Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,823

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Read more

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#190844 May 3, 2013
Stocking wrote:
<quoted text>
Really?? You have both XX and XY chromosomes, yes?
Please explain, what the difference is here? The DNA of two people? means what? If it's not having both XX and XY then what is it?
Yes, sure it's a genetic mistake. I use the word 'mosaic' because that's the word used to describe having both XX and XY chromosomes. Both male and female. It's the same as having the DNA of two people, isn't it?
Ok, that explains the word 'monster', but I'm sure you can appreciate how the meaning may not be immediately apparent as 'large'
I'm in No denial and am fully aware my DNA, and the physical manifestations from it, are a 'mutation', a genetic mistake.
http://www.forteantimes.com/strangedays/
science/2368/chimeras_and_mosa ics.html

"Both mosaics and chimeras are individuals with two genetic­ally distinct populations of cells. The difference between them is that in a mosaic the different types both arise from the same fertilised egg, whereas a chimera comes from more than one. In fact, in some cases a chimera is a pair of twins that has fused into a single person."

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#190845 May 3, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Turn off Faux news, there already are Same Sex marriages, over a million of them in the world, 18,000 here in California
As married as anyone else, no less, no more
Yes there are people that make their money off rubes selling the idea of an invisible magic guy, Yes there are same sex couples that are married.
Welcome to today
What in hell does Fox News have to do with this?

You have no logical response, so you throw an idiotic slur against the most watched news channel? That's like double stupid!

Then you top it off by asserting there is no difference between a fruitful, diverse gendered couple and a duplicate, serile single gendered couple. That is beyond stupid.

You follow it with a bigoted slam against those who dedicate their lives to serving others and people of faith.

What a Big Dope.

Smile.

“Romans 13: 8-10”

Since: Feb 08

Oklahoma City, OK

#190846 May 3, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
What in hell does Fox News have to do with this?
You have no logical response, so you throw an idiotic slur against the most watched news channel? That's like double stupid!
Then you top it off by asserting there is no difference between a fruitful, diverse gendered couple and a duplicate, serile single gendered couple. That is beyond stupid.
You follow it with a bigoted slam against those who dedicate their lives to serving others and people of faith.
What a Big Dope.
Smile.
Ratings have nothing to do with journalistic ethics or credibility. Being "most watched" doesn't change the fact that Fox exists to promote far right propaganda, NOT facts and journalism.
What is stupid is the bigotry in thinking heterosexuals or straight couples are superior to gay couples. They are not.

“Romans 13: 8-10”

Since: Feb 08

Oklahoma City, OK

#190847 May 3, 2013
KiMare--"-Ss couples cannot 'have' children. Do you see what your denial is trying to equate?"

Of course they do. They don't MAKE children...as is the case with many straight couples...which doesn't change the fact that many have children, and are excellent parents.

"I listed point by point corrections to your statements."

Your hateful lies are not "corrections."

"Just a note; The issue is not whether ss couples would harm marriage."

Your fellow Nazis disagree, they talk CONSTANTLY of "attacks on traditional marriage" and "we need to protect traditional marriage."

"The fundamental question is do they equate to marriage."

They don't "equate" to marriage. They ARE marriages. Same as anyone elses'.

"The only aspect is in number. That means marriage would then mean 'two people in a committed relationship'. Restricting marriage to only two for that reason is discriminatory."

You may choose to believe that, but contrary to this scummy stunt the far right keeps trying to pull, in spite of it being PROVEN false, marriage equality for gay people DOES NOT mean society will start accepting people marrying more than one person. The two aren't remotely connected.

"Again, it leaves your mother and father, and your family without distinction. I find that sad."

And I find it despicable that the ONLY distinction you can find for your family is in hating and attempting to destroy other families. If the only thing that made your family worthwhile was that one had a penis and one did not, what a worthless family.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#190848 May 3, 2013
OkieDarren wrote:
<quoted text>
Ratings have nothing to do with journalistic ethics or credibility. Being "most watched" doesn't change the fact that Fox exists to promote far right propaganda, NOT facts and journalism.
What is stupid is the bigotry in thinking heterosexuals or straight couples are superior to gay couples. They are not.
Liar.

Smile.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#190849 May 3, 2013
OkieDarren wrote:
KiMare--"-Ss couples cannot 'have' children. Do you see what your denial is trying to equate?"
Of course they do. They don't MAKE children...as is the case with many straight couples...which doesn't change the fact that many have children, and are excellent parents.
"I listed point by point corrections to your statements."
Your hateful lies are not "corrections."
"Just a note; The issue is not whether ss couples would harm marriage."
Your fellow Nazis disagree, they talk CONSTANTLY of "attacks on traditional marriage" and "we need to protect traditional marriage."
"The fundamental question is do they equate to marriage."
They don't "equate" to marriage. They ARE marriages. Same as anyone elses'.
"The only aspect is in number. That means marriage would then mean 'two people in a committed relationship'. Restricting marriage to only two for that reason is discriminatory."
You may choose to believe that, but contrary to this scummy stunt the far right keeps trying to pull, in spite of it being PROVEN false, marriage equality for gay people DOES NOT mean society will start accepting people marrying more than one person. The two aren't remotely connected.
"Again, it leaves your mother and father, and your family without distinction. I find that sad."
And I find it despicable that the ONLY distinction you can find for your family is in hating and attempting to destroy other families. If the only thing that made your family worthwhile was that one had a penis and one did not, what a worthless family.
Liar.

Smile.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#190850 May 3, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
What in hell does Fox News have to do with this?
You have no logical response, so you throw an idiotic slur against the most watched news channel? That's like double stupid!
Then you top it off by asserting there is no difference between a fruitful, diverse gendered couple and a duplicate, serile single gendered couple. That is beyond stupid.
You follow it with a bigoted slam against those who dedicate their lives to serving others and people of faith.
What a Big Dope.
Smile.
Excellent post. Thanks for sharing.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#190851 May 3, 2013
OkieDarren wrote:
<quoted text>
Ratings have nothing to do with journalistic ethics or credibility. Being "most watched" doesn't change the fact that Fox exists to promote far right propaganda, NOT facts and journalism.
What is stupid is the bigotry in thinking heterosexuals or straight couples are superior to gay couples. They are not.
Sorry Elvis, but your favorite network MSNBC wins the award by far for bias.

http://nation.foxnews.com/fox-vs-msnbc/2013/0...
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#190852 May 3, 2013
OkieDarren wrote:
KiMare--"-Ss couples cannot 'have' children. Do you see what your denial is trying to equate?"
Of course they do. They don't MAKE children...as is the case with many straight couples...which doesn't change the fact that many have children, and are excellent parents.
"I listed point by point corrections to your statements."
Your hateful lies are not "corrections."
"Just a note; The issue is not whether ss couples would harm marriage."
Your fellow Nazis disagree, they talk CONSTANTLY of "attacks on traditional marriage" and "we need to protect traditional marriage."
"The fundamental question is do they equate to marriage."
They don't "equate" to marriage. They ARE marriages. Same as anyone elses'.
"The only aspect is in number. That means marriage would then mean 'two people in a committed relationship'. Restricting marriage to only two for that reason is discriminatory."
You may choose to believe that, but contrary to this scummy stunt the far right keeps trying to pull, in spite of it being PROVEN false, marriage equality for gay people DOES NOT mean society will start accepting people marrying more than one person. The two aren't remotely connected.
"Again, it leaves your mother and father, and your family without distinction. I find that sad."
And I find it despicable that the ONLY distinction you can find for your family is in hating and attempting to destroy other families. If the only thing that made your family worthwhile was that one had a penis and one did not, what a worthless family.
Godwin's Law.
Sail On

Covina, CA

#190853 May 3, 2013
Frankie Rizzos

Get a life.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#190854 May 3, 2013
Sail On wrote:
Frankie Rizzos
Get a life.
Get a life? Don't make me laugh, boy. I make life. Several times a night. In fact, your very own sister and mother are bearing my children right now.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#190855 May 3, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Excellent post. Thanks for sharing.
You are welcome Frankie.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#190856 May 3, 2013
OkieDarren wrote:
<quoted text>
Ratings have nothing to do with journalistic ethics or credibility. Being "most watched" doesn't change the fact that Fox exists to promote far right propaganda, NOT facts and journalism.
What is stupid is the bigotry in thinking heterosexuals or straight couples are superior to gay couples. They are not.
First, the couple is either opposite sex or same sex.

Second opposite sex couples differ in function and purpose than do same sex couples. If you wish to define that as superior......

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#190857 May 3, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
"...depend on what's in your underwear."? Why are talking about bladder control issues?
Logic dictates men are treated like men, and women like women. Urinals aren't put in the women's locker room, and gynocologists don't treat men.
Wow, you are stupid.
Damn.
So what?
The issue is rights, not bathroom fixtures.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#190858 May 3, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Marriage has always been a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior. You are not 'updating' it, you are undefining it.
Even if that were true, it would be a non issue. You are appealing to tradition.

You are a self described monster.
Do you hate god for making such a big mistake in your creation?
If not, why not?

:)
KiMare wrote:
Children are paying the greatest cost.
Rose's Law:
Monsters with no real argument scream, "But what about the children!?"

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#190859 May 3, 2013
167K or so posts later, still not one rational argument against gay marriage.
And now:
"Rhode Island joins New England states in legalizing gay marriage"
http://pbn.com/Rhode-Island-joins-New-England...

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#190860 May 3, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Marriage has always been a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior. You are not 'updating' it, you are undefining it.
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Even if that were true, it would be a non issue. You are appealing to tradition.
<quoted text>
Ho,

It is science. You really think that is "tradition'???

Ho, Ho, Ho.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#190861 May 3, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
What in hell does Fox News have to do with this?
You have no logical response, so you throw an idiotic slur against the most watched news channel? That's like double stupid!
Then you top it off by asserting there is no difference between a fruitful, diverse gendered couple and a duplicate, serile single gendered couple. That is beyond stupid.
Every couple is different from every other couple.
And since you don't have to be able to procreate in order to marry, sterility is a non issue.
You are beyond stupid.

You feel our rights should be based on our genes.
Should you be allowed to marry?
You have both sets of genes.

Do you think god hates you, and that's why he made such a big mistake while creating you? LOL!

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#190862 May 3, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry Elvis, but your favorite network MSNBC wins the award by far for bias.
http://nation.foxnews.com/fox-vs-msnbc/2013/0...
Ptttt...
So, Fox News came to the conclusion that MSNBC is more biased than Fox?

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#190863 May 3, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I have a letter validating I don't need the white suit guys signed by THREE psychologists.
Do YOU have a letter validating your sanity?
Smile.
Smile.
I'd like to remind people that you claimed to lie to several friends in order to obtain said "sanity certificate".

Normal people don't need a piece of paper to prove that they are sane.
It's not normal for someone with a sanity certificate to boast about it.

Troll on, Kuntmary.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Palm Springs Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Desert Hot Springs Mayor Proud Of Out Of State ... 15 hr Bob 6
Warning Douglas Tessitor lives in your town Mar 27 bees waxed 1
mexican landscapers dump in the desert Mar 26 its me daisy 53
Review: 1-800 Loanmart Mar 20 karl deshayes 1
stores with bad customer service {list your wor... Mar 19 Martha 14
News Chinese tourists power-shopping in U.S. (Aug '13) Mar 7 Drgunzet 12
mature white women for young dark mature n sexy... Mar 4 Sean G 1
Palm Springs Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Palm Springs People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]