New York Primary Election Sept 14: Will you vote?

[Goober of Gloversville]

Remiesong wrote:

<quoted text> so, you believe heterosexuals suffer - no wonder your opinions appear so bitter. The only thing I wish for is non-discrimination for any reason. Not just the obvious reasons such as race, religion..........

I lost perspective for a moment, to think that a liberal would recognize humor...hmmm...but you did vote for obama, that's a joke on all of us, but who's laughing.......

[Goober of Gloversville]

Remiesong wrote:

<quoted text> so, you believe heterosexuals suffer - no wonder your opinions appear so bitter. The only thing I wish for is non-discrimination for any reason. Not just the obvious reasons such as race, religion..........

I am too well off to be bitter, I am angry about the transformation of our great nation into a irrevocable debtor nation by the time the fool in the White House has finished his "transformation" of our nation with his reckless spending, endless spending of borrowed money from my childrens future. Only a fool would believe the utopian pasture pudding this clown spreads.

[Remiesong]

Goober of Gloversville wrote:

<quoted text>
I am too well off to be bitter, I am angry about the transformation of our great nation into a irrevocable debtor nation by the time the fool in the White House has finished his "transformation" of our nation with his reckless spending, endless spending of borrowed money from my childrens future. Only a fool would believe the utopian pasture pudding this clown spreads.

you are bitter. So bitter that you changed your rant to picking on poor Obama. Why is that? all trails don't lead to Obama. You may be more successful in winning an argument.

[De Oppresso Liber]

"you are bitter. So bitter that you changed your rant to picking on poor Obama. Why is that? all trails don't lead to Obama"

Leftists and liberals always invoke the strategy of trying to define the argument of their political opposiiton, it doesn't work with me.
It's the facts that count, and the fact is the national debt has increased over six trillion dollars under the "professors" watch, with no intention of curbing his spending appetite. Little school children are denied access to their White House, while Hollywood celebrities continue to have an open door policy to the "professors'" palace. He is a fraud, and a narcisstic skunk, that of course is opinion, later defined by history I'm sure as fact. The "Chicken Little professor" has egg on his face now that the sky hasn't fallen under sequestration. How much has obama given up on his lifestlye for sequestration?

[MacDaddyobama]

Unrelyable wrote:

<quoted text>
Pretending? Try telling that to the children in Indiana who now have to win a lottery to attend head start programs....

Try telling obama he can't go on vacation, he has work to do.

[Remiesong]

De Oppresso Liber wrote:

"you are bitter. So bitter that you changed your rant to picking on poor Obama. Why is that? all trails don't lead to Obama"
Leftists and liberals always invoke the strategy of trying to define the argument of their political opposiiton, it doesn't work with me.
It's the facts that count, and the fact is the national debt has increased over six trillion dollars under the "professors" watch, with no intention of curbing his spending appetite. Little school children are denied access to their White House, while Hollywood celebrities continue to have an open door policy to the "professors'" palace. He is a fraud, and a narcisstic skunk, that of course is opinion, later defined by history I'm sure as fact. The "Chicken Little professor" has egg on his face now that the sky hasn't fallen under sequestration. How much has obama given up on his lifestlye for sequestration?

It was the Repulicans, in their infinite wisdom and unending lack of cooperation who brought about the sequestration. The cuts are in place and you losers are still whining. You see even when you get what you want, spending cuts, it's blame Obama. Knock it off and quit your bellyaching. And quit trying to change the subject, which is Ben Carson. Is the liberal media trying to persecute him? Or did he misspeak? Why apologize to anyone if he did not? Answer these questions or don't reply at all. If you want to address another topic, fine. Just don't try it at my expense. I eat pinheads like you for breakfast. Blow your nose and dry your tears. Obamas in office for four more years.

[Remiesong]

Goober of Gloversville wrote:

<quoted text>
I am too well off to be bitter, I am angry about the transformation of our great nation into a irrevocable debtor nation by the time the fool in the White House has finished his "transformation" of our nation with his reckless spending, endless spending of borrowed money from my childrens future. Only a fool would believe the utopian pasture pudding this clown spreads.

this nation has always been in debt so your trying to cast the blame on the current president holds no water

[De Oppresso Liber]

Remiesong wrote:

<quoted text> It was the Repulicans, in their infinite wisdom and unending lack of cooperation who brought about the sequestration. The cuts are in place and you losers are still whining. You see even when you get what you want, spending cuts, it's blame Obama. Knock it off and quit your bellyaching. And quit trying to change the subject, which is Ben Carson. Is the liberal media trying to persecute him? Or did he misspeak? Why apologize to anyone if he did not? Answer these questions or don't reply at all. If you want to address another topic, fine. Just don't try it at my expense. I eat pinheads like you for breakfast. Blow your nose and dry your tears. Obamas in office for four more years.

I don't respond to propaganda, and that's all your posts are, or there's another possibility, that you're just a useful idiot
parroting the lefts talking points ad infinitum, your reasoning process only allows you to blame the world on Republicans, including sequestration, if it weren't so idiotic you would be laughable instead of pathetic.

[De Oppresso Liber]

Goober is right about Dr. Martin Luther King, he was a registered Republican. Most African-Americans have been successfully brainwashed by the left into thinking that Lincoln was a democrat also. The Ku Klux Klan infested democratic dixiecrats were the party of segregation in the south, hardly sharing the civil rights narrative of conservative Republicans like Dr. King. President Lyndon Baines Johnson is known to have explained the benefit of the civil rights legislation to his hesitant fellow democrats by insuring them that " We'll have these n+gg+rs voting democratic for the next hundred years". An uninformed voter is the best democratic voter, still.

[De Odumbo Conser]

De Oppresso Liber wrote:

I don't respond to propaganda, and that's all your posts are, or there's another possibility, that you're just a useful idiot
parroting the lefts talking points ad infinitum, your reasoning process only allows you to blame the world on Republicans, including sequestration, if it weren't so idiotic you would be laughable instead of pathetic.

I don't respond to propaganda, and that's all your posts are, or there's another possibility, that you're just a useful idiot
parroting the right's talking points ad infinitum, your reasoning process only allows you to blame the world on Democrats, including sequestration, if it weren't so idiotic you would be laughable instead of pathetic.

[De Odumbo Conser]

De Oppresso Liber wrote:

Goober is right about Dr. Martin Luther King, he was a registered Republican.An uninformed voter is the best democratic voter, still.

Speaking of uninformed:

We decided to put that assertion to the test. We knew, because he said so, that King never endorsed politicians and "took this position in order to maintain a bipartisan posture, which I have followed all along in order to be able to look objectively at both parties at all times." We also know from his autobiography that he wrote to a supporter in 1956 that "in the past, I always voted the Democratic ticket."

However, in a 2008 Associated Press story, King’s son and namesake Martin Luther King III said:"It is disingenuous to imply that my father was a Republican. He never endorsed any presidential candidate, and there is certainly no evidence that he ever even voted for a Republican. It is even more outrageous to suggest he would support the Republican Party of today, which has spent so much time and effort trying to suppress African American votes in Florida and many other states."

http://www.politifact.com/tennessee/statement...

An uninformed moron is the best conservative, still.

[De Oppresso Liber]

Remiesong wrote:

<quoted text> this nation has always been in debt so your trying to cast the blame on the current president holds no water

All of your arguments are fallacious and incontinent.

[De Oppresso Liber]

De Odumbo Conser wrote:

<quoted text>
I don't respond to propaganda, and that's all your posts are, or there's another possibility, that you're just a useful idiot
parroting the right's talking points ad infinitum, your reasoning process only allows you to blame the world on Democrats, including sequestration, if it weren't so idiotic you would be laughable instead of pathetic.

That is about as clever as you can get, how sophmoric.

[De Odumbo Conser]

De Oppresso Liber wrote:

It's the facts that count, and the fact is the national debt has increased over six trillion dollars under the "professors" watch, with no intention of curbing his spending appetite.

Huh, that's curious, because Ronald Reagan, the conservative deity, tripled the national debt in 8 years. Hell, this country didn't even HAVE a national debt (for all intents and purposes) until President "I don't recall" took office. Then Bill Clinton produces a surplus (this will be funny watching you say he doesn't get the credit, when in the same breath you give all the blame for the current deficits to Obama), and Curious George comes along with the rest of the fiscal conservatives, and turns a $250,000,000,000 surplus into a $1,700,000,000,000 in 8 years, and somehow it's all Obama's fault?

Classic. God you're a moron.

[De Odumbo Conser]

and turns a $250,000,000,000 surplus into a $1,700,000,000,000 DEFICIT (forgot that word above) in 8 years, and somehow it's all Obama's fault?

[De Oppresso Liber]

Remiesong wrote:

<quoted text> this nation has always been in debt so your trying to cast the blame on the current president holds no water

When was the last time it was 16.7 trillion dollars in debt? Are you an idiot?

[De Oppresso Liber]

De Odumbo Conser wrote:

<quoted text>
Speaking of uninformed:
We decided to put that assertion to the test. We knew, because he said so, that King never endorsed politicians and "took this position in order to maintain a bipartisan posture, which I have followed all along in order to be able to look objectively at both parties at all times." We also know from his autobiography that he wrote to a supporter in 1956 that "in the past, I always voted the Democratic ticket."
However, in a 2008 Associated Press story, King’s son and namesake Martin Luther King III said:"It is disingenuous to imply that my father was a Republican. He never endorsed any presidential candidate, and there is certainly no evidence that he ever even voted for a Republican. It is even more outrageous to suggest he would support the Republican Party of today, which has spent so much time and effort trying to suppress African American votes in Florida and many other states."
http://www.politifact.com/tennessee/statement...
An uninformed moron is the best conservative, still.

Next you will want us to believe he was a Dixiecrat and a Klansman, the fact is he was a registered Republican. Personally, I always vote in private, and so did Dr. King. But that's right, democrats know everything, thanks for the laugh.

[De Oppresso Liber]

To stop the Democrats’ pro-slavery agenda, anti-slavery activists founded the Republican Party, starting with a few dozen men and women in Ripon, Wisconsin on March 20, 1854. The party spread across the northern and western United States like a prairie fire of freedom. The first Republican state convention was held in Jackson, Michigan in July 1854. The Republican National Committee met for the first time in 1856, followed four months later by the first Republican National Convention.

In the election of 1860, Republicans swept to victory in the White House and won majorities in both houses of Congress. Just six years after the party’s founding, the Governor of every northern state in America was a Republican. That phenomenal progress was possible only because the Republican Party was based on the powerful idea that our nation, conceived in liberty and dedicated to equality, must live up to its founding principles.

[De Oppresso Liber]

Despite fierce Democrat opposition, Republicans passed constitutional amendments banning slavery, extending the Bill of Rights to the states, guaranteeing equal protection of the laws and due process to all citizens, and extending the right to vote to persons of all races and backgrounds.

Republicans in Congress also enacted the nation’s first-ever Civil Rights Act, which extended citizenship and equal rights to people of all races, all colors, and all creeds.In 1875, the Republicans expanded these protections to give all citizens the right of equal access to all public accommodations. Struck down by the Supreme Court eight years later, this landmark legislation would be reborn as the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

Republicans led the fight for women’s rights, and most suffragists were Republicans. In fact, Susan B. Anthony bragged about how, after voting (illegally) in 1872, she had voted a straight Republican ticket. The suffragists included two African-American women who were also co-founders of the NAACP: Ida Wells and Mary Terrell, great Republicans, both of them.

[De Oppresso Liber]

In 2004, America marked the 50th anniversary of the modern civil rights movement, which began with the Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court decision. That landmark decision was written by Chief Justice Earl Warren, the three-term Republican Governor of California appointed by Republican President Dwight Eisenhower. The author of Brown was also the 1948 Republican vice presidential nominee.

Three years after Brown, President Eisenhower won passage of his landmark Civil Rights Act of 1957. Republican Senator Everett Dirksen authored and introduced the 1960 Civil Rights Act, and saw it through to passage. Republicans supported the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the 1965 Voting Rights Act overwhelmingly, and by much higher percentages in both House and Senate than the Democrats. Indeed, the 1964 Civil Rights Act became law only after overcoming a Democrat filibuster.