What in the hell are you talking about-LOL??? Predisposition? Prosecutors only have to prove that the defendant violated a crime(having sexual conversation with minor) within a reasonable doubt. They certainly do not have to prove a predisposition to commit any crime. Using your flawed and simple minded logic, if a priest steals meat from a grocery store but is a vegetarian, they are innocent because they are not predisposed to<quoted text>
The prosecutors still have to show predisposition that this person would commit the crime. With it being on an adult site, there is no way to prove it. Now as far as continuing the conversation... there are some that are not even predators that just have trouble shutting it off and saying no, because they are already on sexually charged website. It is psychological.... the police are playing into this psychology to induce someone that would not normally behave this way
either steal or eat meat. Listen carefully you idiot- PREDISPOSTION IS IRRELEVANT.
You are really stupid, aren't you? Your ridiculous psychological excuse is beyond moronic-LOL!!
So using your feeble minded explanation, the person is not a predator if he is sexed up.........it's the evil police that are inducing him to continue the conversation. They can't "shut it off" as you say because they are sexually charged and the police are taking advantage of their psychological state.
How about this-when a person realizes that they are doing something illegal-STOP! Having a raging hard on does not give one immunity to the law, fool!
Do you hold people to any accountability for their actions? If you honestly believe this tripe, you are a blithering pinhead.Regardless of your limited intellect, If you have children I hope that they are never abused by someone who might have been stopped by one of these stings. You can put your head back up your ass now, assclown