Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 200,937

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#190961 May 4, 2013
gohdude wrote:
youtube.com/watch?v=lgrjU8S0TL E
Excuse the judge was Gay?
Does the pope sh!t in the woods?

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#190962 May 4, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Does the pope sh!t in the woods?
Q.: Were the three appellate court judges gay--the ones who read Walker's decision and agreed with it?

A.: Nope...
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#190963 May 4, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Q.: Were the three appellate court judges gay--the ones who read Walker's decision and agreed with it?
A.: Nope...
I have no problem with the judge's sexual preferences, I just couldn't resist a dopey joke. I'm silly like that. So sue me.

Lighten up swizzlestick. If it makes you feel any better I support SSM. I know that confuses you. Not my problem.
Gueedhaa

Covina, CA

#190964 May 4, 2013
Not much but at least it's something, where else would it be?
Rock Hudson

Wooster, OH

#190965 May 4, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Epigentics may EXPLAIN how homosexuality exists. It does not, however, make the "judgment" that homosexuality is wrong or unnatural.
I wasn't making that assertion, I was correcting your assertion that epi-genetics was KiMare's opinion, and not science. And, not for the first time, either...
Rock Hudson

Wooster, OH

#190966 May 4, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
It was a 70. Nice car. It had belonged to the sucker before me. I got out of there when she started trying to own too much of my stuff.
That year had the grill with no center rib, and was the only year that model had the steering column ignition lock.
:-D
Did your have the center console stick, or the steering column shifter?
EastCoast

Covina, CA

#190967 May 4, 2013
Rode Island doing fine.
Bruno

Westminster, CA

#190968 May 4, 2013
Too funny still no queers geting married in California.
Bruno

Westminster, CA

#190969 May 4, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I have no problem with the judge's sexual preferences, I just couldn't resist a dopey joke. I'm silly like that. So sue me.
Lighten up swizzlestick. If it makes you feel any better I support SSM. I know that confuses you. Not my problem.
Why not just have a coming out party you idiot !!!
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#190970 May 4, 2013
Bruno wrote:
<quoted text>
Why not just have a coming out party you idiot !!!
If I did I wouldn't invite a third class jackass such as yourself, so no need to concern yourself fruitcake.

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

#190971 May 5, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Too wordy.
Hello Frankie, how are Bill and Jizzy?

too wordy = too caffeinated

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

#190972 May 5, 2013
Rock Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
We've never said that it invalidates a person, just said that SSC's are not equal to heterosexual couples, and ought not to have the same laws supporting it, as if they WERE equal. Reality is that the SSM'ers are seeking to gain legal validation of their broken relationships, as if they WERE the same as the regular couples. And, as per "having" their own children, some are using laboratory processes to "have" these children. More unnatural behavior, to lay claim to "equality".
There relationships are equal in love. If they had been given equal legal rights and recognitions with 'Civil Partnerships' then may be wanting SS marriage wouldn't have come about.
Broken relationships? There are plenty enough dysfunctional hetero couple relationships... opposite sex partnerships does not guarantee cohesion.
More unnatural behaviour?'unnatural' means of having children has been going on sometime now for childless hetero couples.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#190973 May 5, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Epigentics may EXPLAIN how homosexuality exists. It does not, however, make the "judgment" that homosexuality is wrong or unnatural.
It does say that 'normally' epi-markers are erased. Those not in denial understand that when something 'normal' doesn't happen in a genetic setting, it creates a mutation. A mutation is 'judged' defective when it cannot self-replicate, OR when it has no practical purpose.

Ss orientation cannot replicate, and it has no practical evolutionary purpose.

I keep warning you VV, that this exposure is coming, and the attempt of equate a 'not normal' condition with marriage will be exposed as incredibly foolish.

Smile.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#190974 May 5, 2013
Stocking wrote:
<quoted text>
There relationships are equal in love. If they had been given equal legal rights and recognitions with 'Civil Partnerships' then may be wanting SS marriage wouldn't have come about.
Broken relationships? There are plenty enough dysfunctional hetero couple relationships... opposite sex partnerships does not guarantee cohesion.
More unnatural behaviour?'unnatural' means of having children has been going on sometime now for childless hetero couples.
Many relationships are 'equal' in love. That does not make them marriage.

I agree that gays have every right and opportunity to purse legitimate rights and an identity for their relationship. That is their responsibility. It is not legitimate to impose an imposter relationship on marriage.

As to children, two distinctions.

1. Children in the natural home of their biological parents are at a significant advantage over ANY default setting. That setting, or as close as possible should always be the primary pursuit of society.

2. A ss couple ALWAYS deprives a child of one parental role. To do so deliberately should be criminal. It is narcissistically diabolical.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#190975 May 5, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
It does say that 'normally' epi-markers are erased. Those not in denial understand that when something 'normal' doesn't happen in a genetic setting, it creates a mutation. A mutation is 'judged' defective when it cannot self-replicate, OR when it has no practical purpose.
Ss orientation cannot replicate, and it has no practical evolutionary purpose.
I keep warning you VV, that this exposure is coming, and the attempt of equate a 'not normal' condition with marriage will be exposed as incredibly foolish.
Smile.
First off, most gay and lesbian people have the ability to procreate. Our "plumbing" works just fine.

Secondly, even though you don't see the "practical purpose" of homosexuality DOES NOT mean that there isn't one.

I don't see a practical purpose for the horse shit you spew on here, but here you are, every chance you get, saying ignorant things about science, which you clearly known nothing about.

Finally, you get back to me when the "exposure" arrives. Until then, why don't you drop the prophecy crap. You're horrible at it.
Dorn

La Puente, CA

#190976 May 5, 2013
Sexual orientation means just that . It does not mean that same sex attraction means sterility. The reason same sex orientation persons want to marry is to have the partner they love and can live with and have the acceptant of society and the financial support that opposite sex couples have.
Sexual attaction is inherited as are other traits such as eye color and hair color.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#190977 May 5, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
How, exactly, are men and women different, other than body parts?
Are not the "body parts" sufficient? Is it not the joining of certain "body parts" and the natural result, that provides the biological foundation to marriage?
Appealing to tradition.
Logical fallacy.
Appealing to biology is logical though.
You make no sense.
"Sense" that you wish to acknowledge, and doesn't undermine your position....no.

Perhaps you can answer the questions I posed.

If its the consensus of society that marriage is simply a union of two consenting adults, there's no need to prohibit any two person, consenting adult, union, including blood relatives. Why should it matter who marries who, or who can't marry who?

Your argument seems to be no restriction, except possible number of participants, among consenting adults.

If that is so, why bother licensing marriage at all?
AppleTree

Covina, CA

#190978 May 5, 2013
I'm sure this topic's post was miss placed in the beginning.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#190979 May 5, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
First off, most gay and lesbian people have the ability to procreate. Our "plumbing" works just fine.
As long as it's combined with the "plumbing" of the opposite sex, it does.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#190980 May 5, 2013
Stocking wrote:
<quoted text>
Hello Frankie, how are Bill and Jizzy?
too wordy = too caffeinated
Those two silly jackasses will never change. They're laying low lately, too embarrassed to post. Probably re-inventing themselves.

They both have many sock puppets. They'll be back with some silly new names but the same old dopey schtick.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Palm Springs Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
CA California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legali... (Oct '10) 53 min THCCBN 15,994
CA California seeks to ban free, single-use carryo... (Jun '10) 2 hr lollypop 5,068
Councilman Chuck Vasquez pleads guilty to embez... 10 hr Debbie 2
Allen Brewster arrested again 22 hr Long Beach Saint ... 1
CA Jury reaches verdict in Oakland BART shooting t... (Jul '10) Mon GOP bull 2,265
Tony Casas, 77; Former Prisons Official Worked ... (Sep '07) Sep 13 sex 700
Big Box retail stores add jobs and help local r... Sep 9 concerned citizen 1
•••
•••
Palm Springs Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Palm Springs Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••
•••

Palm Springs People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Palm Springs News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Palm Springs
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••