California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legalization Initiative

Created by CitizenTopix on Oct 7, 2010

19,196 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

Other (explain below)

Mr Anderson

Anderson, CA

#14082 Dec 20, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Impeachment is the sole power of the House.(Art 1 sec 2 U.S. Constitution).
An impeachment cannot "fail the votes" in the Senate. The Senate does not have that power.
You are wrong. Clinton was impeached. It did not fail.
still banging your head against that same old wall??

eh rainmikey.

go to Kmart much??
Big D

Modesto, CA

#14083 Dec 20, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
You've dishonestly changed your original assertion "Clinton's impeachment failed" to "...the intents and objectives failed" Those are two very different things.
You have been dishonest in this argument, I have not.
I have been clear from the beginning Liar Mike
Yes he was impeached
After being Impeached by the house the impeachment was a total failure, in that it did not achieve a single objective that was listed in the impeachment
You keep trying to change the subject, that isn’t going to work, I am saying the same thing I said in the beginning.
He was impeached
And that impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it failed the votes in the Senate and not a single objective written in the Impeachment was fulfilled, absolute and total failure.
Go ahead Liar Mike, find a post where I said he was not impeached, or conversely go to your history books and show that the impeachment was successful in removing Clinton from office as was stated in the impeachment as its intent.
It either succeeded in removing him from office as was stated in the Impeachment, or it was a failure… which is it Liar Mike?
I am going to stop writing new replies as it now seems I can just copy and paste my last reply to everything you say as you have no new information to add, and cannot contradict what I am and have been saying
GMR crash

West Covina, CA

#14084 Dec 20, 2012
Over the side and take a slide.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#14085 Dec 20, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I have been clear from the beginning Liar Mike
Yes he was impeached
After being Impeached by the house the impeachment was a total failure, in that it did not achieve a single objective that was listed in the impeachment
You keep trying to change the subject, that isn’t going to work, I am saying the same thing I said in the beginning.
He was impeached
And that impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it failed the votes in the Senate and not a single objective written in the Impeachment was fulfilled, absolute and total failure.
Go ahead Liar Mike, find a post where I said he was not impeached, or conversely go to your history books and show that the impeachment was successful in removing Clinton from office as was stated in the impeachment as its intent.
It either succeeded in removing him from office as was stated in the Impeachment, or it was a failure… which is it Liar Mike?
I am going to stop writing new replies as it now seems I can just copy and paste my last reply to everything you say as you have no new information to add, and cannot contradict what I am and have been saying
You've dishonestly changed your original assertion "Clinton's impeachment failed" to "...the intents and objectives failed" Those are two very different things.

You also dishonestly imply that I supported his impeachment. You have been very dishonest in this argument, I have not, yet you call me a liar but give no evidence.

Clinton was impeached. It did not fail. You are wrong and dishonest.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#14086 Dec 20, 2012
Mr Anderson wrote:
<quoted text>
still banging your head against that same old wall??
eh rainmikey.
go to Kmart much??
Anyone know what this dopey post is supposed to mean?

old walls? rainmikey? Kmart?

Nevermind. Who cares?

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#14087 Dec 20, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
... the impeachment was a total failure, in that it did not achieve a single objective that was listed in the impeachment
Please tell us what objectives were "listed in the impeachment".

We won't wait.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#14088 Dec 20, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Please tell us what objectives were "listed in the impeachment".
We won't wait.
I have been clear from the beginning Liar Mike
Yes he was impeached
After being Impeached by the house the impeachment was a total failure, in that it did not achieve a single objective that was listed in the impeachment
You keep trying to change the subject, that isn’t going to work, I am saying the same thing I said in the beginning.
He was impeached
And that impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it failed the votes in the Senate and not a single objective written in the Impeachment was fulfilled, absolute and total failure.
Go ahead Liar Mike, find a post where I said he was not impeached, or conversely go to your history books and show that the impeachment was successful in removing Clinton from office as was stated in the impeachment as its intent.
It either succeeded in removing him from office as was stated in the Impeachment, or it was a failure… which is it Liar Mike?
I am going to stop writing new replies as it now seems I can just copy and paste my last reply to everything you say as you have no new information to add, and cannot contradict what I am and have been saying

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#14089 Dec 20, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I have been clear from the beginning Liar Mike
Yes he was impeached
After being Impeached by the house the impeachment was a total failure, in that it did not achieve a single objective that was listed in the impeachment
You keep trying to change the subject, that isn’t going to work, I am saying the same thing I said in the beginning.
He was impeached
And that impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it failed the votes in the Senate and not a single objective written in the Impeachment was fulfilled, absolute and total failure.
Go ahead Liar Mike, find a post where I said he was not impeached, or conversely go to your history books and show that the impeachment was successful in removing Clinton from office as was stated in the impeachment as its intent.
It either succeeded in removing him from office as was stated in the Impeachment, or it was a failure… which is it Liar Mike?
I am going to stop writing new replies as it now seems I can just copy and paste my last reply to everything you say as you have no new information to add, and cannot contradict what I am and have been saying
You've dishonestly changed your original assertion "Clinton's impeachment failed" to "...the intents and objectives failed" Those are two very different things.

Why is that?

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#14090 Dec 20, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I have been clear from the beginning Liar Mike
Yes he was impeached
After being Impeached by the house the impeachment was a total failure, in that it did not achieve a single objective that was listed in the impeachment
You keep trying to change the subject, that isn’t going to work, I am saying the same thing I said in the beginning.
He was impeached
And that impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it failed the votes in the Senate and not a single objective written in the Impeachment was fulfilled, absolute and total failure.
Go ahead Liar Mike, find a post where I said he was not impeached, or conversely go to your history books and show that the impeachment was successful in removing Clinton from office as was stated in the impeachment as its intent.
It either succeeded in removing him from office as was stated in the Impeachment, or it was a failure… which is it Liar Mike?
I am going to stop writing new replies as it now seems I can just copy and paste my last reply to everything you say as you have no new information to add, and cannot contradict what I am and have been saying
Please tell us those "objectives listed in the impeachment".

We're still waiting.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#14091 Dec 20, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
You've dishonestly changed your original assertion "Clinton's impeachment failed" to "...the intents and objectives failed" Those are two very different things.
Why is that?
I have been clear from the beginning Liar Mike
Yes he was impeached
After being Impeached by the house the impeachment was a total failure, in that it did not achieve a single objective that was listed in the impeachment
You keep trying to change the subject, that isn’t going to work, I am saying the same thing I said in the beginning.
He was impeached
And that impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it failed the votes in the Senate and not a single objective written in the Impeachment was fulfilled, absolute and total failure.
Go ahead Liar Mike, find a post where I said he was not impeached, or conversely go to your history books and show that the impeachment was successful in removing Clinton from office as was stated in the impeachment as its intent.
It either succeeded in removing him from office as was stated in the Impeachment, or it was a failure… which is it Liar Mike?
I am going to stop writing new replies as it now seems I can just copy and paste my last reply to everything you say as you have no new information to add, and cannot contradict what I am and have been saying

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#14092 Dec 20, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I have been clear from the beginning Liar Mike
Yes he was impeached
After being Impeached by the house the impeachment was a total failure, in that it did not achieve a single objective that was listed in the impeachment
You keep trying to change the subject, that isn’t going to work, I am saying the same thing I said in the beginning.
He was impeached
And that impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it failed the votes in the Senate and not a single objective written in the Impeachment was fulfilled, absolute and total failure.
Go ahead Liar Mike, find a post where I said he was not impeached, or conversely go to your history books and show that the impeachment was successful in removing Clinton from office as was stated in the impeachment as its intent.
It either succeeded in removing him from office as was stated in the Impeachment, or it was a failure… which is it Liar Mike?
I am going to stop writing new replies as it now seems I can just copy and paste my last reply to everything you say as you have no new information to add, and cannot contradict what I am and have been saying
You've dishonestly changed your original assertion "Clinton's impeachment failed" to "...the intents and objectives failed".

Those are two very different things.

And then you call me a liar with no evidence whatsoever. You won't even tell us what the alleged lie is!

Nice! Liberals. Fair and balanced! Imagine if you clowns were completely in charge without the House protecting us from this stuff?

Too Funny!
Pavers

West Covina, CA

#14093 Dec 20, 2012
Has anyone seen that loudmouthed boy wonder of the Republican party John B.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#14094 Dec 20, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
You've dishonestly changed your original assertion "Clinton's impeachment failed" to "...the intents and objectives failed".
Those are two very different things.
And then you call me a liar with no evidence whatsoever. You won't even tell us what the alleged lie is!
Nice! Liberals. Fair and balanced! Imagine if you clowns were completely in charge without the House protecting us from this stuff?
Too Funny!
I have been clear from the beginning Liar Mike
Yes he was impeached
After being Impeached by the house the impeachment was a total failure, in that it did not achieve a single objective that was listed in the impeachment
You keep trying to change the subject, that isn’t going to work, I am saying the same thing I said in the beginning.
He was impeached
And that impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it failed the votes in the Senate and not a single objective written in the Impeachment was fulfilled, absolute and total failure.
Go ahead Liar Mike, find a post where I said he was not impeached, or conversely go to your history books and show that the impeachment was successful in removing Clinton from office as was stated in the impeachment as its intent.
It either succeeded in removing him from office as was stated in the Impeachment, or it was a failure… which is it Liar Mike?
I am going to stop writing new replies as it now seems I can just copy and paste my last reply to everything you say as you have no new information to add, and cannot contradict what I am and have been saying
NightIce

West Covina, CA

#14095 Dec 20, 2012
Light bulb, Holthaus - never knows what he posts about. At the time of the accident and weather conditions before and after the accident, I would suggest to the light bulbs - that black ice was the major player in this accident.

Here is one the more well know "light bulbs" who post from Glendora, California in the glendorapatch.com

If there is a sliver of truth or logic trying to cme from this poster, it went over the side at the last GMR accident December 19, 2012..

""B.K. Holthaus

This argument arises every time there's an accident on GMR. Get over it. There will always be poor drivers who make bad decisions. Nothing can change that.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#14096 Dec 20, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I have been clear from the beginning Liar Mike
Yes he was impeached
After being Impeached by the house the impeachment was a total failure, in that it did not achieve a single objective that was listed in the impeachment
You keep trying to change the subject, that isn’t going to work, I am saying the same thing I said in the beginning.
He was impeached
And that impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it failed the votes in the Senate and not a single objective written in the Impeachment was fulfilled, absolute and total failure.
Go ahead Liar Mike, find a post where I said he was not impeached, or conversely go to your history books and show that the impeachment was successful in removing Clinton from office as was stated in the impeachment as its intent.
It either succeeded in removing him from office as was stated in the Impeachment, or it was a failure… which is it Liar Mike?
I am going to stop writing new replies as it now seems I can just copy and paste my last reply to everything you say as you have no new information to add, and cannot contradict what I am and have been saying
You are wrong. Clinton was impeached.

Why have you lied and changed your argument? Are you going to defend it? Guess you cannot.

You lose.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#14097 Dec 20, 2012
I have been clear from the beginning Liar Mike
Yes he was impeached
After being Impeached by the house the impeachment was a total failure, in that it did not achieve a single objective that was listed in the impeachment
You keep trying to change the subject, that isn’t going to work, I am saying the same thing I said in the beginning.
He was impeached
And that impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it failed the votes in the Senate and not a single objective written in the Impeachment was fulfilled, absolute and total failure.
Go ahead Liar Mike, find a post where I said he was not impeached, or conversely go to your history books and show that the impeachment was successful in removing Clinton from office as was stated in the impeachment as its intent.
It either succeeded in removing him from office as was stated in the Impeachment, or it was a failure… which is it Liar Mike?
I am going to stop writing new replies as it now seems I can just copy and paste my last reply to everything you say as you have no new information to add, and cannot contradict what I am and have been saying

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#14098 Dec 20, 2012
Big D wrote:
I have been clear from the beginning Liar Mike
Yes he was impeached
After being Impeached by the house the impeachment was a total failure, in that it did not achieve a single objective that was listed in the impeachment
You keep trying to change the subject, that isn’t going to work, I am saying the same thing I said in the beginning.
He was impeached
And that impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it failed the votes in the Senate and not a single objective written in the Impeachment was fulfilled, absolute and total failure.
Go ahead Liar Mike, find a post where I said he was not impeached, or conversely go to your history books and show that the impeachment was successful in removing Clinton from office as was stated in the impeachment as its intent.
It either succeeded in removing him from office as was stated in the Impeachment, or it was a failure… which is it Liar Mike?
I am going to stop writing new replies as it now seems I can just copy and paste my last reply to everything you say as you have no new information to add, and cannot contradict what I am and have been saying
You say the "objectives and intent listed in the impeachment failed."

Please tell us what these objections and intents were.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#14099 Dec 20, 2012
Big D wrote:
I have been clear from the beginning Liar Mike
Yes he was impeached
After being Impeached by the house the impeachment was a total failure, in that it did not achieve a single objective that was listed in the impeachment
You keep trying to change the subject, that isn’t going to work, I am saying the same thing I said in the beginning.
He was impeached
And that impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it failed the votes in the Senate and not a single objective written in the Impeachment was fulfilled, absolute and total failure.
Go ahead Liar Mike, find a post where I said he was not impeached, or conversely go to your history books and show that the impeachment was successful in removing Clinton from office as was stated in the impeachment as its intent.
It either succeeded in removing him from office as was stated in the Impeachment, or it was a failure… which is it Liar Mike?
I am going to stop writing new replies as it now seems I can just copy and paste my last reply to everything you say as you have no new information to add, and cannot contradict what I am and have been saying
You are wrong. Clinton was impeached. It did not fail.
SSOOTP

West Covina, CA

#14100 Dec 20, 2012
What was that again, Same Stupid Out Of Town Postrs.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#14101 Dec 20, 2012
Here's a chance to get back on topic without that jackass "Big D" constantly badgering us with wild off topic stories of Clinton's impeachment failing!

What's with Obama saying that recreational use is cool in WA and CO but meanwhile in CA he's threatening Harborside's landlord with forfeiture of property?

Hooray to the City of Oakland! Even though they're doing it mostly because they like the tax money.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2012/12...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Palm Springs Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
CA Jury reaches verdict in Oakland BART shooting t... (Jul '10) 3 hr theos 2,276
CA Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) 3 hr mix an match 200,976
Perrotte gains support for early release (Jun '07) 21 hr ET SNELL 26
CA California seeks to ban free, single-use carryo... (Jun '10) 22 hr free for all 5,081
Do you approve of Mary Bono Mack as Representat... (Jul '12) Sat marcella williams 4
CA CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming (Oct '10) Sat surfs up 7,955
Scottish-Americans mixed on keeping kingdom united Sat James 3
•••
•••
•••

Palm Springs Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Palm Springs People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Palm Springs News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Palm Springs
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••