Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments
161,521 - 161,540 of 200,564 Comments Last updated 10 hrs ago

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184987
Mar 27, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Orrrrrr....In my town there are two rest rooms, one for men, one for women. Neither one restricts on the basis or orientation. Just like marriage, single union of one male plus one female, no restriction on orientation.
Great reply Pietro!
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184988
Mar 27, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

5

WinstonSmithAKAsheesh wrote:
<quoted text>
Any idea what we can make out of the peanuts & lemons we're getting?
A nice, big "The SSM Crowd Thinks Those Count For Something" cake? Or, some fun, yummy "Someone Has Nothing To Say" pie? How about some Fruitcake?
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184989
Mar 27, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Orrrrrr....In my town there are two rest rooms, one for men, one for women. Neither one restricts on the basis or orientation. Just like marriage, single union of one male plus one female, no restriction on orientation.
Ooohhh......Those pesky labels.... Those darned, inconvenient identifiers.... Drat.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184990
Mar 27, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
You are behind the times, better check the polls
53% to 58%( depending on which poll ) are in favor of Same Sex marrage in the US
These being the polls presented by The Ministry Of Propaganda?
Pietro Armando

Schenectady, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184991
Mar 27, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

heartandmind wrote:
<quoted text>
i merely conceded what a judge referred to - it's in the transcripts so i cannot deny the word he utilized in court.
Thanks for the admission none the less.
why a couple decides to marry, or stay together, cannot be dictated by law. nor can it be dictated by anyone else.
Agreed.
i'm not sure if a CU would suffice or not. my concern is, humans being human, mistakes will be made in either the editing of existing laws to include appropriate CU verbiage or in writing additional laws. this will be expensive for the fed to accomplish and lengthy (in terms of writing and time). from my own personal experience, it's never an easy task, the old adage "all ya gotta do is" is never as simple as the sales guy thinks it is (i speak from an engineers perspective...LOL). i'd hate to see a couple strung up due to a verbiage error. i'd hate to see the extra expenses of rewriting laws or the costs involved when a mistake is made. i just think that allowing same sex couples to use the same terminology makes the most sense, is the expeditious means to grant everyone access to the same laws, protections and priviliges. others may feel or think differently. that's just my take on CU's.
Thank you. appreciate the input. In a sense the laws are already being rewritten now, or in some cases, gender specific terms are being deleted, and there is a difference in the nature of the union. I don't know the extent of the Colorado CU, but I would presume it is extensive.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184992
Mar 27, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
and a majority of those straight people support same sex marriage, I am one of them
No, you keep repeating that lie. It is not true. You just parrot the polls that you like, and ignore the ones that you dislike. I am out in the world more than most, and I know that few actually "support" it.
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184993
Mar 27, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
These being the polls presented by The Ministry Of Propaganda?
different polls from different organizations...

so far they are ranging anywhere from 53% to 60% in favor of same Sex marriage
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184994
Mar 27, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
"Libertine-Istanbul" ..... That was funny. Salud!
:-D TY.
hemp for telelgraphs

Anderson, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184995
Mar 27, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
These being the polls presented by The Ministry Of Propaganda?
I forgot, rethuglicans dont do polls...

this was obvious when you guys thought you were about to win by a landslaide, last fall.

what rude awakening that must have been!!

the 538(nate silver) polls nailed it......

mabey you should pay attention to him next time, instead of piggy rove, or rush.
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184996
Mar 27, 2013
 

Judged:

7

6

6

Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
No, you keep repeating that lie. It is not true. You just parrot the polls that you like, and ignore the ones that you dislike. I am out in the world more than most, and I know that few actually "support" it.
No I am telling you something you are ignorant of, a majority of American are in favor of Same sex marriage and that means tremendous support form heterosexuals
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184997
Mar 27, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

BraveCon wrote:
I don't agree with the notion that everyone needs to 'get with the times' asap and be openly acceptive of gay marriage.
As a Christian, I oppose it on moral grounds but apart from that I also oppose it because of all the potential complications that could arise from gay marriage and the adoption of heterosexual children.
For example, if a heterosexual teenager develops a hateful attitude towards homosexuals including towards his gay parents, should the gay parents punish him/her for it? Do they ground the child until they give up their 'hate'? I think it could lead to many cases of angry, unruly children, and many may run away from home.
Or I'm sure that gay parents will want to give a kiss and a hug to their adopted heterosexual children from time to time and this may make some of the children uncomfortable even though it would be just a sign of love and affection.
Gay marriage will likely create new family dynamics that have never been dealth with before. I'm still not convinced that gay marriage will be a good thing for our society, so excuse me if I don't get with the times asap.
Now, that's a fresh view. I like that. Good point.
hemp for telelgraphs

Anderson, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184998
Mar 27, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Even bigotry from the left? Are you a caped crusader?
which bigotry is that??

im curious
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184999
Mar 27, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks RR.....but I don't know if they fit into Team Rainbow's concept of "tolerance". I guess some are more equal than others.
Yeah, I read that book, too. Snowball and Napoleon.
Bics

La Puente, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#185000
Mar 27, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Sounds more like a pubic-hair problem to me.
hemp for telelgraphs

Anderson, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#185001
Mar 27, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
You're as much full of shit as D is.
Im full of shit because i believe some of the commonly accepted things taught in school?

like evolution??

or that the earth revolves around the sun and is not flat??

you guys always remind me of flat earthers....because your always refuting the latest science on "religious grounds"

some of you are really deficiant in the history dept.....ricardo think the tories of the late 18 the century were liberals.

the first paragraph in any mainstream explaination of them calls them "conservative"

as opposed to liberal.

since then, the crown colony has been anything but a bastion of liberalism throught he years(NH, for instance, was one of the last two states to accept MLK's B day, as a federal holiday)

but they voted for Obama this time, so they must be waking up.

unlike you.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#185002
Mar 27, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

hemp for telelgraphs wrote:
<quoted text>
If the rethugs were silly enough to give bush the nomination??
he will get steamed rolled BY WHO EVER.
but HIllary, on the other hand, will steamroll ANYONE who runs agianst her.
im hoping you guys make good on your threat to nominate a "TRUE"
conservative, like santorum, palin or bachmann...
so you can see what it was like to be barry goldwater..
you thought 2012 was close?
mitt lost by 3 million votes...
because his campaign effort, s&&cked.
and your party's values stink badly.
No, see, that is what I am telling you. It doesn't matter who they hold up as running, because the results have already been decided. Jeb has announced that he is going to run. his family runs this country. It is a done deal, already. Seriously, google "Bush Crime Family' and read about all that they have done so far. Financed the Third Reich. All kinds of shit. They own us. And, not my party.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#185003
Mar 27, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

hemp for telelgraphs wrote:
<quoted text>
how is that??
im not gay, but im a crusader against ALL bigotry.
there is your answer.
the poll from ABC news was at 58% favorablity for gay marraige.
what polls do YOU have to show us ??
the arguements the right are offereing, are being picked apart this week by the scotus justices, just like they were picked apart in the lower courts...
youve been making them as well i see.
so let me see if i get this straight??
you are pro-federal law/ when it suits your cause?/
AND you are pro- states rights also, when it serves your cause?
I'm about smaller government, and leaving power where it belongs. And leaving some institutions alone.
hemp for telelgraphs

Anderson, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#185004
Mar 27, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
So the Democraps will nominate....?
<quoted text>
Hillarity will steamroll anyone....oh sure
<quoted text>
Nah.....ya might say the wind blew in at just the right time to put Obama back in.
Id say the 47% video had a bit more of an effect on the outcome of the election. mitt was almost tied with Obama before that.....

then he plummeted 10 pts in 10 days...

if you guys didnt get that amercia rejected your ideas??

then double down on stoopid, and ill hand ya the next shovel...

hint: minorities vote on policy just like white people do.

so trying to restrict their voting, might not be seen as the nicest thing you could be doing to court their votes.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#185005
Mar 27, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
"All but settled"?!? Are you kidding me?!? Show me one scientist who has said this. Bring me one serious, scholarly article that implies this.
Scientists have discussed these issues ON PAPER! They've not even tried to show how this works on lab rats or any other test subjects at this point. No laboratory has started a project to prove it that we know of.
This is a THEORY. It is not FACT. It is not "all but settled".
Good GOD, you REALLY missed out on the scientific method when you were in school.
Here's a refresher's course:
Scientific Method Step 1: Ask a Question (Why are their gay people?)
Scientific Method Step 2: Make Observations and Conduct Background Research (Not all people are gay, there must be a reason for this)
Scientific Method Step 3: Propose a Hypothesis (based on information gathered from reading other research, perhaps epigenetics or some other biological inheritance related process that would explain why people are gay)**by the way, this is as far as scientists have gotten with regards to determining if epigenetics play a role**
Scientific Method Step 4: Design an Experiment to Test the Hypothesis (it's at this point a scientist would design a LABORATORY EXPERIMENT to see if epigenetics do play a role in homosexuality)
Scientific Method Step 5: Test the Hypothesis (scientists would run their experiment and record the results)
Scientific Method Step 6: Accept or Reject the Hypothesis (based on the results of the experiment, the scientists would either accept their hypothesis that epigenetics play a role in homosexuality or they would not)
Sorry to have to publicly school you on basic, grade school science, but your blatant lack of scientific knowledge makes it necessary.
“We’ve found a story that looks really good,” concluded Rice in the U.S. News article.“There’s more verification needed, but we point out how we can easily do epigenetic profiles genome-wide. We predict where the epi-marks occur, we just need other studies to look at it empirically. This can be tested and proven within six months. It’s easy to test. If it’s a bad idea, we can throw it away in short order.”

http://www.lifebeyondtherapy.com/index.php...
entry-132-researchers-say-they -have-found-genetic-switches-f or-homosexuality/

I wonder if another stage of denial is possible for you?

Smile.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#185006
Mar 27, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

hemp for telelgraphs wrote:
<quoted text>
actaully,im pro 2nd amendment rights.
Im for your right to OWN YOUR PEICE..
that post was more about the fact that you had to sign a loyaty plegde JUST to hear what they were pitching.
when you are an activist??
you try to get your message out.
unless you are somehow ashamed of the message you are lecturing on...other wise, you are just going to be preaching to the choir.
background checks make sense, so does an assault rifle ban.
as well as limiting clip size (lets face it, you can have as much ammo as you can carry)
90% of the country supports background checks...
Cool. I think that background checks are good in essence, but useless in practice. Limited clip size and assault rifle bans are wrong, to me, as a criminal may have a bigger clip, and not all shots hit the mark. Also, the purpose of the 2nd Amendment was to allow us to guard against government aggression. I am an activist just about all the time. I currently drive semis and spend a lot of time on my radio, engaging in activism. And I get called a lot of names, some good, some bad. It goes with the territory.
And that loyalty pledge is a bunch of hooey, in my opinion. Anyone should be able to hear what is being said publicly. But there might have been some talk that would have bordered on subjects not in line with Big Brother. Who's to say? "No just government fears an armed population"

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Palm Springs Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
CA CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming (Oct '10) 17 hr Donny B 7,922
CA California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legali... (Oct '10) Tue matches lighters 15,961
Review: Profix Jewerly And Watch Repair Mon Jonnie S 1
Tony Casas, 77; Former Prisons Official Worked ... (Sep '07) Mon sex 692
CA California seeks to ban free, single-use carryo... (Jun '10) Aug 24 Mono 4,996
City Manager Martin Magana hires Charles "Chuck... Aug 21 Commander Bunny 9
Touch Of Class Consignments, Cathedral City, ca. (Aug '13) Aug 19 Ned 123
•••
•••
•••

Palm Springs Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Palm Springs People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Palm Springs News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Palm Springs
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••