Old gas pumps can't handle ever-rising prices
Comments
|
Better start making the kit's to go to 9.999 becaus eit's about 2 years away
|
|
|
I was amused that North Dakota required "signs to alert costumers.." about the half gallon pricing. So if you provide theatrical clothes, you'll been warned!
Just goes to show that even the Tribune editors don't read the Trib. |
|
|
If anything, it'd be a nice gesture for the gas companies to give back some of the billions they are raking in to support those in their own industry.
|
|
Very good idea, Tom. OK, How do we talk them into it? |
|
|
Back in the late 70's when the price of gas first hit $1.00, most gas pumps at the time could not register a price above .999. I remember half gallon pricing being used at several gas stations around Rockford, IL until the pumps could be modified.
|
|
Joined: Mar 17, 2008 Comments: 13 |
I have the simplest and, IMHO, the very BEST solution to their fuel pump pricing quandary. Why don't they just convert their stations to liter pricing? The USA is the *ONLY* country left on the planet that does not use those units, it is very simple to do - those old pumps are fully capable of doing that - and I have my full faith in the ability of my fellow USAians to know what it is.
Mike |
|
I'll have a liter of cola.
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 19, 2007 Comments: 1996 Tidewater, VA ISP: Suffolk, VA |
Gas companies like Exxon are ONLY making an 8.3% profit! The industry standard is 7.1%. Exxon paid the US Government $23 Billion Dollars in taxes already this past quarter alone! |
Make mine two litres of scotch please. |
|
For the uninitiated a liter is roughly the same size as a U.S. quart(33oz to a liter 32.5 oz for a U.S.quart). The conversion would keep mom and pop stations in business. |
|
Somebody's bored with their homework and came out here to play GROW UP |
|
Tim, what's that aboot, eh? A litre is 33.8 ounces, not 33; a U.S. quart is 32 oz., not 32.5. Take off, you hoser! Beauty, eh? Just kidding you a bit, Tim. I like Canada just fine except for the cruel and inhumane baby seal hunt. |
|
|
Sales by the liter have already been tried, and it confused just about everyone.
Besides, the oil companies have become Masters at passing along any and all cost increases to the consumer. They'll just do the same for the cost of the new pumps. Spare us the crocodile tears. |
|
What a tool! |
|
What's Litreacola? LOL |
|
Interesting and thanks for that post. Our younger peers here probably have no idea how bad it was with the Carter fiasco. Gas lines and rationing because he was a weak, mewling idiot. Well, some things really never change... What kills me is that the democrat congress still refuses to permit any domestic drilling that would alleviate the issue of supply and oil futures. Tap a couple of major sites and oil futures plummet. I guess the rats are making too much money and it's a great election issue for them. Even if they are the one's primarily responsible for it since they've stonewalled new efforts to drill. |
|
|
Just change it to 4.00 a QUART
|
|
|
I pumped 389$ for 78 gallons into my 27 foot CC at Lauderdale Marina, and those pumps are pretty old... get with the times man!
|
|
I, too, remember the oil shocks of the 70s. Odd and even days, lines of cars around the block, the first time the dial went above $1.00/gallon. Crazy times. The US has historically under-paid for gasoline.(I know, I know: we all think we pay too much in gas taxes, but we don't really compared to the rest of the world.) The oil shocks of the 70s were the free market's reaction to OPEC's tightening of supplies. If you think the price rise in the 70s was Carter's fault because he was a "mewling idiot", then shouldn't Bush have cleared up this current situation by now? Surely he's no "mewling idiot" and can set OPEC straight, right? Or are you going to blame the "democrat" congress for that as well? You place far too much faith in so-called "major sites" to tap for future oil. I see your point about oil futures, but say a new field were tapped -- sure, it might provide some immediate downward pressure on futures, but historically they're based on long-term, not short-term, perceptions. And in the long-term, the US doesn't have many options left to drill its own oil. And isn't it time to stop blaming the "democrat" Congress? The Republicans had a rubber-stamp majority for 6 years under Bush, and you didn't see too much progress in that area, did you? Oh right, it was because the Democrats blocked it, wasn't it? |
|
Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.
| Topic | Updated | Last By | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Palo Alto police chief says remarks about stopp... | 8 hr | imho_in my h... | 9 |
| Man shot, killed in East Palo Alto | 8 hr | SAC ST MONSTA | 96 |
| Sinus Patients Can Breathe Easier With New Balloon (from Apr '08) | 10 hr | Jim | 2 |
| Surenos gang member gets new trial date | Nov 15 | Paul Shykor... | 88 |
| Sun Micro cutting 6,000 jobs - Santa Cruz Sentinel | Nov 14 | THANKS GIs | 9 |
| East Palo Alto sees two shootings in one day | Nov 14 | jjj4 | 6 |
| East Palo Alto Woman In Car Crash Had Been Shot (from Jan '07) | Nov 14 | Right back a... | 85 |


52°F