Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

[Frankie Rizzo]

Bore On wrote:

Was the last poster a:
1.) Out of towner?
2.) A bore on?
3.) Just a out of work idiot?
4.) Out of country poster?
5.) a non US citizen that supports the Repubicans?
6.) Married to a Republican but not a citizen?

http://www.wavsource.com/snds_2013-02-03_4016...

[Rose_NoHo]

KiMare wrote:

Here is a simple explanation of the difference;
A fruit tree bearing fruit.
A fruit tree not bearing fruit for some reason.
A nut tree who never bears fruit wanting to be a fruit tree.
A nut tree hanging fruit on it's branches pretending to be a fruit tree.
Even funnier?
The claim that if the government doesn't 'require' fruit trees to bear fruit, then it is discrimination not to call nut trees fruit trees too!
Hilarious!!!

No matter how often you post that analogy, it doesn't hold water. For a couple of reasons. One being nuts are fruits, by definition. Another being that the ability to bear fruit is part of the definition of a fruit tree, but the ability to have kids isn't part of the definition of marriage.
<quoted text>

KiMare wrote:

At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Gay couples are the picture of defective failure. Mating behavior gone abusive with NOTHING to show for it.
Sociologist say marriage would not exist if it were not for children.

LOL, what a pointless statement.
Humanity wouldn't exist were it not for children.

KiMare wrote:

But of more importance, someone who murders their own child has no platform to claim children are not a part of marriage. You should be in jail.
Sad.

I've never murdered any child.
Why did you make that up?
LOLSER!

[Randy -Rock- Hudson]

Slappy Sanchez ESQ wrote:

<quoted text>
Is A.I.D.S. a disease or a cure?

I grew up in Brentwood, next door to some Sanchez's, on Claywood Drive.

[Randy -Rock- Hudson]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
No matter how often you post that analogy, it doesn't hold water. For a couple of reasons. One being nuts are fruits, by definition. Another being that the ability to bear fruit is part of the definition of a fruit tree, but the ability to have kids isn't part of the definition of marriage.
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
LOL, what a pointless statement.
Humanity wouldn't exist were it not for children.
<quoted text>
I've never murdered any child.
Why did you make that up?
LOLSER!

Never murdered any of your children, my White ass. Why lie ?

[Rose_NoHo]

Jane Dodo wrote:

<quoted text>Can you believe this guy? What a maroon. It cracks me up when these uneducated types believe that whatever they write is correct and logical just because they wrote it. They don't realize how silly they look. But, hey.... they will be joining the other bigots in the dustbin of history very soon.

Ah, yes. Hopefully soon it will seem as odd as bigotry against southpaws.

[Dusty Mangina]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
No matter how often you post that analogy, it doesn't hold water. For a couple of reasons. One being nuts are fruits, by definition. Another being that the ability to bear fruit is part of the definition of a fruit tree, but the ability to have kids isn't part of the definition of marriage.
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
LOL, what a pointless statement
Humanity wouldn't exist were it not for children.
<quoted text>
I've never murdered any child.
Why did you make that up?
LOLSER!

Ooo
Kimare says the craziest things. See what I have put up with?

[Frankie Rizzo]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
No matter how often you post that analogy, it doesn't hold water. For a couple of reasons. One being nuts are fruits, by definition. Another being that the ability to bear fruit is part of the definition of a fruit tree, but the ability to have kids isn't part of the definition of marriage.
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
LOL, what a pointless statement.
Humanity wouldn't exist were it not for children.
<quoted text>
I've never murdered any child.
Why did you make that up?
LOLSER!

Too funny!

[Bore On]

Was the last poster a:

1.) Out of towner?

2.) A bore on?

3.) Just a out of work idiot?

4.) Out of country poster?

5.) a non US citizen that supports the Repubicans?

6.) Married to a Republican but not a citizen?

7.) out to the cleaners.

8.) Folding tin hats to protect their heads.

[Frankie Rizzo]

Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
I grew up in Brentwood, next door to some Sanchez's, on Claywood Drive.

When I'm out on the Island I wet my whistle at the Brentwood VFW bar.

The Lt. Robert R. Dolney Post near the parkway on Wurz St.

[Rose_NoHo]

Brian_G wrote:

<quoted text>I've heard hundreds of arguments to keep marriage male/female. Maybe Bid D misunderstood:
.
<quoted text>How's that? The argument is, people in gender segregated institutions will be unfairly treated by same sex marriage because consent is problematic where rules supersede freedom. Prisons, professional sports teams, some universities and religious institutions are gender segregated so they never needed to adapt to marriage among its population. Same sex marriage would change that.

That makes absolutely no sense, you moron. Members of sports teams are going to be forced to marry each other if gay marriage is allowed? Has that happened in states where gay marriage is allowed? They are allowed in MD. Are members of the Ravens going to be forced to marry each other during half-time today?

[Rose_NoHo]

Brian_G wrote:

<quoted text>I think about what I'll post before I click the Post Comment button.

Then you figure you can add something even stupider, and post that.

Brian_G wrote:

<quoted text>Everybody has their own arguments to keep marriage male/female; all those arguments are real. Try to get out of your bubble and learn about the world.

Nobody is talking about getting rid of male/female marriage. Well, your wife did, or should I say ex-wife.

Brian_G wrote:

.
<quoted text>I support the Manhattan Declaration:
http://manhattandeclaration.org/man_dec_resou...
You advocate the way you like and I'll advocate my way.

Keep your way to yourself.

[Dusty Mangina]

Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
Never murdered any of your children, my White ass. Why lie ?

Kimare says every sperm is sacred. If you've masturbated, you've killed a child.

[Frankie Rizzo]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
That makes absolutely no sense, you moron. Members of sports teams are going to be forced to marry each other if gay marriage is allowed? Has that happened in states where gay marriage is allowed? They are allowed in MD. Are members of the Ravens going to be forced to marry each other during half-time today?

No, not at half time, but maybe after they lose!

[Bore On]

Was the last poster a:

1.) Out of towner?

2.) A bore on?

3.) Just a out of work idiot?

4.) Out of country poster?

5.) a non US citizen that supports the Repubicans?

6.) Married to a Republican but not a citizen?

7.) out to the cleaners.

8.) Folding tin hats to protect their heads.

9.) Four idiots who are asking who's on top?

[Rose_NoHo]

Minister of Trust wrote:

<quoted text>How cute. A gay is wrapped in his own words. Gays are hated by their parents, yours hated you. Suicide is the result of this hate. Your dad was on the rag, and he made you into a monster. Mutation? Gosh, gays are mutations from cross bred pigs and apes. Doesn't work.

Why do lions lick their balls?
Because they can.

Why do lions like their backsides?
To get the taste of Christians out of their mouths.

[Rose_NoHo]

Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
That is a sad attempt to generalize, pal. There is no such thing as an "anti-gay homophobe", because the term originated in psychiatric circles, used to describe self-loathing in latent homosexuals. The only homophobes are the gays who experience self-hatred and self-denial.

That's similar to the actual case. You're a homophobe because you can't deal with your own same sex attractions. That's what's behind homophobia.

Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:

Are they bigots ? Who's to say, as they are judging themselves ? They have that right. And to attempt to claim that there no gays, anywhere, wishing to marry children is such an unadulterated lie, that it makes you look foolish. You should stick to facts, and not make up silly little lies that can be examined and found to be false. You run the risk of appearing to be nothing short of another "JodieDoDo", or a "Chongo"... At least, you haven't slipped into "LittleBrain" territory...

Whatever, Bigfoot.

[Randy -Rock- Hudson]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
When I'm out on the Island I wet my whistle at the Brentwood VFW bar.
The Lt. Robert R. Dolney Post near the parkway on Wurz St.

Off of Broadway, almost in my old backyard...
:D

[Editted out]

Reporters do not write the headlines.

Their work gets cut horribly.

It gets edited.

Different versions in the different papers and on line.

Posters as Hot Air help keep the system balanced.

Hard to balance the big business oriented (advitiser biased- Athens) editors and opinion writers.

[Rose_NoHo]

Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes, I do. Its current misusage is meant to demonize the anti-gay crowd, and to subjugate it.

You should be demonized.

Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:

The current usage of that word is a blatant lie, it is why I take exception to it. I make no pretensions to intellectual ability,

That's a good thing, Bigfoot.

Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:

I am merely standing up as strongly, for my side, as you are, for yours. Are you expecting any less ? Yes, I have plenty of logical arguments,

Then why are you keeping them to yourself?

Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:

usually dismissed by your side, as if those arguments mean nothing. We are plagued with propaganda extolling the fact that the majority of Americans support SSM, when, in fact, we do not. I have never met anyone that actually supports it, and I travel the country in a semi, and I ask on the CB radio,

You're talking to other people too stupid to be able to do anything other than drive a truck. What do you expect?

And it doesn't matter if you knuckle draggers support equal rights are not. They are promised in the Constitution.

Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:

I ask people that I deal with, just to see if I am missing anything. I am not. I have even seen a large number of bumper stickers that are being displayed that condemn the notion of SSM. Homosexuality is a behavioral phenomenon, defined as same-gender sexual conduct, and the idea that the institution of marriage is being appropriated by a few libertines, for the financial benefits to be had from the government, cheapens the whole definition and purpose of marriage. It makes a mockery of everything that it has represented, until now. Heterosexual couples and homosexual couples are not equal, but the SSM crowd wishes us to ignore this fact.Unlike homosexuality, heterosexuality is immutable. To define heterosexuality as merely sexual conduct between people of compatible genders is to suppress a fundamental truth about what it means to be human.

What would you know about being human? We've seen your picture.

Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:

All human beings with the exception of hermaphrodites (people with genital deformities) are born with a reproductive system that is heterosexual by nature. We are either male or female. We have sexual feelings only because of chemical and other processes that are rooted in our procreative heterosexual design. Thus, a male sexual orientation toward a female (or vise versa) is self-evidently normal and natural. By contrast, a male-to-male or female-to-female orientation is self-evidently abnormal and unnatural. For homosexuality to be equivalent to heterosexuality, it would need to be rooted in its own homosexual physiology.
In reality, homosexuality is nothing more than same-gender conduct among people who are innately and unchangeably heterosexual. Homosexuality is thus biologically (and to varying degrees morally) equivalent
to pedophilia, sado-masochism, bestiality and many other forms of deviant behavior, or behavior that deviates from the normal design-based function of the human being.
So, yes I have arguments, but they are likely to be dismissed by your crowd...As if a wave of a hand can disqualify the truth.

Zzzz....

[Rose_NoHo]

Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
Nice try, Purple Passion, but you left out the important part: It became an important tool AFTER it had been misappropriated by the gay and lesbian crowd. Up until then, it had been a professional term used in the exact manner I described. You are attempting to explain away the misuse of this term. You are failing. And I do know what I am talking about. This whole phenomenon is Orwellian.

Bigfoot, usage gives words their meaning.
Their origins are interesting trivia at the most.
After all, men can become hysterical.