Texas mother devastated by deadly car...

Texas mother devastated by deadly car crash

There are 9 comments on the KRGV story from Jun 24, 2008, titled Texas mother devastated by deadly car crash. In it, KRGV reports that:

An attorney for a McKinney mother says she's devastated by a deadly car crash that killed five people, including her two children.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at KRGV.

Hmmm

Little Elm, TX

#1 Jun 26, 2008
Maybe if the natural mother would have been a real mother to those kids instead of getting them taken away from her she would still have her kids and wouldnt be grieving.

Since: Jul 07

Indianapolis

#2 Jun 26, 2008
Hmmm wrote:
Maybe if the natural mother would have been a real mother to those kids instead of getting them taken away from her she would still have her kids and wouldnt be grieving.
Good Point. They only remove children from a home that is not safe. She's only grieving now for the attention. Her spokesman is her attorney. Why did she contact an attorney; perhaps, if she could convince a court that she is really a loving mother, grieving for those two children, she will receive some financial compensation for her loss.

She sure as hell doesn't need an attorney to grieve. What an opportunistic, piece of feces.

Allen Texas

San Antonio, TX

#3 Jun 28, 2008
You all need to pray for her as well as the lost of the others. You all need JESUS
Hmmm

Little Elm, TX

#4 Jun 28, 2008
Allen Texas wrote:
You all need to pray for her as well as the lost of the others. You all need JESUS
No, YOU can pray for her. She is a worthless person for having her kids taken away. You can go preach your jesus stuff to her.

Since: Jul 07

Indianapolis

#5 Jul 13, 2008
Hmmm wrote:
<quoted text>
No, YOU can pray for her. She is a worthless person for having her kids taken away. You can go preach your jesus stuff to her.
I couldn't have said it better myself! Thanks!
Angel

Falls Church, VA

#6 Jul 14, 2008
Wow, how uncaring! She's a mother who lost her children. She has to be going through a hard time. In fact, I bet the fact that she lost her children and that led to her demise, probably makes it that much harder on her. I think she needs sympathy more than anything. I don't think it's fair to judge her, when you have no idea the circumstances that led to her children being taken away from her. Everyone makes mistakes.

Also, I think the statement about her having a lawyer and being opportunistic, is kinda silly. She had her children taken away from her and was in the process of trying to regain custody. Usually, when there are custody issues, it involves the court and a judge. Typically, in those situations people tend to hire lawyers to deal with it. It would be likely to assume that she had the lawyer to deal with the custody issues long before her children passed away. She's a grieving mother for goodness sakes.
SUNSHINE5247 ARDMORE OK

Mounds, OK

#7 Jul 15, 2008
I BELIEVE JESUS HAD A PLAN FOR THOSE GIRLS KEVINNISHA AND RAVEN AND IT WAS NOT WITH THE MOTHER. I KNOW FOR FACT THE FATHER OF KEVINNISHA WAS MORE THAN WILLING TO TAKE HIS DAUGHTER BUT PAM HAD MORE SAY SO AND DOWN TALK HIM. WELL HE HAS A NAME RICKY GARZA OF MCKINNEY. WELL BACK TO THE POINT PAM WAS NOT GETTING THE GIRLS BACK NOR HER SON. THOSE CHILDERN DO NOT DESERVE WHAT SHE WAS PUTTING THEM THOUGH. I AM REALLY UPSET FOR ALL THE NEWS PAPERS AND TV TO MAKE HER PAM SEEM LIKE SHE LOVED THOSE BABIES NO NO NO SHE DID NOT I KNOW YOU DO NOT LET THINGS AS ULGY AS THEY WERE HAPPEN TO YOUR OWN BLOOD ALL THE ABUSE ALL THE SIGNS ALL HURT AND PAIN THE KIDS HAD TO GO THREW SHE SHOULD OF NEVER GOT THE CHANC TO BE APART OF THERE LIFES. SHE IS VERY MENTAL AND NO ONE IS SEEN THAT.WE LOVE YOU MOLLY AND RAVEN MAY U BOTH SHINE WITH JESUS NANA
SUNSHINE5247 ARDMORE OK

Mounds, OK

#8 Jul 15, 2008
Hmmm wrote:
Maybe if the natural mother would have been a real mother to those kids instead of getting them taken away from her she would still have her kids and wouldnt be grieving.
SHE DID NOT KNOW HOW TO BE A MOTHER SHE OLNY GOT PG WITH THE CHILDREN TO KEEP THE MAN AND THERE WERE MANY AND HER AND HER WANTA BE BED FRIENDS WERE ABUSEIVE IN MANY WAYS THEY MENT SO MUCH TO OTHERS THEIR SMILE IS WHAT WE MISS MOST PAM NEEDS TO JUST STAY ALONE LIKE DOCTORS SAID BEFORE SHE IS KRAZY

Since: Jul 07

Indianapolis

#9 Jul 22, 2008
Angel wrote:
Wow, how uncaring! She's a mother who lost her children. She has to be going through a hard time. In fact, I bet the fact that she lost her children and that led to her demise, probably makes it that much harder on her. I think she needs sympathy more than anything. I don't think it's fair to judge her, when you have no idea the circumstances that led to her children being taken away from her. Everyone makes mistakes.

Also, I think the statement about her having a lawyer and being opportunistic, is kinda silly. She had her children taken away from her and was in the process of trying to regain custody. Usually, when there are custody issues, it involves the court and a judge. Typically, in those situations people tend to hire lawyers to deal with it. It would be likely to assume that she had the lawyer to deal with the custody issues long before her children passed away. She's a grieving mother for goodness sakes.
Yeah, yeah, yeah! "We all make mistakes???" From what planet did you spring? Since you also do 'not' know under what circumstances her children were removed; how can you make such a ridiculous statement as 'we all make mistakes'?

The only facts about which I am sure is that children are removed from a home where the mother is consistently, either negligent or abusive; and neither one of these are 'mistakes'. Perhaps your children were also victims of negligence and/or abuse; which would explain your empathy for this low-life mother. Children aren't removed
from homes because parents make 'mistakes'.

A mistake is locking your keys in the car or leaving home without your wallet; and one does not lock their keys in the car repeatedly. Therefore, certain behaviors which endanger children, on a daily basis, are 'NOT MISTAKES'.

Has it occurred to you, that without children in the home, the mother's benefits may have been terminated; and the absence of financial aid could possibly be the motivation to regain custody?

Children are only removed from homes when their health and well-being is threatened and their environment presents a potential danger.. You can be assured that the woman for whom you have so much sympathy, is not worthy of it.

I suggest you perform some research on the subject before that 'bleeding heart' of yours bleeds out.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Palmer Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
two double murders go unsolved (Jan '11) Jun 16 Guest 17
The Evidence Against Bill N. Fry (Aug '12) Jun 4 Alex 3
dog fecies Jun 2 Charles Winters 4
Lost sister. Tami lyn Robertson (Mar '12) Mar '17 Bridgesmom 3
Catherine Dade Clegg (Dec '16) Dec '16 Real Estate Search 1
Ennis Music Thread (Oct '13) Nov '16 Musikologist 9
Palmer Music Thread (Sep '13) Nov '16 Musikologist 9

Palmer Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Palmer Mortgages