catgirl

Fishers, IN

#347 May 11, 2011
I'm coming in on late on this... for those who think he's involved, can you tell me what you think his motive might be? Did he ever date her, etc.? TY
April

Gainesboro, TN

#348 May 11, 2011
Everyone makes mistakes. If anyone out there has made a mistake and would like to just come forward and apologize...I think the community would forgive you. Just Come Forward and Apologize...that's all you have to do.
ShinyThings

Indianapolis, IN

#349 May 11, 2011
CC from MI wrote:
<quoted text>
You are right. Blink is Shannon Moser Stoy, a public relations rep from NJ. No LE background or expertise. She was removed from Websleuths for her shenanigans. I am not saying she is not sincere in her desire to help. But she has no inside track. LE typically does not give confidential info to web bloggers. They may do so with carefully cultivated local journalists whom they trust, or national figures such as John Walsh. I enjoy reading her site, but recognize its limitations.
Unless LE is utilizing social media / public relations as a tool in their efforts.
flower

Russell, KY

#350 May 11, 2011
Caveat wrote:
<quoted text>
Let me help! All you have to do is set up a hotmail or yahoo account and use it for posting, then you can delete the account. It's an easy way to remain safe online, too. So you can defend yourself, and still maintain privacy.
Just one bit of advice, as well. Your first part of the post sounded good, but the ending, where you got ugly about Blink really takes points off your credibility. Mean and/or nasty is not the way to go.
Oh, and INFO, I'm not Blink either, so you can save your mean remarks. I wish this kid well, if he's truly innocent, and I hope for his sake, and his daughter's sake, that he was not involved.
STFU Blink....and I'm not INFO
CC from MI

Dearborn Heights, MI

#351 May 11, 2011
ShinyThings wrote:
<quoted text>
Unless LE is utilizing social media / public relations as a tool in their efforts.
I do believe they monitor social media. I do not believe they share info with site administrators. What astounds me is that LE is sharing NOTHING in this case with any local or national news media. Either they know nothing (which I doubt) or they know too much to give even a hint of.
please STOP

Jackson, TN

#352 May 11, 2011
flower wrote:
<quoted text>STFU Blink....and I'm not INFO
it wasn't blink it was websleuths. please stop the distraction.
Toldyouso

Oakland, CA

#353 May 11, 2011
please STOP wrote:
<quoted text>
it wasn't blink it was websleuths. please stop the distraction.
What's "it" refer to?
Outsider

Georgetown, KY

#354 May 11, 2011
catgirl wrote:
I'm coming in on late on this... for those who think he's involved, can you tell me what you think his motive might be? Did he ever date her, etc.? TY
Could this be what LE is waiting on, a motive?

Since: May 11

Location hidden

#355 May 11, 2011
zoey wrote:
<quoted text>
you were doing the same thing with FB. what's up with that?
I don't have a FB anymore and therefore I am unable to look at anyone's FB, so that wasn't me, dear.

Since: May 11

Location hidden

#356 May 11, 2011
Really lady wrote:
<quoted text>
This sounds oddly like "NIKI's" posts from earlier...hmmm
ZOMG! It is Niki, Columbo.
flower

Russell, KY

#357 May 11, 2011
please STOP wrote:
<quoted text>
it wasn't blink it was websleuths. please stop the distraction.
blink, websleuths-tomatOH, TomAHto
Amylnitrite

United States

#358 May 11, 2011
Curious Det, I believe you have made an accurate assessment. Also, if you re-read all of JD's posts, in a forum named exclusively for him, at no time, and having so many opportunities to do so, he did not say, "I didn't do it" which is the best denial. And the shortest and easiest way to deny an assumption. Yet, he ranted about all sorts of stuff.
BridgettBoo

Decatur, AR

#359 May 11, 2011
Curious Det wrote:
<quoted text>
No, I questioned you and I'm questioning your motives as well. After 15 years of studying sociopaths and dealing with them first hand I'm quite sure of my thoughts on this matter.
You question everyone's motives...under different names and on different threads...all about Holly.
I've been silently reading. Each time someone shares an idea, makes a comment, ask a question, you get nasty. What are you here for? Do you get your jollies upseting folks who care? The reason people are on here is because they do not have enough facts.
maybe they can put something together that will explain what happened, at least in their mind.
The person in the post who commented for Jon to shut up, saustin (i think right name), is also connected to some of the questions boys. There is people on this site who do not want others finding clues and they interupt each time a path gets started. Ignore the negative people! Locals are even attempting to make a local blog in hopes we can keep these people off. All are not trolls....some do not want the truth to be found.
Also Dodd needs a lawyer. Weather he was drunk or stupid in his writings last night, this is a case that will be hung on someone as soon as they find a fit. I do not say he is innocent. I say for the safety of all. I want the right one caught. Not the most stupid.
Whoever pulled this off is smart. Now go back and read.
tooty

Decatur, AR

#360 May 11, 2011
Outsider wrote:
<quoted text>
Could this be what LE is waiting on, a motive?
That is the reasoning to local people. That he has no connection with her. He knew her parents and brother, everyone knows. But no one locally can figure out a connection. No stalking her or calling her anyone knows of and even the type of girl he seems to date are opposite in looks than Holly.
Maybe the possibility of more than one and she found out something she should not have. Maybe an accident, just a scare tactic gone bad?
A few posts back, one person told him to shut up like he was told to and quit running off at the mouth. It might be worth checking his affiliation.(saustin maybe)
Smart Bean

Mount Juliet, TN

#361 May 11, 2011
Amylnitrite wrote:
Curious Det, I believe you have made an accurate assessment. Also, if you re-read all of JD's posts, in a forum named exclusively for him, at no time, and having so many opportunities to do so, he did not say, "I didn't do it" which is the best denial. And the shortest and easiest way to deny an assumption. Yet, he ranted about all sorts of stuff.
You and Curious Det have him tried and convicted. You're going to be eating a lot of crow when this over. Mark my words Karma is a B**ch and you get what you give in this world. Has it occurd to you that there are other possibilites? Have you looked into them?
Smart Bean

Mount Juliet, TN

#362 May 11, 2011
Lets stick to
[u]What We Know[/u]
Brother cannot or will not identify abductor
Mother’s initial response to public appeared deceptive (not saying it was – saying appeared)
Father’s initial response appeared genuine stating it must have been someone familiar with their schedule
LE not releasing 911 calls
LE not releasing blood DNA information
LE not releasing info on other evidence found
LE suspending public searches with massive volunteers on hand
Family not addressing media on a regular basis
Family not speaking at volunteer functions
Family sequestered / protected
Family’s last statement to public seemed scripted
Requests to public for only private property to be searched
Family not attending prayer vigils
LE holding sexual offender that may be involved

LE still suspects she is in the local area (on what grounds??) They have to be basing that off of something they know. It is more than apparent by their actions that LE does not want public involvement.

IMO: If I was the mom I’d be screeching,“Give me my daughter back”. There wouldn’t be a day gone by without seeing my face and hearing my plea even if it had to be from a private room with LE standing guard.

In a small town of 2000 with a family that seems to be nice yet quite and in touch with their community, you would think that LE could narrow down a suspect list to less than 20 and probably less than that considering the evidence they are not disclosing. I would think that everyone who owns property in that area has searched it.
Toldyouso

Oakland, CA

#363 May 11, 2011
mama2three wrote:
JonDodd...if this is you...I am willing to give you the benefit of the doubt until proven otherwise, however, I do recommend, if you do not have a lawyer, please get one. If you do have a lawyer, please consult your lawyer before further posting in any public places such as here.
If you are truly innocent, I would hate for your words here to be twisted around and used against you. And by posting here, you are just adding more fuel to the Blink fire.
People have already formed their opinions of you. Like others have said, no matter what you say, your words will not be good enough for some people so it isn't even worth your breath. It will just end up making you seem even more guilty.
If you know any information about the case, I ask that you tell the appropriate authorities. You are the only one who knows your truths.
Do you post on Blink's site under the name Mom3.0? Similar names, similar content, but a distinguishably different tone. If so, it seems you have an
odd personality. If not, apologies.
Caveat

Irrigon, OR

#364 May 11, 2011
flower wrote:
<quoted text>STFU Blink....and I'm not INFO
Although your witty, intelligent, complex and highly original retort just bowled me over, I was able to right myself to assure you that I'm truly not Blink.
Curious Det

Birmingham, AL

#365 May 11, 2011
BridgettBoo wrote:
<quoted text>
You question everyone's motives...under different names and on different threads...all about Holly.
I've been silently reading. Each time someone shares an idea, makes a comment, ask a question, you get nasty. What are you here for? Do you get your jollies upseting folks who care? The reason people are on here is because they do not have enough facts.
maybe they can put something together that will explain what happened, at least in their mind.
The person in the post who commented for Jon to shut up, saustin (i think right name), is also connected to some of the questions boys. There is people on this site who do not want others finding clues and they interupt each time a path gets started. Ignore the negative people! Locals are even attempting to make a local blog in hopes we can keep these people off. All are not trolls....some do not want the truth to be found.
Also Dodd needs a lawyer. Weather he was drunk or stupid in his writings last night, this is a case that will be hung on someone as soon as they find a fit. I do not say he is innocent. I say for the safety of all. I want the right one caught. Not the most stupid.
Whoever pulled this off is smart. Now go back and read.
Sorry, but you must have me mixed up with someone else
Curious Det

Birmingham, AL

#366 May 11, 2011
Amylnitrite wrote:
Curious Det, I believe you have made an accurate assessment. Also, if you re-read all of JD's posts, in a forum named exclusively for him, at no time, and having so many opportunities to do so, he did not say, "I didn't do it" which is the best denial. And the shortest and easiest way to deny an assumption. Yet, he ranted about all sorts of stuff.
Thanks and you are spot on as well!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Parsons Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Authorities: 20 Year old Holly Bobo Abducted in... (Apr '11) 35 min Not Going There 249,305
Sidebar 44 min G Who 468
Candace Horn Fri intrio 6
News Possible plea deal discussed in Holly Bobo's sl... Fri Not Going There 23
mary from food giant (Dec '12) Feb 21 Venus 6
Terry Pirtle Feb 21 A little 3
Love what matters Feb 19 Love what matters 1

Parsons Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Parsons Mortgages