Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments
161,201 - 161,220 of 200,323 Comments Last updated 4 hrs ago

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184625
Mar 25, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Marram wrote:
<quoted text>
You sound like a sniveling wimp. Face it, you donít have anything to offer and should just go away. Iím sure this isnít the first time youíve heard this.
Nope, just pointing out the obvious, and based on your response I would say I might have hit a little too close to home for ya- eh Marram?

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184626
Mar 25, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
You keep on coming up with dumber and dumber arguments.
One would be hard pressed to win that contest against you.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184627
Mar 25, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
You "marriage" could never be one, monster.
You marriage???
Ronald

Long Beach, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184631
Mar 26, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Lately, the Government licensed "news" has been promoting - in unison - the notion that, now, "everyone" supports the idea that two persons of the same SEX should have the "right" to "marry" each other. It must be true. After all, we can always believe the Government propaganda mill. Yeah. Right.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184634
Mar 26, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

akpilot wrote:
How sad is it that there are generally 6-8 people who have no life, and spend their lonely days trolling the thread to post judge-it's not based on the content of the post, but based on the name attached to the post?
How much sadder would it be if there was only 1 person?
Seriously, look at the judge-its. With near 100% accuracy you will see page after page, 6-8 judge-it's.
So sad.
Amen!

It simply exposes the ignorant bigotry of their position. A mindless opposition to anyone who disagrees with their demands. Childish and silly.

Smile.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184635
Mar 26, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

akpilot wrote:
How sad is it that there are generally 6-8 people who have no life, and spend their lonely days trolling the thread to post judge-it's not based on the content of the post, but based on the name attached to the post?
How much sadder would it be if there was only 1 person?
Seriously, look at the judge-its. With near 100% accuracy you will see page after page, 6-8 judge-it's.
So sad.
endocannabanoid system wrote:
<quoted text>
you are right here with, us mr. pursuit of liberty for all...
He is not 'right here with us', he makes one of the most reasoned, respectful and thoughtful responses found here.

No matter what he says, there are 6 to 8 'judgits' that deem it 'hate'. Mindless responses like yours that simply reveal bigotry.

Grow up.

Smile.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184636
Mar 26, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
You are so confused.
DOMA has already failed in court, and the basis for that decision was the the RIGHT to REGULATE and DEFINE marriage rested with the STATE!!! The SCOTUS upholding that decision would AFFIRM that the STATES have the power to REGULATE and DEFINE marriage. It would do NOTHING to help your argument.
You really should stop pretending that you understand the legal system.
The Supreme Court has already once impacted the state's ability to regulate marriage in 1967 when decided in the Loving v. Virginia case. It overturned not only Virginia's law against interracial marriage, but it also overturned its own 1883 decision, Pace v. Alabama, in which a ban on interracial marriage was upheld.

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184637
Mar 26, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Baker v Nelson is US Supreme Court precedent for a State's right to define marriage as one man and one woman. Proposition 8 was a legal amendment to define marriage as one man and one woman. If SCOTUS doesn't rule for the people of California, it will have voided its own precedent.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184638
Mar 26, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

KiMare wrote:
akpilot wrote:
How sad is it that there are generally 6-8 people who have no life, and spend their lonely days trolling the thread to post judge-it's not based on the content of the post, but based on the name attached to the post?
How much sadder would it be if there was only 1 person?
Seriously, look at the judge-its. With near 100% accuracy you will see page after page, 6-8 judge-it's.
So sad.
<quoted text>
He is not 'right here with us', he makes one of the most reasoned, respectful and thoughtful responses found here.
No matter what he says, there are 6 to 8 'judgits' that deem it 'hate'. Mindless responses like yours that simply reveal bigotry.
Grow up.
Smile.
Oh please, Kim... You are on about 10 (or more) of these gay themed forums. You've posted hundreds (thousands?) of comments over the past 3 years.

And you've most recently taken to outright LYING about epigenetics. You claim that science has reached the conclusion that an epigenetic marker "mistake" has been located. You say that there is no doubt. And you KNOW this is not true.

When you come on here and LIE, you continue to lose credibility.

Those who might support you do not like to be associated with a liar.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184639
Mar 26, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

"Marriage Ruling Could Save Same-Sex Couples Thousands"
By Blake Ellis, CNN Money March 26, 2013

Should the Supreme Court overturn a federal law that defines marriage as solely between a man and a woman, some married same-sex couples will save $8,000 or more in income tax, a new analysis finds.

This week, the court will hear a case challenging the Defense of Marriage Act, a 1996 law that prevents same-sex couples from receiving more than 1,000 federal benefits that opposite-sex married couples receive.

This includes the right to file federal taxes jointly -- which, depending on income, gives some married filers a "bonus" of thousands of dollars, while penalizing others.

A same-sex couple with combined income of $100,000, in which one person earns $70,000 and the other makes $30,000, currently pays an extra $1,625 per year by filing separately rather than jointly, according to an analysis H&R Block conducted for CNNMoney. The calculations assume a standard deduction, no children and no tax credits.

The extra tax liability jumps to nearly $8,000 when one spouse earns all $100,000 and the other reports no income. In this case, couples filing jointly owe tax of $11,858, while a same-sex couple filing separately owes $19,585 -- a 65% difference.

Another major tax issue at stake in the DOMA case is the estate tax. Currently, surviving spouses in federally-recognized marriages don't have to pay taxes on their deceased spouse's estate, while same-sex widows pay a 35% estate tax on anything in excess of a $5 million exemption.

(read more here: http://money.cnn.com/2013/03/26/pf/taxes/same... )

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184640
Mar 26, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Let's reform taxes and entitlements, not rewrite marriage laws for everyone.

Same sex marriage is bad because propaganda dissuades low information voters against their natural allies, the conservatives.
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184642
Mar 26, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Brian_G wrote:
Let's reform taxes and entitlements, not rewrite marriage laws for everyone.
Same sex marriage is bad because propaganda dissuades low information voters against their natural allies, the conservatives.
This is the 21st century, we can multitask, we can remove the entitlements for the wealthy in the form of their entitlement tax breaks while at the same time promoting justice and equality for same sex couples by allowing them to marry.
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184643
Mar 26, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
If you buy this nonsense you really need to get your head checked.
If the "far right" had the clout you claim Romney would have never made it to NH in the Primary.
We all watched Romney jump way to the right in order to be nominated, it was really amusing watching him say things that he never ever even indicated before, to get himself nominated.

We all saw it, maybe you were on vacation, you donít remember the comments played over and over about how you say this to get nominated, and then have to backtrack in order to get elected? It was in all the media except the Faux News of course.

And the things he did and said, lost him the election against someone that could have easily been beaten if he had remained the moderate he was before running for office.

His problem was, once saying the right wing fringe stuff in the primary, it is recorded and played back during the general.

Every Republican nominee is going to have the same issue until the republican party moves back to the center.

Until they do, I donít see a way around the problem the Republicans have.
Rant

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184644
Mar 26, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

What happen to the Roman Empire when they accepted same sex as an ok thing to do. The empire fell shortly after that is a fact. Also same sex or gays are nearly one hundred more times likely to pass along hepatitis because of anal bleeding. Odd don't you think. It wasnt meant to be. You have a disease and attempting to poison the US is not right in anyway. You will all have to be quarantined if this goes through then executed and your remains burned in order to cleanse the earth of your filth the Supreme Court must vote you out and put an end to this once and for all. Rule it FINAL NO with no appeal and to never be brought up again.
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184645
Mar 26, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Rant wrote:
What happen to the Roman Empire when they accepted same sex as an ok thing to do. The empire fell shortly after that is a fact. Also same sex or gays are nearly one hundred more times likely to pass along hepatitis because of anal bleeding. Odd don't you think. It wasnt meant to be. You have a disease and attempting to poison the US is not right in anyway. You will all have to be quarantined if this goes through then executed and your remains burned in order to cleanse the earth of your filth the Supreme Court must vote you out and put an end to this once and for all. Rule it FINAL NO with no appeal and to never be brought up again.
Actually Rome fell not long after becoming a Christian empire.

You have to go to actual school, not sunday school to learn about history.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184646
Mar 26, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Brian_G wrote:
Baker v Nelson is US Supreme Court precedent for a State's right to define marriage as one man and one woman. Proposition 8 was a legal amendment to define marriage as one man and one woman. If SCOTUS doesn't rule for the people of California, it will have voided its own precedent.
The Supreme Court has reversed its decision on at least 10 occasions over the years. In the 1830's the Supreme Court upheld a lower court's decision to ban interracial marriage. Then in 1967 it overturned that decision.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184647
Mar 26, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Rant wrote:
What happen to the Roman Empire when they accepted same sex as an ok thing to do. The empire fell shortly after that is a fact. Also same sex or gays are nearly one hundred more times likely to pass along hepatitis because of anal bleeding. Odd don't you think. It wasnt meant to be. You have a disease and attempting to poison the US is not right in anyway. You will all have to be quarantined if this goes through then executed and your remains burned in order to cleanse the earth of your filth the Supreme Court must vote you out and put an end to this once and for all. Rule it FINAL NO with no appeal and to never be brought up again.
The Roman Empire fell for numerous reasons. It's a myth to say that it fell due to an acceptance of homosexuality.

Most historians believe that the Empire fell primarily because it became so large that it could not defend itself, from a monetary standpoint and a lack of manpower.

Regarding "diseases", you have to understand that these illnesses do not care about the orientation of the person when it transmits itself from one person to another. They are opportunistic infections that simply find the easiest way to stay alive and grow.

And if you want to talk about a "deadly disease", let's talk about how you straight people abort 40,000,000 babies each year. In a little over seven and a half years, that's about the number of people who live in the U.S.

You guys cause much more death on the planet than gay men.

And lesbians are less likely than even heterosexuals to develop HIV.

So, your comments about disease and the gay community is just false.
MoneyWasters

San Dimas, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184648
Mar 26, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

This sounds like a direct connection tot he Glendora, California "stupid" file being played out in court.

Oh that's right eh city of Glendora, Ca. lost (3) times and used tax payers money to defend it's self, yet at the same time or out of the other side of their neck they said in city council meetings.

We are not involved?

More lies coming from the city council member's, city attorney and city manager;

Joseph Santoro

Gene Murabito

Judy Nelson

Karen Davis

Douglas Tessitor
gubbub

Pittsburgh, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184649
Mar 26, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

youtube.com/watch... Ö
Judge Gay is why
Grovers crazy

San Dimas, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184650
Mar 26, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

6

Grover Norquist is and always sounded like a "muslim brotherhood" member, since his wife are Muslim's.

Grover Norquist has called for the destruction of America, time for this nasty, filthy piece of trash to be arrested deported to a muslim country of his choice.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Palm Springs Discussions

Search the Palm Springs Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
desert hot springs, ca. unkept yards 1 hr Alice 2
CA CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming (Oct '10) 4 hr Ocean 7,835
Costco readies for new opening (Dec '06) 8 hr AMan 149
Tony Casas, 77; Former Prisons Official Worked ... (Sep '07) 13 hr Shellys Husband is Strong 635
CA Jury reaches verdict in Oakland BART shooting t... (Jul '10) Tue Ronald 2,251
CA California seeks to ban free, single-use carryo... (Jun '10) Jul 21 Racjei 4,885
Touch Of Class Consignments, Cathedral City, ca. (Aug '13) Jul 17 Alice 120
•••

Excessive Heat Warning for Riverside County was issued at July 23 at 5:52PM PDT

•••
•••
•••
•••

Palm Springs Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Palm Springs People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Palm Springs News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Palm Springs
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••