Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,361

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story
K goodbye

Sierra Madre, CA

#228932 Feb 10, 2014
We have had this talk before.

Shut down this stink hole of a topic, America has already embraced it so to the other FAH - bend over and take one good kiss goodbye.
K goodbye

Sierra Madre, CA

#228933 Feb 10, 2014
We have had this talk before.

Shut down this stink hole of a topic.

America has already embraced it, so to the other FAH - bend over and take one good kiss goodbye.

Your stupity has won you, NOTHING.

Go home and pickle your brains or what's left of them after you drill a hole through them.
The Crew

Sierra Madre, CA

#228936 Feb 10, 2014
U.S. District Court judge David C. Bury handed down the sentence, 360 months with credit for time served.

The shootout erupted just north of the Arizona border city of Nogales as Osorio-Arellanes and four other men who are accused of sneaking into the country to rob marijuana smugglers approached Terry and three other agents who were targeting such rip-off crews.

Osorio-Arellanes was wounded in the shootout and was the only person arrested at the scene. Four other alleged rip-off crew members fled to Mexico. Two of the four are now in Mexican custody, while two others remain fugitives.

Osorio-Arellanes maintains he was not the shooter who killed Terry, and prosecutors agree that evidence supports his claim.

Judged:

23

23

1

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#228938 Feb 11, 2014
We see again an attempt to dumb down marriage to a contract. Managed by the government no less.

Marriage has always been a relationship between a man and woman with inseparable integrity with all cultures and religions.

At its most basic essence, marriage is rooted as a cross cultural constraint on functioning evolutionary mating behavior.

Ss couples are a failure of mating behavior making ss marriage an oxymoron at the most foundational level.

If you remove procreation as a key purpose of marriage, you give special rights to select couples that are prohibited for no reason to an individual or any number of individuals. Prejudicial discrimination.
Six_Of_One wrote:
<quoted text>
How then do you explain the very fact that laws about marriage exist and are regulated by the government?
You are arguing this issue and you don't know?

The rights and privileges of marriage were established to protect children and mothers. It is to a nation's best interest to provide the very best setting for the foundational relationship of society. Hence the last paragraph of my post.

Now my question again;

What prevailing interest does government have to selectively give marriage special rights and privileges if procreation is not considered?

Judged:

15

15

15

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#228939 Feb 11, 2014
K goodbye wrote:
We have had this talk before.
Shut down this stink hole of a topic.
America has already embraced it, so to the other FAH - bend over and take one good kiss goodbye.
Your stupity has won you, NOTHING.
Go home and pickle your brains or what's left of them after you drill a hole through them.
Bingo.

Ss couples are still only ever mutually sterile, pointlessly duplicate gendered halves of marriage.

Ss marriage is an oxymoron.

Judged:

14

14

14

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
The crew

Sierra Madre, CA

#228940 Feb 11, 2014
This site has a lot of pop ups, guess it's littered with virus's too!
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#228941 Feb 11, 2014
The crew wrote:
This site has a lot of pop ups, guess it's littered with virus's too!
Install a pop up blocker dummy.

Judged:

14

14

14

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
LaTrina Jimbabwe

Sonoma, CA

#228942 Feb 11, 2014
What do this folks know about the teapartty ayatollahs meeting is at? They aint saying but I wanna go and join them guys as they has got the right ideas and also they is christian which is what I am and we gotta stand together to stop the war on xmas from winning. whatever it is; we aginst it.

Judged:

14

14

14

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Nov 13

Location hidden

#228944 Feb 11, 2014
KiMare wrote:
We see again an attempt to dumb down marriage to a contract. Managed by the government no less....
How then do you explain the very fact that laws about marriage exist and are regulated by the government?
Last time I asked you this you didn't answer.
.
KiMare wrote:
...Marriage has always been a relationship between a man and woman with inseparable integrity with all cultures and religions.
At its most basic essence, marriage is rooted as a cross cultural constraint on functioning evolutionary mating behavior.
Ss couples are a failure of mating behavior making ss marriage an oxymoron at the most foundational level.
If you remove procreation as a key purpose of marriage, you give special rights to select couples that are prohibited for no reason to an individual or any number of individuals. Prejudicial discrimination...
Copy and paste spam that never ceases to bring you bizarre joy.....
.
KiMare wrote:
...<quoted text>
You are arguing this issue and you don't know?...
The quoted text was a question ("How then do you explain the very fact that laws about marriage exist and are regulated by the government?") that you decided not to give an answer to. How do you twist that in your mind to me not knowing the issue exactly?
.
KiMare wrote:
...The rights and privileges of marriage were established to protect children and mothers. It is to a nation's best interest to provide the very best setting for the foundational relationship of society. Hence the last paragraph of my post....?
More spam.*yawn*
.
KiMare wrote:
...Now my question again;
What prevailing interest does government have to selectively give marriage special rights and privileges if procreation is not considered?
Answer: government does not have the ability to give the right of marriage since it is a basic human right. Goverment chooses to regulate the practice of marriage by collecting fees in exchange for marriage licenses and government makes the rules of who gets one.

A far more interesting question would be why does the governement want to be in the business of regulating marriages at all?

Since: Nov 13

Location hidden

#228945 Feb 11, 2014
rabnew wrote:
<quoted text>
Latrine is it?.......there is a thread for you elsewhere.
Hi rabnew. This thread does seem to be slowing way down. Would love tips on other forums to check out if you have others that you would like to suggest... cheers ;-)

Since: Nov 13

Location hidden

#228947 Feb 11, 2014
rabnew wrote:
<quoted text>
Hiya Six.....what time is it over there? I'll inbox you :-(
Almost noon, goin to lunch. caio!
K goodbye

Sierra Madre, CA

#228948 Feb 11, 2014
We have had this talk many times before.

Shut down this stink hole of a topic.

America has already embraced it, so to the other FAH - bend over and take one good kiss goodbye.

Your stupity has won you, NOTHING.

Go home and pickle your brains or what's left of them after you drill a hole through them.

Judged:

15

14

1

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#228949 Feb 11, 2014
Six_Of_One wrote:
<quoted text>

More spam.*yawn*
.
<quoted text>
Answer: government does not have the ability to give the right of marriage since it is a basic human right. Goverment chooses to regulate the practice of marriage by collecting fees in exchange for marriage licenses and government makes the rules of who gets one.
A far more interesting question would be why does the governement want to be in the business of regulating marriages at all?
1. Hardly spam Blondie, that's simple legal history.

2. I didn't say the government gave the right of marriage. I said it gave special privileges and rights TO marriage.

Again, on what basis does it do so while discriminating against other relationships?

Judged:

14

14

14

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Carrot

Sierra Madre, CA

#228950 Feb 11, 2014
we've had this talk many times before.

Shut down this stink hole of a topic.

America has already embraced it, so to the other FAH - bend over and take one good kiss goodbye.

Your stupity has won you, NOTHING.

Go home and pickle your brains or what's left of them after you drill a hole through them.

Since: Nov 13

Location hidden

#228951 Feb 11, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
1. Hardly spam Blondie, that's simple legal history.
2. I didn't say the government gave the right of marriage. I said it gave special privileges and rights TO marriage.
Again, on what basis does it do so while discriminating against other relationships?
You still think blondie is a put down?:-)
Sorry to break it to you but by copy and pasting the same opinion over and over countless times... well, that is the very definition of spam!

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Jake

Los Angeles, CA

#228952 Feb 11, 2014
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
Your post wasn't true. But then when did you phobes care about providing factual data to back up your claims. You don't because there isn't any proof. That's why you lose in court.
My post is very true, if you would take your out of your boyfriends stink hole you would know what is going on in the real word you homo

Judged:

14

14

14

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#228953 Feb 11, 2014
Six_Of_One wrote:
<quoted text>
You still think blondie is a put down?:-)
Sorry to break it to you but by copy and pasting the same opinion over and over countless times... well, that is the very definition of spam!
You got it Blondie.

Sorry to break it to you but by copy and pasting the same opinion over and over countless times... well, that is the very definition of spam!

Snicker.

Judged:

14

14

14

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Carrot sticks

Sierra Madre, CA

#228956 Feb 11, 2014
We've had this talk so many times before.

Shut down this stink hole of a topic.

America has already embraced it, so to the other FAH - bend over and take one good kiss goodbye.

Your stupity has won you, NOTHING.

Go home and pickle your brains or what's left of them after you drill a hole through them.
jack and george

Santa Cruz, CA

#228957 Feb 11, 2014
jack and george went up a hill holding hands
george was old and tripped on his toe
so he took him and jack tumbling down
by tmc
Fish in barrel

Sierra Madre, CA

#228958 Feb 11, 2014
This is too easy.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Palm Springs Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
mexican landscapers dump in the desert 7 hr Jean 46
stores with bad customer service {list your wor... 8 hr Bart 12
Any gay men in coachella valley, Ca. Who'd like... Thu Stella 5
Why Blame the Police for Aggressive Behavior Feb 24 Culture Auditor 5
Gated Communiies - PEEPERS aka LANDSCAPERS! - B... Feb 24 VigilanteBlonde 1
Review: Coachella Valley Collection Service Feb 24 Undyingdebt 2
Review: Utopia Management Feb 22 RonaldHirschman 1

Winter Storm Warning for Riverside County was issued at February 27 at 9:40PM PST

Palm Springs Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Palm Springs People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 11:07 pm PST