sorry for cut.If Hitler said of Axis-of-evil, nuclear weapons issue and WMD of others, these would be Hitler programs.
Imagine Bush as a neo-Hitler hypocrite by lying about WMD (for aggression like Hitler) by war to Iraq, there are still neo-radicals like Obama and Putin to continuously carry the war criminal Bush programs about nuclear weapons and WMD issues.
Still, history never wakes up to the awareness of continuous neo-Hitler alike programs, being alike as Bush calling on North Korea and Iran. In other words, they are still doing the following and enforcement of Bush's call on nuclear weapons issue on North Korea and Iran--just like neo-Nazis are still doing the following of Hitler doctrine and programs after WWII.
think that North Korea and Iran would use nukes if they have the magnitude and difference between nuke weapons and other WMD, such as chemical and biological weapons.
To certain extent, sarin gas is not that dynamically dangerous in measurement of the destruction effects, but it is not to say sarin gas is not poisonous either. But, nuclear weapons today are at least one billion times heavier in destruction ratio than chemical weapons from nuclear radiation and environmental demolishing globally.
Obama was a total crazy radical by calling redline on Syria in the first place. Whether what he said of the August 21 case of Syria using sarin gas might be another serious lie, this would register in history as another evil case of lying to strike Syria, just like Iraq by Bush, despite it did not materialize. Regardless whether it actualized or not, the lying by Obama to Syria to make war is the point of the subject.
There you have it--Putin is another neo-Bush (as a follower of Bush at the current time by calling and doing the same Bush things on North Korea and Iran), just like Obama. Again,what has this Pillsbury Dolby big-boy President Kim with a young beautiful wife of North Korea done, other than listening to some music by GANGNAM man PSY and playing video games after inspecting some military regiments and factories? Is Iran really dangerous and not US, because Bush said so, in what way?
US wanted to snatch and stop Snowden by creating International chaos and disorder.
Here you go again, won't you believe it and ain't they true--to put it in perspective wording, are these such things true to you or not in your beliefs?
Funny thing, the Russian Bear knew Nuclear war would destroy everything so they ramped up Chemical and Biological weaponry thinking that one day they could wipe out the entire USA and wait until the Chems/Bio dissipates and then move in to all our infrastructure.
General Abizaid: We Can Live with a Nuclear Iran
September 17, 2007 http://tinyurl.com/3xvs7p
ABC News' Jonathan Karl Reports: In contrast to U.S. officials who have consistently called a nuclear Iran unthinkable, former CENTCOM commander John Abizaid told reporters Monday that he believes the United States could live with a nuclear Iran.
"There are ways to live with a nuclear Iran," Abizaid said. "I believe we have the power to deter Iran if they go nuclear" he said, just as we deterred the Soviet Union and China. "Iran is not a suicidal nation. Nuclear deterrence would work with Iran."
Even so, Abizaid said the U.S. keep up the pressure to try to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons because that would lead to further nuclear proliferation in the region. Asked if bombing Iran would be an option, he said, "We should not preclude any option" but: "War would be devastating to everyone, and we should avoid it to every extent we can."
Abizaid's comments came in response to questions following a news-less speech to the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.