Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201891 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#212277 Aug 25, 2013
commonpeeps wrote:
<quoted text>Guess with her/him back (or just released) we get to relive those pitifully painful moronic days again. Woo hoo-good times.
It seems Rose_NoHo's medication has been adjusted well enough to allow her internet access again. Ah good times!~Whoop!
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#212278 Aug 25, 2013
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
Which one? Polygamy? Woman as chattel? Child weddings? Go back to banning interracial marriages? Arranged marriages?
Which form of historical marriage do you support? Or, are you willing to admit that the definition of legal marriages changes as society changes, and usually for the better.
No one is trying to change your marriage. Don't prevent mine.
Polygamy deserves the same respect and consideration as same sex marriage. Why are you a hypocrite?
Ronald

Bellflower, CA

#212279 Aug 25, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Humans are apes, what other kind of face would I have? What kind of face do you have? A dog butt face?
Rose_NoHo.

As readers to this post know full well, I love my Homosexual friends, the lesbians, my fellow dog lovers, and yes, even the Homosexual and non-Homosexual Africans. Even so, the honey of my own choosing has a cute puppy face. When he read your canineophobic post, he asked me to inquire of you what are going to do about it?

To my own mind, the issue is not those who go around spouting obvious canineophobic remarks. The issue is when is the politicized Government high court going to give my honey and I the same RIGHT to "marry" that our Homosexual friends, the lesbians, and the non-Homosexual and Homosexual Africans enjoy.

Ronald
Rocky Hudsony

Wooster, OH

#212280 Aug 25, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong. Equal protection under the law. You know, 14th Amendment...
A man can marry a woman, a woman should be able to as well. A woman can marry a man, a man should be able to as well.
No, actually they shouldn't. Nature has shown us that 2 of the same gender are not complimentary. You should know that. There are obvious differences between men and women. You should know that, too.
iIt takes 1 of each to reproduce. You should know that. The 14th Amendment granted full membership in the human race to negroes. You, of all people, should know that, as well.
commonpeeps

Monrovia, CA

#212281 Aug 25, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
No need, you keep proving it over and over. Besides, all they have to do is read back a couple pages and see for themselves.
However, the bottom line is this; Big changes are coming. Science is quickly dealing with sexual disorders. Transgendered can be fixed. Now they may be able to address homosexuality and bi-sexuality before birth with epi-genetics. In a decade, this could all have been a pointless exercise of futility.
Either way, it will be futile.
Will never happen, then they will have to return their "gay card". You know, can't fire me for doing crappy work cuz I'm gay, can't talk back to me cuz I'm gay,everyone picks on me just cuz I'm gay. Even with a free pass they'd be miserable with their own self.
Rocky Hudsony

Wooster, OH

#212282 Aug 25, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
IOW, even if I don't post for months, you can't get me out of your mind.
So, are you admitting there is no rational argument against gay marriage? That's reason enough to allow it.
You've been given plenty. You ignore them. You don't want to acknowledge them. You should provide us with reasons to allow it.
commonpeeps

Monrovia, CA

#212283 Aug 25, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
It seems Rose_NoHo's medication has been adjusted well enough to allow her internet access again. Ah good times!~Whoop!
Not so sure, sprinkles the tripper is missing and then moho appears?? Seems tranjenderic in ways.
Rocky Hudsony

Wooster, OH

#212284 Aug 25, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Then why can't I marry my sister? Or both of them?(I can never choose which one is hotter! They are both SMOKIN' HOT).
Because Chongo said you can't.
commonpeeps

Monrovia, CA

#212285 Aug 25, 2013
Rocky Hudsony wrote:
<quoted text>
No, actually they shouldn't. Nature has shown us that 2 of the same gender are not complimentary. You should know that. There are obvious differences between men and women. You should know that, too.
iIt takes 1 of each to reproduce. You should know that. The 14th Amendment granted full membership in the human race to negroes. You, of all people, should know that, as well.
Man, you plot pooper, They said I missed the equal marriage part in the 14th and I was re-reading it to see, and thought it was just me not seeing the marriage part they was talkin 'bout.Dang
commonpeeps

Monrovia, CA

#212286 Aug 25, 2013
Rocky Hudsony wrote:
<quoted text>
You've been given plenty. You ignore them. You don't want to acknowledge them. You should provide us with reasons to allow it.
You mean "because I want to" ain't enough?
Rocky Hudsony

Wooster, OH

#212287 Aug 25, 2013
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't know the difference between unrelated folks and relatives?
That's a little scary.
Understanding the difference is immaterial. What can it possibly matter, when discussing marriage?
Rocky Hudsony

Wooster, OH

#212289 Aug 25, 2013
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
Which one? Polygamy? Woman as chattel? Child weddings? Go back to banning interracial marriages? Arranged marriages?
Which form of historical marriage do you support? Or, are you willing to admit that the definition of legal marriages changes as society changes, and usually for the better.
No one is trying to change your marriage. Don't prevent mine.
I believe that Karma was making a valid point that had nothing to do with those red herrings that you threw in, in order to confuse the issue.
Even allowing your reds to stand, these include AT LEAST one of each gender.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#212291 Aug 25, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Then why can't I marry my sister? Or both of them?(I can never choose which one is hotter! They are both SMOKIN' HOT).
Your sister's standards are too high. Nobody can marry someone against their will. Nobody can marry more than one person, so that's not an equal protection issue. Should you be able to marry more than one person? Hey, why not start a forum about that subject?
Ever notice that when you tried to make an argument against gay marriage, you never actually make and argument against gay marriage? You bring up other subjects.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#212292 Aug 25, 2013
Ronald wrote:
<quoted text>
Rose_NoHo.
As readers to this post know full well, I love my Homosexual friends, the lesbians, my fellow dog lovers, and yes, even the Homosexual and non-Homosexual Africans. Even so, the honey of my own choosing has a cute puppy face. When he read your canineophobic post, he asked me to inquire of you what are going to do about it?
To my own mind, the issue is not those who go around spouting obvious canineophobic remarks. The issue is when is the politicized Government high court going to give my honey and I the same RIGHT to "marry" that our Homosexual friends, the lesbians, and the non-Homosexual and Homosexual Africans enjoy.
Ronald
Headline:
Brain eating parasites attack Ronald, starve to death.
Rocky Hudsony

Wooster, OH

#212293 Aug 25, 2013
commonpeeps wrote:
<quoted text>Man, you plot pooper, They said I missed the equal marriage part in the 14th and I was re-reading it to see, and thought it was just me not seeing the marriage part they was talkin 'bout.Dang
No. You missed nothing, as it was not about people with gender identity issues. It was about the slaves.
Rocky Hudsony

Wooster, OH

#212295 Aug 25, 2013
commonpeeps wrote:
<quoted text>You mean "because I want to" ain't enough?
No. it isn't. Unless, of course, you are gay. Then, "I want" is all that you need....

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#212296 Aug 25, 2013
Rocky Hudsony wrote:
<quoted text>
No, actually they shouldn't. Nature has shown us that 2 of the same gender are not complimentary. You should know that. There are obvious differences between men and women. You should know that, too.
iIt takes 1 of each to reproduce. You should know that.*racist slurs removed*.
But, stupid "not complimentary" is meaningless babble. There are obvious differences between any two people, even identical twins. That's not the issue. The issue is the 14th Amendment says all persons should get equal protection under the law. Even you.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#212298 Aug 25, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
For dinner tonight, I'm thinking Chik-fil-A! Pack up the whole fam-damily in the station wagon and go enjoy a delicious meal served by a fine family owned socially aware restaurant! Mmmmm!
Check out the new gay friendly menu! The chicken reach around wrap. The new fudge-packin' brownie for dessert.
Oh boy.
Good, the sooner you folks start dying off from eating that crap, the better!
BTW, most people into "fudge packing" are straight.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#212300 Aug 25, 2013
Rocky Hudsony wrote:
<quoted text>
You've been given plenty. You ignore them. You don't want to acknowledge them. You should provide us with reasons to allow it.
Liar. People just try to change the subject to polygamy or anal sex, or babble some nonsense about "complimentary".
And again, the fact there is no good reason not to allow it is reason enough to allow it.
Rocky Hudsony

Wooster, OH

#212301 Aug 25, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Your sister's standards are too high. Nobody can marry someone against their will. Nobody can marry more than one person, so that's not an equal protection issue. Should you be able to marry more than one person? Hey, why not start a forum about that subject?
Ever notice that when you tried to make an argument against gay marriage, you never actually make and argument against gay marriage? You bring up other subjects.

Here's the most basic one for you, explained without pictures:
No, actually they shouldn't. Nature has shown us that 2 of the same gender are not complimentary. You should know that. There are obvious differences between men and women. You should know that, too.
It takes 1 of each to reproduce. You should know that. The 14th Amendment granted full membership in the human race to negroes. You, of all people, should know that, as well.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Palm Springs Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Authorities: Suspect wanted for car thefts arre... 12 hr SnottyGurl 1
Jay Leno and David Thornton are dying of Syph Mon Truth 1
trump lies Sun Pasquali 3
I'm gay too Feb 18 Kinkyboy 4
Drugs on rise in Palm Springs (Sep '07) Feb 18 Lookin1234 32
Review: Coachella Valley Collection Service (Nov '14) Feb 14 MRS NUNEZ 4
hope you having fun mr pres Feb 4 grow up trump 1

Palm Springs Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Palm Springs Mortgages