Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 200,976

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#181278 Feb 25, 2013
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Projecting your own problems onto another isn't a valid cure for your problems. If those solutions worked for you, well, fine. I doubt that he suffers from the same problems that have plagued you.
Yeah, it's always talk of small dick with that guy. Makes me wonder too.

Man who talk too big, small. The Old Papasans used to say.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#181279 Feb 25, 2013
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
And I ask: What gives us the right to restrict the number to "one" ?
He's real mad and won't say. Probably sulking today.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#181280 Feb 25, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
On May 6, 2009, the State of Maine became the fifth U.S. State to codify the legal construct of "same sex marriage." Supporters labeled the passage of the new law as a "civil rights victory," a matter of "fairness and equality" for "all" as well as "equal protection under the law." The new law was titled, "L.D. 1020, An Act To End Discrimination in Civil Marriage and Affirm Religious Freedom." But the Act, itself, very specifically does "discriminate" - against consenting adult polygamists.
On April 22, 2009, up to 4,000 Maine citizens attended the Public Hearing at the Augusta Civic Center. As expected, marriage controllers opposed the law, wanting to continue special rights only for those who choose "one man, one woman." Homosexuals and supporters wanted to further expand the receipt of those special rights to those who choose "same sex marriage" too.
Mark Henkel, speaking as the National Polygamy Advocate and as a Maine citizen, also made a presentation at the Hearing - as "Neither For Nor Against." When he stood up to speak, the entire room immediately hushed, except for the overwhelming clicking sound of numerous media cameras on him. He noted that both homosexuals and marriage controllers re-define marriage. Factually, polygamy has always been included in the definition. Henkel offered the polygamy rights win-win solution to end the government marriage debate, the abolition of all big government marriage control for unrelated consenting adults. When he had finished, many people approached him, expressing their surprise and support for the alternative proposal. Despite the crush of photography, the major Maine media chose only to "sell" L.D. 1020 to persuade their audiences.
Over the subsequent two weeks, the bill was rushed through the Legislature and was immediately signed by Governor Baldacci on May 6th – extremely quickly, indeed.
Previously opposing "gay marriage" in favor of civil unions, the Governor explained, "I have come to believe that this is a question of fairness and of equal protection under the law… Under the Constitution, we are all the same. We are supposed to make sure we are all protected from discrimination, regardless of the differences between us. My responsibility, that I swore an oath to do, is that I'm there for everybody."
And we are all treated the equally when it comes to getting married to more than one person, so it's not an equal rights issue. Should we all be able to marry more than one person? Well, I'm sure there's gotta be a forum about that subject somewhere...if not, why not start one?

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#181281 Feb 25, 2013
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
...
Racial slur reported.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#181282 Feb 25, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
And we are all treated the equally when it comes to getting married to more than one person, so it's not an equal rights issue. Should we all be able to marry more than one person? Well, I'm sure there's gotta be a forum about that subject somewhere...if not, why not start one?
As we are all treated equally when it comes to getting married to one person of the opposite sex as well. Equal is as equal does.
jkhjhjube6trbyey b

Bentonville, AR

#181283 Feb 25, 2013
hope they all suck each-other to death!!!!!!!!!!

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#181284 Feb 25, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
As we are all treated equally when it comes to getting married to one person of the opposite sex as well. Equal is as equal does.
And we were all treated equally when it came to marrying someone of the same race. But since a white person couldn't marry a black person, while a black person could, they weren't treated equally.
A man can marry a woman, but a woman can't. Not equal.
A woman can marry a man, but a man can't. Not equal.
Everybody can only marry one person. Equal.
Should everybody be able to marry more than one person?
Well, I'm sure you're not the first person to come up with the idea, why not see if there is a forum about that subject?

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#181285 Feb 25, 2013
jkhjhjube6trbyeyb wrote:
hope they all suck each-other to death!!!!!!!!!!
What a way to go!!!!!!

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#181286 Feb 25, 2013
Marram wrote:
<quoted text>
You are really an ignorant piece of work. Let me spell it out for you one final time. I support equal marriage for Gay Americans who what to marry the ONE person they love. Do you get it you stupid jackass?
Yeah, we get it- you are a bigot. You don't care about equal right's just your cause.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#181287 Feb 25, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Frank could you explain the ramifications of Poly marriage with regards to our court system, divorce and social security benefits? Same sex marriage in no way affects them, can the same be said of Poly marriage????
So because it might be "difficult", that is a good enough reason to deny someone the equal right to be happy?

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#181288 Feb 25, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Did they let you out finally? Well, keep taking your meds on schedule, or they might have to come get you again, stupid.
Poor Rose, she can't even get people on the internet to take her seriously.
Edgar

Spring, TX

#181289 Feb 25, 2013
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
And I ask: What gives us the right to restrict the number to "one" ?
If nobody else will answer this, then I will:

Our right to limit marriage to one person is backed by the fact that no stigma in our psyche rationally provokes us to want to mate with more than one person. Maybe on a conscious level that may seem like the case sometimes, but it doesn't resonate subconsciously, or at least has not yet been shown to by psychologists.

Which is exactly the opposite case for homosexuality. Scientists, biologists, psychologists - they've all reached the same conclusion regarding this. When it's looked at in an objective, unbiased light, any experienced practician can see the trend: homosexuality is just as genetic as taste buds. The desire to commit bigamy is not.

Gay relationships are not the equivalent of bigamy and shouldn't be equated as such.
Edgar

Spring, TX

#181290 Feb 25, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, we get it- you are a bigot. You don't care about equal right's just your cause.
I'm sorry, which side of this argument are you on again? The anti-equality one?

Yea, the pro-equality guy here is quite the "bigot", eh?

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#181291 Feb 25, 2013
Edgar wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm sorry, which side of this argument are you on again? The anti-equality one?
Yea, the pro-equality guy here is quite the "bigot", eh?
"pro-equality?" Hardly, you're just interested in a cause, not really interested in equality, but then again none of you really are.

But hey, you guys never let rational thought get in the way of a good protest. I guess it makes you guys feel like you have a purpose.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#181292 Feb 25, 2013
Edgar wrote:
<quoted text>
If nobody else will answer this, then I will:
Our right to limit marriage to one person is backed by the fact that no stigma in our psyche rationally provokes us to want to mate with more than one person. Maybe on a conscious level that may seem like the case sometimes, but it doesn't resonate subconsciously, or at least has not yet been shown to by psychologists.
Which is exactly the opposite case for homosexuality. Scientists, biologists, psychologists - they've all reached the same conclusion regarding this. When it's looked at in an objective, unbiased light, any experienced practician can see the trend: homosexuality is just as genetic as taste buds. The desire to commit bigamy is not.
Gay relationships are not the equivalent of bigamy and shouldn't be equated as such.
So you are against equal rights for everyone? You are against the right of everyone to live their life the way they choose?

I guess you really aren't all that interested in keeping the government out of your bedroom after all.
Edgar

Spring, TX

#181293 Feb 25, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
"pro-equality?" Hardly, you're just interested in a cause, not really interested in equality, but then again none of you really are.
But hey, you guys never let rational thought get in the way of a good protest. I guess it makes you guys feel like you have a purpose.
You bet, buddy.

History has shown this: given enough momentum, a rights-activism movement in America cannot be stopped (i.e. racial equality, gender equality, the American revolution...)

Everyone has a purpose. That's what sets the two sides of this debate apart; one side's extreme is shown to consistently show more faith in human capability than the other.

And it ain't your side, if I may resort to briefly using Texan slang.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#181294 Feb 25, 2013
GodSmacked wrote:
<quoted text>
Frankie I have opened this discussion up with you on the LGBT thread.
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/gay/TK0EA9RFQ...
In on that.
Edgar

Spring, TX

#181295 Feb 25, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
So you are against equal rights for everyone? You are against the right of everyone to live their life the way they choose?
I guess you really aren't all that interested in keeping the government out of your bedroom after all.
If you want to legalize multiple-partner marriage than go right on ahead, see where you get.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#181296 Feb 25, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>
Frank got his azz handed to him. Godsmacked tried to discuss Poly marriage with him. All the boy had was Ad- Hominem attacks. Please do click on the link, and read for yourselves. Frankie is a troll.
That is a lie. I took up the glove. And smacked your pet across the mouth with it.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#181297 Feb 25, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Frank could you explain the ramifications of Poly marriage with regards to our court system, divorce and social security benefits?
I did that. In the other forum.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Palm Springs Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Perrotte gains support for early release (Jun '07) 7 hr ET SNELL 26
CA California seeks to ban free, single-use carryo... (Jun '10) 7 hr free for all 5,081
Do you approve of Mary Bono Mack as Representat... (Jul '12) 12 hr marcella williams 4
CA CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming (Oct '10) 20 hr surfs up 7,955
Scottish-Americans mixed on keeping kingdom united 20 hr James 3
CA Jury reaches verdict in Oakland BART shooting t... (Jul '10) Fri scoop 2,273
CA California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legali... (Oct '10) Sep 18 Pizza 16,000
•••
•••
•••

Palm Springs Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Palm Springs People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Palm Springs News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Palm Springs
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••