Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 20 comments on the Aug 4, 2010, www.cnn.com story titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#170564 Dec 9, 2012
The fundamental basis of marriage is a cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.

There is an obvious distinction between redumbant gender couples and diverse gendered couples. You know, the union of Mars and Venus vs the collision of Uranus and Uranus.

Which brings us to the inherent harm, unhealthiness and demeaning factor of anal sex. A violent abuse of evolutionary design.

On a more personal level, a love relationship between diverse genders results in human fruit. The singular birthplace of every single other relationship. Worth of distinction and protection. You are a product of such. However, your duplicate relationship is absolutely desolate. There is no more a profound distinction...

All of this makes it absolutely idiotic to equate the two relationships. A silly attempt to impose an imposter relationship on marriage. A counterfeit that becomes more and more exposed the closer it is joined to the real thing.

Smile.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#170565 Dec 9, 2012
Lililth_Satans_Bore wrote:
<quoted text>hey isnt your rapture soon
What the hell is a rapture and when is yours? Is it some kind of imaginary religious thing?

What are you one of those quacked out fundies? Tell me Rev Phelps, what harm would a loving marriage of two men or women cause you?

Don't tell me Jesus said it's bad.

Your Buy bull is off topic. Take it to church toots. We don't wanna hear it!

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

#170566 Dec 9, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Take notes? People should completely ignore you, you are like a black hole of intellect.
BTW Rose, you have called people names in each and every one of your replies. Why do you expect different when others are replying to you?
As predicted in post 170451

"You can't argue against that, so you'll just call me names.
Now, if only I were this good at predicting lottery numbers.:)"

LOL. One would think you'd be embarrassed to do exactly what I predicted you would do. Guess it takes a certain amount of character to be embarrassed.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#170567 Dec 9, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
As predicted in post 170451
"You can't argue against that, so you'll just call me names.
Now, if only I were this good at predicting lottery numbers.:)"
LOL. One would think you'd be embarrassed to do exactly what I predicted you would do. Guess it takes a certain amount of character to be embarrassed.
What is there to argue moron? You haven't presented an argument.

You told me to take notes, and then you went on to explain the meaning of your made up words? I guess it is your form of baby language?

And yes, you should be embarrassed, hell I am embarrassed for you.

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

#170568 Dec 9, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
The Fourteenth Amendment also gives Congress the authority to uphold the correct definition of marriage. Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment states that Congress has the power to enforce its provisions by appropriate legislation. That is to say, Congress may pass legislation that prevents states from violating Fourteenth Amendment rights. Pursuant to this power, for example, Congress has passed the various civil-rights statutes. Now, if marriage were redefined to include gay relationships, straight married couples would lose the unique burdens and privileges that come with traditional matrimony. Marriage is a public act: by redefining marriage to be what it is not, states would violate the right of all persons to receive the social benefits and uphold the social expectations of being wedded to a human being of the opposite sex.
You just ramble on, ugly. Requiring that a person marry someone of the opposite sex violates the 14th Amendment just like requiring they marry someone certain races did.
And, you homophobes act as if people are trying to get rid of opposite sex marriage.

Didn't bother with the rest of your crap in that post. But it's clear, you aren't a Wiccan, why did you lie about that?

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

#170570 Dec 9, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
It certainly isn't a question of genitalia. It is because homosexual marriage is banned for either gender, thus making it a non-gender issue.
Damn, you are as dumb as you are ugly. And that is dumb!
What you said it the laws against inter-racial marriage didn't involve race because they applied to people of all races.

If a man goes into the JP and asks to marry a man, he'll be told, "No". A woman doing the exact same thing will be told, "Yes" Why? Because of their genders (genitalia).

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

#170572 Dec 9, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
What is there to argue moron? You haven't presented an argument.
"You can't argue against that, so you'll just call me names.
Now, if only I were this good at predicting lottery numbers.:)"
akpilot wrote:
You told me to take notes, and then you went on to explain the meaning of your made up words? I guess it is your form of baby language?
I made up the words "equal" and "rights"?
Wow, I'm impressed with myself.
Since I have the ability to reach though time and space, maybe I will play that lottery!
akpilot wrote:
And yes, you should be embarrassed, hell I am embarrassed for you.
You don't have enough character to be embarrassed, you are a spineless nobody who think he is all that and a side of chips.

So, counter my argument, or STFU, you stupid b!tch. Deal?

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

#170575 Dec 9, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
How original of you, to post like that...But you couldn't afford me, is right, besides, as I support myself, you'd never have the chance to own me, and I'd end up owning you, anyway. Natural superiority would show through, and you'd still end up on crack, using my computer to entertain the masses.
LOL! How are you superior to me? I'm much smarter and better looking than you are.
I could afford to feed you, I just said you aren't worth it. If it cost only a penny to feed you for a life time, that would be more than you are worth.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#170577 Dec 9, 2012
If you
believe denying marriage to a relationship
will prevent love

If you
demand any committed relationship
has to be called marriage

If you
claim rights and benefits can only be acquired
by a imposition on marriage

If you
equate the diversity of two genders
with the redundancy of same genders

If you
desecrate the sacred tradition of all major religions
and violate the historic practice of every single culture in history

If you
believe a fundamental change to the building block of society
will have absolutely no affect

If you
think a law can change
the reality of crucial distinctions in relationships

If you
pretend duplicating sexuality
is the same as blending masculinity and femininity

If you
condemn some children to parents of only one gender
and deliberately deny some children one natural parent

If you
ignore the design of sexual union
to manipulate a harmful act

If you
violate evolution's law of reproduction
to equate a genetic dead end

If you
risk the healthiest human relationship
to include one of the unhealthiest

If you
parallel the sole birthplace of every other relationship
with one that can reproduce none

If you
dilute all these things
down to just 'a committed relationship of two people'

Then, and only then, can you equate same-sex unions with marriage.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#170578 Dec 9, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
"You can't argue against that, so you'll just call me names.
Now, if only I were this good at predicting lottery numbers.:)"
Tactic 1 and 2
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
I made up the words "equal" and "rights"?
Wow, I'm impressed with myself.
Tactic 1 and 2 again.

Misdirect as she knows damn well the terms we are talking about are LOLSER and CONDUMB not Equal and Rights. This could also fall into the "acting stupid" category.
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Since I have the ability to reach though time and space, maybe I will play that lottery!
Tactic 1
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
You don't have enough character to be embarrassed, you are a spineless nobody who think he is all that and a side of chips.
So, counter my argument, or STFU, you stupid b!tch. Deal?
Tactic's 2,3 and 7

Good work Rose, I am proud of you.

Rose tactic #1- Act stupid-(not so sure it is an act)
Rose Tactic #2- Misdirect
Rose Tactic #3- Make stupid comments until opposition is tired of replying then claim victory
Rose Tactic #4- Attack the poster- scream Racist, Bigot, Homophobe
Rose Tactic #5- Act intelligent by making silly statistical references such as- Most people who have anal sex are straight-
Rose Tactic #6- Falsely accuse others of lies- when proven wrong through links to previous posts revert back to tactics 2 and 4.
Rose Tactic #7- Claim to have made an argument, then claim others can't counter the argument that doesn't actually exist.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#170579 Dec 9, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
"You can't argue against that, so you'll just call me names.
I highly doubt that I am the first, and the internet is the only place- you have been called a moron.

That is probably why you get so upset about it.

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

#170580 Dec 9, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you saying that you think homosexuality is equivalent to
heterosexuality?
Actually, I didn't mention either.

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

#170582 Dec 9, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't you owe AKPilot an apology ? For being wrong ? And you owe us all an explanation, for why you were wrong...And don't you owe Mike "congratulations, for correctly predicting the outcome of your false prediction ? And don't you owe me an apology, for lying about me, when you claimed to show that I approved of slavery ? When you didn't ?
But bigfoot, I was right.
Akpilot didn't say anything at all about my argument, and just called me names.
Other than that...

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#170585 Dec 9, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Damn, you are as dumb as you are ugly. And that is dumb!
What you said it the laws against inter-racial marriage didn't involve race because they applied to people of all races.
If a man goes into the JP and asks to marry a man, he'll be told, "No". A woman doing the exact same thing will be told, "Yes" Why? Because of their genders (genitalia).
If Rose_NoHo goes into the JP and asks to marry someone she'll be told, "Get the hell out of here you spun out old bag!"

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#170590 Dec 9, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
But bigfoot, I was right.
Akpilot didn't say anything at all about my argument, and just called me names.
Other than that...
I'm just gonna call you a name too. I got a good one!

"Old Hippo Leg".

Take that picture down now!
LowTide

Covina, CA

#170592 Dec 9, 2012
The funds are mighty low on the Republican side now days.

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

#170593 Dec 9, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
And, since it is a non-gender issue, that is, truly, a display of your equal rights at work...
Stupid, if it weren't a gender issue, then you would be able to marry a person regardless of your or their gender.
GtAquarter

Covina, CA

#170596 Dec 9, 2012
Magic finger beds are the best.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#170597 Dec 9, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Ignorant dolt, you pretend to misunderstand, but you attempting misdirection, again. You posed a question concerning women not being able to marry one another. This I explained thusly. Then you posed the same question in reverse, after adding some inter-racial nonsense, which I clarified. Now, you ask a question, based on marriage laws. I answered those, now, Answer mine. Show where I approve of slavery, if you can. State your religious beliefs. If you can speak properly. And explain why gay people should be allowed to marry. Equate heterosexuality with homosexuality.
I think that's Rose tactic #2 on AK's Rose_NoHo tactic list. Misdirect.

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

#170598 Dec 9, 2012
Bruno wrote:
<quoted text>
Jan Brewer is the only TRUE American Politician left in this country. She is NOT afraid to stand up for the American people who believe in a moral and traditional marriage. You can sit on your boyfriends dick and spin on it yourself !!!
It's funny that you "small government" con dumb think government should be in charge of enforcing traditions. Do you think someone who gives a couple something made of china instead of cotton for their second anniversary should go to jail?

BTW, unless a non consenting party is involve, and act can't be immoral. So, unless someone is forced into a gay marriage, it can't be immoral.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Palm Springs Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
stores with bad customer service {list your wor... 1 hr Tyler 15
News National: How the Drought Will Reshape Californ... Thu H20 the new Oil 1
mature white women for young dark mature n sexy... Apr 19 thugnasty 2
News FIND Food Bank helps feed thousands at the Cent... Apr 19 CaliDervish 1
Desert Hot Springs Mayor Proud Of Out Of State ... Apr 15 Tony 20
News Group seeks to stop Nestlea s water-bottling op... Apr 14 speak out 1
Best SmokeShop in Valley?? Apr 13 BigJG 1
More from around the web

Palm Springs People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]