Um, stupid, I was talking about the UCLA/USC football game...<quoted text>
this is what i love about people like you.. they call others stupid and yet seem to lack critical thinking skills themselves. obviously i cant write a 50 page explanation so when posting online we all generalise. my point is based on a hypothesis.. do you know what the word hypothesis means ??? well let me explain.. nearly every scientific discovery began with an hypothesis.
Damn, I've passed gas smarter than you.this then is used to prove if something is workable or not. regarding the gay debate i hypothesised that if we were all gay humanity would cease to reproduce.[/QOUTE]
Well, if down were up, I wouldn't need a bra.
[QUOTE who="an italian in australia"]
therefore homosexuality is not conducive to future of humanity.
Again, everybody isn't going to turn gay.
And you conclusion, that homosexuality is not conducive to future of humanity, is almost as stupid as you are.
There is more to future of humanity than reproduction.
Humans are tribal animals.
And human offspring take a lot of time and resources to raise.
It's advantageous to the tribe to have several members who aren't burdened with giving birth and raising their own children.
Mostly straight.we can only ever cater to a small percentage of gays to sustain our population. which i suppose is why certain elites support gay rights. they actually want to see half the planet wiped out by aids and other diseases, for example in parts of africa now aids is killing a third of the population there.
LOL.anyway i am obviously debating with someone who is quite uneducated but opinionated.. please learn more