr 18, 2013
Dave, your a moron. I'm 51, experienced and hold a Master of Science. Dr Demarte is very smart and does not avoid answering questions directly as the others were. Do you really think that the longer Wilmont wastes time attempting to brainwash the jurors (trying to disqualify Demarte) will actually make an impact on final outcome? Your points just solidify how ignorant you truly are.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 11
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Peoria Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Trump Swats Hornet Nest 7 min Vote For Trump 8
State Sanctuary Laws Should Work for All States 1 hr Vote For Trump 2
News Protest outside Phoenix-area school after racia... 3 hr guest 7
Frito lay lies to customers and employees 3 hr guest 17
News Sources: KTVK drops 'Good Morning Arizona' pers... (Mar '09) 4 hr HotNPhx 817
Entertainment Culture Brings Suicidal Tendencie... 6 hr Culture Auditor 1
Pop Culture Brings Suicidal Tendencies to Glend... 6 hr Culture Auditor 1
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Peoria Mortgages