Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

[Insomnio]

Por culpa de los maestros y padres todos los nińos están perdiendo de educacion por todos los chismes y realidades por todo eso mi hija tiene que perder su educación querían sacar a la directora y a todo el personal y hora el distrito se quiere llevar a una escuela pública a mi hijo

[Frankie Rizzo]

Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh, is Topix based in San Dimas ?

No, but according to that "San Dimas" jackass anyone not from San Dimas is an "Out of towner" and doesn't have the right to post.

[Randy -Rock- Hudson]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
No, but according to that "San Dimas" jackass anyone not from San Dimas is an "Out of towner" and doesn't have the right to post.

But....IIf Topix isn't based in San Dimas, doesn't..........well, doesn't that make HIM an out-of-towner, too ?

[Randy -Rock- Hudson]

NoQ wrote:

<quoted text>
You're an lDIOT also.

"Sigh" There are so many...

[Frankie Rizzo]

Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
Good thing old hamhock ain't got any..

What IS it with that picture of her stockinged ham hock and high heeled hoof?

It is VERY CREEPY. I wish he'd take it down. It's disturbing.

[Karma is a_______]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
Correct. Men who rape boys are not homosexuals. For example, if a man is raping a 17.99 year old boy he is not gay.
But he better watch out! If that boy turns 18 during the act, the rapist will turn gay at that same moment!

I see that your Vocabulary is very limited. Maybe you should look up the definition of words you don't know before posting something that makes you look like an unintelligent buffoon.

Most 17 year old teenagers are not PREPUBESCENT. Ergo, theya re past puberty and any man interested in a 17 year old male teenager is not a pedophile, same as any man interested in a 17yr old female teenager is not a pedophile.

like you, they are interested in naive young adults cause they don't know how to handle adult relationships

[Bartonll876549]

The fact is that none of us know what we or you or him/her are talking about as that was precluded by our education which has been carefully designed to reduce wit and innovation to near cartoon levels. The purpose of course is to make the electorate more placid, easily led down dark paths and COMPLIANT. The morons fom outer space who run the world for the business interests who are fooled into thinking they are in control are drunk on the giddy waters and seafoam of watching us blather and fart and posture and pose and wait immobile for the next test turd to drop. That is all.

[Frankie Rizzo]

Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
YOU'RE the homosexual, and I have the wrong idea ? That's rich, as I am the one with my head screwed on the right way, you got yours cross-threaded, or something...

HAR!HAR!HAR! Perfect one for Aida Lott! Fits him like a glove.

His head is not on straight, it's "cross-threaded, or something..."

I like it! Hope Mona sticks around a while today, he always runs off with his tail between his legs so soon!

[Frankie Rizzo]

Karma is a_______ wrote:

<quoted text>
I see that your Vocabulary is very limited. Maybe you should look up the definition of words you don't know before posting something that makes you look like an unintelligent buffoon.
Most 17 year old teenagers are not PREPUBESCENT. Ergo, theya re past puberty and any man interested in a 17 year old male teenager is not a pedophile, same as any man interested in a 17yr old female teenager is not a pedophile.
like you, they are interested in naive young adults cause they don't know how to handle adult relationships

Why you mad Squeaky?

The law says a 17.99 year old boy is not an adult, he is a boy. The law says men who rape boys are pedophiles. The rainbow handbook says men who rape boys are not homosexuals.

So duh! Don't get mad at me! Don't shoot the messenger! YUK!YUK!YUK!

P.S. Try for funnier ad hominem dummy!

[Frankie Rizzo]

Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
But....IIf Topix isn't based in San Dimas, doesn't..........well, doesn't that make HIM an out-of-towner, too ?

He don't get it. Tried to explain it to him once. No luck.

He's one step below even Mona Lott on the dopey scale.

[Rose_NoHo]

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
My posts show who cares about the children.
I smile every time I debunk your junk.
Snicker.

I don't have any junk to debunk.

[Rose_NoHo]

NoQ wrote:

<quoted text>
Awwww STFU you fking retard. You big mouth ignorant special needs Fa$$ot.

Can't get your mind off of his mouth, huh? Well, I'm sure a big mouth isn't required to take care of you!

[Rose_NoHo]

Bruno wrote:

No more SSM in this country !! it's absurd

What's absurd about it? You don't have an answer, you just have issues with your own sexuality you externalize.

[Porkers]

The new Miss America Mallory Hagan, has a lot of her Southern biggots hanging out since she is from Alabama.

[Rose_NoHo]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes. This is true. Rose_NoHo doesn't care about children, not being able to have any herself either biologically or legally.
She even has a dopey "Law" she made up which states "Only morons care about children".

That's another flat out lie from you.
My law is:
Morons (like you) with no real argument scream, "But what about the children!?".

You are stupid, so let me explain what that means. It means that morons, like you, who have no real argument, come up with some imagined danger to children. Or a real, but off topic, danger to children. Notice how many of the homophobic morons, like you, talk about pedophilia in the gay marriage debate. And while pedophilia is a really important issue, it has nothing at all to do with gay marriage.
Understand now?
Nah, you're too dumb.

BTW, I'm glad I can't get knocked up anymore, two fewer things to worry about.
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
And if I wanted to legally have a child, I'd adopt.
Wow, you are stupid.

[Rose_NoHo]

NoQ wrote:

You're an idiot. Yes pedophilia is different from homosexuality and heterosexuality, but it take one of them to engage in it. A straight guy will go for a little girl where as a Queer will go for a little boy, because that's the kind of plumbing they like. Little girls doesn't turn a Queer on as where a boy doesn't turn a straight guy on. The pedophilia comes into play because they're way too young. Even an idiot like you should understand it now, since it was spoon fed to you, in the simplest terms.

Um, stupid, pedophiles are sexually attracted to children. A man is more than just a tall boy, and a woman is more than a just tall girl. Once you go though puberty, you'll see that this is the case.

[Rose_NoHo]

Karma is a_______ wrote:

<quoted text>
I see that your Vocabulary is very limited. Maybe you should look up the definition of words you don't know before posting something that makes you look like an unintelligent buffoon.
Most 17 year old teenagers are not PREPUBESCENT. Ergo, theya re past puberty and any man interested in a 17 year old male teenager is not a pedophile, same as any man interested in a 17yr old female teenager is not a pedophile.
like you, they are interested in naive young adults cause they don't know how to handle adult relationships

Yeah, that Frankie guy is a total idiot. Eighteen is an arbitrary age. You are right about puberty being the determining factor.

[Cra Poosed]

Mindless cra poosed coming from those out of towners.

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) prevented $2.1 billion in fraudulent tax refunds filed by prisoners in 2012, largely thanks to stopping two inmates from attempting to collect $1.1 billion from Uncle Sam.

[Karma is a_______]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
Why you mad Squeaky?
The law says a 17.99 year old boy is not an adult, he is a boy. The law says men who rape boys are pedophiles. The rainbow handbook says men who rape boys are not homosexuals.
So duh! Don't get mad at me! Don't shoot the messenger! YUK!YUK!YUK!
P.S. Try for funnier ad hominem dummy!

My point wasn't about if a 17 yr old is an adult. My point was that pedophiles are interested in prepubescent children, not children past puberty, as most 17 yr olds are.

I am not aware of any legal definition of pedophilia. I do believe is a psychological definition.

But even if there is a legal definition of pedophiles my point is still valid and your lack of knowledge in once again showing

In many states the age of consent is 16. Many teenagers 16 and older that are arrested will be tried as an adult.

BTW what is the rainbow book? Is that one of those books you can find in the children's section of the library, right next to the Elmo books?

[Frankie Rizzo]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
I don't have any junk to debunk.

Nope. That's because all your junk's already been debunked!

YUK!YUK!YUK! Rose_NoHo. What an icehole dummy.