Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

[Neil Andblowme]

anonymous wrote:

putting aside the issue of the vote, a vote should be upheld both sides rallied and the losers of the vote should not have voted if they were unwilling to accept the outcome of the vote.
regarding this issue, america should relabel marriages as domestic partnership. this would render all couples equal and "marriage" would remain a religious ceremony for those whom choose to do it.. like baptism

Marriage is a legal contract, not a religious ceremony.

[Rose_NoHo]

KiMare wrote:

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Hardly. The law and the Constitution are being manipulated. Our founding Fathers are rolling over in their graves.

Let 'em roll. Women can vote, slavery is illegal, murder of natives is, well, murder.

KiMare wrote:

If you knew history, you'd know they knew they had sounded the death knell for those issues.
While those issues have been confronted over and over in history, calling gay couples married has only extremely rarely and briefly been attempted. A clear distinction.
Ho, Ho, Ho.

Monster mutations were killed. Even now, DNA tests are done on fetuses so the mother can abort if there is an abnormality. As in the case of a chimera.

[Rose_NoHo]

Brian_G wrote:

<quoted text>I disagree, a popular vote was taken in California, and a judge rewrote marriage law. Maryland is one of the very few cases of popular referendum in support of legislated same sex marriage law. Without a legislated model, I doubt the electorate would have agreed to same sex marriage.

Now that gay marriage is legal in MD, when are members of the Ravens going to be forced to marry each other? Your claim was that members of pro sports teams would be forced to marry each other when gay marriage is allowed.
Any sort of idea on that timeline?

[230 fare]

Remember don't boil the TEA to long, other wise it turns bitter.

Tea Party nuts are bitter.

[Rose_NoHo]

martinezjosei wrote:

<quoted text>
"USA has a net negative migration rate. More people are leaving the AmeriKKKa nation than entering."
Yes, since Libtrads started running Congress!!!

When are you con dumbs leaving?

[Dusty Mangina]

Pietro Armando wrote:

Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Ya didn't answer the question.

I want the 1400 plus benefits that straight people receive from the federal government by being "married ". Until we have that, I'm not prepared to fight other battles.

[Saudi sucks]

Saudi preacher rapes & kills 5-year-old daughter, pays small fine and is free.

Posted by Irina Gonzalez
on February 6, 2013

Activists are angry moms everywhere around the world and calling for justice after a 5-year-old girl was raped "everywhere" and died from her injuries.

The worst part?

Her own muslim father did this to her!

[Dusty Mangina]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
Now that gay marriage is legal in MD, when are members of the Ravens going to be forced to marry each other? Your claim was that members of pro sports teams would be forced to marry each other when gay marriage is allowed.
Any sort of idea on that timeline?

can we watch the consimation of that Marriage?

[Pietro Armando]

Neil Andblowme wrote:

<quoted text>Marriage is a legal contract, not a religious ceremony.

Based on a specific relationship, that of husband and wife. Those states that have legal ssm based it on that same contract, eliminating in essence, that part of the contract referencing the sexual union of husband and wife.

[RiccardoFire]

Saudi sucks wrote:

Saudi preacher rapes & kills 5-year-old daughter, pays small fine and is free.
Posted by Irina Gonzalez
on February 6, 2013
Activists are angry moms everywhere around the world and calling for justice after a 5-year-old girl was raped "everywhere" and died from her injuries.
The worst part?
Her own muslim father did this to her!

and your point on ssm because of this?

[Randy -Rock- Hudson]

Imprtnrd wrote:

<quoted text>There is NO equality in a polygamy marriage. Other than that.....it's a go.

LOL, You made a funny. "No equality"....LOL....Good one.

[Randy -Rock- Hudson]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
LOL you have some tough times coming kiddo
The case has already been made, and passed the court, and the appellate courts, that it should be lega, that making it illegal is unconstitutional.
there are 50 states, 20 years ago it was not legal in any of them.
Now it is legal in quite a few, and that number is growing every year. The number of countries legalizing it is growing even faster.

Just as poly is now...Illegal in all states, but about to change. You didn't really think that the issue was solely for the benefits of the gay crowd, only, did you ?

[Randy -Rock- Hudson]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
He seems terrified of even discussing polygamy, so probably not.
He wishes it would go away because he's not smart enough to debate it. He gets angry because I won't let him dismiss it. The he says he laughing at me. Next he'll be calling me a liar.
But that's the Big Dope!

Kind of like ol' Chongo trying to decide what IS an issue and what isn't...hilarious.

[Pietro Armando]

Dusty Mangina wrote:

<quoted text>
I want the 1400 plus benefits that straight people receive from the federal government by being "married ". Until we have that, I'm not prepared to fight other battles.

Ahhhh.....so you're interested in the bennies but don't like the delivery method. Is that it? Why should the feds care who marries who, if all it is, is a benefits package?

[Rose_NoHo]

Dusty Mangina wrote:

<quoted text>
can we watch the consimation of that Marriage?

Sign me up for that!

[Rose_NoHo]

Pietro Armando wrote:

<quoted text>
Based on a specific relationship, that of husband and wife. Those states that have legal ssm based it on that same contract, eliminating in essence, that part of the contract referencing the sexual union of husband and wife.

Um, so what?
Husbands and wives will still have sex.

[Randy -Rock- Hudson]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
You don't even know what "protest too much" means.

No, of course he doesn't...You're the only one that knows anything, right ?

[Randy -Rock- Hudson]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
Polygamists already have marriage equality.
Next.

Nope. If the married husband wants to marry another woman, the wife should have that right too....Equality for all, remember ? Eat your words, Chongo, eat them.

[Randy -Rock- Hudson]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
Polygamists already have marriage equality.

No, they don't, fucktard.

[Dusty Mangina]

Pietro Armando wrote:

<quoted text>
Ahhhh.....so you're interested in the bennies but don't like the delivery method. Is that it? Why should the feds care who marries who, if all it is, is a benefits package?

Are you saying that's all your marriage is?