what an excellect solution.<quoted text>
What I don't comprehend is your continued misreading of my position.
I did not say it would.
Perhaps if you looked past your own inflated ego, you'd see I never stated it was a requirement for a marriage license. It is however part of marital jurisprudence. As I pointed out several post ago, which you ignored.
Do u understand I never said it was. Probably not, you'll more than likely continue to pontificate about the secular sacred cow know as same sex marriage.
The All Wise and Powerful Big D has spoken, all hail the Big D. Ignore the man behind the curtain.
The bottom line is that SSM is, again, the secular sacred cow, of the left, and there's no possible argument against it, for everyone who opposes it, including those self hating traitor gays, are homophobes, bigots, and anti gays. Your continued pontificating on the matter only proves that.
I see no compelling reason for it. However different situations, different solutions. Several states, and countries have acknowledged this, and same sex couples, by granting them civil unions. Your turn, let's see if you respond with what I think you will, but I give you the benefit of the doubt.
we can further sort out the bigots(rightwingers) by corraling them all off into three distinct regions of the country....the south, the great plains and Idaho, utah and wyoming.
that is another reason why i recommended utah...
youd feel more at home there, politically.
the rest of the states will allow gay marraige
and benefit from tourist dollars from other tolerate populations from other tolerant(blue) states.