Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201887 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

heartandmind

Moline, IL

#185099 Mar 28, 2013
Big D wrote:
There is a BIG issue with the "standing" arguments in court.
If the Supremes go that way, it is admittedly the easy way, decide no on has standing to defend prop 8 and down it goes, same with DOMA, decide that BLAG does not have standing and down it goes.
But that sets up one strange and powerful precedent.
That means any Governor, in any state can overturn any law he wants to, by having someone challenge it, and then refuse to defend it. Don’t get me wrong.
I still think they may rule on standing... but if they do... they are opening a whole new can of worms.
Don’t get me wrong, I think but the republican and democratic governors of California did the right thing refusing to defend it.
i agree. that is a worrisome can of worms. no way of knowing the long term effects of just ruling on the standing validity. any law is then suspect - and i think at least one of the justices pondered upon that as well.
hemp for telelgraphs

Anderson, CA

#185100 Mar 28, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
It has nothing to do with "should"- it is a CONSTITUTIONAL MANDATE.
The States have been all but castrated thanks to the 16th and 17th Amendment's.
The 16th allowed the Federal Government to directly tax the income of the populous. As such, now instead of the State being able to fund it's own programs thus retaining control, the Fed taxes at such a rate little is left for the State to take. Then the Fed dangles the carrot- do as we say or you won't get your citizens money back from us to run all those programs and projects.
This goes right in line with the 17th Amendment which basically created a second House of Representatives, thus removing the State's voice in the Federal government.
We could fix a lot of our issues by sending those two Amendments the way of prohibition.
the 17th amendment allows for local elections??

you are against local elections??

REALLY??

I guess it is not that surprising, as the tea partiers are trying to do away with local elections in michigan.

they have already succeeded in cutting half the black population OFF from their former local representation.

now they have "emergency managers", installed in those cities(inc now detroit)

they arnt doing it quit like hitler did in in 38??

but almost

it IS targeting black communities.

Michigan is one of those states in the rust belt that used to vote republican, but now votes democratic for president.

it is one of the states YOUR party must retake if it EVER hopes to win the whitehouse again.

THIS is NOT a GOOD way to reach out to minority voters to show them that they embody your republican values....

JUst the opposite.

you guys hope to wIN national elections while the members of your state coalitions are passing laws like THAT???

the voters actually repealed the emergency manager law...

.....but then the state legislature(because they dont like the 17th amendment) nullified that mandate by passing another emrgency manager law, THIS time adding that it COULDNT be repealed by popular demand.....what kind of government does things like that??
Big D

Modesto, CA

#185101 Mar 28, 2013
heartandmind wrote:
<quoted text>
wrong again. try reading the prop 8 transcripts and the DOMA transcripts as those are the trials we're discussing.
DOMA is a dead issue, as soon as they read the intent that was written for DOMA in 1996, it was going down.

That is animus, practically a written confession .... DOMA is toast

The question is really now only Prop 8
hemp for telelgraphs

Anderson, CA

#185102 Mar 28, 2013
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
AK, I don't trust the Electoral College, I believe in Popular Vote...Even though the Framers gave it to us, to "..guard against a rash act by the people.."
AKKK doesnt likkk the local elections either...

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#185103 Mar 28, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
WELL THERE ARE MANY EXAMPLES OF HOMOSEXUALITY IN NATURE, IT'S VERY COMMON."
Homosexual behavior has been observed in black swans, penguins, sheep, and other animals, he says.
One dude even took his dog back for being gay...Do you ever think how degrading it is to gay people that their lives and loving bonds are being compared with the instinctual shagging of puzzled birds and dogs?
heartandmind

Moline, IL

#185104 Mar 28, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
DOMA is a dead issue, as soon as they read the intent that was written for DOMA in 1996, it was going down.
That is animus, practically a written confession .... DOMA is toast
The question is really now only Prop 8
true. i'm just curious about the findings and writings from SCOTUS in regards to DOMA. it could set a precedent.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#185105 Mar 28, 2013
hemp for telelgraphs wrote:
<quoted text>
but wait??
doesnt that conflict with your normal line about california being a compleat mess? because the democrats are in charge?
I guess that means CA is not a compleat mess, or did you mean complete? The Democrats here make sure they regulate rabbits and it's Indian casino's. They must be complete.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#185106 Mar 28, 2013
hemp for telelgraphs wrote:
<quoted text>
there is plenty to learn from the past...
like the fact that we dont want to go back there, like the republicans want to.
Then why do the D's keep repeating history?
Big D

Modesto, CA

#185107 Mar 28, 2013
heartandmind wrote:
<quoted text>
true. i'm just curious about the findings and writings from SCOTUS in regards to DOMA. it could set a precedent.
yes.. it shares the precedent that prop 8 does, if they defeat it with standing.

But I doubt they will, animus is obvious, it will be easy for them to just strike it down outright.

I suppose it is also true however that animus can be used in quite a number of states.
Number9

La Puente, CA

#185108 Mar 28, 2013
Just how much to you recycle?
Big D

Modesto, CA

#185109 Mar 28, 2013
heartandmind wrote:
<quoted text>
true. i'm just curious about the findings and writings from SCOTUS in regards to DOMA. it could set a precedent.
It’s funny, neither of these rulings will have any effect on me, my family, and very few people that I even happen to know

But I am on the edge of my seat watching this, the advance of freedom, justice and equality.

It has been an interesting few days

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#185110 Mar 28, 2013
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>One dude even took his dog back for being gay...Do you ever think how degrading it is to gay people that their lives and loving bonds are being compared with the instinctual shagging of puzzled birds and dogs?
Yeah... I guess it's kind of like when folks call it "the birds and the bees." Or when Kimare gets on here and tries to convince us that only straight people should marry because of apple trees and walnut trees.

Oh... Wait... That would be degrading to straight people too.

Seriously, I have no problem having homosexuality pointed out in nature. Heterosexuality exists throughout nature. Even monogamy is seen in nature. Do you have a problem with that?

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#185111 Mar 28, 2013
Number9 wrote:
Just how much to you recycle?
depends on how much it's worth
hemp for telelgraphs

Anderson, CA

#185112 Mar 28, 2013
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>One dude even took his dog back for being gay...Do you ever think how degrading it is to gay people that their lives and loving bonds are being compared with the instinctual shagging of puzzled birds and dogs?
that is what those in favor of SSM have been screaming everytime someone from the bigoted zone, puts in their two cents, comparing gay marriage to beastiality, or worse...

they have been doing it aLL along!!

where have you been??

or are you just now becoming liberal, because of this issue?
hemp for telelgraphs

Anderson, CA

#185113 Mar 28, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
It’s funny, neither of these rulings will have any effect on me, my family, and very few people that I even happen to know
But I am on the edge of my seat watching this, the advance of freedom, justice and equality.
It has been an interesting few days
same here, but I think everybody's rights are somehow intertwined...

weve seen what apathy can do to the political process...
hemp for telelgraphs

Anderson, CA

#185114 Mar 28, 2013
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>Then why do the D's keep repeating history?
you have to be more specific....

everybody "repeats history" in some way.

BUT in keeping you fools OUTA the whitehouse, we are trying to prevent another situation like iraq....

pre-emptive corporate wars are not in the publics interest.

esp when said oil cartels want the public to pay for it.

"the oil will pay for the invasion"

donald dumsfeld, 2003.
hemp for telelgraphs

Anderson, CA

#185115 Mar 28, 2013
Reichardo...
i wouldnt be grilling you so bad on iraq, if Bush cheney had recanted their deeds...

the reason i brought up republicans in the whitehouse??? is because you mention democrats repeating history...

at least the demoncrats who supported that false invasion have recanted.....

but not Bush/cheney, or any of the crew...

cheney said hed do it ALL over again..

if we keep rethugs OUTA the whitehouse, we might have a chance at NOT repeating an event like that.

it is not like the neo-cons didnt have any precident as to what might happen.

they kNEW what would happen, but proceeded anyways.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#185116 Mar 28, 2013
hemp for telelgraphs wrote:
<quoted text>
that is what those in favor of SSM have been screaming everytime someone from the bigoted zone, puts in their two cents, comparing gay marriage to beastiality, or worse...
they have been doing it aLL along!!
where have you been??
or are you just now becoming liberal, because of this issue?
Why are you calling Veryvermilion a bigot?

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#185117 Mar 28, 2013
hemp for telelgraphs wrote:
<quoted text>
you have to be more specific....
everybody "repeats history" in some way.
BUT in keeping you fools OUTA the whitehouse, we are trying to prevent another situation like iraq....
pre-emptive corporate wars are not in the publics interest.
esp when said oil cartels want the public to pay for it.
"the oil will pay for the invasion"
donald dumsfeld, 2003.
I'm sure it's a good bombing or war if it has a "clinton" on the bomb. lol

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#185118 Mar 28, 2013
hemp for telelgraphs wrote:
Reichardo...

at least the demoncrats who supported that false invasion have recanted.....
LOL

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Palm Springs Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
facetime? (gay guys only) (Jul '11) Nov 30 Chechi6 67
Drugs on rise in Palm Springs (Sep '07) Nov 29 SnottyGurl 24
News The Pass2 men charged with attempted murder in ... Nov 24 Cabazon 4real 1
David Thornton Sells Obama Salts For Millions. ... Oct '16 Patriot 1
News Teens protest legislation (Mar '06) Oct '16 never really a part 227
Obama does not want you to check for ill Att. c... Oct '16 Luke 1
Obama does not want you to check for ill Att. c... Oct '16 Luke 1

Palm Springs Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Palm Springs Mortgages