Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 20 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#178782 Feb 8, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I know... I shouldnt bother trying
Yeah, Jazybird is a lost cause. I agree. Don't bother trying.

But lets put your silly personal attack nonsense aside for a few minutes.

Why is the gender part of "one man one woman" irrelevant but the number part still relevant?
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#178783 Feb 8, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Its not my list dippy. Its a list compiled by posters on topix.
I call bullsh!t. Post it.

Try and get on topic! This ain't kindergarten.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#178784 Feb 8, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I call bullsh!t. Post it.
Try and get on topic! This ain't kindergarten.
LOL

But it is, we have people telling others to stay on topic that never do themselves, this is exactly like kindergarten behavior.

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#178785 Feb 8, 2013
Top ten Asshats on topix
Frankie RIzzo
Frankie RIzzo
Frankie RIzzo
Frankie RIzzo
Frankie RIzzo
Frankie RIzzo
Frankie RIzzo
Frankie RIzzo
Frankie RIzzo
Frankie RIzzo
Big D

Modesto, CA

#178786 Feb 8, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, Jazybird is a lost cause. I agree. Don't bother trying.
But lets put your silly personal attack nonsense aside for a few minutes.
Why is the gender part of "one man one woman" irrelevant but the number part still relevant?
You didnít understand what he was saying, you didnít understand my response

You donít have a clue what others are saying... you donít have enough information to be a part of the conversation.

You are like a little kid in the back seat that only gets about every 5th word said
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#178787 Feb 8, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
Top ten Asshats on topix
Frankie RIzzo
Frankie RIzzo
Frankie RIzzo
Frankie RIzzo
Frankie RIzzo
Frankie RIzzo
Frankie RIzzo
Frankie RIzzo
Frankie RIzzo
Frankie RIzzo
Like I said. Bullshit.

Now tell me what is so inviolate as the number two? Why is gender irrelevant but number still relevant?
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#178788 Feb 8, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
You didnít understand what he was saying, you didnít understand my response
You donít have a clue what others are saying... you donít have enough information to be a part of the conversation.
You are like a little kid in the back seat that only gets about every 5th word said
He was saying I made some phony list he made up. I understood it.

But let's try and get you on topic. When in many states gender has become irrelevant as it should be, why is number still relevant?
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#178789 Feb 8, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Well its human nature, when normal people meet, read or see ignorant broken down hypocritical asshats, we feel compelled to fix them.
Speaking of hypocrites, that's what you and Big D are. You support marriage rights only for groups you like and gleefully deny them to groups you don't like. Then personally attack me with ad hominem when I point out your hypocrisy

I support marriage equality you do not.

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#178790 Feb 8, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Like I said. Bullshit.
Now tell me what is so inviolate as the number two? Why is gender irrelevant but number still relevant?
Your memory sucks, I have answerd your question many times. I don't care if you want 5 wives or to marry your brother. None of then has any affect on my marriage.

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#178791 Feb 8, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Like I said. Bullshit.
Now tell me what is so inviolate as the number two? Why is gender irrelevant but number still relevant?
You asked for the list, I gave it to you. Did you see it? Therefore it a real list.
PisnPot

Monrovia, CA

#178792 Feb 8, 2013
While it happens time to time, so many 'out-of-towners post john crappers.

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#178793 Feb 8, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Speaking of hypocrites, that's what you and Big D are. You support marriage rights only for groups you like and gleefully deny them to groups you don't like. Then personally attack me with ad hominem when I point out your hypocrisy
I support marriage equality you do not.
I just ordered a new case of duct tape. When it arrives I will try and fix you.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#178794 Feb 8, 2013
If traditional marriage is defined as the union of two people of opposite gender, and if the gender requirement is nothing but prejudice, exclusion and an arbitrary denial of one's autonomous choices in love, then the other requirement, the number restriction (two and only two), is a similarly arbitrary, discriminatory and indefensible denial of individual choice.

PLEASE Big D and Jazybird, get all your dopey playground insults done and put your hurt feelings aside and let's have a serious discussion of marriage equality!
Big D

Modesto, CA

#178795 Feb 8, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Speaking of hypocrites, that's what you and Big D are. You support marriage rights only for groups you like and gleefully deny them to groups you don't like. Then personally attack me with ad hominem when I point out your hypocrisy
I support marriage equality you do not.
Speaking of your telling others to stay on topic, the cases before the court will have no effect whatsoever on your obsession.

I just wanted to point out your hypocrisy in telling others to stay on topic ( not that anyone needs to have it pointed out, they all know you are a hypocrite )
PisnPot

Monrovia, CA

#178796 Feb 8, 2013
While it happens time to time, so many 'out-of-towners post on the john crappers web site.

His home town of course is located in the UK, center or arm pit of the world.

Keep them there is a task.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#178797 Feb 8, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>I just ordered a new case of duct tape. When it arrives I will try and fix you.
hmmm maybe you can fix stupid? ;)
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#178798 Feb 8, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>You asked for the list, I gave it to you. Did you see it? Therefore it a real list.
It's by you. You fibbed and said it's by many topix posters.

Try and get on topic, or at least make your ad hominem funny.

You clowns complain about me, when you are the problem.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#178799 Feb 8, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Your memory sucks, I have answerd your question many times. I don't care if you want 5 wives or to marry your brother. None of then has any affect on my marriage.
You support the legalization of polygamy? Really? You are such a fibber, I can never tell.

And you never post anything of substance just dopey playground nonsense that you should be embarrassed by. Do you ever read it after you post it? It's stupid.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#178800 Feb 8, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Speaking of your telling others to stay on topic, the cases before the court will have no effect whatsoever on your obsession.
I just wanted to point out your hypocrisy in telling others to stay on topic ( not that anyone needs to have it pointed out, they all know you are a hypocrite )
Marriage rights for others besides monogamous same sex is perfectly on topic.

You attempt to censor me because you want to avoid revealing your hypocrisy in supporting marriage equality only for groups you like.

Censorship sucks. Especially on an opinion forum.

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#178801 Feb 8, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
You support the legalization of polygamy? Really? You are such a fibber, I can never tell.
And you never post anything of substance just dopey playground nonsense that you should be embarrassed by. Do you ever read it after you post it? It's stupid.
WTF are you S-L-O-W, I told you the same things before.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Palm Springs Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Regina or Bill January (Oct '13) May 1 kat 3
stores with bad customer service {list your wor... Apr 26 Tyler 15
News National: How the Drought Will Reshape Californ... Apr 23 H20 the new Oil 1
mature white women for young dark mature n sexy... Apr 19 thugnasty 2
News FIND Food Bank helps feed thousands at the Cent... Apr 19 CaliDervish 1
Desert Hot Springs Mayor Proud Of Out Of State ... Apr 15 Tony 20
News Group seeks to stop Nestlea s water-bottling op... Apr 14 speak out 1
More from around the web

Palm Springs People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]