Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments
152,161 - 152,180 of 200,356 Comments Last updated 30 min ago
heartandmind

Moline, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174346
Jan 11, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You are playing irresponsible games.
Demanding we head down a road while ignoring the destination.
Not only do you once again expose the weakness of your argument, you expose the lack of character that goes with it.
Smirk.
<quoted text>
I ask two serious pertinent questions, and you recklessly slough them off, claiming it's okay because "you play games too".
Once again you expose the weakness of your argument, the lack of character you possess, and now you add to it silly immaturity.
You mistake the sinking of the knife of reality to the hilt into the belly of denial and twisted with a smirk for a cheap smartasz comment. Hardly the same.
Go back to your video games and gay porn.
Smirk.
sounds like you know a lot about that sort of stuff. good luck with that chum.

the reality is that judges have ruled in favor of striking down Prop 8 and DOMA is teetering on it's last lungfuls of air as we wait until March when the Supreme Court considers the cases.

your opinions indeed mean nothing in light of the writings of judges. you, in the end, are a mere internet stranger with no credibility, in stark contrast to that of seated judges.
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174347
Jan 11, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

heartandmind wrote:
<quoted text>
maybe they'll read & educate themselves.
i doubt it, but at least it's there for those that prefer to educate themselves.
i love it when the proclaim just how it fell....and historical fact proves them wrong. typically those guys go off in a huff-n-puff, trying to protest that what is written, vetted and published is wrong and that they are the correct ones in the discussion, yet have nothing to substantiate their claims. LOL. makes me think of how a balloon sounds when it looses it's air. pffffffft.
have a great weekend, bigD
Yes, I have found that most people that have it THAT wrong are more interested in believing what is not true, than knowing what is.

You too, looking forward to a nice weekend!:)
Mikey DiRucci

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174348
Jan 11, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh no, just someone terribly misinformed
A lair would be someone that makes up something and says that someone else said that when they did not.
A mistake, or lack of education is one thing, falsifying what others say is something totally different.
It seems everyone who disagrees with you is a liar. We've all allegedly "made up something and said that you said it when you did not".

And it always happens just as you are losing the argument. And you never accuse anyone who agrees with you of it. Funny that.

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174350
Jan 11, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You mean the slaughter of Christians in arenas deserved to go on?
No one screamed 'what about the children' just like you.
Do you even understand what you are defending?
Ho.
I just stated a truth, that Christianity helped to destroy Rome. Not saying what, if anything, should or shouldn't have been done about it.

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174351
Jan 11, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Circular reasoning about flat (also a pun referring to your chest, and not your ass).
Snicker.
My chest, flat? LOL! You are such an idiot.

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174353
Jan 11, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>Because he's not really interested in polygamy. He's interested in whining.
He's just trolling.
Randy Hudson

Wooster, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174354
Jan 11, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Marram wrote:
<quoted text>
Looks like Topix mimics life. You are officially a loser that no one what’s around. Good riddance mike/rock, I won’t miss you.
The only reason that you would not miss me is because I make a you look like the idiot that you are.
Randy Hudson

Wooster, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174355
Jan 11, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Mikey DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm right behind you. With 4 times. And working on 5! WOO HOOO!
It means you're hitting the sweet spot for sure!
:-D
Mikey DiRucci

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174356
Jan 11, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
He's just trolling.
Limiting the number of husbands a woman has seems to me just as much an infringement as limiting the gender of whom that woman can marry.
Randy Hudson

Wooster, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174357
Jan 11, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, stupid, polygamy is a red herring. It's not the issue, the issue is gay marriage. Why not start a forum to talk about polygamy? Too dumb to know how to do that? That's my guess.
That would be about as far as you can get, in your pursuit of critical thinking skills...guesswork, blundering about, in the dark. Lost and clueless. Like when you thought you'd gotten the better of me, asking to name some of the books I'd made mention of, and i gave you about 50, or so, titles. And then you had to drop the subject, because you'd been made a fool of. And you knew...I mean, guessed it.
Randy Hudson

Wooster, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174358
Jan 11, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Reported.
What, exactly, can you mean by that ? As if you haven't had me banned already, you think that you have something to report ? OMG, what a fool you are.
Uh-oh, if you have reported me, do you think that they might ban me ? Heavens to murgatroyd, that would hurt me, right in my heart, where I'm sensitive, and shit.....

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174359
Jan 11, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

heartandmind wrote:
<quoted text>
the effect of the Crusades :
http://www.the-orb.net/encyclop/religion/crus...
It seems to me you agree with me, as the article does.

Does that still neutralize the barbarity of the Roman arena?

Smile.

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174360
Jan 11, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>^^^That's untrue; Rose has posted this lie many times before.
Most same sex marriage supporters don't care about the truth and will post anything to 'win' the argument. If you care about truth, keep marriage male/female.
I believe the person who said you are divorced, not you.
You are a vile person, and I often find the "save marriage" folks are divorced.
And your "argument" in this post makes no sense. Even if I were the biggest lair on earth, that wouldn't be a good reason to deny US citizens basic, equal, human rights, you dumb b1tch.
Randy Hudson

Wooster, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174361
Jan 11, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Reported.
Ooohh, Chongo is reporting me, for what ? Dissatisfaction at being banned ?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174362
Jan 11, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

7

heartandmind wrote:
<quoted text>
sounds like you know a lot about that sort of stuff. good luck with that chum.
the reality is that judges have ruled in favor of striking down Prop 8 and DOMA is teetering on it's last lungfuls of air as we wait until March when the Supreme Court considers the cases.
your opinions indeed mean nothing in light of the writings of judges. you, in the end, are a mere internet stranger with no credibility, in stark contrast to that of seated judges.
Child, child, child.

Can a judge overrule reality? Commonsense?

You have no answer for two simple assertions;

1. The government has NO interest in protecting or supporting a friendship.

2. It is unconstitutional bias to selectively support friendships.

Moreover, you deny the most basic roots of marriage. A cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.

Snicker.
Mikey DiRucci

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174363
Jan 11, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Randy Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>The only reason that you would not miss me is because I make a you look like the idiot that you are.
Censorship sucks, eh? But what does it say about the bias of the censors? It says they've lost the argument. They know it, we know it.

I guess certain opinions must stay unregistered. No problem.
Randy Hudson

Wooster, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174364
Jan 11, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

7

Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>
Yet another meaningless post from our resident drama queen....yawn...
Nice of you, to comment on Chongo. We all feel the same way, every time that it drools and posts...

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174365
Jan 11, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
My chest, flat? LOL! You are such an idiot.
I admit, I was mistaken.

You must have a huge chest on front to balance that ass hanging off the back.

However, your circular reasoning is still flat.

:-)
Randy Hudson

Wooster, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174366
Jan 11, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text> Who is this "we" ? You got a frog in your pocket, little boy?
We, the people that outnumber you little poofs, and don't want your asses around, controlling what the rest of us have to put up with. We.

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174367
Jan 11, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Brian_G wrote:
Same sex marriage is gender apartheid marriage; gender integration marriage is one man and one woman.
Love diversity; keep marriage male/female.
You stupid sow, apartheid is imposed. Two people of the same sex deciding to marry is no more "apartheid" than two members of the same race deciding to get married. Should people be forced to marry someone of a different race so we have integrated marriages?

Nobody is talking about getting rid of male/female marriages.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Palm Springs Discussions

Search the Palm Springs Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
CA California seeks to ban free, single-use carryo... (Jun '10) 13 min Ban Central Station 4,892
Tony Casas, 77; Former Prisons Official Worked ... (Sep '07) 13 hr Tammie Casas is Fat 640
CA Jury reaches verdict in Oakland BART shooting t... (Jul '10) Mon snodder 2,252
desert hot springs, ca. unkept yards Jul 27 Ron 3
CA CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming (Oct '10) Jul 27 Twilight sun 7,848
CA California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legali... (Oct '10) Jul 27 Facts facts 15,927
Review: Rich's Painting Jul 23 Spectacular job 1
•••
•••
•••
•••

Palm Springs Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Palm Springs People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Palm Springs News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Palm Springs
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••