Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 200,987

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#211456 Aug 22, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
More opinion... No facts... You don't even believe your own boo-shit anymore. Why should we?
Your 'we' is a bunch of idiots.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education...
just-26-percent-of-act-test-ta kers-are-prepared-for-college/ 2013/08/21/a99fba0e-0a81-11e3- 8974-f97ab3b3c677_story.html

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#211457 Aug 22, 2013
kookaa wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no such word as irregardless. You posted no truths. You posted your personal opinions.
"Definition of IRREGARDLESS
nonstandard
: regardless
Usage Discussion of IRREGARDLESS
Irregardless originated in dialectal American speech in the early 20th century. Its fairly widespread use in speech called it to the attention of usage commentators as early as 1927. The most frequently repeated remark about it is that “there is no such word.” There is such a word, however. It is still used primarily in speech, although it can be found from time to time in edited prose."

You are consistent though. Consistently wrong, but consistent.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#211458 Aug 22, 2013
KiMare wrote:
FACT 1 THAT GAYS REFUSE TO FACE:
Marriage in every single culture in human history from start to finish.
SS couples being called married? Zero.
FACT 2 THAT GAYS REFUSE TO FACE:
Anal sex is 'unnatural'.
1. Your anus was not designed for intercourse.
2. Anal intercourse is inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning.
http://www.net doctor.co.uk/sexandrelationshi ps/analsex .htm
Please note;
1. I am not denying that some hetero couples also engage in anal sex.
2. I am asserting that the ONLY truly safe and natural sex is 'traditional' sexual practices within the bounds of a monogamous marriage. Sex that is not abusive to either person's body, is not degrading and carries no inherent risks for damage, infection or disease.
3. Ss gay couples need protection to HAVE sex. Monogamous married couples need protection not to procreate. An incredible distinction, clearly not equal intimately in any sense of the word.
kookaa wrote:
<quoted text>
Will you ever stop posting the same shyt over and over and over? You have made basically that same post over 15,000 times. Enough is enough.
No.

You refuse to face the facts.

I keep putting them in your face.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#211459 Aug 22, 2013
kookaa wrote:
<quoted text>
If YOUR marriage were strong, gay marriage would be no threat to it. It would not need "defending". Perhaps that is where the problem lies...
You have no basis to know that.

Deception is always a threat. A deceptive relationship in the most critical societal relationship is a grave threat.

That my idiot friend is where the problem lies...

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#211460 Aug 22, 2013
KiMare wrote:
FACT 1 THAT GAYS REFUSE TO FACE:
Marriage in every single culture in human history from start to finish.
SS couples being called married? Zero.
FACT 2 THAT GAYS REFUSE TO FACE:
Anal sex is 'unnatural'.
1. Your anus was not designed for intercourse.
2. Anal intercourse is inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning.
http://www.net doctor.co.uk/sexandrelationshi ps/analsex .htm
Please note;
1. I am not denying that some hetero couples also engage in anal sex.
2. I am asserting that the ONLY truly safe and natural sex is 'traditional' sexual practices within the bounds of a monogamous marriage. Sex that is not abusive to either person's body, is not degrading and carries no inherent risks for damage, infection or disease.
3. Ss gay couples need protection to HAVE sex. Monogamous married couples need protection not to procreate. An incredible distinction, clearly not equal intimately in any sense of the word.
kookaa wrote:
<quoted text>
Will you ever stop posting the same shyt over and over and over? You have made basically that same post over 15,000 times. Enough is enough.
Lets hear your answer.

Why has calling ss couples married never become the norm in 8000 years of human history.

How do you defend medically harmful, unhealthy and demeaning sex that defines gays?

You could put it to rest with a logical answer.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#211461 Aug 22, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
FACT 1 THAT GAYS REFUSE TO FACE:
Marriage in every single culture in human history from start to finish.
SS couples being called married? Zero.
FACT 2 THAT GAYS REFUSE TO FACE:
Anal sex is 'unnatural'.
1. Your anus was not designed for intercourse.
2. Anal intercourse is inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning.
http://www.net doctor.co.uk/sexandrelationshi ps/analsex .htm
Please note;
1. I am not denying that some hetero couples also engage in anal sex.
2. I am asserting that the ONLY truly safe and natural sex is 'traditional' sexual practices within the bounds of a monogamous marriage. Sex that is not abusive to either person's body, is not degrading and carries no inherent risks for damage, infection or disease.
3. Ss gay couples need protection to HAVE sex. Monogamous married couples need protection not to procreate. An incredible distinction, clearly not equal intimately in any sense of the word.
<quoted text>
Lets hear your answer.
Why has calling ss couples married never become the norm in 8000 years of human history.
How do you defend medically harmful, unhealthy and demeaning sex that defines gays?
You could put it to rest with a logical answer.
Oh it is already put to rest, they are married, legally and recognized as married by law.

They won, you lost

None of them care what your opinion is because it isn't worth anything.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#211462 Aug 22, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
"Definition of IRREGARDLESS
nonstandard
: regardless
Usage Discussion of IRREGARDLESS
Irregardless originated in dialectal American speech in the early 20th century. Its fairly widespread use in speech called it to the attention of usage commentators as early as 1927. The most frequently repeated remark about it is that “there is no such word.” There is such a word, however. It is still used primarily in speech, although it can be found from time to time in edited prose."
You are consistent though. Consistently wrong, but consistent.
You didnt post the rest of it, trying to hide something?

"Its reputation has not risen over the years, and it is still a long way from general acceptance. Use regardless instead."

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#211464 Aug 22, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
You didnt post the rest of it, trying to hide something?
"Its reputation has not risen over the years, and it is still a long way from general acceptance. Use regardless instead."
I simply proved that there is such a word, and it is used.
Saddle Up

Monrovia, CA

#211465 Aug 22, 2013
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2013/...

This Homeland Security Employee Is Preparing for a Coming Race War.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#211466 Aug 22, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I simply proved that there is such a word, and it is used.
and left out the part where it is not a generally accepted word, and the dictionary mentions using the word regardless instead.

This speaks volumes about you
Big D

Modesto, CA

#211467 Aug 22, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I simply proved that there is such a word, and it is used.
Don’t get me wrong, I could care less what words you use and I took your meaning ( as stupid as it was )

You can use the word irreguardless all day long and I won’t care, that isnt the point.

It is only quoting a part of what the dictionary said that is very telling about you. It is exactly the same way you use your bible.

Pick and choose, use this phrase, but not that phrase.

We will mention this from the old testament, but we won’t mention words that Christ used at all as it wouldn’t support your hate campaign.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#211468 Aug 22, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
and left out the part where it is not a generally accepted word, and the dictionary mentions using the word regardless instead.
This speaks volumes about you
Irregardless, you were wrong, I was right.
Gustavo

Harbor City, CA

#211469 Aug 22, 2013
suzanne henderson wrote:
For your information, we did not get any information from Pat Robertson, for we do not even listen to his program at all. We told the forum that we got our information from a organization of which we support on all the topics that they are involved with. It is called ( saveCalifornia.com ), but the site is "NOT BORN THAT WAY". Pat Robertson may support this group of which we are not aware of, but that is not the issue here. Lesbians can be cured and I have heard many testimonies that homosexuals left that sin and had a difficult time forgiving themselves and also asking God to forgive them, but they did come out of the closet and became straight again. God loves you and he can heal you for God is the Creator of all things and he did not create homosexuals as we stated in the our last thread. He created a perfect world and then man began to disobey Him.
Here is proof: Ask Frankie Rizzo, because he was NOT BORN THAT WAY! right Frankie
Big D

Modesto, CA

#211470 Aug 22, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Irregardless, you were wrong, I was right.
I never said it wasn’t, you are wrong

I am talking about your picking and choosing which parts of the dictionary ( or bible ) you decide to quote or leave out to try and make yourselves right.

That is the telling part about you.
Gustavo

Harbor City, CA

#211471 Aug 22, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh it is already put to rest, they are married, legally and recognized as married by law.
They won, you lost
None of them care what your opinion is because it isn't worth anything.
Your real problems are just starting.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#211472 Aug 22, 2013
Gustavo wrote:
<quoted text>
Your real problems are just starting.
I doubt that, prop 8 didn’t affect me in any way at all personally, I don’t happen to be gay.

But I do support my fellow Americans because I believe in this country, liberty, freedom and justice.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#211473 Aug 22, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
You are free to have your preference
My problem is the more I look at history, the more damage I see has been done. As a human being, I cannot help but despise it
But I do agree about Suzanne, I honestly don’t think she understands the damage she causes. Nor do I think you will get her to look at herself one little bit. She is indoctrinated to the point that she thinks she is in possession of knowledge others do not have, she is looking down at you from on high in her mind, she is deluded beyond redemption.
You are not going to make any progress with a psychosis like that.
It reminds me of something Carl Sagan once said
“One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back.”
Religion can be a force for good or evil. Its very easy to dismiss it as evil, but those who in the West who do so fail to understand Western Civilization would not be what it is without Christianity in general, and Catholicism in particular.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#211474 Aug 22, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I doubt that, prop 8 didn’t affect me in any way at all personally, I don’t happen to be gay.
But I do support my fellow Americans because I believe in this country, liberty, freedom and justice.
And he wears Superman depends!
Big D

Modesto, CA

#211475 Aug 22, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Religion can be a force for good or evil. Its very easy to dismiss it as evil, but those who in the West who do so fail to understand Western Civilization would not be what it is without Christianity in general, and Catholicism in particular.
Yes it can

And I don’t only limit it to cults of Christianity either

I will grant you that Christianity and Catholicism specifically have probably done the most harm. But they are not alone, Islam is trying to catch up, but they are still a couple hundred years of harm behind.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#211477 Aug 22, 2013
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>
Yea western society would already have total equality and be 200 years into future in tech and progress. Religion of any kind has been worst invention man ever created. Wish all religion would go away. Until it does there will be war and hate and violence.
200?

I could make a case for 1000 years lost, starting with the burning of the library at Alexandria

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Palm Springs Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
CA CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming (Oct '10) 5 hr ForkBelly 7,962
CA California seeks to ban free, single-use carryo... (Jun '10) 11 hr Flaggstaff 5,083
CA Jury reaches verdict in Oakland BART shooting t... (Jul '10) Sun theos 2,276
Perrotte gains support for early release (Jun '07) Sat ET SNELL 26
Do you approve of Mary Bono Mack as Representat... (Jul '12) Sep 20 marcella williams 4
Scottish-Americans mixed on keeping kingdom united Sep 20 James 3
CA California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legali... (Oct '10) Sep 18 Pizza 16,000
•••
•••
•••

Palm Springs Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Palm Springs People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Palm Springs News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Palm Springs
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••