I am not going to school you on the difference between evidence and non-evidence. If you are interested, the library will be a better educational opportunity than asking me.<quoted text>
The only thing the public knows is Adams property was searched, he was arrested and LE claims he threatened someone possibly his brother.
Other than that at this point there is no evidence supported by credentials.
There are many stories told by Clint is that the noise you are referring to?
Mark my post this won't go to trial a deal will be made and the truth will be hidden to save quite a few folks rumps!
I am referring to evidence that is reported by LE or other proven credible sources. We do no from previous cases that much unannouced evidence is held by LE prior to the trial. Therefore, we do infer at times, based on LE's actions, that evidence is driving their actions or lack thereof. There is no evidence that ZA's property was searched prior to the search which lead to his arrest. If a search did occur, as you suggest, during the generic searches for Holly you cannot equate those searches with searches by LE that is linked to specific evidence linked to a person or property.
Your post has been marked and your opinion noted.