Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201809 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#178152 Feb 2, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>Can you believe this guy? What a maroon. It cracks me up when these uneducated types believe that whatever they write is correct and logical just because they wrote it. They don't realize how silly they look. But, hey.... they will be joining the other bigots in the dustbin of history very soon.
Can you believe this Janey-Doody? What a maroon. It cracks me up when uneducated types believe that whatever they write is correct and logical just because they wrote it. He doesn't realize how silly he looks. But, hey.... he will be joining the other bigots in the dustbin of history soon.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#178154 Feb 2, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>
Polygamists are NOT in the same boat I'm in. Geez......
"Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage" is the topic.
Where did a judge overturn California's ban on polygamy? Why didn't it happen?
So polygamists should not have equal protection because "Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage"?

Are you serious Miss Thing?
Rush

Columbus, NE

#178156 Feb 2, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
I only attack evil demonic slime!
Me too.
Bruno

Westminster, CA

#178157 Feb 2, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I bet that Applebee's was in your town Fruitcake!
Your town sucks.
Pizzo, You are not playing the game right. You are to reply to the comments of others, not your own. You are playing with yourself again you loser. I guess you are not ready step out into the world. You should return back to your mommys tit. lol
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#178160 Feb 2, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Your partner woud never admire your ugly legs, and body, filthbag!
Did you get a gander at that stockinged ham and high heeled hoof in it's picture? WOO-HOOO that's nasty! Wonder why she displays it? Just to disorient us?

YUK!YUK!YUK! Rose_NoHo's big nasty ham leg!
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#178162 Feb 2, 2013
Bruno wrote:
<quoted text>
Pizzo, You are not playing the game right. You are to reply to the comments of others, not your own. You are playing with yourself again you loser. I guess you are not ready step out into the world. You should return back to your mommys tit. lol
Aw shuddup dummy! You're a third class jackass! That guy's town sucks and so do you.

http://www.rosswalker.co.uk/movie_sounds/soun...
ThePitch

Monrovia, CA

#178164 Feb 2, 2013
Pine Pitch workd just as good.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#178167 Feb 2, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh child! Be honest!
http://www.rosswalker.co.uk/movie_sounds/soun...
PeeCrow

Monrovia, CA

#178168 Feb 2, 2013
Ken Crow Co-Founder of "Restoring America Project ". Co-Founder of " Tea Party Community.com ".

Regular Contributor to Tea Party Tribune.

They called George Washington an Anarchist.

They called John Adams a Treasonist. They called Thomas Jefferson a Trouble-Maker.

I guess I am in good company.
Rush

Columbus, NE

#178170 Feb 2, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you only post to me? Looks like someones gay! Shut up you effeminate man! I will take it back though if you aren't gay, so you only need to feel offended if you are of a homosexual disposition!
Not offended at all. Sorry, not gay, but just so you know, even if I was, you stil would have no chance of going out with me. I respond to you mosly cause you are jerk, and it is funny to see you put your foot in your mouth time after time, and then declare yourself the winner in a contest that dont exist.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#178171 Feb 2, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Thats a response, bollocks? You little piece of shit! Walking know it all turd!
Now you want to play with my danglies! Great! Thanks but no thanks. Are you still WINNING!? Mind if I refer to you as Charlie Sheen? How about Chuckie Glisten?

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#178172 Feb 2, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Gibberish?
That is your strong suit.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#178173 Feb 2, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe he likes me better and wishes I would call him boi.
I bet he would love the two of you to spit roast him.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#178174 Feb 2, 2013
KiMare wrote:
Here is a simple explanation of the difference;
A fruit tree bearing fruit.
A fruit tree not bearing fruit for some reason.
A nut tree who never bears fruit wanting to be a fruit tree.
A nut tree hanging fruit on it's branches pretending to be a fruit tree.
Even funnier?
The claim that if the government doesn't 'require' fruit trees to bear fruit, then it is discrimination not to call nut trees fruit trees too!
Hilarious!!!
<quoted text>
At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Gay couples are the picture of defective failure. Mating behavior gone abusive with NOTHING to show for it.
Sociologist say marriage would not exist if it were not for children.
But of more importance, someone who murders their own child has no platform to claim children are not a part of marriage. You should be in jail.
Sad.
Anthropomorphisation of trees - DUMB!
Did it give you wood?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#178175 Feb 2, 2013
sheesh void of hate wrote:
<quoted text>
Now you want to play with my danglies! Great! Thanks but no thanks. Are you still WINNING!? Mind if I refer to you as Charlie Sheen? How about Chuckie Glisten?
Winner winner Largelanguage dinner.
Bandannas

Monrovia, CA

#178176 Feb 2, 2013
No more today, your still a out of towners blowhard

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#178177 Feb 2, 2013
Badnannas wrote:
No more today, your still a out of towners blowhard
No more what?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#178178 Feb 2, 2013
KiMare wrote:
Here is a simple explanation of the difference;
A fruit tree bearing fruit.
A fruit tree not bearing fruit for some reason.
A nut tree who never bears fruit wanting to be a fruit tree.
A nut tree hanging fruit on it's branches pretending to be a fruit tree.
Even funnier?
The claim that if the government doesn't 'require' fruit trees to bear fruit, then it is discrimination not to call nut trees fruit trees too!
Hilarious!!!
<quoted text>
At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Gay couples are the picture of defective failure. Mating behavior gone abusive with NOTHING to show for it.
Sociologist say marriage would not exist if it were not for children.
But of more importance, someone who murders their own child has no platform to claim children are not a part of marriage. You should be in jail.
Sad.
sheesh void of hate wrote:
<quoted text>
Anthropomorphisation of trees - DUMB!
Did it give you wood?
You took that literally? Really?

Are you really, really really sure you were not just playing dumb to avoid admitting using the trees as a type exposed the ridiculousness of gay twirl?

SMirk.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#178179 Feb 2, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
Here is a simple explanation of the difference;
A fruit tree bearing fruit.
A fruit tree not bearing fruit for some reason.
A nut tree who never bears fruit wanting to be a fruit tree.
A nut tree hanging fruit on it's branches pretending to be a fruit tree.
Even funnier?
The claim that if the government doesn't 'require' fruit trees to bear fruit, then it is discrimination not to call nut trees fruit trees too!
Hilarious!!!
<quoted text>
At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Gay couples are the picture of defective failure. Mating behavior gone abusive with NOTHING to show for it.
Sociologist say marriage would not exist if it were not for children.
But of more importance, someone who murders their own child has no platform to claim children are not a part of marriage. You should be in jail.
Sad.
<quoted text>
You took that literally? Really?
Are you really, really really sure you were not just playing dumb to avoid admitting using the trees as a type exposed the ridiculousness of gay twirl?
SMirk.
Are you really so dumb to not know that I didn't take it literally? Nope, it is a dumb analogy. Plain and simple. I'm quite happy you took the time to compose it though. It speaks volumes about you. Or was it something you copied? Which sheds more light.

DUMB!
Bandannas

Monrovia, CA

#178180 Feb 2, 2013
No more today, your still a out of towners blowhards, P.S. get your hang nails cut and filed.

d-CON works wonder's have you tried any lately?

Will it work on those shanks callingthemselves tea party community members?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Palm Springs Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Review: Utopia Management 17 hr MichaelJames20178 2
Touch Of Class Consignment (Cathedral City, Ca. Fri Sandy 1
mexican landscapers dump in the desert (Nov '14) Fri Sandy 54
Fraud Website against Winderemere Real Estate. ... Thu Palm Desert Local 3
Mayor Pougnet dodges questions about conflict o... May 21 California Resident 3
Any housekeepers near indio?? May 20 BigJG 1
News Palm Springs Gay and Lesbian Film Festival to o... (Sep '13) May 11 sam 3
More from around the web

Palm Springs People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]