Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments (Page 7,810)

Showing posts 156,181 - 156,200 of200,229
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179097
Feb 9, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope. If the married husband wants to marry another woman, the wife should have that right too....Equality for all, remember ? Eat your words, Chongo, eat them.
She has the right to want to, just like he does. Equal, Bigfoot, equal.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179098
Feb 9, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Jazybird58 wrote:
Top ten Asshats on topix
Frankie RIzzo
Frankie RIzzo
Frankie RIzzo
Frankie RIzzo
Frankie RIzzo
Frankie RIzzo
Frankie RIzzo
Frankie RIzzo
Frankie RIzzo
Frankie RIzzo
Yeah, you sure fooled us all, with that list.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179099
Feb 9, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>You asked for the list, I gave it to you. Did you see it? Therefore it a real list.
You're not married, you're a child.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179100
Feb 9, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
No, they don't, fucktard.
Yes, they do, Bigfoot. If a polygamist walks into the JP and asks to marry more than one person, they will be told the same thing anybody else is told. That's equal. Should people be allowed to marry more than one person? Well, that's not really the topic here, why not start a forum and talk about it? Oh, yeah, you don't really give a damn about polygamy, you are just against gay marriage, but can't come up with a good argument against it, so you try to cloud the issue by bringing up polygamy.(Notice, I'm not taking a stand on polygamy.)
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179101
Feb 9, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text> I asked Big D, Rose No-Ho that and myself are many. Judging from the Judgits there are many more. Would you care for more people to tell you the same thing? I can put it up for a vote if you like. Maybe a poll on Topix. Is Frankie Rizzo an asshat?
Chongo puts up all the judgits, when he has run out of crack, we all know where they come from.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179102
Feb 9, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Um, so what?
Husbands and wives will still have sex.
Uh Rose...I didn't say they wouldn't.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179103
Feb 9, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>It was private.
You ignorant moron, do you think that your shallow bullshit fools anyone ? you are seriously an embarrassment to all the people on this forum. "Private" ? If, and I say "if", you took a "private" poll, Why would you even bring it up in public ? you are seriously the most moronic ass-puppet in here. Childish evasions that even Chongo would be embarrassed to use.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179104
Feb 9, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Your advocating asshatness.
Aw, STFU, I took a poll and everyone agreed that you're childish, beyond hope.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179105
Feb 9, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
No, they don't, fucktard.
She's using the same argument she hates when used against same sex marriage!

She's so dishonest. Or really, really stupid. Or both.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179106
Feb 9, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Aw, STFU, I took a poll and everyone agreed that you're childish, beyond hope.
Jizzybird has made a thread for me! But it backfired on him. Too funny!

Come over and rattle his cage for big fun!
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179107
Feb 9, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

The dummy Jizzybird's thread he made for me-

http://www.topix.com/forum/news/gay/TUNATFE41...
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179108
Feb 9, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I was just laughing at him complaining about the link, it worked for me, maybe he is computer challenged.
There is a special living facility for the computer impaired
More lies, from Big Deceitful.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179109
Feb 9, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Uh Rose...I didn't say they wouldn't.
Then, um, so what?
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179110
Feb 9, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Karma is a_______ wrote:
<quoted text>
Not really sure what you mean by "all marriage equality" there Frankie boy but I hazard to guess you mean
1. Marrying children
2. Marrying blood relatives, i.e. mom & son, father & daughter, brother & sister.
3. Marrying your pet.
4. polygamy
First you are using the slippery slope fallacy. But just to answer your stupidity.
1. There is thing called AGE OF CONSENT. Children can not give their consent to sex and marriage. ergo it will remain illegal.
CASED CLOSED
2. Therre are health issues with marrying close relatives, which is why it is illegal. You can easily see what happens by studying British and Russian royalty in the 1600-1800's, particularly the Tsar family, you will notice the high rate of hemophilia. And that was with cousins marrying cousins. No telling what would have happened between direct family members...well I take that back...you are a prime example.
3. Besides from the obvious health issues, animals can not give their consent to marriage....so it would be rape.
4. marriage above all else is a social contract. Inheritances, medical decisions, etc are all part of that contract. With polygamy, the lines of who gets what, who makes what decisions are blurred and lead to legal battles. Does one of the wives who is not the mother of one of the children in the marriage get to make medical decisions for that child is a prime example of why polygamy is illegal.
These are all rational, logical reasons why the slippery slope fallacy is moot. However, judging by your previous posts, intelligent logical debate is not your forte. Debating with a wall has better results.
Just to clarify,#1 and #3 are your additions. As for #2, there is no risk of developing hemophilia by marrying your close/blood relatives. As we have been told that procreation is not a valid marriage point, there is no basis for worrying about children of these marriages. Slippery slope #1...
As for #4, these are issues that can be covered by a contract, so this is slippery slope #2...
Don't be so stupid, next time, if you can help it....
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179111
Feb 9, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Karma is a_______ wrote:
<quoted text>
are these rhetoric questions, or do you want answers?
You mean "rhetorical", not "rhetoric", and you meant to type "borne out", not "bore out"....No answers required.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179112
Feb 9, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Frankie RIzzo wrote:
The dummy Jizzybird's thread he made for me-
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/gay/TUNATFE41...
Yeah, I caught the subsequent one that he had to create, after the fact. The original one that he listed didn't work.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179113
Feb 9, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, I caught the subsequent one that he had to create, after the fact. The original one that he listed didn't work.
He has trouble posting links due to the fact that he is stupid.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179114
Feb 9, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
How silly. there is no list, else you'd be on it.
It's an imaginary list.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179115
Feb 9, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
You are spinning. The number is 41. Not 32. Actually, you are not spinning, you are flat out lying.
Big D is an unabashed liar. If you call him on it, he'll accuse you of lying.

I call it Big D's Liar Straw Man. He attempts to get you to defend yourself to take the attention away from his lies. Of course it only works for so long.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179116
Feb 9, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Neil Andblowme wrote:
<quoted text>About to change? Really? What State is about to legalize polygamous marriage?
Are you now going to try and tell us polygamy will never, ever be legalized Miss Thing? Remember not long ago that's what they said about gay marriage?

Why are you a hypocrite?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 156,181 - 156,200 of200,229
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••

Palm Springs Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Palm Springs People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Palm Springs News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Palm Springs
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••