California Proposition 19: the Mariju...

California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legalization Initiative

Created by CitizenTopix on Oct 7, 2010

19,668 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

Other (explain below)

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#14087 Dec 20, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
... the impeachment was a total failure, in that it did not achieve a single objective that was listed in the impeachment
Please tell us what objectives were "listed in the impeachment".

We won't wait.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#14088 Dec 20, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Please tell us what objectives were "listed in the impeachment".
We won't wait.
I have been clear from the beginning Liar Mike
Yes he was impeached
After being Impeached by the house the impeachment was a total failure, in that it did not achieve a single objective that was listed in the impeachment
You keep trying to change the subject, that isn’t going to work, I am saying the same thing I said in the beginning.
He was impeached
And that impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it failed the votes in the Senate and not a single objective written in the Impeachment was fulfilled, absolute and total failure.
Go ahead Liar Mike, find a post where I said he was not impeached, or conversely go to your history books and show that the impeachment was successful in removing Clinton from office as was stated in the impeachment as its intent.
It either succeeded in removing him from office as was stated in the Impeachment, or it was a failure… which is it Liar Mike?
I am going to stop writing new replies as it now seems I can just copy and paste my last reply to everything you say as you have no new information to add, and cannot contradict what I am and have been saying

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#14089 Dec 20, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I have been clear from the beginning Liar Mike
Yes he was impeached
After being Impeached by the house the impeachment was a total failure, in that it did not achieve a single objective that was listed in the impeachment
You keep trying to change the subject, that isn’t going to work, I am saying the same thing I said in the beginning.
He was impeached
And that impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it failed the votes in the Senate and not a single objective written in the Impeachment was fulfilled, absolute and total failure.
Go ahead Liar Mike, find a post where I said he was not impeached, or conversely go to your history books and show that the impeachment was successful in removing Clinton from office as was stated in the impeachment as its intent.
It either succeeded in removing him from office as was stated in the Impeachment, or it was a failure… which is it Liar Mike?
I am going to stop writing new replies as it now seems I can just copy and paste my last reply to everything you say as you have no new information to add, and cannot contradict what I am and have been saying
You've dishonestly changed your original assertion "Clinton's impeachment failed" to "...the intents and objectives failed" Those are two very different things.

Why is that?

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#14090 Dec 20, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I have been clear from the beginning Liar Mike
Yes he was impeached
After being Impeached by the house the impeachment was a total failure, in that it did not achieve a single objective that was listed in the impeachment
You keep trying to change the subject, that isn’t going to work, I am saying the same thing I said in the beginning.
He was impeached
And that impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it failed the votes in the Senate and not a single objective written in the Impeachment was fulfilled, absolute and total failure.
Go ahead Liar Mike, find a post where I said he was not impeached, or conversely go to your history books and show that the impeachment was successful in removing Clinton from office as was stated in the impeachment as its intent.
It either succeeded in removing him from office as was stated in the Impeachment, or it was a failure… which is it Liar Mike?
I am going to stop writing new replies as it now seems I can just copy and paste my last reply to everything you say as you have no new information to add, and cannot contradict what I am and have been saying
Please tell us those "objectives listed in the impeachment".

We're still waiting.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#14091 Dec 20, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
You've dishonestly changed your original assertion "Clinton's impeachment failed" to "...the intents and objectives failed" Those are two very different things.
Why is that?
I have been clear from the beginning Liar Mike
Yes he was impeached
After being Impeached by the house the impeachment was a total failure, in that it did not achieve a single objective that was listed in the impeachment
You keep trying to change the subject, that isn’t going to work, I am saying the same thing I said in the beginning.
He was impeached
And that impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it failed the votes in the Senate and not a single objective written in the Impeachment was fulfilled, absolute and total failure.
Go ahead Liar Mike, find a post where I said he was not impeached, or conversely go to your history books and show that the impeachment was successful in removing Clinton from office as was stated in the impeachment as its intent.
It either succeeded in removing him from office as was stated in the Impeachment, or it was a failure… which is it Liar Mike?
I am going to stop writing new replies as it now seems I can just copy and paste my last reply to everything you say as you have no new information to add, and cannot contradict what I am and have been saying

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#14092 Dec 20, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I have been clear from the beginning Liar Mike
Yes he was impeached
After being Impeached by the house the impeachment was a total failure, in that it did not achieve a single objective that was listed in the impeachment
You keep trying to change the subject, that isn’t going to work, I am saying the same thing I said in the beginning.
He was impeached
And that impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it failed the votes in the Senate and not a single objective written in the Impeachment was fulfilled, absolute and total failure.
Go ahead Liar Mike, find a post where I said he was not impeached, or conversely go to your history books and show that the impeachment was successful in removing Clinton from office as was stated in the impeachment as its intent.
It either succeeded in removing him from office as was stated in the Impeachment, or it was a failure… which is it Liar Mike?
I am going to stop writing new replies as it now seems I can just copy and paste my last reply to everything you say as you have no new information to add, and cannot contradict what I am and have been saying
You've dishonestly changed your original assertion "Clinton's impeachment failed" to "...the intents and objectives failed".

Those are two very different things.

And then you call me a liar with no evidence whatsoever. You won't even tell us what the alleged lie is!

Nice! Liberals. Fair and balanced! Imagine if you clowns were completely in charge without the House protecting us from this stuff?

Too Funny!
Pavers

West Covina, CA

#14093 Dec 20, 2012
Has anyone seen that loudmouthed boy wonder of the Republican party John B.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#14094 Dec 20, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
You've dishonestly changed your original assertion "Clinton's impeachment failed" to "...the intents and objectives failed".
Those are two very different things.
And then you call me a liar with no evidence whatsoever. You won't even tell us what the alleged lie is!
Nice! Liberals. Fair and balanced! Imagine if you clowns were completely in charge without the House protecting us from this stuff?
Too Funny!
I have been clear from the beginning Liar Mike
Yes he was impeached
After being Impeached by the house the impeachment was a total failure, in that it did not achieve a single objective that was listed in the impeachment
You keep trying to change the subject, that isn’t going to work, I am saying the same thing I said in the beginning.
He was impeached
And that impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it failed the votes in the Senate and not a single objective written in the Impeachment was fulfilled, absolute and total failure.
Go ahead Liar Mike, find a post where I said he was not impeached, or conversely go to your history books and show that the impeachment was successful in removing Clinton from office as was stated in the impeachment as its intent.
It either succeeded in removing him from office as was stated in the Impeachment, or it was a failure… which is it Liar Mike?
I am going to stop writing new replies as it now seems I can just copy and paste my last reply to everything you say as you have no new information to add, and cannot contradict what I am and have been saying
NightIce

West Covina, CA

#14095 Dec 20, 2012
Light bulb, Holthaus - never knows what he posts about. At the time of the accident and weather conditions before and after the accident, I would suggest to the light bulbs - that black ice was the major player in this accident.

Here is one the more well know "light bulbs" who post from Glendora, California in the glendorapatch.com

If there is a sliver of truth or logic trying to cme from this poster, it went over the side at the last GMR accident December 19, 2012..

""B.K. Holthaus

This argument arises every time there's an accident on GMR. Get over it. There will always be poor drivers who make bad decisions. Nothing can change that.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#14096 Dec 20, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I have been clear from the beginning Liar Mike
Yes he was impeached
After being Impeached by the house the impeachment was a total failure, in that it did not achieve a single objective that was listed in the impeachment
You keep trying to change the subject, that isn’t going to work, I am saying the same thing I said in the beginning.
He was impeached
And that impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it failed the votes in the Senate and not a single objective written in the Impeachment was fulfilled, absolute and total failure.
Go ahead Liar Mike, find a post where I said he was not impeached, or conversely go to your history books and show that the impeachment was successful in removing Clinton from office as was stated in the impeachment as its intent.
It either succeeded in removing him from office as was stated in the Impeachment, or it was a failure… which is it Liar Mike?
I am going to stop writing new replies as it now seems I can just copy and paste my last reply to everything you say as you have no new information to add, and cannot contradict what I am and have been saying
You are wrong. Clinton was impeached.

Why have you lied and changed your argument? Are you going to defend it? Guess you cannot.

You lose.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#14097 Dec 20, 2012
I have been clear from the beginning Liar Mike
Yes he was impeached
After being Impeached by the house the impeachment was a total failure, in that it did not achieve a single objective that was listed in the impeachment
You keep trying to change the subject, that isn’t going to work, I am saying the same thing I said in the beginning.
He was impeached
And that impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it failed the votes in the Senate and not a single objective written in the Impeachment was fulfilled, absolute and total failure.
Go ahead Liar Mike, find a post where I said he was not impeached, or conversely go to your history books and show that the impeachment was successful in removing Clinton from office as was stated in the impeachment as its intent.
It either succeeded in removing him from office as was stated in the Impeachment, or it was a failure… which is it Liar Mike?
I am going to stop writing new replies as it now seems I can just copy and paste my last reply to everything you say as you have no new information to add, and cannot contradict what I am and have been saying

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#14098 Dec 20, 2012
Big D wrote:
I have been clear from the beginning Liar Mike
Yes he was impeached
After being Impeached by the house the impeachment was a total failure, in that it did not achieve a single objective that was listed in the impeachment
You keep trying to change the subject, that isn’t going to work, I am saying the same thing I said in the beginning.
He was impeached
And that impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it failed the votes in the Senate and not a single objective written in the Impeachment was fulfilled, absolute and total failure.
Go ahead Liar Mike, find a post where I said he was not impeached, or conversely go to your history books and show that the impeachment was successful in removing Clinton from office as was stated in the impeachment as its intent.
It either succeeded in removing him from office as was stated in the Impeachment, or it was a failure… which is it Liar Mike?
I am going to stop writing new replies as it now seems I can just copy and paste my last reply to everything you say as you have no new information to add, and cannot contradict what I am and have been saying
You say the "objectives and intent listed in the impeachment failed."

Please tell us what these objections and intents were.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#14099 Dec 20, 2012
Big D wrote:
I have been clear from the beginning Liar Mike
Yes he was impeached
After being Impeached by the house the impeachment was a total failure, in that it did not achieve a single objective that was listed in the impeachment
You keep trying to change the subject, that isn’t going to work, I am saying the same thing I said in the beginning.
He was impeached
And that impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it failed the votes in the Senate and not a single objective written in the Impeachment was fulfilled, absolute and total failure.
Go ahead Liar Mike, find a post where I said he was not impeached, or conversely go to your history books and show that the impeachment was successful in removing Clinton from office as was stated in the impeachment as its intent.
It either succeeded in removing him from office as was stated in the Impeachment, or it was a failure… which is it Liar Mike?
I am going to stop writing new replies as it now seems I can just copy and paste my last reply to everything you say as you have no new information to add, and cannot contradict what I am and have been saying
You are wrong. Clinton was impeached. It did not fail.
SSOOTP

West Covina, CA

#14100 Dec 20, 2012
What was that again, Same Stupid Out Of Town Postrs.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#14101 Dec 20, 2012
Here's a chance to get back on topic without that jackass "Big D" constantly badgering us with wild off topic stories of Clinton's impeachment failing!

What's with Obama saying that recreational use is cool in WA and CO but meanwhile in CA he's threatening Harborside's landlord with forfeiture of property?

Hooray to the City of Oakland! Even though they're doing it mostly because they like the tax money.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2012/12...

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#14102 Dec 20, 2012
SSOOTP wrote:
What was that again, Same Stupid Out Of Town Postrs.
WTF is "San Dimas"? Is that the psycho wing at San Quentin or something?
The Flag is

West Covina, CA

#14103 Dec 20, 2012
Once again the idiot Tea Party is about to crash the system, it's is all to apparent that the Tea Party needs to be outlawed and declared a danger to all american citizen's.

It;s another big defeat for John Boehner, Republicans party because they have nixed his fiscal "Plan B," because they didn't have the votes to pass it.

The bill would have raised taxes on incomes over $1 million per year.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#14104 Dec 20, 2012
The Flag is wrote:
Once again the idiot Tea Party is about to crash the system, it's is all to apparent that the Tea Party needs to be outlawed and declared a danger to all american citizen's.
It;s another big defeat for John Boehner, Republicans party because they have nixed his fiscal "Plan B," because they didn't have the votes to pass it.
The bill would have raised taxes on incomes over $1 million per year.
Stop making such a big fuss about it puss. It's not going to save anything. Drink some more Moochelle-kool aid fool.
Mr Anderson

Anderson, CA

#14105 Dec 20, 2012
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>Stop making such a big fuss about it puss. It's not going to save anything. Drink some more Moochelle-kool aid fool.
anything or anyone who might offer some other point of veiw, is a threat to you and you must demonize it somehow...

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#14106 Dec 20, 2012
Mr Anderson wrote:
<quoted text>
anything or anyone who might offer some other point of veiw, is a threat to you and you must demonize it somehow...
All he does is spit hate at a different view. And is scared to debate. Is that a hero to you?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Palm Springs Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Costco readies for new opening (Dec '06) Jul 26 Maria Anderson 157
Desert Hot Springs Police Dept. Great Public Se... Jul 17 Dorris 7
News Man petitions road name change to mend racial t... Jul 11 inewsmaster 1
Review: jumpers zone party rentals Jul 9 Yaneth 1
News SC Labs wins contract to test pot for Palm Springs Jul 9 LOLbumps 1
Plus Size clothes - Draper's & Damon's Jun '15 Tracy 2
Complaint CATHEDRAL CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT (Jan '08) Jun '15 Mr Jon Doe 49
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Palm Springs Mortgages