Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

[Rose_NoHo]

151K posts, and not one good argument against gay marriage.

[Mike DiRucci]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

151K posts, and not one good argument against gay marriage.

Or for it.

[KiMare]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

151K posts, and not one good argument against gay marriage.

151k posts.

Not one valid reason to equate redumbant couples with marriage.

:-)

[akpilot]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
akpilot's only tactic - avoid debating my argument and try to insult me

You want a cracker?

BTW, we are still waiting for that compelling argument you claim to have presented.

[akpilot]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
All people are inherently unequal. That's not the issue. The 14th Amendment grants all US citizens equal rights.

Yes Rose, everyone is equally able to marry one person of the opposite sex. Your point?

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
The issue is marriage. A man has the right to marry a woman, so a woman should have that same right. A woman has the right to marry a man, so a man should have that same right.

The fact that you feel that way, doesn't make it an equal rights issue. It simply a question of inclusion.

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
<quoted text>
The Court says there is a right to marry in Loving v VA.

No, Skinner v Oklahoma said marriage was a "right"- Loving V Virginia extended that right to interracial couples. Loving v Virginia had nothing to do with marriage being a "right", that had already been decided.

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
<quoted text>
There will be gay marriage in all 50.

Perhaps

[Rose_NoHo]

akpilot wrote:

<quoted text>
You want a cracker?

Oh, now you are insulting my bf, too.

akpilot wrote:

BTW, we are still waiting for that compelling argument you claim to have presented.

akpilot's only tactic - avoid debating my argument and try to insult me

[Rose_NoHo]

akpilot wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes Rose, everyone is equally able to marry one person of the opposite sex. Your point?

That's like saying everyone was equally able to marry one person of the same race before Loving v VA.
Stupid, my point is that a man doesn't have the same right a woman does, the right to marry a man. And a woman doesn't have the same right a man does, the right to marry a woman.

akpilot wrote:

The fact that you feel that way, doesn't make it an equal rights issue. It simply a question of inclusion.
<quoted text>
No, Skinner v Oklahoma said marriage was a "right"- Loving V Virginia extended that right to interracial couples. Loving v Virginia had nothing to do with marriage being a "right", that had already been decided.
<quoted text>
Perhaps

Loving v VA stated marriage is a right.
Why lie? It's so easy to look it up.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/histori...

[Here Is One]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
You can't tell a woman from a man. If you ever were to get off of your computer and go talk to people IRL, that could prove embarrassing. But, I'm sure you never will.

The vast majority here say you look like a man.........

Add to it your skanky ghetto tranny ho foul mouth and yes ..........We know you are a guy...

[KochState]

Republicans stand on the cusp of delivering a major blow to organized labor, a right to work state.

[Lililth_Satans_B ore]

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
The vast majority here say you look like a man.........
Add to it your skanky ghetto tranny ho foul mouth and yes ..........We know you are a guy...

and everyone here knows your an idiot

[Rose_NoHo]

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
The vast majority here say you look like a man.........
Add to it your skanky ghetto tranny ho foul mouth and yes ..........We know you are a guy...

You can't tell a woman from a man. You are so pathetic, you even have to ask other people. They tell you "man", just to laugh at what an idiot you are. It's a good thing you don't have any social life at all. It would really embarrassing, your inability to tell the difference between women and men.

[Quickers]

The former FL police officer robbed drug dealers and then killed them and witnesses.

At his 1988 trial, Pardo admitted to the killings, saying he was ridding the streets of the "scum of the earth."

Quick and easy??

[akpilot]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes it was, you lying b!tch.

Since Rose can't seem to remember our conversation, I will help her out.

akpilot wrote:

<quoted text>
Isn't it cute, the queen of calling people- Bigots, LOLSERS (Whatever that is), Condumbs (Whatever they are), racist, and homophobes- is crying about being attacked.
You poor little baby Rose.

http://www.topix.com/forum/city/fairfield-ca/...

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
LOLSER = LOL + LOSER
LOL = Laugh Out Loud
LOSER = akpilot.
<quoted text>
It's a play on words...
Con(servative) dumb...
Condumb (condom)
Get it now?
<quoted text>
I'm just pointing out the fact that you don't have any real arguments, so you just attack me.
So, come up with a real argument.

http://www.topix.com/forum/city/fairfield-ca/...

akpilot wrote:

<quoted text>
Funny how Rose does everything in her post which she accuses others of doing.
How about you present an actual argument Rose and stop trying to be funny. You aren't any better at that than you are at sounding intelligent.

http://www.topix.com/forum/city/fairfield-ca/...

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
Take notes this time, stupid.
Two words:
Equal rights.
You can't argue against that, so you'll just call me names.
Now, if only I were this good at predicting lottery numbers.:)

http://www.topix.com/forum/city/fairfield-ca/...

Now watch her perfectly implement Tactic #6

Rose tactic #1- Act stupid-(not so sure it is an act)
Rose Tactic #2- Misdirect
Rose Tactic #3- Make stupid comments until opposition is tired of replying then claim victory
Rose Tactic #4- Attack the poster- scream Racist, Bigot, Homophobe
Rose Tactic #5- Act intelligent by making silly statistical references such as- Most people who have anal sex are straight-
Rose Tactic #6- Falsely accuse others of lies- when proven wrong through links to previous posts revert back to tactics 2 and 4.
Rose Tactic #7- Claim to have made an argument, then claim others can't counter the argument that doesn't actually exist.

[Mike DiRucci]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
You can't tell a woman from a man. You are so pathetic, you even have to ask other people. They tell you "man", just to laugh at what an idiot you are. It's a good thing you don't have any social life at all. It would really embarrassing, your inability to tell the difference between women and men.

No. That's not it. It's because you look like a man. Trust us toots. Nice athletic leg but it's definitely man leg.

[Calenders]

Experts say the U.S. Supreme Court likely will force the federal government to recognize same-sex marriages in 2013.

[Rose_NoHo]

akpilot wrote:

<quoted text>
Since Rose can't seem to remember our conversation, I will help her out.
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/fairfield-ca/...
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/fairfield-ca/...
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/fairfield-ca/...
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/fairfield-ca/...
Now watch her perfectly implement Tactic #6
Rose tactic #1- Act stupid-(not so sure it is an act)
Rose Tactic #2- Misdirect
Rose Tactic #3- Make stupid comments until opposition is tired of replying then claim victory
Rose Tactic #4- Attack the poster- scream Racist, Bigot, Homophobe
Rose Tactic #5- Act intelligent by making silly statistical references such as- Most people who have anal sex are straight-
Rose Tactic #6- Falsely accuse others of lies- when proven wrong through links to previous posts revert back to tactics 2 and 4.
Rose Tactic #7- Claim to have made an argument, then claim others can't counter the argument that doesn't actually exist.

LOLSER.
Your only tactic, avoid debate, and try to insult me.

[akpilot]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
LOLSER.
Your only tactic, avoid debate, and try to insult me.

Looks like you are the one avoiding Rose. You failed to answer for your lies.

[akpilot]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh, now you are insulting my bf, too.

WTF are you blabbing about now Rose?

[akpilot]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>

Loving v VA stated marriage is a right.
Why lie? It's so easy to look it up.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/histori...

Yes Rose, it's easy to look up, not so easy for you to comprehend.

You do realize why Loving V Virginia referenced Skinner V Oklahoma when making the statement that marriage was a "right" don't you? Because that was the SOURCE..

It's OK puppet, we don't expect much from you.

[Rose_NoHo]

akpilot wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes Rose, it's easy to look up, not so easy for you to comprehend.
You do realize why Loving V Virginia referenced Skinner V Oklahoma when making the statement that marriage was a "right" don't you? Because that was the SOURCE..
It's OK puppet, we don't expect much from you.

Um, stupid, are you trying to deny Loving v VA states marriage is a right?