Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,197

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#190984 May 5, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
It does say that 'normally' epi-markers are erased. Those not in denial understand that when something 'normal' doesn't happen in a genetic setting, it creates a mutation. A mutation is 'judged' defective when it cannot self-replicate, OR when it has no practical purpose.
Ss orientation cannot replicate, and it has no practical evolutionary purpose.
I keep warning you VV, that this exposure is coming, and the attempt of equate a 'not normal' condition with marriage will be exposed as incredibly foolish.
Smile.
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
First off, most gay and lesbian people have the ability to procreate. Our "plumbing" works just fine.
Secondly, even though you don't see the "practical purpose" of homosexuality DOES NOT mean that there isn't one.
I don't see a practical purpose for the horse shit you spew on here, but here you are, every chance you get, saying ignorant things about science, which you clearly known nothing about.
Finally, you get back to me when the "exposure" arrives. Until then, why don't you drop the prophecy crap. You're horrible at it.
First off, you deliberately distorted what I said. Why does a legitimate cause need that deceit??? You never answer that question VV.

Of course homosexuals can procreate. Just not within their orientation, as I said. So the reality remains. That lack of ability within orientation is a clear indication of a defect.

Second, while it could be true homosexuality has a purpose, the fact remains there still is no valid reason, and science is quickly confirming it as a epi-marker mistake.

All this exposes your denial about my purpose here; Exposing your deceit and BS. Over and over. And trust me, I will get back to you. Soon.

Smirk.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#190986 May 5, 2013
Just the Facts wrote:
<quoted text>Still here jackass.
Glad to see that you are still full of shat.
Great post spice boy.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#190987 May 5, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
It does say that 'normally' epi-markers are erased. Those not in denial understand that when something 'normal' doesn't happen in a genetic setting, it creates a mutation. A mutation is 'judged' defective when it cannot self-replicate, OR when it has no practical purpose.
Ss orientation cannot replicate, and it has no practical evolutionary purpose.
I keep warning you VV, that this exposure is coming, and the attempt of equate a 'not normal' condition with marriage will be exposed as incredibly foolish.
Smile.
<quoted text>
First off, you deliberately distorted what I said. Why does a legitimate cause need that deceit??? You never answer that question VV.
Of course homosexuals can procreate. Just not within their orientation, as I said. So the reality remains. That lack of ability within orientation is a clear indication of a defect.
Second, while it could be true homosexuality has a purpose, the fact remains there still is no valid reason, and science is quickly confirming it as a epi-marker mistake.
All this exposes your denial about my purpose here; Exposing your deceit and BS. Over and over. And trust me, I will get back to you. Soon.
Smirk.
1.) One of your frequent downfalls in this issue is your continued belief that unless a person is popping out children, they are of no use to society--they are a "defect".

2.) You keep saying that science is going to prove that we are an epi-marker mistake. I'm waiting... And by the way, what, exactly, makes us a mistake? Is it our ability to function? Is it our ability to live a full and happy life? Is it our ability to contribute to society at large? I'm not finding many "mistakes" there.
On the other hand, however, I can look back at history and find multiple wars championed by heterosexuals. All of that death and mayhem... And while we're talking death and mayhem, let's not EVER forget the heterosexual impact on the deaths of 40,000,000 babies each year via abortion.
I wonder if there is an epi-marker mistake for war and abortion?
Rock Hudson

Wooster, OH

#190988 May 5, 2013
Anybody else watching the news/propaganda agencies pretend that they are going after Obummer, After the election is over, when it can no longer matter? They were all in love with him before the election..Now, they pretend to want blood... Too late now.
Rock Hudson

Wooster, OH

#190989 May 5, 2013
We should have gotten Romney.
Hooters

Covina, CA

#190990 May 5, 2013
Don't worry all those bad people aren't very sane anyway.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#190991 May 5, 2013
Just the Facts wrote:
<quoted text>Still here jackass.
Glad to see that you are still full of shat.
Jizzy! Someone was just asking about your sillyass. I thought you were still sulking.

Good that you got over it, we'll have some more fun together! It doesn't have to be joyless.
More Guns

Covina, CA

#190992 May 5, 2013
Off LoneHill and market place.

A man with a gun robbed a woman customer of her purse in the Sam's Club parking lot, which is located in the "Glendora Market Place" April 04, 2013 Saturday around 5:25 p.m.

The suspect, described as a male white, 20-25 years old, she refused and the suspect yanked the purse from her, while brandishing a small pistol.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#190995 May 5, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
It does say that 'normally' epi-markers are erased. Those not in denial understand that when something 'normal' doesn't happen in a genetic setting, it creates a mutation. A mutation is 'judged' defective when it cannot self-replicate, OR when it has no practical purpose.
Ss orientation cannot replicate, and it has no practical evolutionary purpose.
I keep warning you VV, that this exposure is coming, and the attempt of equate a 'not normal' condition with marriage will be exposed as incredibly foolish.
Smile.
<quoted text>
First off, you deliberately distorted what I said. Why does a legitimate cause need that deceit??? You never answer that question VV.
Of course homosexuals can procreate. Just not within their orientation, as I said. So the reality remains. That lack of ability within orientation is a clear indication of a defect.
Second, while it could be true homosexuality has a purpose, the fact remains there still is no valid reason, and science is quickly confirming it as a epi-marker mistake.
All this exposes your denial about my purpose here; Exposing your deceit and BS. Over and over. And trust me, I will get back to you. Soon.
Smirk.
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
1.) One of your frequent downfalls in this issue is your continued belief that unless a person is popping out children, they are of no use to society--they are a "defect".
2.) You keep saying that science is going to prove that we are an epi-marker mistake. I'm waiting... And by the way, what, exactly, makes us a mistake? Is it our ability to function? Is it our ability to live a full and happy life? Is it our ability to contribute to society at large? I'm not finding many "mistakes" there.
On the other hand, however, I can look back at history and find multiple wars championed by heterosexuals. All of that death and mayhem... And while we're talking death and mayhem, let's not EVER forget the heterosexual impact on the deaths of 40,000,000 babies each year via abortion.
I wonder if there is an epi-marker mistake for war and abortion?
1. I've never one time said that unless people are 'popping out babies' they are useless. You blatantly lied again.

2. I didn't assert homosexuality is mistake, science does. Nor have I asserted that a person is a mistake.

If your mouth is moving, it is doing something foul

Snicker.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#190997 May 5, 2013
Just the Facts wrote:
<quoted text>Why you mad? Flat tire on your scotter? Stuck inside? Dirty diaper?
What would make you think I'm mad Jizzy!? It's a fine day and you stopped sulking so now we can have some more fun! What's to be mad about? Don't be silly.

P.S. What's a scotter?
Golem is Dead

Indianapolis, IN

#190998 May 5, 2013
Just the Facts wrote:
<quoted text>Dirty diaper?
A queers favorite snack.
Lilith_Satans_Wh _ore

Indianapolis, IN

#191002 May 5, 2013
Just the Facts wrote:
<quoted text>Could you provide a link, from a non biased sourse, that states that homosexuality is mistake, ya know from science.
Oh and could you provide proof, that procreation is a requirement in marriage?
God hates queers..nuff said.. NOW DIE OF AIDS !!
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#191003 May 5, 2013
Just the Facts wrote:
<quoted text>Could you provide a link, from a non biased sourse, that states that homosexuality is mistake, ya know from science.
Oh and could you provide proof, that procreation is a requirement in marriage?
Homosexuality is not a mistake, you're normal in that regard. But you are a mistake in general. As in useless. And dumb.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#191004 May 5, 2013
Just the Facts wrote:
<quoted text>Could you provide a link, from a non biased sourse, that states that homosexuality is mistake, ya know from science.
Oh and could you provide proof, that procreation is a requirement in marriage?
1. Look it up.

2. This shows the stupidity of 'requiring' children in a marriage;

The differences between marriage with/without kids and gay couples;

An apple tree bearing fruit.
An apple tree not bearing fruit for some reason.
A walnut tree who never bears any fruit wanting to be an apple tree.
A walnut tree hanging apples on it's branches pretending to be a apple tree.

Even funnier?

The claim that if the government doesn't 'require' apple trees to bear fruit, then it is discrimination not to call walnut trees apple trees too!

Smirk.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#191005 May 5, 2013
Just the Facts wrote:
<quoted text>Could you provide a link, from a non biased sourse, that states that homosexuality is mistake, ya know from science.
Oh and could you provide proof, that procreation is a requirement in marriage?
Could you go jump in a lake?

Oh and could you provide proof that he said that procreation is a requirement for marriage? I didn't see that.

P.S. What's a sourse?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#191009 May 5, 2013
Just the Facts wrote:
<quoted text>Could you provide a link, from a non biased sourse, that states that homosexuality is mistake, ya know from science.
Oh and could you provide proof, that procreation is a requirement in marriage?
Here is one of the best overviews I have read. It was written however, before the proposition about epi-genetic epi-marker mistakes.

http://chronicle.com/article/The-Evolutionary...

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#191010 May 5, 2013
Just the Facts wrote:
<quoted text>Are you confused? You know that we are talking about humans don't you? Really can you show me a law from any state that requries reproduction in marriage. Any state will do.
Jesus hates liars
Are you an idiot?

Why would there need to be a law requiring children? What about requiring sex?

Moreover, you ignore the analogy with an ad homoan attack.

But even more fundamental, before a ss couple can claim the rights of marriage, they must establish that they are an equal relationship.

Smirk.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#191011 May 5, 2013
Just the Facts wrote:
<quoted text>Aww Frank why are you so gosh darn mad? Let me guess, you're pissed because you can't buy beer and MD20/20 with food stamps. Is that it Frank?
Aww Jizzy why are you so gosh darn stupid? Let me guess, you are a loser and you sat around and got stoned and worked at Quicky Burger part time instead of going to college.

You got stoned and you missed it. Right sugar britches? Oh Snap! Cool beans!
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#191012 May 5, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you an idiot?
Why would there need to be a law requiring children? What about requiring sex?
Moreover, you ignore the analogy with an ad homoan attack.
But even more fundamental, before a ss couple can claim the rights of marriage, they must establish that they are an equal relationship.
Smirk.
Jizzy (aka "just the facts") is stupid.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#191013 May 5, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
It does say that 'normally' epi-markers are erased. Those not in denial understand that when something 'normal' doesn't happen in a genetic setting, it creates a mutation. A mutation is 'judged' defective when it cannot self-replicate, OR when it has no practical purpose.
Ss orientation cannot replicate, and it has no practical evolutionary purpose.
I keep warning you VV, that this exposure is coming, and the attempt of equate a 'not normal' condition with marriage will be exposed as incredibly foolish.
Smile.
<quoted text>
First off, you deliberately distorted what I said. Why does a legitimate cause need that deceit??? You never answer that question VV.
Of course homosexuals can procreate. Just not within their orientation, as I said. So the reality remains. That lack of ability within orientation is a clear indication of a defect.
Second, while it could be true homosexuality has a purpose, the fact remains there still is no valid reason, and science is quickly confirming it as a epi-marker mistake.
All this exposes your denial about my purpose here; Exposing your deceit and BS. Over and over. And trust me, I will get back to you. Soon.
Smirk.
<quoted text>
1. I've never one time said that unless people are 'popping out babies' they are useless. You blatantly lied again.
2. I didn't assert homosexuality is mistake, science does. Nor have I asserted that a person is a mistake.
If your mouth is moving, it is doing something foul
Snicker.
Now who's backpedaling? You have said repeatedly that gays are "broken". Don't make me pour through your thousands of comments here to make you eat your words. You know you've said it repeatedly.

And you say "science" has said that homosexuality is a mistake. Prove it. Show me where "science" has said it's a mistake. Because the "science" that I know--doctors, psychologists, psychiatrist, sociologists, etc.--have decided hands down that homosexuality is not a mistake.

Maybe you delude yourself into believing that you know better than these people? After all, a bachelor's degree in the "scientific" field of being a preacher means that you know everything doesn't it?

You'd be better off sticking to what you know--not what you think you know.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Palm Springs Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Chart House demolition slated for Tuesday (Mar '13) Tue Michael2327 2
Elizabeth Taylor & Michael Jackson at Her Final... Oct 27 Octopus 73
Touch Of Class Consignments, Cathedral City, ca. (Aug '13) Oct 26 Jill 130
Tony Casas, 77; Former Prisons Official Worked ... (Sep '07) Oct 25 nick 710
child molester at large in dhs Oct 22 tay 2
Review: Law Office Of Geoffrey M. Yaryan Oct 18 gmyaryan 1
Costco readies for new opening (Dec '06) Oct 15 Ramya 151
Palm Springs Dating
Find my Match

Palm Springs People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Palm Springs News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Palm Springs

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]