California Proposition 19: the Mariju...

California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legalization Initiative

Created by CitizenTopix on Oct 7, 2010

19,879 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

Other (explain below)

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#15486 Mar 4, 2013
Increasingly over the years, we are witnessing the appearance of “scientific” studies that are little more than commercials, public relation sound bytes, to promote vaccination’s efficacy. Today a highly flawed medical trial conducted by a pharmaceutical corporation has a greater chance of being published in a more prestigious medical journal than does medical designed research conducted by an independent scientist without conflicts of interest with government or private industries. When we question why this would be the case, we can only draw the conclusion that such research is more often than not promotional spin designed to support the financial interests of the corporate party. This is particularly true of vaccine science, and is solely published in order to influence the nation’s health policy makers and physicians, and to relieve doubts concerning their vaccine’s efficacy and safety. The nation’s health agencies then rely on these fabrications to convince the larger public healthcare community and citizens about the importance of vaccination. And this scenario is particularly true for the flu vaccine.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#15487 Mar 4, 2013
There is only one big question that needs to be answered: what is the real gold standard proof to claim that the flu vaccine is efficacious for any given individual? The question whether or not the flu vaccine is safe becomes secondary if the vaccine’s efficacy is negligible or useless. In that case, there would be no convincing scientific rationale for administering the vaccine in the first place. During the past four years, since the hype and subsequent fizzle of the H1N1 scare in 2008, we have done an extensive review of the scientific literature and analysis of flu vaccination, and the results are startling.



In a recent interview with Dr. Thomas Jefferson, coordinator for the Cochrane Vaccine Field in Rome, Italy, he said that in 2009 he conducted a thorough review of 217 published studies on flu vaccines and found only 5% reliable. In other words, 95% of studies on flu vaccination are flawed and should therefore be ignored. This should not come as a great surprise; even CDC officials were forced to confess that “influenza vaccines are still among the least effective immunizing agents available, and this seems to be particularly true for elderly recipients.”[1] Dr. Anthony Morris, a distinguished virologist and a former Chief Vaccine Office at the FDA, found “there is no evidence that any influenza vaccine thus far developed is effective in preventing or mitigating any attack of influenza.’ Dr. Morris states,“The producers of these vaccines know they are worthless, but they go on selling them anyway.”

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#15488 Mar 4, 2013
The CDC’s website states,“if you are pregnant, a flu shot is your best protection against serious illness from the flu. A flu shot can protect pregnant women, their unborn babies and even the baby after birth.” Is there any scientific truth to this claim?

Come on big mouth d, give us some proof? Where is it published? Because all information has to be published in a journal...lol. I know you think everything is truth from the great Obama, lies hide in your brain. Why do u lie so much?

Most of us don’t live with your childish delusions.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#15489 Mar 4, 2013
When the CDC launched new swine flu vaccine in 2009, it recommended children as young as 6 months be vaccinated. All FDA-approved intramuscular flu vaccines comprise an inactivated virus. So is there any evidence that inactivated viral influenza vaccines are effective in very young children?

Answer the question big mouth d. Show us the journals. Back your mouth or just do as most of us predict, just lie and insult.
BrassO

Covina, CA

#15490 Mar 5, 2013
So why do you think they did it that way?

Was there a plan behind all this?

Just where did they cook all this up at in the first place?

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#15491 Mar 6, 2013
A study in England has strengthened evidence from Scandinavia that a vaccine used to prevent pandemic flu boosted the risk of sleep disorder among teens and children, doctors said on Tuesday.

Using the Pandemrix vaccine increased the risk of narcolepsy among people aged four to 18 by a factor of 14 compared to those who did not get the jab, they said.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#15492 Mar 6, 2013
Two years to the day after CSL's Fluvax was banned for use in children under the age of 5, news has emerged that Australian doctors are continuing to administer this shot to infants and toddlers despite the fact that there are four other vaccines that are licensed for use in this age group.

Originally, it was discovered that the rate of febrile convulsions following Fluvax was 10 times higher than the 'expected' rate and was causing seizures in 1 child in 100. As a result, the Chief Medical Officer of Australia, Jim Bishop, banned the vaccine for use in children under five and current recommendations state that it should only be used in children between five and 10 years of age if no other vaccination is available.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#15493 Mar 6, 2013
A new scientific study published in The Lancet reveals that influenza vaccines only prevent influenza in 1.5 out of every 100 adults who are injected with the flu vaccine. Yet, predictably, this report is being touted by the quack science community, the vaccine-pushing CDC and the scientifically-inept mainstream media as proof that "flu vaccines are 60% effective!"

This absurd claim was repeated across the mainstream media over the past few days, with all sorts of sloppy reporting that didn't even bother to read the study itself (as usual).

It was published! It was published!
Rain

Covina, CA

#15494 Mar 6, 2013
The magical tour will begin very soon, or has it already?
G points

Covina, CA

#15496 Mar 7, 2013
A all know a "d" is below average, so can't have anymore of this being posted here since it sets a bad example for other readers to follow.
Jillian Galloway

Atlanta, GA

#15497 Mar 7, 2013
It was the will of the American people that legalized marijuana in CO and WA and it was the will of the American people that gave President Obama a second term. He can't now nullify one without severely undermining the legitimacy of the other!

In the seventy years since the launch of the marijuana prohibition we've learned a few important things: 1.) The prohibition absolutely does NOT stop people using marijuana. 2.) The prohibition causes FAR more harm than what it prevents. 3.) The prohibition fuels organized crime and makes children LESS safe.

It is fundamentally WRONG for the government to continue any policy that causes more harm than good! We have to put the safety of our children FIRST and demand that marijuana be legalized like beer and wine.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#15498 Mar 7, 2013
Jillian Galloway wrote:
It was the will of the American people that legalized marijuana in CO and WA and it was the will of the American people that gave President Obama a second term. He can't now nullify one without severely undermining the legitimacy of the other!
In the seventy years since the launch of the marijuana prohibition we've learned a few important things: 1.) The prohibition absolutely does NOT stop people using marijuana. 2.) The prohibition causes FAR more harm than what it prevents. 3.) The prohibition fuels organized crime and makes children LESS safe.
It is fundamentally WRONG for the government to continue any policy that causes more harm than good! We have to put the safety of our children FIRST and demand that marijuana be legalized like beer and wine.
while I agree pot should be legal, I didn't realize we elected the Marxist a second time because of the pot issue?
Trains

Covina, CA

#15499 Mar 7, 2013
The magical medical tour will begin very soon, or has it already?
ThomasA

Birmingham, AL

#15500 Mar 8, 2013
Jillian Galloway wrote:
In the seventy years since the launch of the marijuana prohibition we've learned a few important things: 1.) The prohibition absolutely does NOT stop people using marijuana. 2.) The prohibition causes FAR more harm than what it prevents. 3.) The prohibition fuels organized crime and makes children LESS safe.
It is fundamentally WRONG for the government to continue any policy that causes more harm than good! We have to put the safety of our children FIRST and demand that marijuana be legalized like beer and wine.
Step forward and come up with a 100% accurate non-invasive field test that will stand up in court to show THC content in someone suspected of using MJ like the BAT used in alcohol tests. Until that time, companies with a zero policy and police suspecting a DUI will have to put up with positive/negative results and act accordingly.
BeekerBeeker

Covina, CA

#15501 Mar 8, 2013
The magical medical tour will begin very soon, or has it already?

I was under the impression the bus would be yellow in color?

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#15502 Mar 8, 2013
ThomasA wrote:
<quoted text>Step forward and come up with a 100% accurate non-invasive field test that will stand up in court to show THC content in someone suspected of using MJ like the BAT used in alcohol tests. Until that time, companies with a zero policy and police suspecting a DUI will have to put up with positive/negative results and act accordingly.
What do you call a blood test for alcohol? Just like booze they can do a blood or a urine test. Why you so worried and scared bro?
ThomasA

Birmingham, AL

#15503 Mar 8, 2013
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>What do you call a blood test for alcohol? Just like booze they can do a blood or a urine test. Why you so worried and scared bro?
You're sidestepping! A BAT is a non-invasive test for alcohol content and can be administered in the field where a pee test shows either positive/negative and not whether you smoked last night or this morning. Any kind of blood testing is at the employee's expense. They would be challenging a professional testing lab rather than the employer. Any testing on the employee's part would have to be done at the same time as the first test to prevent dilluting,blocking,or tampering with the results.
BeanOs

Covina, CA

#15504 Mar 8, 2013
Glendora, California news:

A steady group of RACISTS writers for the sgvexaminer.com have once again posted their twisted southern racists cramp-ons.

March 7 - 13, 2013 edition, page B2 an B3.

George Ogden, Ken Herman and Ken Eliasberg but another person Steve Herfert couldn't make the newspapers deadline this time but he regulary speaks at the council member for West Covina, California.

All these clowns are GOP, Republican or Tea Party bigots.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#15505 Mar 8, 2013
ThomasA wrote:
<quoted text>You're sidestepping! A BAT is a non-invasive test for alcohol content and can be administered in the field where a pee test shows either positive/negative and not whether you smoked last night or this morning. Any kind of blood testing is at the employee's expense. They would be challenging a professional testing lab rather than the employer. Any testing on the employee's part would have to be done at the same time as the first test to prevent dilluting,blocking,or tampering with the results.
How many people that drink or smoke would want to work for a North korean style company like that in the first place? DO you go around collecting the piss? Why you so worried about it? If you worry what an employee puts in their body, and work performance, sick days....etc. Do a blood test, make sure they don't smoke at home, or drink alcohol, sugar drinks, diet soda drinks, popcorn candy, maybe have a curfew so they get enough sleep at night. lol...keep it up....lol
ThomasA

Birmingham, AL

#15506 Mar 8, 2013
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>How many people that drink or smoke would want to work for a North korean style company like that in the first place? DO you go around collecting the piss? Why you so worried about it? If you worry what an employee puts in their body, and work performance, sick days....etc. Do a blood test, make sure they don't smoke at home, or drink alcohol, sugar drinks, diet soda drinks, popcorn candy, maybe have a curfew so they get enough sleep at night. lol...keep it up....lol
You're rambling and babbling! Try again when you come down tomorrow.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Patterson Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
What's that factory west of I-5 at Crow's Landing? (Apr '06) May 17 V Frankenstein 99
News Little Mr. Apricot Flips Off Crowd, Loses Title (Jul '06) Apr 27 Sydney Loyd 5
News Newman Community Shocked by Mysterious Deadly S... (Oct '17) Oct '17 Erar311 1
News Mom of dead teen chooses forgiveness over anger (Mar '07) Jul '17 Joe paioni 7
News Patterson High Seeks Peace After Gang Brawl (Sep '07) Dec '16 Lawrence 12
Apartments??? (Dec '16) Dec '16 NSS 1
News Vallejo teenager drowns in San Joaquin River; c... (Sep '07) Oct '16 waste of time 27

Patterson Jobs

Personal Finance

Patterson Mortgages