Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Read more: www.cnn.com 201,862

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Read more

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#197931 Jun 25, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
You were hardly speaking of me?!? I'm sorry, did I misunderstand when you asked what I would lose or what I would gain if "cured" of homosexuality? You were absolutely talking about me when you discussed a "cure".--FACT #1
Homosexuality is not a "condition".--FACT #2
No legitimate scientist in any field has ever suggested that homosexuality is an evolutionary mating behavior defect.--FACT #3
There are plenty of theories as to why homosexuals exist. That there hasn't been a universal consensus among scientists DOES NOT mean that one does not exist. Likewise, there are many theories as to what causes gravity. No one has been able to reproduce gravity in a laboratory. It can be mimicked through centripetal force devices. However, we observe gravity on a daily basis. To not understand an issue in its entirety DOES NOT mean that it should not exist.--FACT #4
NO ONE other than YOU has referred to the "epi-genetic THEORY" that may explain homosexuality as a "MISTAKE". If the "epi-genetic theory" is ever proven to be linked to homosexuality, IT DOES NOT imply that homosexuality is a mistake. In fact it would be MORE evidence that homosexuality is a NATURALLY OCCURRING phenomenon.--FACT #5
There is NO evidence that once a cause is established for homosexuality that "most" will seek a cure.--FACT #6
Once again your lies have been decimated.
You continue to show your hand. Everyone who is following this exchange has NO DOUBT as to your motives.
In your ideal world, homosexuals would not exist. You are an eugenicist sh!t stain who believes that a huge segment of the population needs to be "cured". You are an embarrassment to the human race.
But I've got news for you, Blanche... This isn't YOUR world. It's God's world. It's the Creator's world. And God, the Creator, WANTED gay people to be here.
The way I see it you have two choices. You can get on board with the rest of modern society. Or you can be miserable as the world goes on around you. It's your choice.
You already made your choice clear. I was trying to get you into a normal gay's shoes.

In your case, it is a condition.

Mating behavior has one goal. Homosexuality fails.

'Normally' the epi-marker is erased. Abnormally, as in your case, it is not.

Normal gays would choose a cure.

But hey, this all started with your delight with a depraved parade, what do I know?
Zoro Rizzo

Union City, CA

#197932 Jun 25, 2013
Straight Sh00ter wrote:
Would you let these freaks despoil the instituion of marriage?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =1USs58TO0D4XX
Is the one with the red clown hair Jizzy?

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#197933 Jun 25, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
I find it difficult to see the logic of defending monogamous marriage as the historic norm when the laws of several states have already departed from the principle that it is heterosexual, monogamous marriage that is essential to social stability.
If heterosexuality is no longer legally, morally or socially relevant to marriage, why should monogamy continue to be so important?
That never gets old.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#197935 Jun 25, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You already made your choice clear. I was trying to get you into a normal gay's shoes.
In your case, it is a condition.
Mating behavior has one goal. Homosexuality fails.
'Normally' the epi-marker is erased. Abnormally, as in your case, it is not.
Normal gays would choose a cure.
But hey, this all started with your delight with a depraved parade, what do I know?
Again... You ASS-ume so much.

You say that "normally" that epi-marker is erased. Prove it! Show me one scientist who has said that the "epi-marker theory" has been proven.

Show me one scientist who will agree that IF the "epi-marker theory" is proven that it represents a mistake.

And what would you know about "normal gays". What the hell is a "normal gay"? Do you speak from experience? Do you hate that overwhelming attraction that gnaws at you when you see a hot, beefcake of a man? Is that why you believe that "normal gays" would want a cure--because you've been running from it for so long?

Tell us more about what "normal gays" would want. I'm sure as an (allegedly) straight man you would have great insight as to what a gay man would decide.

The more I see of your comments, the more I am convinced that you are a drunk, self-loathing, closeted gay (or bisexual) man who has a death grip hold that he may someday be "cured".

No sober, honest-to-God straight man would be so delusional or concerned.

The more you type, the more transparent you become.

You've been "Watchmann". You're currently "Kimare". I think your next name here should be "Translucence"
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#197937 Jun 25, 2013
The Troll Stopper wrote:
<quoted text>
...said one knuckle-dragging, mouth-breathing Neanderthal bigot to the other. The rest of us will all take that for what it's worth.
I support true marriage equality. Do you?

Perhaps you are the knuckle dragging neanderthal here.
xolo

Long Beach, CA

#197938 Jun 25, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You already made your choice clear. I was trying to get you into a normal gay's shoes.
In your case, it is a condition.
Mating behavior has one goal. Homosexuality fails.
'Normally' the epi-marker is erased. Abnormally, as in your case, it is not.
Normal gays would choose a cure.
But hey, this all started with your delight with a depraved parade, what do I know?
Do "normal" straight people spend hours every day posting anti-gay rhetoric on a gay-themed forum thread?

Homosexuality is part of nature. It has always existed and always will. You don't have to like it. You don't have to understand it. But we're not going anywhere. Try to get over whatever is troubling you so much. Life is too short to spend in the condition you're in. Peace!
Ronald

Long Beach, CA

#197939 Jun 25, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I support true marriage equality. Do you?
Perhaps you are the knuckle dragging neanderthal here.
Frankie Rizzo.

The Honey of my choice has been reading your postings. He said he believes our Homosexual friends may have aligned themselves with the canineophobes and the taxpayer supported schizophrenic from Azusa and Covina to load the "judge its" to make it appear your comments are not appreciated by the silent majority. Bowser said to tell you to hang in there and that he wishes you the best of Bow! Wows!

Ronald

Ronald
Ronald

Long Beach, CA

#197940 Jun 25, 2013
Ronald wrote:
<quoted text>
Frankie Rizzo.
The Honey of my choice has been reading your postings. He said he believes our Homosexual friends may have aligned themselves with the canineophobes and the taxpayer supported schizophrenic from Azusa and Covina to load the "judge its" to make it appear your comments are not appreciated by the silent majority. Bowser said to tell you to hang in there and that he wishes you the best of Bow! Wows!
Ronald
Ronald
Arf!
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#197941 Jun 25, 2013
Ronald wrote:
<quoted text>
Frankie Rizzo.
The Honey of my choice has been reading your postings. He said he believes our Homosexual friends may have aligned themselves with the canineophobes and the taxpayer supported schizophrenic from Azusa and Covina to load the "judge its" to make it appear your comments are not appreciated by the silent majority. Bowser said to tell you to hang in there and that he wishes you the best of Bow! Wows!
Ronald
Ronald
Ronald.

Yes. This is true. Our taxpayer supported progressive friends heavily rig the judge-its in their zeal to promote "marriage equality".

Also many of my posts are deleted by our more sensitive tax payer supported progressive friends for "violations of TOS" (winning an argument).

Regards to Bowser!

Frankie Rizzo.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#197942 Jun 25, 2013
xolo wrote:
<quoted text>
Do "normal" straight people spend hours every day posting anti-gay rhetoric on a gay-themed forum thread?
Homosexuality is part of nature. It has always existed and always will. You don't have to like it. You don't have to understand it. But we're not going anywhere. Try to get over whatever is troubling you so much. Life is too short to spend in the condition you're in. Peace!
Here we go again. This is not a gay thread. It is a thread to discuss the judge's decision on prop 8.

Everyone has the right to post here. You know, this is the USA and all. We're all equal. Get it? Got it? Good!
Bowser

Long Beach, CA

#197943 Jun 25, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Ronald.
Yes. This is true. Our taxpayer supported progressive friends heavily rig the judge-its in their zeal to promote "marriage equality".
Also many of my posts are deleted by our more sensitive tax payer supported progressive friends for "violations of TOS" (winning an argument).
Regards to Bowser!
Frankie Rizzo.
If you need to resort to violating TOS in order to think you "won" an argument, you have in fact failed.
xolo

Long Beach, CA

#197944 Jun 25, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Here we go again. This is not a gay thread. It is a thread to discuss the judge's decision on prop 8.
Everyone has the right to post here. You know, this is the USA and all. We're all equal. Get it? Got it? Good!
Gay-THEMED thread. Got it? Good!
xolo

Long Beach, CA

#197945 Jun 25, 2013
xolo wrote:
<quoted text>
Gay-THEMED thread. Got it? Good!
Frankie doesn't get it. That's why he's here. He's lonely in that tiny closet.
xolo

Long Beach, CA

#197946 Jun 25, 2013
xolo wrote:
<quoted text>
Frankie doesn't get it. That's why he's here. He's lonely in that tiny closet.
Here we go again with the hijacking of my nic. Grow up. You can do better. Peace!
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#197947 Jun 25, 2013
Bowser wrote:
<quoted text>
If you need to resort to violating TOS in order to think you "won" an argument, you have in fact failed.
But my posts that get deleted don't violate TOS.

Polygamy deserves the same respect and consideration as same sex marriage. You won't rebut my argument, you will just insult me and call me a bigot. When in fact you are the bigot.

You have in fact failed.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#197948 Jun 25, 2013
xolo wrote:
<quoted text>
Gay-THEMED thread. Got it? Good!
It is not a gay THEMED thread. Even if it were, you cannot exclude straight people. It's open to everyone and should be. And imagine how boring if only gays were allowed!

Poster 1: Oh! Isn't it wonderful that SSM is gaining support?

Poster 2: Yes! That is wonderful. Tomorrow the SCOTUS takes up SSM!

Poster 1: Oh Yes! Isn't that wonderful?

Poster 2: Yes! That is so wonderful.

Poster 3 There are three ways they could go.

Poster 2 Yes. There are three ways they could go.

Poster 1: Isn't it wonderful...

Be careful what you wish for fruitcake. Do you really only "correct" posters?
Bowser

Long Beach, CA

#197949 Jun 25, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
But my posts that get deleted don't violate TOS.
Polygamy deserves the same respect and consideration as same sex marriage. You won't rebut my argument, you will just insult me and call me a bigot. When in fact you are the bigot.
You have in fact failed.
\
No, you have failed. I have no problem with polygamy. It's not my thing but does not harm me in any way so I couldn't care less. What was the argument? I have never corresponded with you so don't know what you are referring to, dude.
xolo

Long Beach, CA

#197950 Jun 25, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
It is not a gay THEMED thread. Even if it were, you cannot exclude straight people. It's open to everyone and should be. And imagine how boring if only gays were allowed!
Poster 1: Oh! Isn't it wonderful that SSM is gaining support?
Poster 2: Yes! That is wonderful. Tomorrow the SCOTUS takes up SSM!
Poster 1: Oh Yes! Isn't that wonderful?
Poster 2: Yes! That is so wonderful.
Poster 3 There are three ways they could go.
Poster 2 Yes. There are three ways they could go.
Poster 1: Isn't it wonderful...
Be careful what you wish for fruitcake. Do you really only "correct" posters?
First, no need to call me derogatory names. It just points out your insecurities and your need to put others down in order to feel better about yourself. Typical bully behavior, like on the playground in 4th grade. Time to grow up. And yes, a thread about gay marriage is a gay themed thread. Stop nit picking. And yes, anyone can post. But keep it civil and stop calling people names. If that's all you have to add, you have added nothing. Find something better to do with your time. Hope you feel better about yourself soon Peace!
Spleezle Spalzal

Beacon, NY

#197951 Jun 25, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
But my posts that get deleted don't violate TOS.
Polygamy deserves the same respect and consideration as same sex marriage. You won't rebut my argument, you will just insult me and call me a bigot. When in fact you are the bigot.
You have in fact failed.
Oh YES they do flunky! 95% of your posts contain some type of prickish off topic comments and usually nothing to do with the post you're replying to but simply some kind of personal insult that does in fact violate the TOPIX Terms of service! You are lying and whining all the time about some other poster having your posts 86'ed but that in fact is just one more BIG lie from you! Your posts are deleted by the righteous moderator and deservedly so! YOU are not the only one who has had your posts removed or lost a registered profile all together because of your complete nastiness! Many of us have also Flunky! You remain a deluded,hypocritical,whining dufus who blames everything and every one except where the blame truly belongs,with YOU! By simply posting you are agreeing too and giving your consent to abide by the T.O.S.! And the biggest lie of all is you saying you support marriage equality,facts are the only thing you support is every nasty bigot on these threads and others! Glad I could be of help and set you straight Flunky! It is YOU in fact who has failed,bigot! Yuk,yuk,yuk,yuk,yuk! ;)
One round

Monrovia, CA

#197952 Jun 25, 2013
Should have just executed the shooter and made it, an eye for a eye. And be done with it.
Or smoked another joint before the cop went on duty. Just like these dots who post their nonsense.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Palm Springs Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Desert Hot Springs Mayor Proud Of Out Of State ... Apr 15 Tony 20
News Group seeks to stop Nestlea s water-bottling op... Apr 14 speak out 1
Best SmokeShop in Valley?? Apr 13 BigJG 1
Review: 1-800 Loanmart Apr 13 BigJG 2
Any Nice Sweet Babysitters in Indio?:) Apr 13 BigJG 1
Indio Fun;) Apr 13 BigJG 1
Any Cougars or milfs ??? Apr 12 bear2015 2
More from around the web

Palm Springs People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]