Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201820 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#170734 Dec 10, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
akpilot's only tactic - avoid debating my argument and try to insult me
You want a cracker?

BTW, we are still waiting for that compelling argument you claim to have presented.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#170735 Dec 10, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
All people are inherently unequal. That's not the issue. The 14th Amendment grants all US citizens equal rights.
Yes Rose, everyone is equally able to marry one person of the opposite sex. Your point?
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
The issue is marriage. A man has the right to marry a woman, so a woman should have that same right. A woman has the right to marry a man, so a man should have that same right.
The fact that you feel that way, doesn't make it an equal rights issue. It simply a question of inclusion.
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
The Court says there is a right to marry in Loving v VA.
No, Skinner v Oklahoma said marriage was a "right"- Loving V Virginia extended that right to interracial couples. Loving v Virginia had nothing to do with marriage being a "right", that had already been decided.
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
There will be gay marriage in all 50.
Perhaps

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#170736 Dec 10, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
You want a cracker?
Oh, now you are insulting my bf, too.
akpilot wrote:
BTW, we are still waiting for that compelling argument you claim to have presented.
akpilot's only tactic - avoid debating my argument and try to insult me

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#170737 Dec 10, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes Rose, everyone is equally able to marry one person of the opposite sex. Your point?
That's like saying everyone was equally able to marry one person of the same race before Loving v VA.
Stupid, my point is that a man doesn't have the same right a woman does, the right to marry a man. And a woman doesn't have the same right a man does, the right to marry a woman.
akpilot wrote:
The fact that you feel that way, doesn't make it an equal rights issue. It simply a question of inclusion.
<quoted text>
No, Skinner v Oklahoma said marriage was a "right"- Loving V Virginia extended that right to interracial couples. Loving v Virginia had nothing to do with marriage being a "right", that had already been decided.
<quoted text>
Perhaps
Loving v VA stated marriage is a right.
Why lie? It's so easy to look it up.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/histori...

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Mexico

#170738 Dec 10, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
You can't tell a woman from a man. If you ever were to get off of your computer and go talk to people IRL, that could prove embarrassing. But, I'm sure you never will.
The vast majority here say you look like a man.........

Add to it your skanky ghetto tranny ho foul mouth and yes ..........We know you are a guy...
KochState

Covina, CA

#170739 Dec 10, 2012
Republicans stand on the cusp of delivering a major blow to organized labor, a right to work state.

Since: May 12

Bellevue, WA

#170740 Dec 10, 2012
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
The vast majority here say you look like a man.........
Add to it your skanky ghetto tranny ho foul mouth and yes ..........We know you are a guy...
and everyone here knows your an idiot

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#170741 Dec 10, 2012
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
The vast majority here say you look like a man.........
Add to it your skanky ghetto tranny ho foul mouth and yes ..........We know you are a guy...
You can't tell a woman from a man. You are so pathetic, you even have to ask other people. They tell you "man", just to laugh at what an idiot you are. It's a good thing you don't have any social life at all. It would really embarrassing, your inability to tell the difference between women and men.
Quickers

Covina, CA

#170742 Dec 10, 2012
The former FL police officer robbed drug dealers and then killed them and witnesses.

At his 1988 trial, Pardo admitted to the killings, saying he was ridding the streets of the "scum of the earth."

Quick and easy??

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#170743 Dec 10, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes it was, you lying b!tch.
Since Rose can't seem to remember our conversation, I will help her out.
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Isn't it cute, the queen of calling people- Bigots, LOLSERS (Whatever that is), Condumbs (Whatever they are), racist, and homophobes- is crying about being attacked.
You poor little baby Rose.
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/fairfield-ca/...
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
LOLSER = LOL + LOSER
LOL = Laugh Out Loud
LOSER = akpilot.
<quoted text>
It's a play on words...
Con(servative) dumb...
Condumb (condom)
Get it now?
<quoted text>
I'm just pointing out the fact that you don't have any real arguments, so you just attack me.
So, come up with a real argument.
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/fairfield-ca/...
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Funny how Rose does everything in her post which she accuses others of doing.
How about you present an actual argument Rose and stop trying to be funny. You aren't any better at that than you are at sounding intelligent.
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/fairfield-ca/...
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Take notes this time, stupid.
Two words:
Equal rights.
You can't argue against that, so you'll just call me names.
Now, if only I were this good at predicting lottery numbers.:)
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/fairfield-ca/...

Now watch her perfectly implement Tactic #6

Rose tactic #1- Act stupid-(not so sure it is an act)
Rose Tactic #2- Misdirect
Rose Tactic #3- Make stupid comments until opposition is tired of replying then claim victory
Rose Tactic #4- Attack the poster- scream Racist, Bigot, Homophobe
Rose Tactic #5- Act intelligent by making silly statistical references such as- Most people who have anal sex are straight-
Rose Tactic #6- Falsely accuse others of lies- when proven wrong through links to previous posts revert back to tactics 2 and 4.
Rose Tactic #7- Claim to have made an argument, then claim others can't counter the argument that doesn't actually exist.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#170744 Dec 10, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
You can't tell a woman from a man. You are so pathetic, you even have to ask other people. They tell you "man", just to laugh at what an idiot you are. It's a good thing you don't have any social life at all. It would really embarrassing, your inability to tell the difference between women and men.
No. That's not it. It's because you look like a man. Trust us toots. Nice athletic leg but it's definitely man leg.
Calenders

Covina, CA

#170745 Dec 10, 2012
Experts say the U.S. Supreme Court likely will force the federal government to recognize same-sex marriages in 2013.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#170746 Dec 10, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Since Rose can't seem to remember our conversation, I will help her out.
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/fairfield-ca/...
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/fairfield-ca/...
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/fairfield-ca/...
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/fairfield-ca/...
Now watch her perfectly implement Tactic #6
Rose tactic #1- Act stupid-(not so sure it is an act)
Rose Tactic #2- Misdirect
Rose Tactic #3- Make stupid comments until opposition is tired of replying then claim victory
Rose Tactic #4- Attack the poster- scream Racist, Bigot, Homophobe
Rose Tactic #5- Act intelligent by making silly statistical references such as- Most people who have anal sex are straight-
Rose Tactic #6- Falsely accuse others of lies- when proven wrong through links to previous posts revert back to tactics 2 and 4.
Rose Tactic #7- Claim to have made an argument, then claim others can't counter the argument that doesn't actually exist.
LOLSER.
Your only tactic, avoid debate, and try to insult me.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#170747 Dec 10, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
LOLSER.
Your only tactic, avoid debate, and try to insult me.
Looks like you are the one avoiding Rose. You failed to answer for your lies.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#170748 Dec 10, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, now you are insulting my bf, too.
WTF are you blabbing about now Rose?

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#170749 Dec 10, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>

Loving v VA stated marriage is a right.
Why lie? It's so easy to look it up.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/histori...
Yes Rose, it's easy to look up, not so easy for you to comprehend.

You do realize why Loving V Virginia referenced Skinner V Oklahoma when making the statement that marriage was a "right" don't you? Because that was the SOURCE..

It's OK puppet, we don't expect much from you.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#170750 Dec 10, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes Rose, it's easy to look up, not so easy for you to comprehend.
You do realize why Loving V Virginia referenced Skinner V Oklahoma when making the statement that marriage was a "right" don't you? Because that was the SOURCE..
It's OK puppet, we don't expect much from you.
Um, stupid, are you trying to deny Loving v VA states marriage is a right?

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#170751 Dec 10, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
WTF are you blabbing about now Rose?
Dummy, you said I wanted a cracker. So, you are trying to insult my bf. Do you know what "bf" stands for? Guess not, it stands for "boy friend".

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#170752 Dec 10, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Looks like you are the one avoiding Rose. You failed to answer for your lies.
I didn't lie, dummy.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#170753 Dec 10, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Um, stupid, are you trying to deny Loving v VA states marriage is a right?
No moron, I am stating the fact that it merely upheld the previous precedent established in Skinner v Oklahoma.

I am sorry that you don't know how to read the opinion of the court.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Palm Springs Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Plus Size clothes - Draper's & Damon's Jun 28 Tracy 2
Complaint CATHEDRAL CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT (Jan '08) Jun 26 Mr Jon Doe 49
News Statues Of Virgin Mary Beheaded, Jesus Christ D... Jun 26 inewsmaster 1
Touch Of Class Consignment (Cathedral City, Ca. Jun 25 Jgreen 7
News Chinese tourists power-shopping in U.S. (Aug '13) Jun 25 Go Blue Forever 14
need some ideas or direction Jun 23 deserthelp 1
Review: Inter-City Plumbing (Jun '09) Jun 23 Ron T 12
More from around the web

Palm Springs People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Palm Springs Mortgages