Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 200,968

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story

“Get it right”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#178690 Feb 7, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
1. Only if you are dismissive of the unrefuted answers.
2. So defensive (and avoiding the issue...)! The difference is between asking "do you think" (a question) and stating "why do you think" (an assertion). You lied. Like I said, why are these childish word games necessary for a legitimate cause?
...
Huh? What is your question again?
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
...3. Of course lots of gays have procreated. That's not what I said and you know it. Another act of deception. I said gay couples.
Not one single gay couple in ALL of human history has ever procreated....
That is unture.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
...The differences between marriage with/without kids and gay couples;
A apple tree bearing fruit.
A apple tree not bearing fruit for some reason.
A walnut tree who never bears apples wanting to be a apple tree.
A walnut tree hanging apples on it's branches pretending to be a apple tree.
Even funnier?
The claim that if the government doesn't 'require' apple trees to bear fruit, then it is discrimination not to call walnut trees apple trees too!....
Why do you contend marraige has anything to do with offspring? It doesn't. Having children and getting married are two independent events!
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
...
4. You make a simpleton blunder by confusing 'blunder' and 'defect' with 'mutation'. Evolution thrives on mutation. However, a mutation that cannot perpetuate itself is a blunder/defect.
Remember when I schooled you about the fundamental goal of evolution (VIST)?
I = Inheritance: Genetic traits are inherited from parents and are passed on to offspring.
S = Selection: Organisms with traits that are favorable to their survival get to live and pass on their genes to the next generation.
It seems to me your post picture should be a buff ego with no head...
Snicker.
Now tell me who's playing word games, really?
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
.... Snicker.
Of course your smile is gone now as it should be!
Reality2013

Thousand Oaks, CA

#178692 Feb 7, 2013
Once again we have activist judges making up their own absurd interpretation to ignore the will of the people. The ban did not violate anyone's right it just protected the ability of straight couples to differentiate their marriage from non-traditional unions. Marriage doesn't mean much anymore as it is.It was originally very religious and now is very legal. It used to be a contract you did not break for every little problem you have in a marriage. The Gay community can now be as unhappy and join the high divorce rate.
Neil Andblowme

Hoboken, NJ

#178694 Feb 7, 2013
Reality2013 wrote:
Once again we have activist judges making up their own absurd interpretation to ignore the will of the people. The ban did not violate anyone's right it just protected the ability of straight couples to differentiate their marriage from non-traditional unions. Marriage doesn't mean much anymore as it is.It was originally very religious and now is very legal. It used to be a contract you did not break for every little problem you have in a marriage. The Gay community can now be as unhappy and join the high divorce rate.
Um, hellooooooooooooooo.... Prop 8 took away the right that gay couples had to marry. How can you say it didn't violate anyone's rights?

Marriage was NOT originally very religious. It's always been a legal contract.

“Get it right”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#178696 Feb 7, 2013
KiMare wrote:
1. Which makes the gay (pun intended) claim that not having access to marriage stops love.
...
Love is. Marriage is different.
KiMare wrote:
...2. Of course rights are innate. However, certain rights are unique to select people/groups. You avoid answering the assertion; Why discriminate with only gays relationships instead of all relationships?
...
Why indeed?! You must be confused. Denying the basic human right of marriage to gay couples is the DISCRIMIANTION (duh!) that shouldn't be there.
KiMare wrote:
...3. You don't need marriage to acquire any legitimate rights due a gay couple.
...
"Legitimate right" ...What is an IL-legitimate right by the way?
KiMare wrote:
...4. Another simpleton response... Using a classic analogy, Marriage is the union of Mars and Venus, Gay couples are the collision of Uranus and Uranus.
....
Well, not sure quite what to make of this....
KiMare wrote:
...
5. You are not just culturally insensitive, you are culturally stupid. All major religions hold marriage sacred. Calling gay couples married is a sacrilege.
Slavery and intellectual repression have been rejected over and over through history. Gay couples being designated married has never been accepted or legal in any culture from start to finish in all of human history. Simply because they are viewed as a defective distinct relationship.
Marriage liscenses are government issued and have nothing to do with religious choice or affiliation. So why does your or my or anyone else's religious thoughts matter even one iota?
Big D

Modesto, CA

#178697 Feb 7, 2013
chance47 wrote:
<quoted text>
Marriage liscenses are government issued and have nothing to do with religious choice or affiliation. So why does your or my or anyone else's religious thoughts matter even one iota?
Exactly!

“Get it right”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#178698 Feb 7, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Was that a threat?
A wannabe tough guy on the internet, you name it, hahaha!
Likewise I'm sure.

“Get it right”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#178699 Feb 7, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
People would accept getting married to same sex partners if gay marriage is allowed, and accept not having children "as a part of life" and will usually hook up to their same sex "spouse". If it is not allowed then they won't stick to their same sex partner.
How many married gay couples are you friends with? Have you offered this theory to them for their thoughts?
They thinking

Monrovia, CA

#178702 Feb 7, 2013
Oh look, another out of towner poster trying to think?
Big D

Modesto, CA

#178704 Feb 7, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
He said: "So why does your or my or anyone else's religious thoughts matter even one iota?"
That includes your religious thoughts too dummy.
They donít matter :)

Simply not important at all.

I just enjoy reminding them of that fact
Big D

Modesto, CA

#178705 Feb 7, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Listen jackass. Of course when I talk of marriage equity I am not talking about for child molesters or degenerates no matter their preference in marriage or religion.
Some homosexuals have forced children to have sex with them too. Does that mean we shouldn't allow same sex marriage?
You're a bigot and a hypocrite.
No one gives a crap about your obsession, nothing currently in the courts is going to change anything about your obsession, and it has no bearing whatsoever about this topic.:)

You can cry and whine and scream and make every comparison you want, and it isnít worth a piece of crap.:)

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#178706 Feb 7, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
You are illogical, no use for you. It will become a prison regulation only if it happens nationally, gay marriage isn't national yet.
Look dum dum, Brian_G was bleating on about the consequences of gay marriage for prisons. I asked him to provide evidence for forced marriages in prisons. He used Canada as an example.

Same sex marriage has been recognised, nationally, in Canada for the last 7 or 8 years.

In the last 7 or 8 years Canada's prisons have seen three, count 'em, three, same sex marriages. No outbreak of forced same sex marriages and the Canadian police haven't created laws about any of the gibberish you have mentioned.

You keep up the idiocy though. We'd be surprised if you didn't continue making dumb comments.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#178707 Feb 7, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Gays are narcissists. They would get angry at anyone who sees them.
Gay people get angry if you see them? Now that is funny. How hard did you get hit on the noggin?
Big D

Modesto, CA

#178708 Feb 7, 2013
sheesh void of hate wrote:
<quoted text>
Look dum dum, Brian_G was bleating on about the consequences of gay marriage for prisons. I asked him to provide evidence for forced marriages in prisons. He used Canada as an example.
Same sex marriage has been recognised, nationally, in Canada for the last 7 or 8 years.
In the last 7 or 8 years Canada's prisons have seen three, count 'em, three, same sex marriages. No outbreak of forced same sex marriages and the Canadian police haven't created laws about any of the gibberish you have mentioned.
You keep up the idiocy though. We'd be surprised if you didn't continue making dumb comments.
You are confusing the issue with facts

They donít care about facts ;)
Rush

Columbus, NE

#178710 Feb 7, 2013
sheesh void of hate wrote:
<quoted text>
Gay people get angry if you see them? Now that is funny. How hard did you get hit on the noggin?
Largelanguage in a post on another forum in Virginia IL told a 15 year old girl that he wished she would get raped. He has nothing in his noggin. This guy needs to be in jail.
Rush

Columbus, NE

#178713 Feb 7, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
You need to holster your mouth, watch it!
Besides, she probably wasn't looking at the thread anymore, considering it was an old thread, and was probably abandoned, so no one got hurt really.
I think you are the one who better watch it. No excuse for saying somthing like that. You are one sick ba$tard. Get help soon.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#178716 Feb 7, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Relax Fruitloops. If discussing marriage equality upsets you perhaps you should find another thread and/or ignore posts discussing it.
I am not obsessed. I am not crying, whining or screaming. Stop your dishonesty.
Not at all, I find it hilarious how you obsess about something that is going nowhere, and will not be affected in any way by the actual topic or the legal changes taking place.

You can discuss it all you like, no one gives a crap about it, but what the heck. Go ahead

But donít mind us laughing at you about it

I also find it very telling how you defend all those opposed to same sex marriage and attack anyone that is for it. And then claim yourself to be for it.

You donít think any of us believe you, do you? Come on you canít be as gullible as LargeLanguage, even I give you more credit than that.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#178718 Feb 7, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
What is wrong with polygamy then? And no, I am nowhere near gullible, that is why I don't listen to leftwinged propaganda.
I donít care about it, but you can discuss it with Frankie all day, it is nearly all he thinks about.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#178721 Feb 7, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
No it isn't. He was simply pointing out your irony and hypocrisy. Can't give an answer? Lost?
Yes he is using it as the standard diversionary tactic used by most opposed to same sex marriage, which is why most of us donít believe him when he says he is for it.

No one has been able to come up with any valid reason not to allow same sex marriage, not even in court, that is why you are losing court battle after court battle.

So they go after the bait and switch diversionary tactic.

It will still fail of course, justice will win and you will lose.

It is already legal in a growing number of states and countries, you are on the wrong side of history.

“What Goes Around, Comes Around”

Since: Mar 07

Kansas City, MO.

#178722 Feb 7, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Ha ha so funny.
You don't want to discuss marriage equality for other forms of marriage besides same sex and opposite sex because you want to avoid revealing your hypocrisy. Fine. Don't. But don't attempt to censor others who do.
There is NO equality in a polygamy marriage. Other than that.....it's a go.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#178723 Feb 7, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Ha ha so funny.
You don't want to discuss marriage equality for other forms of marriage besides same sex and opposite sex because you want to avoid revealing your hypocrisy. Fine. Don't. But don't attempt to censor others who do.
Oh no, I just enjoy laughing at you so desperately wanting to talk about it.

All other tactics are failing, so you scrape the barrel with this crap

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Palm Springs Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
CA Jury reaches verdict in Oakland BART shooting t... (Jul '10) 2 hr g 2,270
CA California seeks to ban free, single-use carryo... (Jun '10) 4 hr zhuzhamm 5,079
CA California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legali... (Oct '10) 9 hr Pizza 16,000
Touch Of Class Consignments, Cathedral City, ca. (Aug '13) Wed Mac 124
Is any place hiring? Wed GrdCabot 1
CA CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming (Oct '10) Wed Blazing saddles 7,954
Councilman Chuck Vasquez pleads guilty to embez... Sep 16 Debbie 2
•••
•••
•••

Palm Springs Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Palm Springs People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Palm Springs News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Palm Springs
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••