Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,148

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#179575 Feb 14, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Because this is a perfectly good marriage equality thread, thank you.
Why don't you start a thread on red herrings? Over in the fish threads. Or maybe a straw man thread.
Rosie forgets the key word here is "MARRIAGE", as in same sex marriage, conjugal marriage, and yes the one she loves to deny, plural marriage. In her "marriage equality" world, Kody and his ladies are a bunch of Mormon fundies, Red necks, in breeders, and all sorts of trollette undesirables. They're not worthy of being allowed in the club house. It must make her cringe every time the Browns appear on national TV supporting gay marriage. "Wahhhhhh.....why can't those people leave us alone". Remember, Rosie, your cause is their cause, and their cause is your cause.

Did anyone from the pro gay marriage crowd honestly think this wouldn't happen? That plural marriage practitioners wouldn't jump on the band wagon?

Anyone willing to offer an honest answer?
Big D

Modesto, CA

#179576 Feb 14, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Rosie forgets the key word here is "MARRIAGE", as in same sex marriage, conjugal marriage, and yes the one she loves to deny, plural marriage. In her "marriage equality" world, Kody and his ladies are a bunch of Mormon fundies, Red necks, in breeders, and all sorts of trollette undesirables. They're not worthy of being allowed in the club house. It must make her cringe every time the Browns appear on national TV supporting gay marriage. "Wahhhhhh.....why can't those people leave us alone". Remember, Rosie, your cause is their cause, and their cause is your cause.
Did anyone from the pro gay marriage crowd honestly think this wouldn't happen? That plural marriage practitioners wouldn't jump on the band wagon?
Anyone willing to offer an honest answer?
They can try to jump on the bandwagon ( chuckle )

It wonít help

Until more responsible and civilized advocates of it come forward, it just isnít going anywhere.

It is just talk
Big D

Modesto, CA

#179577 Feb 14, 2013
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>Is that a good thing old man? You want women in the front lines fighting islamics? U czy!
They already are, you just are ignorant of the fact
Big D

Modesto, CA

#179580 Feb 14, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
It's all marriage equality. Except for the goats, that's PETA.
P.S. Learn the subject you are debating, goats cannot enter into contracts. Neither can little girls. So your bigotry and ignorance regarding poly marriage is unfounded. It's just ignorance. And bigotry. And hypocrisy.
P.S. What happened to your dopey plan to tell all married gay couples that they are no longer married?
What a dope!
again you will need someone more civilized and human to make the case, because that is not what the general public is seeing and has seen.

I am not talking about me you idiot, I am talking about general support which you wont get as long as all they see so far on the subject has been pretty darn negative.
Mongol Man

Fallbrook, CA

#179582 Feb 14, 2013
I think gays should be allowed to marry. If I have to put up with a mother-in-law, they should too.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#179585 Feb 14, 2013
Mongol Man wrote:
I think gays should be allowed to marr y. If I have to put up with a mother-in-law, they should too.
And you know that's going to be ugly. Talk about a mommas boy.

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#179586 Feb 14, 2013
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>Is that a good thing old man? You want women in the front lines fighting islamics? U czy!
Islamics? Crap did we declare war on the Muslims?

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#179587 Feb 14, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Imagine the poor polygamist! Multiple mothers-in-law!
Good point. You'd think polygamists would be opposed to themselves!
Big D

Modesto, CA

#179590 Feb 14, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Off topic. Go start a woman in the military thread. this is a thread about MARRIAGE.
No thanks poly boy we will talk about whatever we want to
Big D

Modesto, CA

#179591 Feb 14, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Islamics? Crap did we declare war on the Muslims?
He personally is at war with a religion, the US is not.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179592 Feb 14, 2013
sheesh void of hate wrote:
<quoted text>
Good point. You'd think polygamists would be opposed to themselves!
It certainly would make me think twice, or three times...
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179593 Feb 14, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
No thanks poly boy we will talk about whatever we want to
You pull the off topic card on me, I pull it on you. Equal.

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#179594 Feb 14, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
He personally is at war with a religion, the US is not.
Thanks for clearing that up
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179595 Feb 14, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
He personally is at war with a religion, the US is not.
You are personally at war with Mormons. But not Islamists. They've both polygamists (according to your bigotry). Yet you only hate the Mormons. Funny that.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179596 Feb 14, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Thanks for clearing that up
Says the jackass geek who worships an imaginary bowl of frikkin spaghetti that flies!
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179597 Feb 14, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
He personally is at war with a religion, the US is not.
Ever since I began researching the topic of polygamy, I have been bothered by the idea that this practice is justifiably criminalized because it is associated with the ills of child exploitation, abuse of women and children, etc.

But, within the criminal code, we have clear and specific provisions to target these offences, which are clearly harmful, and which any reasonable person considers intolerable and deserving of criminal sanction. So why does the law banning polygamy remain, a provision which, by the way, is almost never invoked and when it has been used, has led to few convictions that carried relatively minimal sentences?

If someone commits a crime, prosecute the hell out of them NO MATTER THE TYPE OF MARRIAGE THEY CHOOSE.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#179598 Feb 14, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
You are personally at war with Mormons. But not Islamists. They've both polygamists (according to your bigotry). Yet you only hate the Mormons. Funny that.
Not at all, again you have not comprehended posts others make, you are like a little kid in the back seat that only understands every 5th word said.

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#179599 Feb 14, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Says the jackass geek who worships an imaginary bowl of frikkin spaghetti that flies!
Why is The FSM imiginary? Why do you hate him? Do you feel the same towards the mean god in your book? What a maroon

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#179600 Feb 14, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Ever since I began researching the topic of polygamy, I have been bothered by the idea that this practice is justifiably criminalized because it is associated with the ills of child exploitation, abuse of women and children, etc.
But, within the criminal code, we have clear and specific provisions to target these offences, which are clearly harmful, and which any reasonable person considers intolerable and deserving of criminal sanction. So why does the law banning polygamy remain, a provision which, by the way, is almost never invoked and when it has been used, has led to few convictions that carried relatively minimal sentences?
If someone commits a crime, prosecute the hell out of them NO MATTER THE TYPE OF MARRIAGE THEY CHOOSE.
Wow you cant read. That not what Dan was talking about. What a maroon
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179601 Feb 14, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Thanks for clearing that up
Hey Jizy Birdy! You're wife is over my house! I'll be busy for about 10 minutes! She's calling me!

http://www.rleeermey.com/sounds/horney.wav

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Palm Springs Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
stores with bad customer service {list your wor... Dec 11 Tony 1
mexican landscapers dump in the desert Dec 11 Jean 22
Re-Thinking Southern California Earthquake Scen... Dec 8 Rick 1
Lower gas prices means more people on the road ... Dec 7 Ronald 6
Costco readies for new opening (Dec '06) Dec 6 Bobbo Yogi 154
Review: Inter-City Plumbing (Jun '09) Dec 3 Jean 11
Complaint CATHEDRAL CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT (Jan '08) Dec 1 kent 48

Flash Flood Watch for Riverside County was issued at December 17 at 3:53PM PST

Palm Springs Dating
Find my Match

Palm Springs People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Palm Springs News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Palm Springs

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 4:07 pm PST