Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments
150,801 - 150,820 of 200,347 Comments Last updated 9 hrs ago

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#172550
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

linus simms wrote:
<quoted text>
quiet phagg-oid. keep your mental issues to yourself.
Aw, SHUDDUP you dopey Jackass!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#172551
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

YUK!YUK!YUK!

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#172552
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Great, let's hear it.
<quoted text>
That isn't an argument as equal rights to not always mean equal outcomes. And no matter how much you peddle your nonsense, currently all people are treated equally as each and every person can marry someone of the opposite sex.
Well, stupid, that's like saying everyone was treated equally under Jim Crow because everyone could sit in the section assigned to their race.

The "opposite sex" isn't the same for men and women, so they are not being treated equally.
akpilot wrote:
The jabs don't take any effort, you make is quite easy with you consistent presentation of nonsense.
Obviously, since you're not capable of any real effort.
akpilot wrote:
BTW Rose, you never answered the question. What are you more angry about- the color of your skin or the fact that no one cares?
Begging the question.(Look that up.)
How can I be angry when I'm laughing at you?

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#172553
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Brian_G wrote:
Loving v Virginia is US Supreme Court precedence for male/female marriage. I doubt the court would have decided the same if the Lovings were a same sex couple.
Dummy, you can't even follow your own train of thought. You were talking about states' rights. Well, stupid, VA is a state. OK, it's a commonwealth, but the principle is the same. VA had laws that violated the 14th Amendment, so they were overturned by the Supreme Court.

If they were a same sex couple? If down were up, I wouldn't need a bra.
Ronald

Long Beach, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#172554
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Straight Sh00ter wrote:
<quoted text>
So why aren't you posting in the gay cafe, hmmm?
Straight Sh00ter.

Out of staters such as yourself probably are not aware of it, but the free-spending out-of-control Homosexual and non-Homosexual California legislators are using hard earned taxpayer money to teach Homosexuality to innocent little non-Homosexual children who attend expensive taxpayer funded forced California Government schools.

Most Californians love their Homosexual friends and the lesbians. Because California politicians collect most of the hard earned taxpayer money used to teach Homosexuality to innocent little non-Homosexual children from the non-Homosexual community, the Homosexuality issue is no longer an issue only of concern to our Homosexual friends, the lesbians, and the Africans - including AIDS infected Haitian immigrants.

Ronald

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#172555
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Marriage has already been defined.
It is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior. Gay couples are a obviously false imposter relationship.
It would be like trying to put a bent rod in a straight hole. Everyone can see it isn't the same.
Jane Pudenda wrote:
<quoted text>
boring claptrap.
In other words, you are defenseless in the face of reality.

Smirk.

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#172556
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

7

6

6

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Loving v Virginia had nothing to do with same sex marriage.
"Plaintiffs' reliance on Loving v Virginia (388 US 1 [1967]) for the proposition that the US Supreme Court has established a fundamental "right to marry the spouse of one's choice" outside the male/female construct is misplaced."- Hernandez v Robles
Even the court told you that you are wrong, yet here you are.
Dummy, I didn't say Loving v VA had anything to do with gay marriage.

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#172557
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Marriage has already been defined.
It is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior. Gay couples are a obviously false imposter relationship.
It would be like trying to put a bent rod in a straight hole. Everyone can see it isn't the same.
<quoted text>
In other words, you are defenseless in the face of reality.
Smirk.

You call yourself a "monster mutation".
Should your rights depend on your genes?
Should you be allowed to marry twice because you have both sets?
Or should you not be allowed to marry at all because you have both sets?
LOLSER!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#172558
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Ronald wrote:
<quoted text>
Straight Sh00ter.
Out of staters such as yourself probably are not aware of it, but the free-spending out-of-control Homosexual and non-Homosexual California legislators are using hard earned taxpayer money to teach Homosexuality to innocent little non-Homosexual children who attend expensive taxpayer funded forced California Government schools.
Most Californians love their Homosexual friends and the lesbians. Because California politicians collect most of the hard earned taxpayer money used to teach Homosexuality to innocent little non-Homosexual children from the non-Homosexual community, the Homosexuality issue is no longer an issue only of concern to our Homosexual friends, the lesbians, and the Africans - including AIDS infected Haitian immigrants.
Ronald
Ronald.

I too love our gay friends and yes, the lesbians. Especially the lesbians.

I wish you and your honey a safe and prosperous New Year despite our free spending homosexual and non homosexual legislators.

Michael.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#172559
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

8

7

7

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
You call yourself a "monster mutation".
Should your rights depend on your genes?
Should you be allowed to marry twice because you have both sets?
Or should you not be allowed to marry at all because you have both sets?
LOLSER!
Aw shuddup you silly jackass!

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#172560
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

8

8

7

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, stupid, that's like saying everyone was treated equally under Jim Crow because everyone could sit in the section assigned to their race.
The "opposite sex" isn't the same for men and women, so they are not being treated equally.
No Rose, it's nothing like Jim Crow Laws. Homosexuals are allowed to do everything a heterosexual can do. They can eat at the same tables, drink from the same fountains, they can even partake and marriage following the same laws as everyone else.

There is hardly a resemblance. Your reliance on relating everything to the plight of the African American simply shows the weakness of your argument. Time to turn in your race card Rose.
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Obviously, since you're not capable of any real effort.
<quoted text>
Begging the question.(Look that up.)
How can I be angry when I'm laughing at you?
The only one being laughed at here is you Rose. You are ignorant as a rock.
Ronald

Long Beach, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#172561
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Ronald.
I too love our gay friends and yes, the lesbians. Especially the lesbians.
I wish you and your honey a safe and prosperous New Year despite our free spending homosexual and non homosexual legislators.
Michael.
Mike DiRucci.

Thank you Mike. And a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to you too. My Honey sends lots of Woff! Woff!.

Ronald

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#172562
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

9

9

8

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Dummy, I didn't say Loving v VA had anything to do with gay marriage.
Than why don't you stop using it in an attempt to somehow support your position.

What an idiot.
black Clem

Bell, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#172564
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Ronald wrote:
<quoted text>
Mike DiRucci.
Thank you Mike. And a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to you too. My Honey sends lots of Woff! Woff!.
Ronald
Ronald.- Please let your wife know I can only go as high as $15 for an hour. I'll also include a brown bag lunch and six quarters for the parking meter.

black Clem

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#172565
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

black Clem wrote:
<quoted text>
Ronald.- Please let your wife know I can only go as high as $15 for an hour. I'll also include a brown bag lunch and six quarters for the parking meter.
black Clem
Unfortunately due to discriminatory laws and hateful bigotry Ronald is not allowed to marry his honey. So he doesn't have a wife. You must be mistaken, try the dog pound.
Ronald

Bell, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#172566
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Unfortunately due to discriminatory laws and hateful bigotry Ronald is not allowed to marry his honey. So he doesn't have a wife. You must be mistaken, try the dog pound.
Michael.

Please do not speak for me. You haven't earned the right to do so.

Ronald

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#172567
Dec 30, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

5

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Marriage has already been defined.
It is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior. Gay couples are a obviously false imposter relationship.
It would be like trying to put a bent rod in a straight hole. Everyone can see it isn't the same.
<quoted text>
In other words, you are defenseless in the face of reality.
Smirk.
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
You call yourself a "monster mutation".
Should your rights depend on your genes?
Should you be allowed to marry twice because you have both sets?
Or should you not be allowed to marry at all because you have both sets?
LOLSER!
You make my point and yourself a HO. What a 'talent'!

How does your ad homoan attack on me have ANY relation to the basic essence of marriage?

In other words, you are defenseless in the face of reality.

Smirk.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#172568
Dec 30, 2012
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Ronald wrote:
<quoted text>
Michael.
Please do not speak for me. You haven't earned the right to do so.
Ronald
Troll from L.A.

Please don't try to speak for Ronald, you are way too stupid to pull it off. Also Ronald has a fine sense of humor while yours is dumb and unfunny.

Mike DiRucci.
Largelanguage

Chester, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#172569
Dec 30, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
You call yourself a "monster mutation".
Should your rights depend on your genes?
Should you be allowed to marry twice because you have both sets?
Or should you not be allowed to marry at all because you have both sets?
LOLSER!
You poor little child. Homosexuality is sinful, and vile. It is not natural. You fell in love with your boys boner and just dated who you liked, not who you wanted to see fit as someone who you will love and marry. You poor child. So innocent and yet so evil.
Hitties

San Dimas, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#172570
Dec 30, 2012
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Oh you mean, those flat-heads in the Republican and tea party membership club.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Palm Springs Discussions

Search the Palm Springs Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
Tony Casas, 77; Former Prisons Official Worked ... (Sep '07) 25 min Tammie Casas is Fat 640
CA Jury reaches verdict in Oakland BART shooting t... (Jul '10) 23 hr snodder 2,252
desert hot springs, ca. unkept yards Sun Ron 3
CA CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming (Oct '10) Sun Twilight sun 7,848
CA California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legali... (Oct '10) Sun Facts facts 15,927
Review: Rich's Painting Jul 23 Spectacular job 1
Costco readies for new opening (Dec '06) Jul 23 AMan 149
•••
•••
•••
Palm Springs Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Palm Springs Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Palm Springs People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Palm Springs News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Palm Springs
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••