Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,318

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#183266 Mar 13, 2013
Figures wrote:
Just more degradation of the morality of America, caving into the immorality and radical liberal socialist political correctness agenda destroying America!
LOL. Con dumb parroting. You don't even know what socialism is! Why are you against the Constitution and equal rights?

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#183267 Mar 13, 2013
KiMare wrote:
11. If you violate evolution's law of reproduction to equate a genetic dead end
Speaking of genetic dead ends, you call yourself a monster mutation.
Should you have been aborted?

KiMare wrote:
KiMare'a wrote; We have covered it, and your position is continually shown to be distortion and denial.
Marriage combines the DNA of the husband and wife within the marriage.
Speaking of DNA, if a genetic test shows the fetus has two sets, should it be aborted?

KiMare wrote:

Additionally, a gay couple specifically deprives and child of one gender and more critically, denies the child at least one of the only natural parents we ever are allowed!
You deprive a child of a fully human parent. You are a monster mutation.
LOL!
Trummeled

Covina, CA

#183268 Mar 13, 2013
Same bunch of stupid posters.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#183270 Mar 13, 2013
right on wrote:
<quoted text> Two words for you bub, Sodom and Gomorrah
Ezekiel 16:49 Now this was the sin of your sister Sodom: She and her daughters were arrogant, overfed and unconcerned; they did not help the poor and needy (nothing about homosexuality)

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#183271 Mar 13, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
Marriage isn't about evolution. Marriage is about marriage.
Any two heterosexual people can (and do) have offspring all of the time.
Kimare's argument that a marriage certificate--a piece of paper--is needed to keep males from spreading their seed is ridiculous.
In the wild, in fact, it's more advantageous for the strongest male to spread his genes to as many different females as possible. This results in a greater number of stronger offspring.
So, his "one-man, one-woman" argument is not based on evolution. It's based on man-made morals and values that have no basis in science.
And ultimately, it has no impact on same-gender marriage; which is about legal equality.
1. Marriage isn't about evolution?

Really.

Marriage has nothing to do with evolutionary mating behavior?

Marriage has no correlation to procreation?

2. Of course heterosexuals have offspring outside of marriage.

To the immediate and devastating consequences for the child.

3. I made no such claim about a 'piece of paper'. Marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior. It does not need a 'piece of paper'.

4. I did not base my one man/one woman on evolution. I based it on the cross cultural 'constraint' of marriage. That means marriage restricts the drive of evolutionary mating behavior primarily for the sake of the child.

Social scientist surmise that marriage would not exist if it were not for the desire of humans to maintain contact with their child and pursue that child's best interests.

5. Legal equality is not possible, since gay couples are a direct defective contradiction to evolution's primary goal. Literally 'unmarriage'!

However, legal rights for gay couples are available through other means without imposing an imposter relationship on marriage.

Welcome back VV.

Smirk.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#183272 Mar 13, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>Discredit your posts????? You haven't proved them in the first place. They are nothing but your opinion..... based on lies and misinformation. But here in America, you are free to hold the craziest opinions you can conjure up. Just don't be surprised when people laugh in your face.
Do you really think you are fooling anyone with ad homoan attacks and no logical defense?

The truth is in black and white. It looks like shit on your face.

Snicker.
Tents

Covina, CA

#183274 Mar 13, 2013
Leave it to the WACKo Boy Scouts or should I say Mormon's - it was the mormon men that were doing this in the first place.
rob

Klamath Falls, OR

#183275 Mar 13, 2013
when is it ever good to talk about your deviant sex life in public, next people will want to marry kids

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#183277 Mar 13, 2013
Quest wrote:
Stringing unrelated words together just makes you look silly.
It just prove's Quest's poor reading comprehension.

.
Quest wrote:
What you need to do is prove that gay couples legally marrying has any negative effect on society, on other couples, and on their own children.
I don't need to prove anything, I'm for keeping the law as is. Your the one backing the suit, in America you have to prove your complaint, the defendant isn't required to prove innocence.

.
Quest wrote:
Can't do that? Then keep conflating marriage with apartheid and segregation.
Same sex marriage is gender segregation marriage. In other words, same sex marriage is gender apartheid marriage. Words have meanings, same sex means the opposite of gender diversity and integration.
Anonymous

Vallejo, CA

#183278 Mar 13, 2013
The new Pope Francis (St Francis of Assisi) isn't going to be giving San Francisco (St Francis of Assisi) gays any slack. He's conservative and hardline and will be keeping an eye on what's going on around here......

http://www.businessinsider.com/pope-francis-c...
Bergoglio is seen an unwaveringly orthodox on matters of sexual morality, staunchly opposing abortion, same-sex marriage, and contraception. In 2010 he asserted that gay adoption is a form of discrimination against children.
annie

Klamath Falls, OR

#183280 Mar 13, 2013
yeah, Vallejo,
where the Christan help center had a gay prest that lived upstairs from the teen boys shelter, not teen girls, they had a men's section, and a woman and children's section, but why the teen boys in the same building as a gay priest?
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#183281 Mar 13, 2013
sheesh void of hate wrote:
<quoted text>
So what you're saying is he couldn't out do your average of blowing and tossing salad for 60 homeless men in dire need of a bath per day for free.
I do believe that is what he is saying, yes...
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#183282 Mar 13, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
uh-huh.... so you blank your mind when you rail against gays, eh? Interesting.
Oh....Do I? What else do I do?
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#183283 Mar 13, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
Keep butting in. It proves your obsession.
He's not butting in, I invited him. While you made false claims.
duck soup

Klamath Falls, OR

#183284 Mar 13, 2013
free Hitler showers for the D-faced
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#183285 Mar 13, 2013
Francisco dAnconia wrote:
<quoted text>
what obsession?
you are an angry ignorant a-hole and I don't mind telling anyone you are posting to while I am around...
obsession like you and my job?
It's X-Box that has the obsession.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#183287 Mar 13, 2013
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
Stringing unrelated words together just makes you look silly.
What you need to do is prove that gay couples legally marrying has any negative effect on society, on other couples, and on their own children.
Can't do that? Then keep conflating marriage with apartheid and segregation.
Actually, sweets, we don't need to do that, at all. It's you who must show compelling need for changing the existing laws.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#183289 Mar 13, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>Discredit your posts????? You haven't proved them in the first place. They are nothing but your opinion..... based on lies and misinformation. But here in America, you are free to hold the craziest opinions you can conjure up. Just don't be surprised when people laugh in your face.
Kimare's posts make perfect sense. You just have no recourse, but to scoff and ignore. It's the only defense that you have. Like going off-topic to accuse someone of being a lawyer. Or not being a lawyer. Or trying a case. Or not trying a case. Aw, shit, who knows what you are trying to say ? Not that it matters.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#183290 Mar 13, 2013
right on wrote:
<quoted text>It is disgusting that we have come to this point in our decrepit society that we actually consider allowing men to marry men and women to marry women. I cannot wait for the return of God.
I'm not pushing the religious side of this, just the common sense part of it, so I agree with you...

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#183291 Mar 13, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
1. Marriage isn't about evolution?
Really.
Marriage has nothing to do with evolutionary mating behavior?
Marriage has no correlation to procreation?

2. Of course heterosexuals have offspring outside of marriage.
To the immediate and devastating consequences for the child.
3. I made no such claim about a 'piece of paper'. Marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior. It does not need a 'piece of paper'.
4. I did not base my one man/one woman on evolution. I based it on the cross cultural 'constraint' of marriage. That means marriage restricts the drive of evolutionary mating behavior primarily for the sake of the child.
Social scientist surmise that marriage would not exist if it were not for the desire of humans to maintain contact with their child and pursue that child's best interests.
5. Legal equality is not possible, since gay couples are a direct defective contradiction to evolution's primary goal. Literally 'unmarriage'!
However, legal rights for gay couples are available through other means without imposing an imposter relationship on marriage.
Welcome back VV.
Smirk.
Speaking of imposer...humans only have 23 pairs of chromosomes. How many do you have?
Should you have been aborted?
LOL!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Palm Springs Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Charles Koch calls on fellow conservative donor... 2 hr THE most DUHHHHHHH 8
grill a burger in palm desert, ca. 22 hr Betty 1
stores with bad customer service {list your wor... 22 hr Bob 8
mexican landscapers dump in the desert Jan 21 its me daisy 40
Review: Tj's Steaks Pasta & Spirits Jan 20 Wordonthestreet 1
Is Missing 71-Year-Old Palm Desert Man In San B... Jan 18 ImNotWeTarDidButU... 2
DHS Police Chief Charles Maynard to retire Jan 16 not to mention 3

High Wind Warning for Riverside County was issued at January 25 at 11:53AM PST

Palm Springs Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Palm Springs People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 2:47 pm PST