Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

[Frankie Rizzo]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh I am an active supporter of space sciences, I talk with my wallet on that.
I am not personally going to space, too old am afraid
But back to the actual topic here, Same sex marriage, it is hilarious that your champions are from Utah... what a contradiction, and if they ask for marriage equality on the national stage, we all know what will get thrown in their face.
I still think Montana is a better place for you to start, they pride themselves on their rebelliousness anyway.

Sorry to spoil your fun but the secular humanists who support marriage equality for everyone, including Mormons in Utah, and are "my champions", are not from Utah.

Would you be less hostile and/or amused at denying equality if the people in Utah were excluded?

How about a gay polyamorist relationship in Utah? If you were king would you deny that too? Or do they get a pass in Big D's Bigotland simply because they are gay and not Mormons?

[Frankie Rizzo]

Lililth_Satans_Bore wrote:

<quoted text>Hey how's that wife of yours... LOL

How's Jerry?

[Dusty Mangina]

Brian_G wrote:

<quoted text>The physical fitness training standards are here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Ar...
You can see for yourself, the standards are lower for women.
If you want to let unqualified people in combat units, change the rules for everyone, not just women.

Wrong thread, Captain Commando.

[Jazybird58]

Brian_G wrote:

<quoted text>The physical fitness training standards are here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Ar...
You can see for yourself, the standards are lower for women.
If you want to let unqualified people in combat units, change the rules for everyone, not just women.

Golly Brian do the requirements of fitness change with age as well????

[Jazybird58]

Lililth_Satans_Bore wrote:

<quoted text>Hey how's that wife of yours... LOL

Sup, baby?

[Jazybird58]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
Sorry to spoil your fun but the secular humanists who support marriage equality for everyone, including Mormons in Utah, and are "my champions", are not from Utah.
Would you be less hostile and/or amused at denying equality if the people in Utah were excluded?
How about a gay polyamorist relationship in Utah? If you were king would you deny that too? Or do they get a pass in Big D's Bigotland simply because they are gay and not Mormons?

STFU

[Big D]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
Sorry to spoil your fun but the secular humanists who support marriage equality for everyone, including Mormons in Utah, and are "my champions", are not from Utah.
Would you be less hostile and/or amused at denying equality if the people in Utah were excluded?
How about a gay polyamorist relationship in Utah? If you were king would you deny that too? Or do they get a pass in Big D's Bigotland simply because they are gay and not Mormons?

You complaining about hostility?

That is the best one today!!!

I thought you didn’t want people laughing at you.:D

[Lililth_Satans_B ore]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
How's Jerry?

He's fine... Thank you

[Lililth_Satans_B ore]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
How's Jerry?

Don't worry Brians wife was Special needs... she rode the short bus

[Frankie Rizzo]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
You complaining about hostility?
That is the best one today!!!
I thought you didn’t want people laughing at you.:D

Great argument.

[Frankie Rizzo]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
If you are tired of being laughed at, stop being so funny

Another great argument from Big D!

Don't get your feelings hurt, get more tolerant.

[Lililth_Satans_B ore]

The Worlds Biggest Lie wrote:

You've ruined the lives of untold numbers of souls the world over. Now you're gonna pay.
Eternally

what... did you forget your meds again today... nutcase

[Brian_G]

Big D wrote:

You don’t get it, the standards are going to be lowering anyway, because of technology, and raising in other respects, particularly intellectually In 10 years we will have few piloted aircraft in 25 years there will probably be no crews in tanks

Science fiction on one side, and the fact that our front line combat units have been reaching higher standards of excellence on the other. That doesn't change the fact, women can't meet the physical demands without excessive illness, injuries and deaths. They aren't assigned to combat units because they can't pass the training courses.

.

Big D wrote:

Already we have women in house to house searches in Afghanistan side by side men in ground action

Probably Afghan women too, but that's not the point, a search isn't combat. When the TSA probes you before a flight, that's not combat, it's a search. Women are better at searching women, no question.

.

Big D wrote:

You can whine and complain all day long, it wont matter, this change is overdue ( other countries have already done it ) and is coming regardless of your objections

It results in death; that's why leftists like it. Anything that kills our service people is a go in their playbook.

I call foul, soldiers are supposed to protect women, not lead them to slaughter.

[Brian_G]

Jazybird58 wrote:

Golly Brian do the requirements of fitness change with age as well????

Yes. Gender and age equality is illusion.

Keep marriage male female to keep the very old from marrying the too young.

[sickofit]

Brian_G wrote:

<quoted text>Yes. Gender and age equality is illusion.
Keep marriage male female to keep the very old from marrying the too young.

Why do you nazi pigs hate FREEDOM and EQUALITY so much???? Why is the Constitution vile to you hitler lovers???

You traitors should mvoe to Iran..You would fit right in.

[Lililth_Satans_B ore]

sickofit wrote:

<quoted text>
Why do you nazi pigs hate FREEDOM and EQUALITY so much???? Why is the Constitution vile to you hitler lovers???
You traitors should mvoe to Iran..You would fit right in.

it's because of his wife

[sickofit]

Lililth_Satans_Bore wrote:

<quoted text>it's because of his wife

He is married???? A women agreed to marry that pig??? WOW. What you bet she is having an affair with a hung black stud on the side...LOL Bet that drives that nazi pig nuts.

[Frankie Rizzo]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
You complaining about hostility?
That is the best one today!!!
I thought you didn’t want people laughing at you.:D

WOW! You're really "wiping the floor" with me again today aren't you Big D?

Too Funny!

Marriage. There is no one right way. Even for the people of Utah.

[sheesh void of hate]

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
Where did I say that?
Smile.

Head trauma, KiMart?

Let me refresh your memory about the conversation involving you a few pages back:

Quest wrote:

<quoted text>
Well, except for the simple fact that the majority of gay folks don't engage in it, and the majority of straight folks have tried it.
And how would you go about identifying who is gay by this factor?
By this standard, the majority of folks would be gay, wouldn't they?
I think that means you are completely surrounded.

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>The huge difference is that straights have an option, gays don't. However, in either case, Anal sex is inherently Harmful, unhealthy and demeaning. Moreover, MOST people don't engage in anal sex. Something about common sense...

Smirk.

Apparently the two of you were speaking about anal sex (something you seem to obsess over a great deal.

You also need to try to understand the language you're using, namely english. We have words that are synonyms and words that are antonyms. You said, in reference to anal sex, that gays had no option. That brins us to antonyms of option, like mandatory.

Smirk

[Lililth_Satans_B ore]

sickofit wrote:

<quoted text>
He is married???? A women agreed to marry that pig??? WOW. What you bet she is having an affair with a hung black stud on the side...LOL Bet that drives that nazi pig nuts.

I know right!!! lol