Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201820 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179423 Feb 12, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
No you are just too stupid to comprehend what I am saying.
Perhaps your friend can
Is this the start of a new Big D straw man? "You're too stupid to comprehend my enlightened position Mormon boy"?

Too Funny!
Big D

Modesto, CA

#179424 Feb 12, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Same sex couples want nothing short of real marriage just like hetero couples. And I agree with them, they should have it.
So your dopey plan won't work. Hetero couples don't have to settle for civil unions and homosexual couples should not have to either. Nor should polyamorists.
Under what I just said, they would be 100% equal, as the government wouldn’t recognize heterosexual marriage either.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#179425 Feb 12, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Rosie....Rosie.....Rosie....pe rsonally there's no good argument for gay marriage.
Equal rights.
No other argument is needed.
Pietro Armando wrote:
Frankie may feel different. But ya can't argue for "marriage equality" for those forms of marriage you like, and ignore those you don't. Plural marriage people are knocking on the rainbow clubhouse door. They want some of that "marriage equality" you keep harping about.
They have it. They have the same right to marry more than one person everybody else does.
Pietro Armando wrote:
Don't be mad cuz they want to crash the party. Kody Brown and his wives support you, can't you support them?
Stupid troll, equal means "the same". Everybody is treated equally, the same, when it comes to getting married to more than one spouse, so it's not an equal rights issue. Are you really so dumb you don't understand that? But everybody is not treated equally when it comes to getting married to a man (or a woman), so that is an equal rights issue.

Should everybody be able to marry more than one spouse? Well, why not start a forum and talk about it?(Notice, I'm not stating a position on polygamy, it's just a red herring in this forum.)
Big D

Modesto, CA

#179426 Feb 12, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>

(Notice, I'm not stating a position on polygamy, it's just a red herring in this forum.)
Exactly right, it is an argument to get people to say something that they can re-apply opposed to same sex marriage

It is an old tactic

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#179427 Feb 12, 2013
If you remove gender diversity from marriage in the name of same sex marriage, to create a new standard of gender segregated marriage...

To make your government gender blind to mothers, sisters, daughters, fathers, brothers and sons;

That's on you. We naturally reject ersatz gender equality. Women in combat units is a sick joke!
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179428 Feb 12, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
They have the same right to marry more than one person everybody else does.
Sure. Just like homosexuals have the same right to marry the opposite sex person of their choice that everyone else does.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179429 Feb 12, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly right, it is an argument to get people to say something that they can re-apply opposed to same sex marriage
It is an old tactic
I find it difficult to see the logic of defending monogamous marriage as the historic norm when the laws of many states have already departed from the principle that it is heterosexual, monogamous marriage that is essential to social stability.

If heterosexuality is no longer legally, morally or socially relevant to marriage, why should monogamy continue to be so important?
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179430 Feb 12, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly right, it is an argument to get people to say something that they can re-apply opposed to same sex marriage
It is an old tactic
Tell it to the judge. Submit a friend of the court memo and tell him polygamy shouldn't be allowed because it's a red herring. And an old tactic.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#179431 Feb 12, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
If you remove gender diversity from marriage in the name of same sex marriage, to create a new standard of gender segregated marriage...
To make your government gender blind to mothers, sisters, daughters, fathers, brothers and sons;
That's on you. We naturally reject ersatz gender equality. Women in combat units is a sick joke!
Speaking of joke...
When are members of pro sports teams in MD going to be forced to marry each other? Will they have to be on the same team?
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179432 Feb 12, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Under what I just said, they would be 100% equal, as the government wouldn’t recognize heterosexual marriage either.
Brilliant plan dippy! Now sell it to everyone. I suggest you start with gay couples. Tell them that you are going to downgrade their marriages, but it's OK because you're going to do it to hetero couples too.

Your dumb plan demonstrates how little you know about the subject.
Nugent lost

Monrovia, CA

#179433 Feb 12, 2013
Watch ted nugent make a fool out himself tonight, he is out of his league and paygrade.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#179434 Feb 12, 2013

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#179435 Feb 12, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Sure. Just like homosexuals have the same right to marry the opposite sex person of their choice that everyone else does.
Exactly....she keeps forgetting that part.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#179436 Feb 12, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
https://www.facebook.com/photo .php?fbid=604256512923870& set=a.297761996906658.93777.27 5304779152380&type=1&r ef=nf
Just imagine those sign saying "no gender mixing" , there's a great slogan for the ssm crowd.
Nugent lost

Monrovia, CA

#179437 Feb 12, 2013
Ted Nugent has been lost in the north 40 for years, that's why he is kept there under lock and key.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#179438 Feb 12, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly....she keeps forgetting that part.
I don't make my argument based on sexual orientation, but on gender.
A man can marry a woman, so a woman should have that same right.
A woman can marry a man, so a man should have that same right.
Nugent Lost

Monrovia, CA

#179439 Feb 12, 2013
What a mess, read smoking gun article about Ted Nugent.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#179441 Feb 12, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't make my argument based on sexual orientation, but on gender.
Exactly marriage is a union of both genders. The old tab A into slot B.
A man can marry a woman, so a woman should have that same right.
How can a woman be a husband to another woman. Something is missing.
A woman can marry a man, so a man should have that same right.
How can a man be a wife to another man? Surgery perhaps.
Guns Blazing

Monrovia, CA

#179442 Feb 12, 2013
Ted Nugent, the NRA's number 1 champion avoided the draft, claiming to be and still is 4-F.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#179443 Feb 12, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly marriage is a union of both genders. The old tab A into slot B.
<quoted text>
How can a woman be a husband to another woman. Something is missing.
<quoted text>
How can a man be a wife to another man? Surgery perhaps.
Really? You can't think any further outside of the box than that????

A man can be a husband to another man.
A woman can be a wife to another woman.

Husband and husband.
Wife and wife.

See how basic and easy that is???

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Palm Springs Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Plus Size clothes - Draper's & Damon's Jun 28 Tracy 2
Complaint CATHEDRAL CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT (Jan '08) Jun 26 Mr Jon Doe 49
News Statues Of Virgin Mary Beheaded, Jesus Christ D... Jun 26 inewsmaster 1
Touch Of Class Consignment (Cathedral City, Ca. Jun 25 Jgreen 7
News Chinese tourists power-shopping in U.S. (Aug '13) Jun 25 Go Blue Forever 14
need some ideas or direction Jun 23 deserthelp 1
Review: Inter-City Plumbing (Jun '09) Jun 23 Ron T 12
More from around the web

Palm Springs People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Palm Springs Mortgages